linux-stable.git/scripts/genksyms/keywords.c, branch linux-5.2.y Linux kernel stable tree genksyms: Teach parser about 128-bit built-in types 2019-07-31T05:24:43+00:00 Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com 2019-06-18T13:10:48+00:00 667b1d0b964d6a05dd329dafff348657a63c4821 [ Upstream commit a222061b85234d8a44486a46bd4df7e2cda52385 ] __uint128_t crops up in a few files that export symbols to modules, so teach genksyms about it and the other GCC built-in 128-bit integer types so that we don't end up skipping the CRC generation for some symbols due to the parser failing to spot them: | WARNING: EXPORT symbol "kernel_neon_begin" [vmlinux] version | generation failed, symbol will not be versioned. | ld: arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.o: relocation R_AARCH64_ABS32 against | `__crc_kernel_neon_begin' can not be used when making a shared | object | ld: arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.o:(.data+0x0): dangerous relocation: | unsupported relocation Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit a222061b85234d8a44486a46bd4df7e2cda52385 ]

__uint128_t crops up in a few files that export symbols to modules, so
teach genksyms about it and the other GCC built-in 128-bit integer types
so that we don't end up skipping the CRC generation for some symbols due
to the parser failing to spot them:

  | WARNING: EXPORT symbol "kernel_neon_begin" [vmlinux] version
  |          generation failed, symbol will not be versioned.
  | ld: arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.o: relocation R_AARCH64_ABS32 against
  |     `__crc_kernel_neon_begin' can not be used when making a shared
  |     object
  | ld: arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.o:(.data+0x0): dangerous relocation:
  |     unsupported relocation

Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
treewide: Add SPDX license identifier for missed files 2019-05-21T08:50:45+00:00 Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de 2019-05-19T12:08:55+00:00 457c89965399115e5cd8bf38f9c597293405703d Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which: - Have no license information of any form - Have EXPORT_.*_SYMBOL_GPL inside which was used in the initial scan/conversion to ignore the file These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX license identifier is: GPL-2.0-only Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which:

 - Have no license information of any form

 - Have EXPORT_.*_SYMBOL_GPL inside which was used in the
   initial scan/conversion to ignore the file

These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX
license identifier is:

  GPL-2.0-only

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove gperf usage from toolchain 2017-08-19T18:02:53+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2017-08-19T17:17:02+00:00 bb3290d91695bb1ae78ab86f18fb4d7ad8e5ebcc It turns out that gperf-3.1 changed types in the generated code in ways that aren't even trivially detectable without having to generate a test-file. It's just not worth using tools and libraries from clowns that don't understand or care about compatibility. So get rid of gperf. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 
It turns out that gperf-3.1 changed types in the generated code in ways
that aren't even trivially detectable without having to generate a test-file.

It's just not worth using tools and libraries from clowns that don't
understand or care about compatibility.  So get rid of gperf.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>