<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux-stable.git/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc, branch v5.4.78</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>selftests/powerpc: Fix eeh-basic.sh exit codes</title>
<updated>2020-10-29T08:57:52+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Oliver O'Halloran</name>
<email>oohall@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-10-14T02:47:11+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=f08ae0c461980409bcb048d0e71ede12c64bc048'/>
<id>f08ae0c461980409bcb048d0e71ede12c64bc048</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 996f9e0f93f16211945c8d5f18f296a88cb32f91 ]

The kselftests test running infrastructure expects tests to finish with an
exit code of 4 if the test decided it should be skipped. Currently
eeh-basic.sh exits with the number of devices that failed to recover, so if
four devices didn't recover we'll report a skip instead of a fail.

Fix this by checking if the return code is non-zero and report success
and failure by returning 0 or 1 respectively. For the cases where should
actually skip return 4.

Fixes: 85d86c8aa52e ("selftests/powerpc: Add basic EEH selftest")
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran &lt;oohall@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201014024711.1138386-1-oohall@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 996f9e0f93f16211945c8d5f18f296a88cb32f91 ]

The kselftests test running infrastructure expects tests to finish with an
exit code of 4 if the test decided it should be skipped. Currently
eeh-basic.sh exits with the number of devices that failed to recover, so if
four devices didn't recover we'll report a skip instead of a fail.

Fix this by checking if the return code is non-zero and report success
and failure by returning 0 or 1 respectively. For the cases where should
actually skip return 4.

Fixes: 85d86c8aa52e ("selftests/powerpc: Add basic EEH selftest")
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran &lt;oohall@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201014024711.1138386-1-oohall@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/powerpc: Purge extra count_pmc() calls of ebb selftests</title>
<updated>2020-09-03T09:26:44+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario</name>
<email>desnesn@linux.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-06-26T16:47:37+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=110c5a5a68546772a0acda55b2b15dd00417f001'/>
<id>110c5a5a68546772a0acda55b2b15dd00417f001</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 3337bf41e0dd70b4064cdf60acdfcdc2d050066c ]

An extra count on ebb_state.stats.pmc_count[PMC_INDEX(pmc)] is being per-
formed when count_pmc() is used to reset PMCs on a few selftests. This
extra pmc_count can occasionally invalidate results, such as the ones from
cycles_test shown hereafter. The ebb_check_count() failed with an above
the upper limit error due to the extra value on ebb_state.stats.pmc_count.

Furthermore, this extra count is also indicated by extra PMC1 trace_log on
the output of the cycle test (as well as on pmc56_overflow_test):

==========
   ...
   [21]: counter = 8
   [22]: register SPRN_MMCR0 = 0x0000000080000080
   [23]: register SPRN_PMC1  = 0x0000000080000004
   [24]: counter = 9
   [25]: register SPRN_MMCR0 = 0x0000000080000080
   [26]: register SPRN_PMC1  = 0x0000000080000004
   [27]: counter = 10
   [28]: register SPRN_MMCR0 = 0x0000000080000080
   [29]: register SPRN_PMC1  = 0x0000000080000004
&gt;&gt; [30]: register SPRN_PMC1  = 0x000000004000051e
PMC1 count (0x280000546) above upper limit 0x2800003e8 (+0x15e)
[FAIL] Test FAILED on line 52
failure: cycles
==========

Signed-off-by: Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario &lt;desnesn@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Tested-by: Sachin Sant &lt;sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200626164737.21943-1-desnesn@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 3337bf41e0dd70b4064cdf60acdfcdc2d050066c ]

An extra count on ebb_state.stats.pmc_count[PMC_INDEX(pmc)] is being per-
formed when count_pmc() is used to reset PMCs on a few selftests. This
extra pmc_count can occasionally invalidate results, such as the ones from
cycles_test shown hereafter. The ebb_check_count() failed with an above
the upper limit error due to the extra value on ebb_state.stats.pmc_count.

Furthermore, this extra count is also indicated by extra PMC1 trace_log on
the output of the cycle test (as well as on pmc56_overflow_test):

==========
   ...
   [21]: counter = 8
   [22]: register SPRN_MMCR0 = 0x0000000080000080
   [23]: register SPRN_PMC1  = 0x0000000080000004
   [24]: counter = 9
   [25]: register SPRN_MMCR0 = 0x0000000080000080
   [26]: register SPRN_PMC1  = 0x0000000080000004
   [27]: counter = 10
   [28]: register SPRN_MMCR0 = 0x0000000080000080
   [29]: register SPRN_PMC1  = 0x0000000080000004
&gt;&gt; [30]: register SPRN_PMC1  = 0x000000004000051e
PMC1 count (0x280000546) above upper limit 0x2800003e8 (+0x15e)
[FAIL] Test FAILED on line 52
failure: cycles
==========

Signed-off-by: Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario &lt;desnesn@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Tested-by: Sachin Sant &lt;sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200626164737.21943-1-desnesn@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/powerpc: ptrace-pkey: Don't update expected UAMOR value</title>
<updated>2020-08-21T11:05:33+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Aneesh Kumar K.V</name>
<email>aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-07-09T03:29:45+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=34c920e2c858f47d0816df3356e1df7b03166602'/>
<id>34c920e2c858f47d0816df3356e1df7b03166602</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 3563b9bea0ca7f53e4218b5e268550341a49f333 ]

With commit 4a4a5e5d2aad ("powerpc/pkeys: key allocation/deallocation
must not change pkey registers") we are not updating UAMOR on key
allocation. So don't update the expected uamor value in the test.

Fixes: 4a4a5e5d2aad ("powerpc/pkeys: key allocation/deallocation must not change pkey registers")
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V &lt;aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200709032946.881753-23-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 3563b9bea0ca7f53e4218b5e268550341a49f333 ]

With commit 4a4a5e5d2aad ("powerpc/pkeys: key allocation/deallocation
must not change pkey registers") we are not updating UAMOR on key
allocation. So don't update the expected uamor value in the test.

Fixes: 4a4a5e5d2aad ("powerpc/pkeys: key allocation/deallocation must not change pkey registers")
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V &lt;aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200709032946.881753-23-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/powerpc: ptrace-pkey: Update the test to mark an invalid pkey correctly</title>
<updated>2020-08-21T11:05:33+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Aneesh Kumar K.V</name>
<email>aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-07-09T03:29:44+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=cf507818152813e2eb0871e3f49535fab7a128db'/>
<id>cf507818152813e2eb0871e3f49535fab7a128db</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 0eaa3b5ca7b5a76e3783639c828498343be66a01 ]

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V &lt;aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200709032946.881753-22-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 0eaa3b5ca7b5a76e3783639c828498343be66a01 ]

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V &lt;aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200709032946.881753-22-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/powerpc: ptrace-pkey: Rename variables to make it easier to follow code</title>
<updated>2020-08-21T11:05:33+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Aneesh Kumar K.V</name>
<email>aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-07-09T03:29:43+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=e4a6919c9908c258e3f0d92da5f65f332316939b'/>
<id>e4a6919c9908c258e3f0d92da5f65f332316939b</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 9a11f12e0a6c374b3ef1ce81e32ce477d28eb1b8 ]

Rename variable to indicate that they are invalid values which we will
use to test ptrace update of pkeys.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V &lt;aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200709032946.881753-21-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 9a11f12e0a6c374b3ef1ce81e32ce477d28eb1b8 ]

Rename variable to indicate that they are invalid values which we will
use to test ptrace update of pkeys.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V &lt;aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200709032946.881753-21-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/powerpc: Fix online CPU selection</title>
<updated>2020-08-19T06:16:18+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sandipan Das</name>
<email>sandipan@linux.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-07-30T05:08:46+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=5299edbfc19aefdd39bee651a1d27ea697bb2616'/>
<id>5299edbfc19aefdd39bee651a1d27ea697bb2616</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit dfa03fff86027e58c8dba5c03ae68150d4e513ad ]

The size of the CPU affinity mask must be large enough for
systems with a very large number of CPUs. Otherwise, tests
which try to determine the first online CPU by calling
sched_getaffinity() will fail. This makes sure that the size
of the allocated affinity mask is dependent on the number of
CPUs as reported by get_nprocs_conf().

Fixes: 3752e453f6ba ("selftests/powerpc: Add tests of PMU EBBs")
Reported-by: Shirisha Ganta &lt;shiganta@in.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das &lt;sandipan@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal &lt;kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a408c4b8e9a23bb39b539417a21eb0ff47bb5127.1596084858.git.sandipan@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit dfa03fff86027e58c8dba5c03ae68150d4e513ad ]

The size of the CPU affinity mask must be large enough for
systems with a very large number of CPUs. Otherwise, tests
which try to determine the first online CPU by calling
sched_getaffinity() will fail. This makes sure that the size
of the allocated affinity mask is dependent on the number of
CPUs as reported by get_nprocs_conf().

Fixes: 3752e453f6ba ("selftests/powerpc: Add tests of PMU EBBs")
Reported-by: Shirisha Ganta &lt;shiganta@in.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das &lt;sandipan@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal &lt;kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a408c4b8e9a23bb39b539417a21eb0ff47bb5127.1596084858.git.sandipan@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/powerpc: Fix CPU affinity for child process</title>
<updated>2020-08-19T06:16:17+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Harish</name>
<email>harish@linux.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-06-09T08:14:23+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=04cf65b784d2e947b17c4034138ed1c249b894f0'/>
<id>04cf65b784d2e947b17c4034138ed1c249b894f0</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 854eb5022be04f81e318765f089f41a57c8e5d83 ]

On systems with large number of cpus, test fails trying to set
affinity by calling sched_setaffinity() with smaller size for affinity
mask. This patch fixes it by making sure that the size of allocated
affinity mask is dependent on the number of CPUs as reported by
get_nprocs().

Fixes: 00b7ec5c9cf3 ("selftests/powerpc: Import Anton's context_switch2 benchmark")
Reported-by: Shirisha Ganta &lt;shiganta@in.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das &lt;sandipan@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Harish &lt;harish@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal &lt;kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Satheesh Rajendran &lt;sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200609081423.529664-1-harish@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 854eb5022be04f81e318765f089f41a57c8e5d83 ]

On systems with large number of cpus, test fails trying to set
affinity by calling sched_setaffinity() with smaller size for affinity
mask. This patch fixes it by making sure that the size of allocated
affinity mask is dependent on the number of CPUs as reported by
get_nprocs().

Fixes: 00b7ec5c9cf3 ("selftests/powerpc: Import Anton's context_switch2 benchmark")
Reported-by: Shirisha Ganta &lt;shiganta@in.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das &lt;sandipan@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Harish &lt;harish@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal &lt;kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Satheesh Rajendran &lt;sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200609081423.529664-1-harish@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/powerpc: Squash spurious errors due to device removal</title>
<updated>2020-08-19T06:16:17+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Oliver O'Halloran</name>
<email>oohall@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-07-27T01:01:27+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=09c2050239fb7227bea8917e7436db75e952a555'/>
<id>09c2050239fb7227bea8917e7436db75e952a555</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 5f8cf6475828b600ff6d000e580c961ac839cc61 ]

For drivers that don't have the error handling callbacks we implement
recovery by removing the device and re-probing it. This causes the sysfs
directory for the PCI device to be removed which causes the following
spurious error to be printed when checking the PE state:

Breaking 0005:03:00.0...
./eeh-basic.sh: line 13: can't open /sys/bus/pci/devices/0005:03:00.0/eeh_pe_state: no such file
0005:03:00.0, waited 0/60
0005:03:00.0, waited 1/60
0005:03:00.0, waited 2/60
0005:03:00.0, waited 3/60
0005:03:00.0, waited 4/60
0005:03:00.0, waited 5/60
0005:03:00.0, waited 6/60
0005:03:00.0, waited 7/60
0005:03:00.0, Recovered after 8 seconds

We currently try to avoid this by checking if the PE state file exists
before reading from it. This is however inherently racy so re-work the
state checking so that we only read from the file once, and we squash any
errors that occur while reading.

Fixes: 85d86c8aa52e ("selftests/powerpc: Add basic EEH selftest")
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran &lt;oohall@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200727010127.23698-1-oohall@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 5f8cf6475828b600ff6d000e580c961ac839cc61 ]

For drivers that don't have the error handling callbacks we implement
recovery by removing the device and re-probing it. This causes the sysfs
directory for the PCI device to be removed which causes the following
spurious error to be printed when checking the PE state:

Breaking 0005:03:00.0...
./eeh-basic.sh: line 13: can't open /sys/bus/pci/devices/0005:03:00.0/eeh_pe_state: no such file
0005:03:00.0, waited 0/60
0005:03:00.0, waited 1/60
0005:03:00.0, waited 2/60
0005:03:00.0, waited 3/60
0005:03:00.0, waited 4/60
0005:03:00.0, waited 5/60
0005:03:00.0, waited 6/60
0005:03:00.0, waited 7/60
0005:03:00.0, Recovered after 8 seconds

We currently try to avoid this by checking if the PE state file exists
before reading from it. This is however inherently racy so re-work the
state checking so that we only read from the file once, and we squash any
errors that occur while reading.

Fixes: 85d86c8aa52e ("selftests/powerpc: Add basic EEH selftest")
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran &lt;oohall@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200727010127.23698-1-oohall@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/powerpc: Add tlbie_test in .gitignore</title>
<updated>2020-04-17T08:50:19+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Christophe Leroy</name>
<email>christophe.leroy@c-s.fr</email>
</author>
<published>2020-02-28T00:00:09+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=b5eec37a3b8530e7e345c281db08fe21e49c7b80'/>
<id>b5eec37a3b8530e7e345c281db08fe21e49c7b80</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 47bf235f324c696395c30541fe4fcf99fcd24188 upstream.

The commit identified below added tlbie_test but forgot to add it in
.gitignore.

Fixes: 93cad5f78995 ("selftests/powerpc: Add test case for tlbie vs mtpidr ordering issue")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4+
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy &lt;christophe.leroy@c-s.fr&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/259f9c06ed4563c4fa4fa8ffa652347278d769e7.1582847784.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 47bf235f324c696395c30541fe4fcf99fcd24188 upstream.

The commit identified below added tlbie_test but forgot to add it in
.gitignore.

Fixes: 93cad5f78995 ("selftests/powerpc: Add test case for tlbie vs mtpidr ordering issue")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4+
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy &lt;christophe.leroy@c-s.fr&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/259f9c06ed4563c4fa4fa8ffa652347278d769e7.1582847784.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/eeh: Bump EEH wait time to 60s</title>
<updated>2020-02-24T07:36:57+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Oliver O'Halloran</name>
<email>oohall@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-01-22T03:11:25+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=16ec28640dc675ceafba2158930f7d4622a9fc1e'/>
<id>16ec28640dc675ceafba2158930f7d4622a9fc1e</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 414f50434aa2463202a5b35e844f4125dd1a7101 ]

Some newer cards supported by aacraid can take up to 40s to recover
after an EEH event. This causes spurious failures in the basic EEH
self-test since the current maximim timeout is only 30s.

Fix the immediate issue by bumping the timeout to a default of 60s,
and allow the wait time to be specified via an environmental variable
(EEH_MAX_WAIT).

Reported-by: Steve Best &lt;sbest@redhat.com&gt;
Suggested-by: Douglas Miller &lt;dougmill@us.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran &lt;oohall@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200122031125.25991-1-oohall@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 414f50434aa2463202a5b35e844f4125dd1a7101 ]

Some newer cards supported by aacraid can take up to 40s to recover
after an EEH event. This causes spurious failures in the basic EEH
self-test since the current maximim timeout is only 30s.

Fix the immediate issue by bumping the timeout to a default of 60s,
and allow the wait time to be specified via an environmental variable
(EEH_MAX_WAIT).

Reported-by: Steve Best &lt;sbest@redhat.com&gt;
Suggested-by: Douglas Miller &lt;dougmill@us.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran &lt;oohall@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200122031125.25991-1-oohall@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
