* Don't send an IPI if receiver already has a pending IPI.
  Atomically piggyback the new msg with pending msg.

* IPI receiver looping on xchg() not required

References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/25/232
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>

* ipi_data is just a word, no need to keep it as struct

* find_next_bit() not needed to loop thru a 32bit word, ffs suffices

Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>

The interface is confusing, it feels like we are getting "sender" info,
whereas it is the "receiver", which can very well be retrived by
smp_processor_id(), if need be.

Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>

The current IPI sending callstack needlessly involves cpumask.

   arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu) / smp_send_reschedule(cpu)
      ipi_send_msg(cpumask_of(cpu))	--> [cpu to cpumask]
         plat_smp_ops.ipi_send(callmap)
            for_each_cpu(callmap)	--> [cpuask to cpu]
               do_plat_specific_ipi_PER_CPU

Given that current backends are not capable of 1:N IPIs, lets simplify
the interface for now, by keeping "a" cpu all along.

Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>

Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic
similar to smp_call_function_single()" has unified the way to handle
single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one interrupt
is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP function
call interfaces, so kill the redundant single function call interrupt.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>

- Add mm_cpumask setting (aggregating only, unlike some other arches)
  used to restrict the TLB flush cross-calling

- cross-calling versions of TLB flush routines (thanks to Noam)

Signed-off-by: Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>

Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>

The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.

After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.

Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.

This removes all the arch/arc uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files.  Currently arc does not have any __CPUINIT used in
assembly files.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589

Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>

The generic idle loop implements all functionality. Aside of that it
allows arc to implement the tsk_is_polling() functionality correctly,
despite the patently (now gone) comment in the original arc cpu_idle()
function:
/* Since we SLEEP in idle loop, TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG can't be set */
See kernel/cpu/idle.c

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Cc: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Tested-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130321215233.711253792@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>