linux-stable.git/tools/testing/selftests/net, branch v6.10

selftests: make order checking verbose in msg_zerocopy selftest

2024-07-04T02:42:32+00:00

We find that when lock debugging is on, notifications may not come in
order. Thus, we have order checking outputs managed by cfg_verbose, to
avoid too many outputs in this case.

Fixes: 07b65c5b31ce ("test: add msg_zerocopy test")
Signed-off-by: Zijian Zhang 
Signed-off-by: Xiaochun Lu 
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn 
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240701225349.3395580-3-zijianzhang@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

selftests: fix OOM in msg_zerocopy selftest

2024-07-04T02:42:32+00:00

In selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c, it has a while loop keeps calling sendmsg
on a socket with MSG_ZEROCOPY flag, and it will recv the notifications
until the socket is not writable. Typically, it will start the receiving
process after around 30+ sendmsgs. However, as the introduction of commit
dfa2f0483360 ("tcp: get rid of sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale"), the sender is
always writable and does not get any chance to run recv notifications.
The selftest always exits with OUT_OF_MEMORY because the memory used by
opt_skb exceeds the net.core.optmem_max. Meanwhile, it could be set to a
different value to trigger OOM on older kernels too.

Thus, we introduce "cfg_notification_limit" to force sender to receive
notifications after some number of sendmsgs.

Fixes: 07b65c5b31ce ("test: add msg_zerocopy test")
Signed-off-by: Zijian Zhang 
Signed-off-by: Xiaochun Lu 
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn 
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240701225349.3395580-2-zijianzhang@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

selftest: af_unix: Add test case for backtrack after finalising SCC.

2024-07-04T02:36:22+00:00

syzkaller reported a KMSAN splat in __unix_walk_scc() while backtracking
edge_stack after finalising SCC.

Let's add a test case exercising the path.

Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima 
Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida 
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240702160428.10153-2-syoshida@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

selftest: af_unix: Check SIOCATMARK after every send()/recv() in msg_oob.c.

2024-06-27T10:05:01+00:00

To catch regression, let's check ioctl(SIOCATMARK) after every
send() and recv() calls.

Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima 
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni

af_unix: Fix wrong ioctl(SIOCATMARK) when consumed OOB skb is at the head.

2024-06-27T10:05:01+00:00

Even if OOB data is recv()ed, ioctl(SIOCATMARK) must return 1 when the
OOB skb is at the head of the receive queue and no new OOB data is queued.

Without fix:

  #  RUN           msg_oob.no_peek.oob ...
  # msg_oob.c:305:oob:Expected answ[0] (0) == oob_head (1)
  # oob: Test terminated by assertion
  #          FAIL  msg_oob.no_peek.oob
  not ok 2 msg_oob.no_peek.oob

With fix:

  #  RUN           msg_oob.no_peek.oob ...
  #            OK  msg_oob.no_peek.oob
  ok 2 msg_oob.no_peek.oob

Fixes: 314001f0bf92 ("af_unix: Add OOB support")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima 
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni

selftest: af_unix: Check EPOLLPRI after every send()/recv() in msg_oob.c

2024-06-27T10:05:01+00:00

When OOB data is in recvq, we can detect it with epoll by checking
EPOLLPRI.

This patch add checks for EPOLLPRI after every send() and recv() in
all test cases.

Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima 
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni

selftest: af_unix: Check SIGURG after every send() in msg_oob.c

2024-06-27T10:05:01+00:00

When data is sent with MSG_OOB, SIGURG is sent to a process if the
receiver socket has set its owner to the process by ioctl(FIOSETOWN)
or fcntl(F_SETOWN).

This patch adds SIGURG check after every send(MSG_OOB) call.

Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima 
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni

selftest: af_unix: Add SO_OOBINLINE test cases in msg_oob.c

2024-06-27T10:05:01+00:00

When SO_OOBINLINE is enabled on a socket, MSG_OOB can be recv()ed
without MSG_OOB flag, and ioctl(SIOCATMARK) will behaves differently.

This patch adds some test cases for SO_OOBINLINE.

Note the new test cases found two bugs in TCP.

  1) After reading OOB data with non-inline mode, we can re-read
     the data by setting SO_OOBINLINE.

  #  RUN           msg_oob.no_peek.inline_oob_ahead_break ...
  # msg_oob.c:146:inline_oob_ahead_break:AF_UNIX :world
  # msg_oob.c:147:inline_oob_ahead_break:TCP     :oworld
  #            OK  msg_oob.no_peek.inline_oob_ahead_break
  ok 14 msg_oob.no_peek.inline_oob_ahead_break

  2) The head OOB data is dropped if SO_OOBINLINE is disabled
     if a new OOB data is queued.

  #  RUN           msg_oob.no_peek.inline_ex_oob_drop ...
  # msg_oob.c:171:inline_ex_oob_drop:AF_UNIX :x
  # msg_oob.c:172:inline_ex_oob_drop:TCP     :y
  # msg_oob.c:146:inline_ex_oob_drop:AF_UNIX :y
  # msg_oob.c:147:inline_ex_oob_drop:TCP     :Resource temporarily unavailable
  #            OK  msg_oob.no_peek.inline_ex_oob_drop
  ok 17 msg_oob.no_peek.inline_ex_oob_drop

Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima 
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni

af_unix: Don't stop recv() at consumed ex-OOB skb.

2024-06-27T10:05:01+00:00

Currently, recv() is stopped at a consumed OOB skb even if a new
OOB skb is queued and we can ignore the old OOB skb.

  >>> from socket import *
  >>> c1, c2 = socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM)
  >>> c1.send(b'hellowor', MSG_OOB)
  8
  >>> c2.recv(1, MSG_OOB)  # consume OOB data stays at middle of recvq.
  b'r'
  >>> c1.send(b'ld', MSG_OOB)
  2
  >>> c2.recv(10)          # recv() stops at the old consumed OOB
  b'hellowo'               # should be 'hellowol'

manage_oob() should not stop recv() at the old consumed OOB skb if
there is a new OOB data queued.

Note that TCP behaviour is apparently wrong in this test case because
we can recv() the same OOB data twice.

Without fix:

  #  RUN           msg_oob.no_peek.ex_oob_ahead_break ...
  # msg_oob.c:138:ex_oob_ahead_break:AF_UNIX :hellowo
  # msg_oob.c:139:ex_oob_ahead_break:Expected:hellowol
  # msg_oob.c:141:ex_oob_ahead_break:Expected ret[0] (7) == expected_len (8)
  # ex_oob_ahead_break: Test terminated by assertion
  #          FAIL  msg_oob.no_peek.ex_oob_ahead_break
  not ok 11 msg_oob.no_peek.ex_oob_ahead_break

With fix:

  #  RUN           msg_oob.no_peek.ex_oob_ahead_break ...
  # msg_oob.c:146:ex_oob_ahead_break:AF_UNIX :hellowol
  # msg_oob.c:147:ex_oob_ahead_break:TCP     :helloworl
  #            OK  msg_oob.no_peek.ex_oob_ahead_break
  ok 11 msg_oob.no_peek.ex_oob_ahead_break

Fixes: 314001f0bf92 ("af_unix: Add OOB support")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima 
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni

selftest: af_unix: Add non-TCP-compliant test cases in msg_oob.c.

2024-06-27T10:05:01+00:00

While testing, I found some weird behaviour on the TCP side as well.

For example, TCP drops the preceding OOB data when queueing a new
OOB data if the old OOB data is at the head of recvq.

  #  RUN           msg_oob.no_peek.ex_oob_drop ...
  # msg_oob.c:146:ex_oob_drop:AF_UNIX :x
  # msg_oob.c:147:ex_oob_drop:TCP     :Resource temporarily unavailable
  # msg_oob.c:146:ex_oob_drop:AF_UNIX :y
  # msg_oob.c:147:ex_oob_drop:TCP     :Invalid argument
  #            OK  msg_oob.no_peek.ex_oob_drop
  ok 9 msg_oob.no_peek.ex_oob_drop

  #  RUN           msg_oob.no_peek.ex_oob_drop_2 ...
  # msg_oob.c:146:ex_oob_drop_2:AF_UNIX :x
  # msg_oob.c:147:ex_oob_drop_2:TCP     :Resource temporarily unavailable
  #            OK  msg_oob.no_peek.ex_oob_drop_2
  ok 10 msg_oob.no_peek.ex_oob_drop_2

This patch allows AF_UNIX's MSG_OOB implementation to produce different
results from TCP when operations are guarded with tcp_incompliant{}.

Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima 
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni