linux.git/arch/arm64/include/asm, branch v5.1 Linux kernel source tree Merge tag 'syscalls-5.1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic 2019-04-23T20:34:17+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2019-04-23T20:34:17+00:00 d286e13d53f54b00bcd7443eedd067cd432cf547 Pull syscall numbering updates from Arnd Bergmann: "arch: add pidfd and io_uring syscalls everywhere This comes a bit late, but should be in 5.1 anyway: we want the newly added system calls to be synchronized across all architectures in the release. I hope that in the future, any newly added system calls can be added to all architectures at the same time, and tested there while they are in linux-next, avoiding dependencies between the architecture maintainer trees and the tree that contains the new system call" * tag 'syscalls-5.1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic: arch: add pidfd and io_uring syscalls everywhere 
Pull syscall numbering updates from Arnd Bergmann:
 "arch: add pidfd and io_uring syscalls everywhere

  This comes a bit late, but should be in 5.1 anyway: we want the newly
  added system calls to be synchronized across all architectures in the
  release.

  I hope that in the future, any newly added system calls can be added
  to all architectures at the same time, and tested there while they are
  in linux-next, avoiding dependencies between the architecture
  maintainer trees and the tree that contains the new system call"

* tag 'syscalls-5.1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic:
  arch: add pidfd and io_uring syscalls everywhere
arm64: futex: Restore oldval initialization to work around buggy compilers 2019-04-18T17:17:08+00:00 Nathan Chancellor natechancellor@gmail.com 2019-04-17T07:21:21+00:00 ff8acf929014b7f87315588e0daf8597c8aa9d1c Commit 045afc24124d ("arm64: futex: Fix FUTEX_WAKE_OP atomic ops with non-zero result value") removed oldval's zero initialization in arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser because it is not necessary. Unfortunately, Android's arm64 GCC 4.9.4 [1] does not agree: ../kernel/futex.c: In function 'do_futex': ../kernel/futex.c:1658:17: warning: 'oldval' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] return oldval == cmparg; ^ In file included from ../kernel/futex.c:73:0: ../arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h:53:6: note: 'oldval' was declared here int oldval, ret, tmp; ^ GCC fails to follow that when ret is non-zero, futex_atomic_op_inuser returns right away, avoiding the uninitialized use that it claims. Restoring the zero initialization works around this issue. [1]: https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/gcc/linux-x86/aarch64/aarch64-linux-android-4.9/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 045afc24124d ("arm64: futex: Fix FUTEX_WAKE_OP atomic ops with non-zero result value") Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> 
Commit 045afc24124d ("arm64: futex: Fix FUTEX_WAKE_OP atomic ops with
non-zero result value") removed oldval's zero initialization in
arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser because it is not necessary. Unfortunately,
Android's arm64 GCC 4.9.4 [1] does not agree:

../kernel/futex.c: In function 'do_futex':
../kernel/futex.c:1658:17: warning: 'oldval' may be used uninitialized
in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
   return oldval == cmparg;
                 ^
In file included from ../kernel/futex.c:73:0:
../arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h:53:6: note: 'oldval' was declared here
  int oldval, ret, tmp;
      ^

GCC fails to follow that when ret is non-zero, futex_atomic_op_inuser
returns right away, avoiding the uninitialized use that it claims.
Restoring the zero initialization works around this issue.

[1]: https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/gcc/linux-x86/aarch64/aarch64-linux-android-4.9/

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 045afc24124d ("arm64: futex: Fix FUTEX_WAKE_OP atomic ops with non-zero result value")
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
arch: add pidfd and io_uring syscalls everywhere 2019-04-15T14:31:17+00:00 Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de 2019-02-28T12:59:19+00:00 39036cd2727395c3369b1051005da74059a85317 Add the io_uring and pidfd_send_signal system calls to all architectures. These system calls are designed to handle both native and compat tasks, so all entries are the same across architectures, only arm-compat and the generic tale still use an old format. Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc) Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> (s390) Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> 
Add the io_uring and pidfd_send_signal system calls to all architectures.

These system calls are designed to handle both native and compat tasks,
so all entries are the same across architectures, only arm-compat and
the generic tale still use an old format.

Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> (s390)
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
arm64: futex: Fix FUTEX_WAKE_OP atomic ops with non-zero result value 2019-04-12T14:04:33+00:00 Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com 2019-04-08T11:45:09+00:00 045afc24124d80c6998d9c770844c67912083506 Rather embarrassingly, our futex() FUTEX_WAKE_OP implementation doesn't explicitly set the return value on the non-faulting path and instead leaves it holding the result of the underlying atomic operation. This means that any FUTEX_WAKE_OP atomic operation which computes a non-zero value will be reported as having failed. Regrettably, I wrote the buggy code back in 2011 and it was upstreamed as part of the initial arm64 support in 2012. The reasons we appear to get away with this are: 1. FUTEX_WAKE_OP is rarely used and therefore doesn't appear to get exercised by futex() test applications 2. If the result of the atomic operation is zero, the system call behaves correctly 3. Prior to version 2.25, the only operation used by GLIBC set the futex to zero, and therefore worked as expected. From 2.25 onwards, FUTEX_WAKE_OP is not used by GLIBC at all. Fix the implementation by ensuring that the return value is either 0 to indicate that the atomic operation completed successfully, or -EFAULT if we encountered a fault when accessing the user mapping. Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Fixes: 6170a97460db ("arm64: Atomic operations") Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> 
Rather embarrassingly, our futex() FUTEX_WAKE_OP implementation doesn't
explicitly set the return value on the non-faulting path and instead
leaves it holding the result of the underlying atomic operation. This
means that any FUTEX_WAKE_OP atomic operation which computes a non-zero
value will be reported as having failed. Regrettably, I wrote the buggy
code back in 2011 and it was upstreamed as part of the initial arm64
support in 2012.

The reasons we appear to get away with this are:

  1. FUTEX_WAKE_OP is rarely used and therefore doesn't appear to get
     exercised by futex() test applications

  2. If the result of the atomic operation is zero, the system call
     behaves correctly

  3. Prior to version 2.25, the only operation used by GLIBC set the
     futex to zero, and therefore worked as expected. From 2.25 onwards,
     FUTEX_WAKE_OP is not used by GLIBC at all.

Fix the implementation by ensuring that the return value is either 0
to indicate that the atomic operation completed successfully, or -EFAULT
if we encountered a fault when accessing the user mapping.

Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Fixes: 6170a97460db ("arm64: Atomic operations")
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
arm64/ftrace: fix inadvertent BUG() in trampoline check 2019-04-08T15:58:13+00:00 Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org 2019-04-07T19:06:16+00:00 5a3ae7b314a2259b1188b22b392f5eba01e443ee The ftrace trampoline code (which deals with modules loaded out of BL range of the core kernel) uses plt_entries_equal() to check whether the per-module trampoline equals a zero buffer, to decide whether the trampoline has already been initialized. This triggers a BUG() in the opcode manipulation code, since we end up checking the ADRP offset of a 0x0 opcode, which is not an ADRP instruction. So instead, add a helper to check whether a PLT is initialized, and call that from the frace code. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.0 Fixes: bdb85cd1d206 ("arm64/module: switch to ADRP/ADD sequences for PLT entries") Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> 
The ftrace trampoline code (which deals with modules loaded out of
BL range of the core kernel) uses plt_entries_equal() to check whether
the per-module trampoline equals a zero buffer, to decide whether the
trampoline has already been initialized.

This triggers a BUG() in the opcode manipulation code, since we end
up checking the ADRP offset of a 0x0 opcode, which is not an ADRP
instruction.

So instead, add a helper to check whether a PLT is initialized, and
call that from the frace code.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.0
Fixes: bdb85cd1d206 ("arm64/module: switch to ADRP/ADD sequences for PLT entries")
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
syscalls: Remove start and number from syscall_set_arguments() args 2019-04-05T13:27:23+00:00 Steven Rostedt (VMware) rostedt@goodmis.org 2019-03-28T00:07:31+00:00 32d92586629a8b3637a3c9361709818e25f327ad After removing the start and count arguments of syscall_get_arguments() it seems reasonable to remove them from syscall_set_arguments(). Note, as of today, there are no users of syscall_set_arguments(). But we are told that there will be soon. But for now, at least make it consistent with syscall_get_arguments(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190327222014.GA32540@altlinux.org Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Cc: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com> Cc: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Cc: nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> # For xtensa changes Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> # For the arm64 bits Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> # for x86 Reviewed-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> 
After removing the start and count arguments of syscall_get_arguments() it
seems reasonable to remove them from syscall_set_arguments(). Note, as of
today, there are no users of syscall_set_arguments(). But we are told that
there will be soon. But for now, at least make it consistent with
syscall_get_arguments().

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190327222014.GA32540@altlinux.org

Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Cc: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org
Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp
Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org
Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> # For xtensa changes
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> # For the arm64 bits
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> # for x86
Reviewed-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
syscalls: Remove start and number from syscall_get_arguments() args 2019-04-05T13:26:43+00:00 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rostedt@goodmis.org 2016-11-07T21:26:37+00:00 b35f549df1d7520d37ba1e6d4a8d4df6bd52d136 At Linux Plumbers, Andy Lutomirski approached me and pointed out that the function call syscall_get_arguments() implemented in x86 was horribly written and not optimized for the standard case of passing in 0 and 6 for the starting index and the number of system calls to get. When looking at all the users of this function, I discovered that all instances pass in only 0 and 6 for these arguments. Instead of having this function handle different cases that are never used, simply rewrite it to return the first 6 arguments of a system call. This should help out the performance of tracing system calls by ptrace, ftrace and perf. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161107213233.754809394@goodmis.org Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Cc: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com> Cc: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Cc: nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> # MIPS parts Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> # For xtensa changes Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> # For the arm64 bits Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> # for x86 Reviewed-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org> Reported-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> 
At Linux Plumbers, Andy Lutomirski approached me and pointed out that the
function call syscall_get_arguments() implemented in x86 was horribly
written and not optimized for the standard case of passing in 0 and 6 for
the starting index and the number of system calls to get. When looking at
all the users of this function, I discovered that all instances pass in only
0 and 6 for these arguments. Instead of having this function handle
different cases that are never used, simply rewrite it to return the first 6
arguments of a system call.

This should help out the performance of tracing system calls by ptrace,
ftrace and perf.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161107213233.754809394@goodmis.org

Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Cc: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org
Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp
Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org
Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> # MIPS parts
Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> # For xtensa changes
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> # For the arm64 bits
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> # for x86
Reviewed-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
Reported-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Merge tag 'kvmarm-fixes-for-5.1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into kvm-master 2019-03-28T18:07:30+00:00 Paolo Bonzini pbonzini@redhat.com 2019-03-28T18:07:30+00:00 690edec54cbaa0e98dc592aae6864272f48f3c84 KVM/ARM fixes for 5.1 - Fix THP handling in the presence of pre-existing PTEs - Honor request for PTE mappings even when THPs are available - GICv4 performance improvement - Take the srcu lock when writing to guest-controlled ITS data structures - Reset the virtual PMU in preemptible context - Various cleanups 
KVM/ARM fixes for 5.1

- Fix THP handling in the presence of pre-existing PTEs
- Honor request for PTE mappings even when THPs are available
- GICv4 performance improvement
- Take the srcu lock when writing to guest-controlled ITS data structures
- Reset the virtual PMU in preemptible context
- Various cleanups
KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Take the srcu lock when writing to guest memory 2019-03-19T17:56:56+00:00 Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com 2019-03-19T12:47:11+00:00 a6ecfb11bf37743c1ac49b266595582b107b61d4 When halting a guest, QEMU flushes the virtual ITS caches, which amounts to writing to the various tables that the guest has allocated. When doing this, we fail to take the srcu lock, and the kernel shouts loudly if running a lockdep kernel: [ 69.680416] ============================= [ 69.680819] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 69.681526] 5.1.0-rc1-00008-g600025238f51-dirty #18 Not tainted [ 69.682096] ----------------------------- [ 69.682501] ./include/linux/kvm_host.h:605 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [ 69.683225] [ 69.683225] other info that might help us debug this: [ 69.683225] [ 69.683975] [ 69.683975] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 69.684598] 6 locks held by qemu-system-aar/4097: [ 69.685059] #0: 0000000034196013 (&kvm->lock){+.+.}, at: vgic_its_set_attr+0x244/0x3a0 [ 69.686087] #1: 00000000f2ed935e (&its->its_lock){+.+.}, at: vgic_its_set_attr+0x250/0x3a0 [ 69.686919] #2: 000000005e71ea54 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0 [ 69.687698] #3: 00000000c17e548d (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0 [ 69.688475] #4: 00000000ba386017 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0 [ 69.689978] #5: 00000000c2c3c335 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0 [ 69.690729] [ 69.690729] stack backtrace: [ 69.691151] CPU: 2 PID: 4097 Comm: qemu-system-aar Not tainted 5.1.0-rc1-00008-g600025238f51-dirty #18 [ 69.691984] Hardware name: rockchip evb_rk3399/evb_rk3399, BIOS 2019.04-rc3-00124-g2feec69fb1 03/15/2019 [ 69.692831] Call trace: [ 69.694072] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xcc/0x110 [ 69.694490] gfn_to_memslot+0x174/0x190 [ 69.694853] kvm_write_guest+0x50/0xb0 [ 69.695209] vgic_its_save_tables_v0+0x248/0x330 [ 69.695639] vgic_its_set_attr+0x298/0x3a0 [ 69.696024] kvm_device_ioctl_attr+0x9c/0xd8 [ 69.696424] kvm_device_ioctl+0x8c/0xf8 [ 69.696788] do_vfs_ioctl+0xc8/0x960 [ 69.697128] ksys_ioctl+0x8c/0xa0 [ 69.697445] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0x38 [ 69.697817] el0_svc_common+0xd8/0x138 [ 69.698173] el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78 [ 69.698528] el0_svc+0x8/0xc The fix is to obviously take the srcu lock, just like we do on the read side of things since bf308242ab98. One wonders why this wasn't fixed at the same time, but hey... Fixes: bf308242ab98 ("KVM: arm/arm64: VGIC/ITS: protect kvm_read_guest() calls with SRCU lock") Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> 
When halting a guest, QEMU flushes the virtual ITS caches, which
amounts to writing to the various tables that the guest has allocated.

When doing this, we fail to take the srcu lock, and the kernel
shouts loudly if running a lockdep kernel:

[   69.680416] =============================
[   69.680819] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
[   69.681526] 5.1.0-rc1-00008-g600025238f51-dirty #18 Not tainted
[   69.682096] -----------------------------
[   69.682501] ./include/linux/kvm_host.h:605 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
[   69.683225]
[   69.683225] other info that might help us debug this:
[   69.683225]
[   69.683975]
[   69.683975] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
[   69.684598] 6 locks held by qemu-system-aar/4097:
[   69.685059]  #0: 0000000034196013 (&kvm->lock){+.+.}, at: vgic_its_set_attr+0x244/0x3a0
[   69.686087]  #1: 00000000f2ed935e (&its->its_lock){+.+.}, at: vgic_its_set_attr+0x250/0x3a0
[   69.686919]  #2: 000000005e71ea54 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0
[   69.687698]  #3: 00000000c17e548d (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0
[   69.688475]  #4: 00000000ba386017 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0
[   69.689978]  #5: 00000000c2c3c335 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0
[   69.690729]
[   69.690729] stack backtrace:
[   69.691151] CPU: 2 PID: 4097 Comm: qemu-system-aar Not tainted 5.1.0-rc1-00008-g600025238f51-dirty #18
[   69.691984] Hardware name: rockchip evb_rk3399/evb_rk3399, BIOS 2019.04-rc3-00124-g2feec69fb1 03/15/2019
[   69.692831] Call trace:
[   69.694072]  lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xcc/0x110
[   69.694490]  gfn_to_memslot+0x174/0x190
[   69.694853]  kvm_write_guest+0x50/0xb0
[   69.695209]  vgic_its_save_tables_v0+0x248/0x330
[   69.695639]  vgic_its_set_attr+0x298/0x3a0
[   69.696024]  kvm_device_ioctl_attr+0x9c/0xd8
[   69.696424]  kvm_device_ioctl+0x8c/0xf8
[   69.696788]  do_vfs_ioctl+0xc8/0x960
[   69.697128]  ksys_ioctl+0x8c/0xa0
[   69.697445]  __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0x38
[   69.697817]  el0_svc_common+0xd8/0x138
[   69.698173]  el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78
[   69.698528]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc

The fix is to obviously take the srcu lock, just like we do on the
read side of things since bf308242ab98. One wonders why this wasn't
fixed at the same time, but hey...

Fixes: bf308242ab98 ("KVM: arm/arm64: VGIC/ITS: protect kvm_read_guest() calls with SRCU lock")
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
arm64: Add MIDR encoding for HiSilicon Taishan CPUs 2019-03-19T14:55:10+00:00 Hanjun Guo hanjun.guo@linaro.org 2019-03-05T13:40:57+00:00 efd00c722ca855745fcc35a7e6675b5a782a3fc8 Adding the MIDR encodings for HiSilicon Taishan v110 CPUs, which is used in Kunpeng ARM64 server SoCs. TSV110 is the abbreviation of Taishan v110. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Zhangshaokun <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> 
Adding the MIDR encodings for HiSilicon Taishan v110 CPUs,
which is used in Kunpeng ARM64 server SoCs. TSV110 is the
abbreviation of Taishan v110.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhangshaokun <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>