This reverts commit 9a501cdb05348fa8f85db8df5a82f4b8cd11594e. Which was upstream commit 53fe307dfd309e425b171f6272d64296a54f4dff. Ben Hutchings reports that this commit depends on new code added in v4.18, and so is irrelevant on older kernels, and breaks the build. Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4e4cf62b37da5ff45c904a3acf242ab29ed5881d ] Running the 'perf test' command after building perf with a memory sanitizer causes a warning that says: WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value... in mmap-thread-lookup.c Initializing the go variable to 0 silences this harmless warning. Committer warning: This was harmless, just a simple test writing whatever was at that sizeof(int) memory area just to signal another thread blocked reading that file created with pipe(). Initialize it tho so that we don't get this warning. Signed-off-by: Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo <nums@google.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Drayton <mbd@fb.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190702173716.181223-1-nums@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 53fe307dfd309e425b171f6272d64296a54f4dff ]
Command
# perf test -Fv 6
fails with error
running test 100 'kvm-s390:kvm_s390_create_vm' failed to parse
event 'kvm-s390:kvm_s390_create_vm', err -1, str 'unknown tracepoint'
event syntax error: 'kvm-s390:kvm_s390_create_vm'
\___ unknown tracepoint
when the kvm module is not loaded or not built in.
Fix this by adding a valid function which tests if the module
is loaded. Loaded modules (or builtin KVM support) have a
directory named
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kvm-s390
for this tracepoint.
Check for existence of this directory.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604053504.43073-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit d982b33133284fa7efa0e52ae06b88f9be3ea764 ]
=================================================================
==20875==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 1160 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f1b6fc84138 in calloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0xee138)
#1 0x55bd50005599 in zalloc util/util.h:23
#2 0x55bd500068f5 in perf_evsel__newtp_idx util/evsel.c:327
#3 0x55bd4ff810fc in perf_evsel__newtp /home/work/linux/tools/perf/util/evsel.h:216
#4 0x55bd4ff81608 in test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test tests/evsel-tp-sched.c:69
#5 0x55bd4ff528e6 in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:358
#6 0x55bd4ff52baf in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:388
#7 0x55bd4ff543fe in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:583
#8 0x55bd4ff5572f in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:722
#9 0x55bd4ffc4087 in run_builtin /home/changbin/work/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:302
#10 0x55bd4ffc45c6 in handle_internal_command /home/changbin/work/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:354
#11 0x55bd4ffc49ca in run_argv /home/changbin/work/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:398
#12 0x55bd4ffc5138 in main /home/changbin/work/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:520
#13 0x7f1b6e34809a in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2409a)
Indirect leak of 19 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f1b6fc83f30 in __interceptor_malloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0xedf30)
#1 0x7f1b6e3ac30f in vasprintf (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x8830f)
Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Fixes: 6a6cd11d4e57 ("perf test: Add test for the sched tracepoint format fields")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190316080556.3075-17-changbin.du@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 93faa52e8371f0291ee1ff4994edae2b336b6233 ]
=================================================================
==7497==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 40 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f0333a88f30 in __interceptor_malloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0xedf30)
#1 0x5625e5326213 in cpu_map__trim_new util/cpumap.c:45
#2 0x5625e5326703 in cpu_map__read util/cpumap.c:103
#3 0x5625e53267ef in cpu_map__read_all_cpu_map util/cpumap.c:120
#4 0x5625e5326915 in cpu_map__new util/cpumap.c:135
#5 0x5625e517b355 in test__openat_syscall_event_on_all_cpus tests/openat-syscall-all-cpus.c:36
#6 0x5625e51528e6 in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:358
#7 0x5625e5152baf in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:388
#8 0x5625e51543fe in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:583
#9 0x5625e515572f in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:722
#10 0x5625e51c3fb8 in run_builtin /home/changbin/work/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:302
#11 0x5625e51c44f7 in handle_internal_command /home/changbin/work/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:354
#12 0x5625e51c48fb in run_argv /home/changbin/work/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:398
#13 0x5625e51c5069 in main /home/changbin/work/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:520
#14 0x7f033214d09a in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2409a)
Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Fixes: f30a79b012e5 ("perf tools: Add reference counting for cpu_map object")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190316080556.3075-15-changbin.du@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 03d309711d687460d1345de8a0363f45b1c8cd11 ]
Commit 489338a717a0 ("perf tests evsel-tp-sched: Fix bitwise operator")
causes test case 14 "Parse sched tracepoints fields" to fail on s390.
This test succeeds on x86.
In fact this test now fails on all architectures with type char treated
as type unsigned char.
The root cause is the signed-ness of character arrays in the tracepoints
sched_switch for structure members prev_comm and next_comm.
On s390 the output of:
[root@m35lp76 perf]# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_switch/format
name: sched_switch
ID: 287
format:
field:unsigned short common_type; offset:0; size:2; signed:0;
...
field:char prev_comm[16]; offset:8; size:16; signed:0;
...
field:char next_comm[16]; offset:40; size:16; signed:0;
reveals the character arrays prev_comm and next_comm are per
default unsigned char and have values in the range of 0..255.
On x86 both fields are signed as this output shows:
[root@f29]# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_switch/format
name: sched_switch
ID: 287
format:
field:unsigned short common_type; offset:0; size:2; signed:0;
...
field:char prev_comm[16]; offset:8; size:16; signed:1;
...
field:char next_comm[16]; offset:40; size:16; signed:1;
and the character arrays prev_comm and next_comm are per default signed
char and have values in the range of -1..127. The implementation of
type char is architecture specific.
Since the character arrays in both tracepoints sched_switch and
sched_wakeup should contain ascii characters, simply omit the check for
signedness in the test case.
Output before:
[root@m35lp76 perf]# ./perf test -F 14
14: Parse sched tracepoints fields :
--- start ---
sched:sched_switch: "prev_comm" signedness(0) is wrong, should be 1
sched:sched_switch: "next_comm" signedness(0) is wrong, should be 1
sched:sched_wakeup: "comm" signedness(0) is wrong, should be 1
---- end ----
14: Parse sched tracepoints fields : FAILED!
[root@m35lp76 perf]#
Output after:
[root@m35lp76 perf]# ./perf test -Fv 14
14: Parse sched tracepoints fields :
--- start ---
---- end ----
Parse sched tracepoints fields: Ok
[root@m35lp76 perf]#
Fixes: 489338a717a0 ("perf tests evsel-tp-sched: Fix bitwise operator")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190219153639.31267-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 489338a717a0dfbbd5a3fabccf172b78f0ac9015 upstream.
Notice that the use of the bitwise OR operator '|' always leads to true
in this particular case, which seems a bit suspicious due to the context
in which this expression is being used.
Fix this by using bitwise AND operator '&' instead.
This bug was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 6a6cd11d4e57 ("perf test: Add test for the sched tracepoint format fields")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190122233439.GA5868@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit aa90f9f9554616d5738f7bedb4a8f0e5e14d1bc6 ]
Recently, the subtest numbering was changed to start from 1. While it
is fine for displaying results, this should not be the case when the
subtests are actually invoked.
Typically, the subtests are stored in zero-indexed arrays and invoked
based on the index passed to the main test function. Since the index
now starts from 1, the second subtest in the array (index 1) gets
invoked instead of the first (index 0). This applies to all of the
following subtests but for the last one, the subtest always fails
because it does not meet the boundary condition of the subtest index
being lesser than the number of subtests.
This can be observed on powerpc64 and x86_64 systems running Fedora 28
as shown below.
Before:
# perf test "builtin clang support"
55: builtin clang support :
55.1: builtin clang compile C source to IR : Ok
55.2: builtin clang compile C source to ELF object : FAILED!
# perf test "LLVM search and compile"
38: LLVM search and compile :
38.1: Basic BPF llvm compile : Ok
38.2: kbuild searching : Ok
38.3: Compile source for BPF prologue generation : Ok
38.4: Compile source for BPF relocation : FAILED!
# perf test "BPF filter"
40: BPF filter :
40.1: Basic BPF filtering : Ok
40.2: BPF pinning : Ok
40.3: BPF prologue generation : Ok
40.4: BPF relocation checker : FAILED!
After:
# perf test "builtin clang support"
55: builtin clang support :
55.1: builtin clang compile C source to IR : Ok
55.2: builtin clang compile C source to ELF object : Ok
# perf test "LLVM search and compile"
38: LLVM search and compile :
38.1: Basic BPF llvm compile : Ok
38.2: kbuild searching : Ok
38.3: Compile source for BPF prologue generation : Ok
38.4: Compile source for BPF relocation : Ok
# perf test "BPF filter"
40: BPF filter :
40.1: Basic BPF filtering : Ok
40.2: BPF pinning : Ok
40.3: BPF prologue generation : Ok
40.4: BPF relocation checker : Ok
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Fixes: 9ef0112442bd ("perf test: Fix subtest number when showing results")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180726171733.33208-1-sandipan@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 7a1ac110c22eb726684c837544a2d42c33e07be7 ]
Since commit 18e7a45af91a ("perf/x86: Reject non sampling events with
precise_ip") returns -EINVAL for sys_perf_event_open() with an attribute
with (attr.precise_ip > 0 && attr.sample_period == 0), just like is done
in the routine used to probe the max precise level when no events were
passed to 'perf record' or 'perf top', i.e.:
perf_evsel__new_cycles()
perf_event_attr__set_max_precise_ip()
The x86 code, in x86_pmu_hw_config(), which is called all the way from
sys_perf_event_open() did, starting with the aforementioned commit:
/* There's no sense in having PEBS for non sampling events: */
if (!is_sampling_event(event))
return -EINVAL;
Which makes it fail for cycles:ppp, cycles:pp and cycles:p, always using
just the non precise cycles variant.
To make sure that this is the case, I tested it, before this patch,
with:
# perf probe -L x86_pmu_hw_config
<x86_pmu_hw_config@/home/acme/git/linux/arch/x86/events/core.c:0>
0 int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
1 {
2 if (event->attr.precise_ip) {
<SNIP>
17 if (event->attr.precise_ip > precise)
18 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
/* There's no sense in having PEBS for non sampling events: */
21 if (!is_sampling_event(event))
22 return -EINVAL;
}
<SNIP>
# perf probe x86_pmu_hw_config:22
Added new events:
probe:x86_pmu_hw_config (on x86_pmu_hw_config:22)
probe:x86_pmu_hw_config_1 (on x86_pmu_hw_config:22)
You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
perf record -e probe:x86_pmu_hw_config_1 -aR sleep 1
# perf trace -e perf_event_open,probe:x86_pmu_hwconfig*/max-stack=16/ perf record usleep 1
0.000 ( 0.015 ms): perf/4150 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x7ffebc8ba110, cpu: -1, group_fd: -1 ) ...
0.015 ( ): probe:x86_pmu_hw_config:(ffffffff9c0065e1))
x86_pmu_hw_config ([kernel.kallsyms])
hsw_hw_config ([kernel.kallsyms])
x86_pmu_event_init ([kernel.kallsyms])
perf_try_init_event ([kernel.kallsyms])
perf_event_alloc ([kernel.kallsyms])
SYSC_perf_event_open ([kernel.kallsyms])
sys_perf_event_open ([kernel.kallsyms])
do_syscall_64 ([kernel.kallsyms])
return_from_SYSCALL_64 ([kernel.kallsyms])
syscall (/usr/lib64/libc-2.24.so)
perf_event_attr__set_max_precise_ip (/home/acme/bin/perf)
perf_evsel__new_cycles (/home/acme/bin/perf)
perf_evlist__add_default (/home/acme/bin/perf)
cmd_record (/home/acme/bin/perf)
run_builtin (/home/acme/bin/perf)
handle_internal_command (/home/acme/bin/perf)
0.000 ( 0.021 ms): perf/4150 ... [continued]: perf_event_open()) = -1 EINVAL Invalid argument
0.023 ( 0.002 ms): perf/4150 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x7ffebc8ba110, cpu: -1, group_fd: -1 ) ...
0.025 ( ): probe:x86_pmu_hw_config:(ffffffff9c0065e1))
x86_pmu_hw_config ([kernel.kallsyms])
hsw_hw_config ([kernel.kallsyms])
x86_pmu_event_init ([kernel.kallsyms])
perf_try_init_event ([kernel.kallsyms])
perf_event_alloc ([kernel.kallsyms])
SYSC_perf_event_open ([kernel.kallsyms])
sys_perf_event_open ([kernel.kallsyms])
do_syscall_64 ([kernel.kallsyms])
return_from_SYSCALL_64 ([kernel.kallsyms])
syscall (/usr/lib64/libc-2.24.so)
perf_event_attr__set_max_precise_ip (/home/acme/bin/perf)
perf_evsel__new_cycles (/home/acme/bin/perf)
perf_evlist__add_default (/home/acme/bin/perf)
cmd_record (/home/acme/bin/perf)
run_builtin (/home/acme/bin/perf)
handle_internal_command (/home/acme/bin/perf)
0.023 ( 0.004 ms): perf/4150 ... [continued]: perf_event_open()) = -1 EINVAL Invalid argument
0.028 ( 0.002 ms): perf/4150 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x7ffebc8ba110, cpu: -1, group_fd: -1 ) ...
0.030 ( ): probe:x86_pmu_hw_config:(ffffffff9c0065e1))
x86_pmu_hw_config ([kernel.kallsyms])
hsw_hw_config ([kernel.kallsyms])
x86_pmu_event_init ([kernel.kallsyms])
perf_try_init_event ([kernel.kallsyms])
perf_event_alloc ([kernel.kallsyms])
SYSC_perf_event_open ([kernel.kallsyms])
sys_perf_event_open ([kernel.kallsyms])
do_syscall_64 ([kernel.kallsyms])
return_from_SYSCALL_64 ([kernel.kallsyms])
syscall (/usr/lib64/libc-2.24.so)
perf_event_attr__set_max_precise_ip (/home/acme/bin/perf)
perf_evsel__new_cycles (/home/acme/bin/perf)
perf_evlist__add_default (/home/acme/bin/perf)
cmd_record (/home/acme/bin/perf)
run_builtin (/home/acme/bin/perf)
handle_internal_command (/home/acme/bin/perf)
0.028 ( 0.004 ms): perf/4150 ... [continued]: perf_event_open()) = -1 EINVAL Invalid argument
41.018 ( 0.012 ms): perf/4150 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x7ffebc8b5dd0, pid: -1, group_fd: -1, flags: FD_CLOEXEC) = 4
41.065 ( 0.011 ms): perf/4150 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x3c7db78, pid: -1, group_fd: -1, flags: FD_CLOEXEC) = 4
41.080 ( 0.006 ms): perf/4150 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x3c7db78, pid: -1, group_fd: -1, flags: FD_CLOEXEC) = 4
41.103 ( 0.010 ms): perf/4150 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x3c4e748, pid: 4151 (perf), group_fd: -1, flags: FD_CLOEXEC) = 4
41.115 ( 0.006 ms): perf/4150 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x3c4e748, pid: 4151 (perf), cpu: 1, group_fd: -1, flags: FD_CLOEXEC) = 5
41.122 ( 0.004 ms): perf/4150 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x3c4e748, pid: 4151 (perf), cpu: 2, group_fd: -1, flags: FD_CLOEXEC) = 6
41.128 ( 0.008 ms): perf/4150 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x3c4e748, pid: 4151 (perf), cpu: 3, group_fd: -1, flags: FD_CLOEXEC) = 8
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.017 MB perf.data (2 samples) ]
#
I.e. that return -EINVAL in x86_pmu_hw_config() is hit three times.
So fix it by just setting attr.sample_period
Now, after this patch:
# perf trace --max-stack=2 -e perf_event_open,probe:x86_pmu_hw_config* perf record usleep 1
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
0.000 ( 0.017 ms): perf/8469 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x7ffe36c27d10, pid: -1, cpu: 3, group_fd: -1, flags: FD_CLOEXEC) = 4
syscall (/usr/lib64/libc-2.24.so)
perf_event_open_cloexec_flag (/home/acme/bin/perf)
0.050 ( 0.031 ms): perf/8469 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x24ebb78, pid: -1, group_fd: -1, flags: FD_CLOEXEC) = 4
syscall (/usr/lib64/libc-2.24.so)
perf_evlist__config (/home/acme/bin/perf)
0.092 ( 0.040 ms): perf/8469 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x24ebb78, pid: -1, group_fd: -1, flags: FD_CLOEXEC) = 4
syscall (/usr/lib64/libc-2.24.so)
perf_evlist__config (/home/acme/bin/perf)
0.143 ( 0.007 ms): perf/8469 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x24bc748, cpu: -1, group_fd: -1 ) = 4
syscall (/usr/lib64/libc-2.24.so)
perf_event_attr__set_max_precise_ip (/home/acme/bin/perf)
0.161 ( 0.007 ms): perf/8469 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x24bc748, pid: 8470 (perf), group_fd: -1, flags: FD_CLOEXEC) = 4
syscall (/usr/lib64/libc-2.24.so)
perf_evsel__open (/home/acme/bin/perf)
0.171 ( 0.005 ms): perf/8469 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x24bc748, pid: 8470 (perf), cpu: 1, group_fd: -1, flags: FD_CLOEXEC) = 5
syscall (/usr/lib64/libc-2.24.so)
perf_evsel__open (/home/acme/bin/perf)
0.180 ( 0.007 ms): perf/8469 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x24bc748, pid: 8470 (perf), cpu: 2, group_fd: -1, flags: FD_CLOEXEC) = 6
syscall (/usr/lib64/libc-2.24.so)
perf_evsel__open (/home/acme/bin/perf)
0.190 ( 0.005 ms): perf/8469 perf_event_open(attr_uptr: 0x24bc748, pid: 8470 (perf), cpu: 3, group_fd: -1, flags: FD_CLOEXEC) = 8
syscall (/usr/lib64/libc-2.24.so)
perf_evsel__open (/home/acme/bin/perf)
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.017 MB perf.data (7 samples) ]
#
The probe one called from perf_event_attr__set_max_precise_ip() works
the first time, with attr.precise_ip = 3, wit hthe next ones being the
per cpu ones for the cycles:ppp event.
And here is the text from a report and alternative proposed patch by
Thomas-Mich Richter:
---
On s390 the counter and sampling facility do not support a precise IP
skid level and sometimes returns EOPNOTSUPP when structure member
precise_ip in struct perf_event_attr is not set to zero.
On s390 commnd 'perf record -- true' fails with error EOPNOTSUPP. This
happens only when no events are specified on command line.
The functions called are
...
--> perf_evlist__add_default
--> perf_evsel__new_cycles
--> perf_event_attr__set_max_precise_ip
The last function determines the value of structure member precise_ip by
invoking the perf_event_open() system call and checking the return code.
The first successful open is the value for precise_ip.
However the value is determined without setting member sample_period and
indicates no sampling.
On s390 the counter facility and sampling facility are different. The
above procedure determines a precise_ip value of 3 using the counter
facility. Later it uses the sampling facility with a value of 3 and
fails with EOPNOTSUPP.
---
v2: Older compilers (e.g. gcc 4.4.7) don't support referencing members
of unnamed union members in the container struct initialization, so
move from:
struct perf_event_attr attr = {
...
.sample_period = 1,
};
to right after it as:
struct perf_event_attr attr = {
...
};
attr.sample_period = 1;
v3: We need to reset .sample_period to 0 to let the users of
perf_evsel__new_cycles() to properly setup attr.sample_period or
attr.sample_freq. Reported by Ingo Molnar.
Reported-and-Acked-by: Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Fixes: 18e7a45af91a ("perf/x86: Reject non sampling events with precise_ip")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-yv6nnkl7tzqocrm0hl3x7vf1@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 9ef0112442bdddef5fb55adf20b3a5464b33de75 ] Perf test 40 for example has several subtests numbered 1-4 when displaying the start of the subtest. When the subtest results are displayed the subtests are numbered 0-3. Use this command to generate trace output: [root@s35lp76 perf]# ./perf test -Fv 40 2>/tmp/bpf1 Fix this by adjusting the subtest number when show the subtest result. Output before: [root@s35lp76 perf]# egrep '(^40\.[0-4]| subtest [0-4]:)' /tmp/bpf1 40.1: Basic BPF filtering : BPF filter subtest 0: Ok 40.2: BPF pinning : BPF filter subtest 1: Ok 40.3: BPF prologue generation : BPF filter subtest 2: Ok 40.4: BPF relocation checker : BPF filter subtest 3: Ok [root@s35lp76 perf]# Output after: root@s35lp76 ~]# egrep '(^40\.[0-4]| subtest [0-4]:)' /tmp/bpf1 40.1: Basic BPF filtering : BPF filter subtest 1: Ok 40.2: BPF pinning : BPF filter subtest 2: Ok 40.3: BPF prologue generation : BPF filter subtest 3: Ok 40.4: BPF relocation checker : BPF filter subtest 4: Ok [root@s35lp76 ~]# Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180724134858.100644-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>