Currently on ARM when <SysRq-L> is triggered from an interrupt handler
(e.g. a SysRq issued using UART or kbd) the main CPU will wedge for ten
seconds with interrupts masked before issuing a backtrace for every CPU
except itself.

The new backtrace code introduced by commit 96f0e00378d4 ("ARM: add
basic support for on-demand backtrace of other CPUs") does not work
correctly when run from an interrupt handler because IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE
is used to generate the backtrace on all CPUs but cannot preempt the
current calling context.

This can be fixed by detecting that the calling context cannot be
preempted and issuing the backtrace directly in this case. Issuing
directly leaves us without any pt_regs to pass to nmi_cpu_backtrace()
so we also modify the generic code to call dump_stack() when its
argument is NULL.

Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

This function just copies '*ops' to 'smp_ops', so the given
structure '*ops' is not modified at all.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

This patch adds imprecise abort enable/disable macros and uses them to
enable imprecise aborts early when starting the kernel.

This helps in tracking down the real cause for such imprecise abort, as
they are handled as soon as they occur. Until now those aborts would
only be enabled when entering the userspace and as a consequence crash
the first userspace process if any abort had been raised during kernel
startup.

Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Pull NMI backtrace update from Russell King:
 "These changes convert the x86 NMI handling to be a library
  implementation which other architectures can make use of.  Thomas
  Gleixner has reviewed and tested these changes, and wishes me to send
  these rather than taking them through the tip tree.

  The final patch in the set adds an initial implementation using this
  infrastructure to ARM, even though it doesn't send the IPI at "NMI"
  level.  Patches are in progress to add the ARM equivalent of NMI, but
  we still need the IRQ-level fallback for systems where the "NMI" isn't
  available due to secure firmware denying access to it"

* 'nmi' of git://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/linux-arm:
  ARM: add basic support for on-demand backtrace of other CPUs
  nmi: x86: convert to generic nmi handler
  nmi: create generic NMI backtrace implementation

The only caller of cpu_die() on ARM is arch_cpu_idle_dead(), so
let's simplify the code by renaming cpu_die() to
arch_cpu_idle_dead(). While were here, drop the __ref annotation
because __cpuinit is gone nowadays.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Writes to /sys/.../cpuX/online fail if we determine the platform
doesn't support hotplug for that CPU. Furthermore, if the cpu_die
op isn't specified the system hangs when we try to offline a CPU
and it comes right back online unexpectedly. Let's figure this
stuff out before we make the sysfs nodes so that the online file
doesn't even exist if it isn't (at least sometimes) possible to
hotplug the CPU.

Add a new 'cpu_can_disable' op and repoint all 'cpu_disable'
implementations at it because all implementers use the op to
indicate if a CPU can be hotplugged or not in a static fashion.
With PSCI we may need to add a 'cpu_disable' op so that the
secure OS can be migrated off the CPU we're trying to hotplug.
In this case, the 'cpu_can_disable' op will indicate that all
CPUs are hotpluggable by returning true, but the 'cpu_disable' op
will make a PSCI migration call and occasionally fail, denying
the hotplug of a CPU. This shouldn't be any worse than x86 where
we may indicate that all CPUs are hotpluggable but occasionally
we can't offline a CPU due to check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable()
failing to find a CPU to move vectors to.

Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> [shmobile portion]
Tested-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>
Tested-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

As we now have generic infrastructure to support backtracing of other
CPUs in the system on lockups, we can start to implement this for ARM.
Initially, we add an IPI based implementation, as the GIC code needs
modification to support the generation of FIQ IPIs, and not all ARM
platforms have the ability to raise a FIQ in the non-secure world.

This provides us with a "best efforts" implementation in the absence
of FIQs.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

John Stultz reports an RCU splat on boot with ARM ipi trace
events enabled.

===============================
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.1.0-rc7-00033-gb5bed2f #153 Not tainted
-------------------------------
include/trace/events/ipi.h:68 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

other info that might help us debug this:

RCU used illegally from idle CPU!
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
RCU used illegally from extended quiescent state!
no locks held by swapper/0/0.

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.1.0-rc7-00033-gb5bed2f #153
Hardware name: Qualcomm (Flattened Device Tree)
[<c0216b08>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c02136e8>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c02136e8>] (show_stack) from [<c075e678>] (dump_stack+0x70/0xbc)
[<c075e678>] (dump_stack) from [<c0215a80>] (handle_IPI+0x428/0x604)
[<c0215a80>] (handle_IPI) from [<c020942c>] (gic_handle_irq+0x54/0x5c)
[<c020942c>] (gic_handle_irq) from [<c0766604>] (__irq_svc+0x44/0x7c)
Exception stack(0xc09f3f48 to 0xc09f3f90)
3f40:                   00000001 00000001 00000000 c09f73b8 c09f4528 c0a5de9c
3f60: c076b4f0 00000000 00000000 c09ef108 c0a5cec1 00000001 00000000 c09f3f90
3f80: c026bf60 c0210ab8 20000113 ffffffff
[<c0766604>] (__irq_svc) from [<c0210ab8>] (arch_cpu_idle+0x20/0x3c)
[<c0210ab8>] (arch_cpu_idle) from [<c02647f0>] (cpu_startup_entry+0x2c0/0x5dc)
[<c02647f0>] (cpu_startup_entry) from [<c099bc1c>] (start_kernel+0x358/0x3c4)
[<c099bc1c>] (start_kernel) from [<8020807c>] (0x8020807c)

At this point in the IPI handling path we haven't called
irq_enter() yet, so RCU doesn't know that we're about to exit
idle and properly warns that we're using RCU from an idle CPU.
Use trace_ipi_entry_rcuidle() instead of trace_ipi_entry() so
that RCU is informed about our exit from idle.

Fixes: 365ec7b17327 ("ARM: add IPI tracepoints")
Reported-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>