linux-stable.git/tools/perf/bench, branch linux-5.9.y Linux kernel stable tree x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}() 2020-11-04T17:09:05+00:00 Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com 2020-10-06T03:40:16+00:00 5fec7e5a28627138223aa20f5ff484898955ff77 commit ec6347bb43395cb92126788a1a5b25302543f815 upstream. In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit ec6347bb43395cb92126788a1a5b25302543f815 upstream.

In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast()
implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named
relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what
addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults /
exceptions are handled.

Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle
the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic()
implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this
case:

  On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
  >
  > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
  > >
  > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason.
  > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison
  > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the
  > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work
  > > for the wrong reason relative to the name.
  >
  > Right.
  >
  > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a
  > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it
  > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an
  > artifact of the architecture oddity.
  >
  > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs -
  > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers
  > having just one function.

Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either
copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel().

Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the
low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used
as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast
copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch.

One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S
to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies
for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks.

 [ bp: Massage a bit. ]

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Revert "x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}()" 2020-11-04T17:08:28+00:00 Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org 2020-11-04T17:05:30+00:00 8b5145ba3afc24f9749e57d3c0e6bba0b129dc4d This reverts commit a85748ed9eb70108f9605558f2754ca94ee91401 which is commit ec6347bb43395cb92126788a1a5b25302543f815 upstream. We had a mistake when merging a later patch in this series due to some file movements, so revert this change for now, as we will add it back in a later commit. Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
This reverts commit a85748ed9eb70108f9605558f2754ca94ee91401 which is
commit ec6347bb43395cb92126788a1a5b25302543f815 upstream.

We had a mistake when merging a later patch in this series due to some
file movements, so revert this change for now, as we will add it back in
a later commit.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}() 2020-11-01T11:47:03+00:00 Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com 2020-10-06T03:40:16+00:00 a85748ed9eb70108f9605558f2754ca94ee91401 commit ec6347bb43395cb92126788a1a5b25302543f815 upstream. In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit ec6347bb43395cb92126788a1a5b25302543f815 upstream.

In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast()
implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named
relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what
addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults /
exceptions are handled.

Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle
the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic()
implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this
case:

  On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
  >
  > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
  > >
  > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason.
  > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison
  > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the
  > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work
  > > for the wrong reason relative to the name.
  >
  > Right.
  >
  > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a
  > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it
  > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an
  > artifact of the architecture oddity.
  >
  > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs -
  > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers
  > having just one function.

Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either
copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel().

Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the
low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used
as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast
copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch.

One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S
to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies
for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks.

 [ bp: Massage a bit. ]

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
perf bench: Fix 2 memory sanitizer warnings 2020-09-14T21:30:26+00:00 Ian Rogers irogers@google.com 2020-09-12T05:37:25+00:00 d2c73501a767514b6c85c7feff9457a165d51057 Memory sanitizer warns if a write is performed where the memory being read for the write is uninitialized. Avoid this warning by initializing the memory. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200912053725.1405857-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> 
Memory sanitizer warns if a write is performed where the memory being
read for the write is uninitialized. Avoid this warning by initializing
the memory.

Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200912053725.1405857-1-irogers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf bench: The do_run_multi_threaded() function must use IS_ERR(perf_session__new()) 2020-09-03T18:55:56+00:00 YueHaibing yuehaibing@huawei.com 2020-09-02T14:05:26+00:00 e4d71f79cf5c10fa8bc6f5d3bebea570c9c438f1 In case of error, the function perf_session__new() returns ERR_PTR() and never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return value check should be replaced with IS_ERR() Committer notes: This wasn't compiling due to an extraneous '{' not matched by a '}', fix it. Fixes: 13edc237200c ("perf bench: Add a multi-threaded synthesize benchmark") Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200902140526.26916-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> 
In case of error, the function perf_session__new() returns ERR_PTR() and
never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return value check should be
replaced with IS_ERR()

Committer notes:

This wasn't compiling due to an extraneous '{' not matched by a '}', fix
it.

Fixes: 13edc237200c ("perf bench: Add a multi-threaded synthesize benchmark")
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200902140526.26916-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf bench numa: Remove dead code in parse_nodes_opt() 2020-08-14T12:42:30+00:00 Peng Fan fanpeng@loongson.cn 2020-08-14T10:44:54+00:00 a508d061ef04b163a85f55ba8a748c026f89da45 In the function parse_nodes_opt(), the statement "return 0;" is dead code, remove it. Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <fanpeng@loongson.cn> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1597401894-27549-1-git-send-email-fanpeng@loongson.cn Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> 
In the function parse_nodes_opt(), the statement "return 0;" is dead
code, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <fanpeng@loongson.cn>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1597401894-27549-1-git-send-email-fanpeng@loongson.cn
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf bench numa: Use numa_node_to_cpus() to bind tasks to nodes 2020-08-13T13:02:27+00:00 Alexander Gordeev agordeev@linux.ibm.com 2020-08-13T11:32:48+00:00 2db13a9b30f7e438777eb1a462c4b055ba948b89 It is currently assumed that each node contains at most nr_cpus/nr_nodes CPUs and nodes' CPU ranges do not overlap. That assumption is generally incorrect as there are archs where a CPU number does not depend on to its node number. This update removes the described assumption by simply calling numa_node_to_cpus() interface and using the returned mask for binding CPUs to nodes. Also, variable types and names made consistent in functions using cpumask. Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200813113247.GA2014@oc3871087118.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> 
It is currently assumed that each node contains at most nr_cpus/nr_nodes
CPUs and nodes' CPU ranges do not overlap.

That assumption is generally incorrect as there are archs where a CPU
number does not depend on to its node number.

This update removes the described assumption by simply calling
numa_node_to_cpus() interface and using the returned mask for binding
CPUs to nodes.

Also, variable types and names made consistent in functions using
cpumask.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200813113247.GA2014@oc3871087118.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf bench numa: Fix cpumask memory leak in node_has_cpus() 2020-08-13T13:02:00+00:00 Alexander Gordeev agordeev@linux.ibm.com 2020-08-13T11:30:42+00:00 509f68e327d0c87e9bc93cb138e445c506ae9ce9 Couple numa_allocate_cpumask() and numa_free_cpumask() functions Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200813113041.GA1685@oc3871087118.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> 
Couple numa_allocate_cpumask() and numa_free_cpumask() functions

Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200813113041.GA1685@oc3871087118.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf bench mem: Always memset source before memcpy 2020-08-13T12:34:26+00:00 Vincent Whitchurch vincent.whitchurch@axis.com 2020-08-10T13:34:04+00:00 1beaef29c34154ccdcb3f1ae557f6883eda18840 For memcpy, the source pages are memset to zero only when --cycles is used. This leads to wildly different results with or without --cycles, since all sources pages are likely to be mapped to the same zero page without explicit writes. Before this fix: $ export cmd="./perf stat -e LLC-loads -- ./perf bench \ mem memcpy -s 1024MB -l 100 -f default" $ $cmd 2,935,826 LLC-loads 3.821677452 seconds time elapsed $ $cmd --cycles 217,533,436 LLC-loads 8.616725985 seconds time elapsed After this fix: $ $cmd 214,459,686 LLC-loads 8.674301124 seconds time elapsed $ $cmd --cycles 214,758,651 LLC-loads 8.644480006 seconds time elapsed Fixes: 47b5757bac03c338 ("perf bench mem: Move boilerplate memory allocation to the infrastructure") Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: kernel@axis.com Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200810133404.30829-1-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> 
For memcpy, the source pages are memset to zero only when --cycles is
used.  This leads to wildly different results with or without --cycles,
since all sources pages are likely to be mapped to the same zero page
without explicit writes.

Before this fix:

$ export cmd="./perf stat -e LLC-loads -- ./perf bench \
  mem memcpy -s 1024MB -l 100 -f default"
$ $cmd

         2,935,826      LLC-loads
       3.821677452 seconds time elapsed

$ $cmd --cycles

       217,533,436      LLC-loads
       8.616725985 seconds time elapsed

After this fix:

$ $cmd

       214,459,686      LLC-loads
       8.674301124 seconds time elapsed

$ $cmd --cycles

       214,758,651      LLC-loads
       8.644480006 seconds time elapsed

Fixes: 47b5757bac03c338 ("perf bench mem: Move boilerplate memory allocation to the infrastructure")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: kernel@axis.com
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200810133404.30829-1-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf bench: Fix a couple of spelling mistakes in options text 2020-08-12T12:10:25+00:00 Colin Ian King colin.king@canonical.com 2020-08-12T06:46:47+00:00 f9f95068266d875d1840ad90abf51773a765f41a There are a couple of spelling mistakes in the text. Fix these. Signed-off-by: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200812064647.200132-1-colin.king@canonical.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> 
There are a couple of spelling mistakes in the text. Fix these.

Signed-off-by: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200812064647.200132-1-colin.king@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>