linux-stable.git/tools/lib/lockdep/uinclude/linux/lockdep.h, branch master

tools/lib/lockdep: Remove private kernel headers

2017-06-05T07:28:14+00:00

Move to using tools/include/ instead.

Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: acme@redhat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170531003747.10557-2-alexander.levin@verizon.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

tools/lib/lockdep: Add empty __is_[module,kernel]_percpu_address

2017-06-05T07:28:12+00:00

This would fix the build error caused by:

	383776fa7 ("locking/lockdep: Handle statically initialized
PER_CPU locks properly")

Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Cc: ben@decadent.org.uk
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170525130005.5947-19-alexander.levin@verizon.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

tools/lib/lockdep: Don't mix fd-based and stream IO

2017-06-05T07:28:08+00:00

Mixing fd-based and stream-base IO results in interleaved output like
following:

=====================================
liblockdep 4.7.6
-------------------------------------
conopal/372 is trying to release lock (0x3a45c) at:
/lib/libpt.so.2.17-alpha2(_ZN11PTimedMutex6SignalEv+0x3c) [0xb613c688]
but there are no more locks to release!
other info that might help us debug this:
no locks held by conopal/372.
stack backtrace:
=====================================
liblockdep 4.7.6
---------------------------------/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(+0x1e3c)[0xb67c2e3c]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(+0x5fe0)[0xb67c6fe0]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(+0x6450)[0xb67c7450]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(lock_release+0x5c)[0xb67c7c40]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(pthread_mutex_unlock+0x38)[0xb67c91d4]
/lib/libpt.so.2.17-alpha2(_ZN11PTimedMutex6SignalEv+0x3c)[0xb613c688]
/lib/libpt.so.2.17-alpha2(_ZN10PContainer14AssignContentsERKS_+0xe4)[0xb6160730]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(_ZN15OpalMediaFormat14AssignContentsERK10PContainer+0x90)[0xb6435edc]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(_ZN15OpalMediaFormataSERK7PString+0x68)[0xb643b610]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(_ZN15OpalMediaFormatC2EPKc+0x68)[0xb643b6cc]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(_ZN11OpalWAVFile14AddMediaFormatERK15OpalMediaFormat+0x330)[0xb66b2224]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(+0x2526f8)[0xb640c6f8]
/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3(+0x102f0)[0xb6f852f0]
/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3(+0x1044c)[0xb6f8544c]
/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3(+0xac4)[0xb6f75ac4]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(+0x1e3c)[0xb67c2e3c]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(+0x5fe0)[0xb67c6fe0]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(+0x6450)[0xb67c7450]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(lock_release+0x5c)[0xb67c7c40]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(pthread_mutex_unlock+0x38)[0xb67c91d4]
/lib/libpt.so.2.17-alpha2(_ZN11PTimedMutex6SignalEv+0x3c)[0xb613c688]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(_ZN15OpalMediaFormat14AssignContentsERK10PContainer+0x78)[0xb6435ec4]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(_ZN15OpalMediaFormataSERK7PString+0x68)[0xb643b610]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(_ZN15OpalMediaFormatC2EPKc+0x68)[0xb643b6cc]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(_ZN11OpalWAVFile14AddMediaFormatERK15OpalMediaFormat+0x330)[0xb66b2224]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(+0x2526f8)[0xb640c6f8]
/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3(+0x102f0)[0xb6f852f0]
/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3(+0x1044c)[0xb6f8544c]
/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3(+0xac4)[0xb6f75ac4]

Therefore change all bare printf(...) to dprintf(STDOUT_FILENO, ...) to
sychronize with backtrace_symbols_fd().

[ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Sasha Levin 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Cc: ben@decadent.org.uk
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170525130005.5947-12-alexander.levin@verizon.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

tools/lib/lockdep: Fix 'defined but not used' warning for init_utsname()

2017-06-05T07:28:06+00:00

We define init_utsname() as static but not inline, resulting
in a warning for every source file that includes lockdep.h but
doesn't call it.

Since it is only used by lockdep.c, define it in there.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170525130005.5947-8-alexander.levin@verizon.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

tools/lib/lockdep: Fix 'unused value' warnings

2017-06-05T07:28:05+00:00

liblockdep defines various macros that may expand to an expression
with no effect, while the in-kernel definition does have an effect.
This results in warnings from gcc when -Wunused-value is enabled, and
is is enabled by -Wall.  Fix this by introducing trivial functions,
as function return values are generally allowed to be ignored.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170525130005.5947-6-alexander.levin@verizon.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

tools/lib/lockdep: Reduce MAX_LOCK_DEPTH to avoid overflowing lock_chain/: Depth

2017-06-05T07:28:03+00:00

liblockdep has been broken since commit 75dd602a5198 ("lockdep: Fix
lock_chain::base size"), as that adds a check that MAX_LOCK_DEPTH is
within the range of lock_chain::depth and in liblockdep it is much
too large.

That should have resulted in a compiler error, but didn't because:

- the check uses ARRAY_SIZE(), which isn't yet defined in liblockdep
  so is assumed to be an (undeclared) function
- putting a function call inside a BUILD_BUG_ON() expression quietly
  turns it into some nonsense involving a variable-length array

It did produce a compiler warning, but I didn't notice because
liblockdep already produces too many warnings if -Wall is enabled
(which I'll fix shortly).

Even before that commit, which reduced lock_chain::depth from 8 bits
to 6, MAX_LOCK_DEPTH was too large.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Cc:  # for versions before 4.6, use a value of 255
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170525130005.5947-3-alexander.levin@verizon.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

tools/liblockdep: explicitly declare lockdep API we call from liblockdep

2015-11-06T21:01:37+00:00

It seems that newer gcc complains about lack of explicit declaration for some
of the API we use, add it in.

Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

tools/liblockdep: Ignore asmlinkage and visible

2014-04-01T15:46:09+00:00

Commit 63f9a7fde7 "asmlinkage: Make lockdep_sys_exit asmlinkage" has added
asmlinkage annotation to lockdep_sys_exit, which broke build of liblockdep.

Since we don't need asmlinkage in liblockep, just ignore it.

Reported-by: Eunbong Song 
Reported-by: Robin Hack 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

liblockdep: Wrap kernel/locking/lockdep.c to allow usage from userspace

2013-11-27T10:55:21+00:00

kernel/locking/lockdep.c deals with validating locking scenarios for
various architectures supported by the kernel. There isn't
anything kernel specific going on in lockdep, and when we
compare userspace to other architectures that don't have to deal
with irqs such as s390, they become all too similar.

We wrap kernel/locking/lockdep.c and include/linux/lockdep.h with
several headers which allow us to build and use lockdep from
userspace. We don't touch the kernel code itself which means
that any work done on lockdep in the kernel will automatically
benefit userspace lockdep as well!

Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1371163284-6346-3-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar