linux.git/arch/arm/kernel, branch v2.6.14 Linux kernel source tree [ARM] 3008/1: the exception table is not read-only 2005-10-13T21:04:37+00:00 Nicolas Pitre nico@cam.org 2005-10-13T21:04:37+00:00 13b1f64c16e2eb96a021b49cf3986528046ba3dc Patch from Nicolas Pitre ... and therefore should not live in the .text section. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> 
Patch from Nicolas Pitre

... and therefore should not live in the .text section.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
[ARM] 2977/1: armksyms.c - make items in export table static 2005-10-12T18:58:07+00:00 Ben Dooks ben-linux@fluff.org 2005-10-12T18:58:07+00:00 a7b1bbbc89194deba8cde02200f08b3840c9daa2 Patch from Ben Dooks The items in the export table do not need to be exported elsehwere, so quash the sparse warning by making the symbol for the table entry static. Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> 
Patch from Ben Dooks

The items in the export table do not need to be
exported elsehwere, so quash the sparse warning
by making the symbol for the table entry static.

Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
[ARM] 2974/1: fix ARM710 swi bug workaround 2005-10-12T18:51:24+00:00 Nicolas Pitre nico@cam.org 2005-10-12T18:51:24+00:00 60ac133aac9e07b94f2cb6bf571bf8aef69248c3 Patch from Nicolas Pitre Either no one is using an ARM710 with recent kernels, or all ARM710s still in use are not afflicted by this swi bug. Nevertheless, the code to work around the ARM710 swi bug is itself currently buggy since it uses r8 as a pointer to S_PC while in fact it holds the spsr content these days. Fix that, and simplify the code as well. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> 
Patch from Nicolas Pitre

Either no one is using an ARM710 with recent kernels, or all ARM710s
still in use are not afflicted by this swi bug.  Nevertheless, the code
to work around the ARM710 swi bug is itself currently buggy since it
uses r8 as a pointer to S_PC while in fact it holds the spsr content
these days. Fix that, and simplify the code as well.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
[ARM] 2952/1: fix a register clobber list 2005-10-04T22:17:53+00:00 Nicolas Pitre nico@cam.org 2005-10-04T22:17:53+00:00 c2f480869fa7559fa3532e415e3e3ec49339f208 Patch from Nicolas Pitre If gcc decides to assign lr to %0 we're screwed. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> 
Patch from Nicolas Pitre

If gcc decides to assign lr to %0 we're screwed.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
[ARM] 2951/1: fix wrong comment 2005-10-04T22:17:52+00:00 Nicolas Pitre nico@cam.org 2005-10-04T22:17:52+00:00 74f8849496b73d2ae4f9c53f61bf59e063ceed88 Patch from Nicolas Pitre The cmpxchg emulation syscall needs write access. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> 
Patch from Nicolas Pitre

The cmpxchg emulation syscall needs write access.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
[ARM] Fix compiler warnings for memcpy_toio/memcpy_fromio/memset_io 2005-09-24T09:42:06+00:00 Russell King rmk@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk 2005-09-24T09:42:06+00:00 d2f607484f8210cf19b1730dee26d426a5a770a5 Add 'volatile' to the __iomem pointers for these functions as per x86. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> 
Add 'volatile' to the __iomem pointers for these functions as
per x86.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
[ARM] Fix context switch with ARMv6 + TLS 2005-09-23T20:49:58+00:00 Russell King rmk@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk 2005-09-23T20:49:58+00:00 73394322a4bf4108847ba3c2eee33a81b1b44450 We accidentally corrupted the TLS value when clearing out the ARMv6 exclusive monitor. Avoid doing so. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> 
We accidentally corrupted the TLS value when clearing out the ARMv6
exclusive monitor.  Avoid doing so.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
[ARM] 2932/1: Avoid the "noreturn" warning in arch/arm/kernel/traps.c 2005-09-21T21:14:05+00:00 Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com 2005-09-21T21:14:05+00:00 6a1ced59b3ac5d1088f597fd0613a724cdf19e2c Patch from Catalin Marinas This patch prevents the "noreturn function does return" warning in the __bug() function in arch/arm/kernel/traps.c Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> 
Patch from Catalin Marinas

This patch prevents the "noreturn function does return" warning in the
__bug() function in arch/arm/kernel/traps.c

Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
[ARM] 2927/1: .arch.info - postfix section with .init for `make buildcheck` 2005-09-20T15:45:20+00:00 Ben Dooks ben-linux@fluff.org 2005-09-20T15:45:20+00:00 9d0fd1eb8a3c19f3ede5418540b3c9f64fac4b86 Patch from Ben Dooks The `make buildcheck` is erroneously reporting that the .arch.info list is referencing items in the .init section as it is not itself postfixed with .init Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> 
Patch from Ben Dooks

The `make buildcheck` is erroneously reporting that the .arch.info
list is referencing items in the .init section as it is not itself
postfixed with .init

Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
[ARM] 2926/1: .proc.info - postfix section with .init for `make buildcheck` 2005-09-20T15:35:03+00:00 Ben Dooks ben-linux@fluff.org 2005-09-20T15:35:03+00:00 02b7dd1244aab9267ae4078e1ad6a2fdaabeb6ed Patch from Ben Dooks The `make buildcheck` is erroneously reporting that the .proc.info list is referencing items in the .init section as it is not itself postfixed with .init Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> 
Patch from Ben Dooks

The `make buildcheck` is erroneously reporting that the .proc.info
list is referencing items in the .init section as it is not itself
postfixed with .init

Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>