linux-stable.git/tools/lib, branch v6.15.4

libbpf: Add identical pointer detection to btf_dedup_is_equiv()

2025-06-27T10:13:25+00:00

[ Upstream commit 8e64c387c942229c551d0f23de4d9993d3a2acb6 ]

Recently as a side-effect of

commit ac053946f5c4 ("compiler.h: introduce TYPEOF_UNQUAL() macro")

issues were observed in deduplication between modules and kernel BTF
such that a large number of kernel types were not deduplicated so
were found in module BTF (task_struct, bpf_prog etc).  The root cause
appeared to be a failure to dedup struct types, specifically those
with members that were pointers with __percpu annotations.

The issue in dedup is at the point that we are deduplicating structures,
we have not yet deduplicated reference types like pointers.  If multiple
copies of a pointer point at the same (deduplicated) integer as in this
case, we do not see them as identical.  Special handling already exists
to deal with structures and arrays, so add pointer handling here too.

Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire 
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250429161042.2069678-1-alan.maguire@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

libbpf: Check bpf_map_skeleton link for NULL

2025-06-27T10:13:24+00:00

[ Upstream commit d0445d7dd3fd9b15af7564c38d7aa3cbc29778ee ]

Avoid dereferencing bpf_map_skeleton's link field if it's NULL.
If BPF map skeleton is created with the size, that indicates containing
link field, but the field was not actually initialized with valid
bpf_link pointer, libbpf crashes. This may happen when using libbpf-rs
skeleton.
Skeleton loading may still progress, but user needs to attach struct_ops
map separately.

Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko 
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250514113220.219095-1-mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

libbpf/btf: Fix string handling to support multi-split BTF

2025-06-27T10:13:21+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4e29128a9acec2a622734844bedee013e2901bdf ]

libbpf handling of split BTF has been written largely with the
assumption that multiple splits are possible, i.e. split BTF on top of
split BTF on top of base BTF.  One area where this does not quite work
is string handling in split BTF; the start string offset should be the
base BTF string section length + the base BTF string offset.  This
worked in the past because for a single split BTF with base the start
string offset was always 0.

Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire 
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250519165935.261614-2-alan.maguire@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

libbpf: Use proper errno value in nlattr

2025-06-19T13:39:52+00:00

[ Upstream commit fd5fd538a1f4b34cee6823ba0ddda2f7a55aca96 ]

Return value of the validate_nla() function can be propagated all the
way up to users of libbpf API. In case of error this libbpf version
of validate_nla returns -1 which will be seen as -EPERM from user's
point of view. Instead, return a more reasonable -EINVAL.

Fixes: bbf48c18ee0c ("libbpf: add error reporting in XDP")
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov 
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250510182011.2246631-1-a.s.protopopov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Fix uninitialized values in BPF_{CORE,PROBE}_READ

2025-06-19T13:39:49+00:00

[ Upstream commit 41d4ce6df3f4945341ec509a840cc002a413b6cc ]

With the latest LLVM bpf selftests build will fail with
the following error message:

    progs/profiler.inc.h:710:31: error: default initialization of an object of type 'typeof ((parent_task)->real_cred->uid.val)' (aka 'const unsigned int') leaves the object uninitialized and is incompatible with C++ [-Werror,-Wdefault-const-init-unsafe]
      710 |         proc_exec_data->parent_uid = BPF_CORE_READ(parent_task, real_cred, uid.val);
          |                                      ^
    tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf_core_read.h:520:35: note: expanded from macro 'BPF_CORE_READ'
      520 |         ___type((src), a, ##__VA_ARGS__) __r;                               \
          |                                          ^

This happens because BPF_CORE_READ (and other macro) declare the
variable __r using the ___type macro which can inherit const modifier
from intermediate types.

Fix this by using __typeof_unqual__, when supported. (And when it
is not supported, the problem shouldn't appear, as older compilers
haven't complained.)

Fixes: 792001f4f7aa ("libbpf: Add user-space variants of BPF_CORE_READ() family of macros")
Fixes: a4b09a9ef945 ("libbpf: Add non-CO-RE variants of BPF_CORE_READ() macro family")
Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov 
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250502193031.3522715-1-a.s.protopopov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

libbpf: Use proper errno value in linker

2025-06-19T13:39:48+00:00

[ Upstream commit 358b1c0f56ebb6996fcec7dcdcf6bae5dcbc8b6c ]

Return values of the linker_append_sec_data() and the
linker_append_elf_relos() functions are propagated all the
way up to users of libbpf API. In some error cases these
functions return -1 which will be seen as -EPERM from user's
point of view. Instead, return a more reasonable -EINVAL.

Fixes: faf6ed321cf6 ("libbpf: Add BPF static linker APIs")
Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov 
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250430120820.2262053-1-a.s.protopopov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Use thread-safe function pointer in libbpf_print

2025-06-19T13:39:46+00:00

[ Upstream commit 91dbac4076537b464639953c055c460d2bdfc7ea ]

This patch fixes a thread safety bug where libbpf_print uses the
global variable storing the print function pointer rather than the local
variable that had the print function set via __atomic_load_n.

Fixes: f1cb927cdb62 ("libbpf: Ensure print callback usage is thread-safe")
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Wiepert 
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Acked-by: Mykyta Yatsenko 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250424221457.793068-1-jonathan.wiepert@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

libbpf: Remove sample_period init in perf_buffer

2025-06-19T13:39:46+00:00

[ Upstream commit 64821d25f05ac468d435e61669ae745ce5a633ea ]

It seems that sample_period is not used in perf buffer. Actually, only
wakeup_events are meaningful to enable events aggregation for wakeup notification.
Remove sample_period setting code to avoid confusion.

Fixes: fb84b8224655 ("libbpf: add perf buffer API")
Signed-off-by: Tao Chen 
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa 
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250423163901.2983689-1-chen.dylane@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

libbpf: Fix event name too long error

2025-06-19T13:39:46+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4dde20b1aa85d69c4281eaac9a7cfa7d2b62ecf0 ]

When the binary path is excessively long, the generated probe_name in libbpf
exceeds the kernel's MAX_EVENT_NAME_LEN limit (64 bytes).
This causes legacy uprobe event attachment to fail with error code -22.

The fix reorders the fields to place the unique ID before the name.
This ensures that even if truncation occurs via snprintf, the unique ID
remains intact, preserving event name uniqueness. Additionally, explicit
checks with MAX_EVENT_NAME_LEN are added to enforce length constraints.

Before Fix:
	./test_progs -t attach_probe/kprobe-long_name
	......
	libbpf: failed to add legacy kprobe event for 'bpf_testmod_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name+0x0': -EINVAL
	libbpf: prog 'handle_kprobe': failed to create kprobe 'bpf_testmod_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name+0x0' perf event: -EINVAL
	test_attach_kprobe_long_event_name:FAIL:attach_kprobe_long_event_name unexpected error: -22
	test_attach_probe:PASS:uprobe_ref_ctr_cleanup 0 nsec
	#13/11   attach_probe/kprobe-long_name:FAIL
	#13      attach_probe:FAIL

	./test_progs -t attach_probe/uprobe-long_name
	......
	libbpf: failed to add legacy uprobe event for /root/linux-bpf/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs:0x13efd9: -EINVAL
	libbpf: prog 'handle_uprobe': failed to create uprobe '/root/linux-bpf/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs:0x13efd9' perf event: -EINVAL
	test_attach_uprobe_long_event_name:FAIL:attach_uprobe_long_event_name unexpected error: -22
	#13/10   attach_probe/uprobe-long_name:FAIL
	#13      attach_probe:FAIL
After Fix:
	./test_progs -t attach_probe/uprobe-long_name
	#13/10   attach_probe/uprobe-long_name:OK
	#13      attach_probe:OK
	Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

	./test_progs -t attach_probe/kprobe-long_name
	#13/11   attach_probe/kprobe-long_name:OK
	#13      attach_probe:OK
	Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Fixes: 46ed5fc33db9 ("libbpf: Refactor and simplify legacy kprobe code")
Fixes: cc10623c6810 ("libbpf: Add legacy uprobe attaching support")
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen 
Signed-off-by: Feng Yang 
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250417014848.59321-2-yangfeng59949@163.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

libbpf: Fix buffer overflow in bpf_object__init_prog

2025-06-19T13:39:42+00:00

[ Upstream commit ee684de5c1b0ac01821320826baec7da93f3615b ]

As shown in [1], it is possible to corrupt a BPF ELF file such that
arbitrary BPF instructions are loaded by libbpf. This can be done by
setting a symbol (BPF program) section offset to a large (unsigned)
number such that  overflows and points
before the section data in the memory.

Consider the situation below where:
- prog_start = sec_start + symbol_offset    <-- size_t overflow here
- prog_end   = prog_start + prog_size

    prog_start        sec_start        prog_end        sec_end
        |                |                 |              |
        v                v                 v              v
    .....................|################################|............

The report in [1] also provides a corrupted BPF ELF which can be used as
a reproducer:

    $ readelf -S crash
    Section Headers:
      [Nr] Name              Type             Address           Offset
           Size              EntSize          Flags  Link  Info  Align
    ...
      [ 2] uretprobe.mu[...] PROGBITS         0000000000000000  00000040
           0000000000000068  0000000000000000  AX       0     0     8

    $ readelf -s crash
    Symbol table '.symtab' contains 8 entries:
       Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
    ...
         6: ffffffffffffffb8   104 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT    2 handle_tp

Here, the handle_tp prog has section offset ffffffffffffffb8, i.e. will
point before the actual memory where section 2 is allocated.

This is also reported by AddressSanitizer:

    =================================================================
    ==1232==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x7c7302fe0000 at pc 0x7fc3046e4b77 bp 0x7ffe64677cd0 sp 0x7ffe64677490
    READ of size 104 at 0x7c7302fe0000 thread T0
        #0 0x7fc3046e4b76 in memcpy (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xe4b76)
        #1 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__init_prog /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:856
        #2 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__add_programs /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:928
        #3 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__elf_collect /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:3930
        #4 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object_open /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:8067
        #5 0x00000040f176 in bpf_object__open_file /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:8090
        #6 0x000000400c16 in main /poc/poc.c:8
        #7 0x7fc3043d25b4 in __libc_start_call_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x35b4)
        #8 0x7fc3043d2667 in __libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3667)
        #9 0x000000400b34 in _start (/poc/poc+0x400b34)

    0x7c7302fe0000 is located 64 bytes before 104-byte region [0x7c7302fe0040,0x7c7302fe00a8)
    allocated by thread T0 here:
        #0 0x7fc3046e716b in malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xe716b)
        #1 0x7fc3045ee600 in __libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock (/lib64/libelf.so.1+0xb600)
        #2 0x7fc3045ef018 in __elf_getdata_rdlock (/lib64/libelf.so.1+0xc018)
        #3 0x00000040642f in elf_sec_data /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:3740

The problem here is that currently, libbpf only checks that the program
end is within the section bounds. There used to be a check
`while (sec_off < sec_sz)` in bpf_object__add_programs, however, it was
removed by commit 6245947c1b3c ("libbpf: Allow gaps in BPF program
sections to support overriden weak functions").

Add a check for detecting the overflow of `sec_off + prog_sz` to
bpf_object__init_prog to fix this issue.

[1] https://github.com/lmarch2/poc/blob/main/libbpf/libbpf.md

Fixes: 6245947c1b3c ("libbpf: Allow gaps in BPF program sections to support overriden weak functions")
Reported-by: lmarch2 <2524158037@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik 
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Reviewed-by: Shung-Hsi Yu 
Link: https://github.com/lmarch2/poc/blob/main/libbpf/libbpf.md
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250415155014.397603-1-vmalik@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin