linux-stable.git/net, branch v6.0.3

net/ieee802154: don't warn zero-sized raw_sendmsg()

2022-10-21T10:39:28+00:00

[ Upstream commit b12e924a2f5b960373459c8f8a514f887adf5cac ]

syzbot is hitting skb_assert_len() warning at __dev_queue_xmit() [1],
for PF_IEEE802154 socket's zero-sized raw_sendmsg() request is hitting
__dev_queue_xmit() with skb->len == 0.

Since PF_IEEE802154 socket's zero-sized raw_sendmsg() request was
able to return 0, don't call __dev_queue_xmit() if packet length is 0.

  ----------
  #include 
  #include 

  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
  {
    struct sockaddr_in addr = { .sin_family = AF_INET, .sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_LOOPBACK) };
    struct iovec iov = { };
    struct msghdr hdr = { .msg_name = &addr, .msg_namelen = sizeof(addr), .msg_iov = &iov, .msg_iovlen = 1 };
    sendmsg(socket(PF_IEEE802154, SOCK_RAW, 0), &hdr, 0);
    return 0;
  }
  ----------

Note that this might be a sign that commit fd1894224407c484 ("bpf: Don't
redirect packets with invalid pkt_len") should be reverted, for
skb->len == 0 was acceptable for at least PF_IEEE802154 socket.

Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5ea725c25d06fb9114c4 [1]
Reported-by: syzbot 
Fixes: fd1894224407c484 ("bpf: Don't redirect packets with invalid pkt_len")
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa 
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221005014750.3685555-2-aahringo@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Revert "net/ieee802154: reject zero-sized raw_sendmsg()"

2022-10-21T10:39:28+00:00

[ Upstream commit 2eb2756f6c9e9621e022d78321ce40a62c4520b5 ]

This reverts commit 3a4d061c699bd3eedc80dc97a4b2a2e1af83c6f5.

There is a v2 which does return zero if zero length is given.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221005014750.3685555-1-aahringo@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

net: sched: cls_u32: Avoid memcpy() false-positive warning

2022-10-21T10:39:11+00:00

[ Upstream commit 7cba18332e3635aaae60e4e7d4e52849de50d91b ]

To work around a misbehavior of the compiler's ability to see into
composite flexible array structs (as detailed in the coming memcpy()
hardening series[1]), use unsafe_memcpy(), as the sizing,
bounds-checking, and allocation are all very tightly coupled here.
This silences the false-positive reported by syzbot:

  memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 80) of single field "&n->sel" at net/sched/cls_u32.c:1043 (size 16)

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/20220901065914.1417829-2-keescook@chromium.org

Cc: Cong Wang 
Cc: Jiri Pirko 
Reported-by: syzbot+a2c4601efc75848ba321@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000a96c0b05e97f0444@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook 
Reviewed-by: Jamal Hadi Salim 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220927153700.3071688-1-keescook@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix user-after-free

2022-10-21T10:39:11+00:00

[ Upstream commit 35fcbc4243aad7e7d020b7c1dfb14bb888b20a4f ]

This uses l2cap_chan_hold_unless_zero() after calling
__l2cap_get_chan_blah() to prevent the following trace:

Bluetooth: l2cap_core.c:static void l2cap_chan_destroy(struct kref
*kref)
Bluetooth: chan 0000000023c4974d
Bluetooth: parent 00000000ae861c08
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __mutex_waiter_is_first
kernel/locking/mutex.c:191 [inline]
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __mutex_lock_common
kernel/locking/mutex.c:671 [inline]
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __mutex_lock+0x278/0x400
kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888006a49b08 by task kworker/u3:2/389

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220622082716.478486-1-lee.jones@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz 
Signed-off-by: Sungwoo Kim 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

net: If sock is dead don't access sock's sk_wq in sk_stream_wait_memory

2022-10-21T10:39:11+00:00

[ Upstream commit 3f8ef65af927db247418d4e1db49164d7a158fc5 ]

Fixes the below NULL pointer dereference:

  [...]
  [   14.471200] Call Trace:
  [   14.471562]  
  [   14.471882]  lock_acquire+0x245/0x2e0
  [   14.472416]  ? remove_wait_queue+0x12/0x50
  [   14.473014]  ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x17/0x50
  [   14.473681]  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x50
  [   14.474318]  ? remove_wait_queue+0x12/0x50
  [   14.474907]  remove_wait_queue+0x12/0x50
  [   14.475480]  sk_stream_wait_memory+0x20d/0x340
  [   14.476127]  ? do_wait_intr_irq+0x80/0x80
  [   14.476704]  do_tcp_sendpages+0x287/0x600
  [   14.477283]  tcp_bpf_push+0xab/0x260
  [   14.477817]  tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir+0x297/0x500
  [   14.478461]  ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x77/0xe0
  [   14.479096]  tcp_bpf_send_verdict+0x105/0x470
  [   14.479729]  tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x318/0x4f0
  [   14.480311]  sock_sendmsg+0x2d/0x40
  [   14.480822]  ____sys_sendmsg+0x1b4/0x1c0
  [   14.481390]  ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x62/0x80
  [   14.482048]  ___sys_sendmsg+0x78/0xb0
  [   14.482580]  ? vmf_insert_pfn_prot+0x91/0x150
  [   14.483215]  ? __do_fault+0x2a/0x1a0
  [   14.483738]  ? do_fault+0x15e/0x5d0
  [   14.484246]  ? __handle_mm_fault+0x56b/0x1040
  [   14.484874]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xdf/0x130
  [   14.485474]  ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
  [   14.486046]  ? __sys_sendmsg+0x41/0x70
  [   14.486587]  __sys_sendmsg+0x41/0x70
  [   14.487105]  ? intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core+0x350/0x350
  [   14.487822]  do_syscall_64+0x34/0x80
  [   14.488345]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
  [...]

The test scenario has the following flow:

thread1                               thread2
-----------                           ---------------
 tcp_bpf_sendmsg
  tcp_bpf_send_verdict
   tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir              sock_close
    tcp_bpf_push_locked                 __sock_release
     tcp_bpf_push                         //inet_release
      do_tcp_sendpages                    sock->ops->release
       sk_stream_wait_memory          	   // tcp_close
          sk_wait_event                      sk->sk_prot->close
           release_sock(__sk);
            ***
                                                lock_sock(sk);
                                                  __tcp_close
                                                    sock_orphan(sk)
                                                      sk->sk_wq  = NULL
                                                release_sock
            ****
           lock_sock(__sk);
          remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
             sk_sleep(sk)
             //NULL pointer dereference
             &rcu_dereference_raw(sk->sk_wq)->wait

While waiting for memory in thread1, the socket is released with its wait
queue because thread2 has closed it. This caused by tcp_bpf_send_verdict
didn't increase the f_count of psock->sk_redir->sk_socket->file in thread1.

We should check if SOCK_DEAD flag is set on wakeup in sk_stream_wait_memory
before accessing the wait queue.

Suggested-by: Jakub Sitnicki 
Signed-off-by: Liu Jian 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Acked-by: John Fastabend 
Cc: Eric Dumazet 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220823133755.314697-2-liujian56@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

can: bcm: check the result of can_send() in bcm_can_tx()

2022-10-21T10:39:10+00:00

[ Upstream commit 3fd7bfd28cfd68ae80a2fe92ea1615722cc2ee6e ]

If can_send() fail, it should not update frames_abs counter
in bcm_can_tx(). Add the result check for can_send() in bcm_can_tx().

Suggested-by: Marc Kleine-Budde 
Suggested-by: Oliver Hartkopp 
Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9851878e74d6d37aee2f1ee76d68361a46f89458.1663206163.git.william.xuanziyang@huawei.com
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp 
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Bluetooth: hci_event: Make sure ISO events don't affect non-ISO connections

2022-10-21T10:39:09+00:00

[ Upstream commit ed680f925aea76ac666f34d9923cb40558f4e97b ]

ISO events (CIS/BIS) shall only be relevant for connection with link
type of ISO_LINK, otherwise the controller is probably buggy or it is
the result of fuzzer tools such as syzkaller.

Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Bluetooth: hci_sysfs: Fix attempting to call device_add multiple times

2022-10-21T10:39:09+00:00

[ Upstream commit 448a496f760664d3e2e79466aa1787e6abc922b5 ]

device_add shall not be called multiple times as stated in its
documentation:

 'Do not call this routine or device_register() more than once for
 any device structure'

Syzkaller reports a bug as follows [1]:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:33!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
[...]
Call Trace:
 
 __list_add include/linux/list.h:69 [inline]
 list_add_tail include/linux/list.h:102 [inline]
 kobj_kset_join lib/kobject.c:164 [inline]
 kobject_add_internal+0x18f/0x8f0 lib/kobject.c:214
 kobject_add_varg lib/kobject.c:358 [inline]
 kobject_add+0x150/0x1c0 lib/kobject.c:410
 device_add+0x368/0x1e90 drivers/base/core.c:3452
 hci_conn_add_sysfs+0x9b/0x1b0 net/bluetooth/hci_sysfs.c:53
 hci_le_cis_estabilished_evt+0x57c/0xae0 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:6799
 hci_le_meta_evt+0x2b8/0x510 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:7110
 hci_event_func net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:7440 [inline]
 hci_event_packet+0x63d/0xfd0 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:7495
 hci_rx_work+0xae7/0x1230 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:4007
 process_one_work+0x991/0x1610 kernel/workqueue.c:2289
 worker_thread+0x665/0x1080 kernel/workqueue.c:2436
 kthread+0x2e4/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:376
 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:306
 

Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=da3246e2d33afdb92d66bc166a0934c5b146404a
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz 
Tested-by: Hawkins Jiawei 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Bluetooth: L2CAP: initialize delayed works at l2cap_chan_create()

2022-10-21T10:39:09+00:00

[ Upstream commit 2d2cb3066f2c90cd8ca540b36ba7a55e7f2406e0 ]

syzbot is reporting cancel_delayed_work() without INIT_DELAYED_WORK() at
l2cap_chan_del() [1], for CONF_NOT_COMPLETE flag (which meant to prevent
l2cap_chan_del() from calling cancel_delayed_work()) is cleared by timer
which fires before l2cap_chan_del() is called by closing file descriptor
created by socket(AF_BLUETOOTH, SOCK_STREAM, BTPROTO_L2CAP).

l2cap_bredr_sig_cmd(L2CAP_CONF_REQ) and l2cap_bredr_sig_cmd(L2CAP_CONF_RSP)
are calling l2cap_ertm_init(chan), and they call l2cap_chan_ready() (which
clears CONF_NOT_COMPLETE flag) only when l2cap_ertm_init(chan) succeeded.

l2cap_sock_init() does not call l2cap_ertm_init(chan), and it instead sets
CONF_NOT_COMPLETE flag by calling l2cap_chan_set_defaults(). However, when
connect() is requested, "command 0x0409 tx timeout" happens after 2 seconds
 from connect() request, and CONF_NOT_COMPLETE flag is cleared after 4
seconds from connect() request, for l2cap_conn_start() from
l2cap_info_timeout() callback scheduled by

  schedule_delayed_work(&conn->info_timer, L2CAP_INFO_TIMEOUT);

in l2cap_connect() is calling l2cap_chan_ready().

Fix this problem by initializing delayed works used by L2CAP_MODE_ERTM
mode as soon as l2cap_chan_create() allocates a channel, like I did in
commit be8597239379f0f5 ("Bluetooth: initialize skb_queue_head at
l2cap_chan_create()").

Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=83672956c7aa6af698b3 [1]
Reported-by: syzbot 
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa 
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

xfrm: Update ipcomp_scratches with NULL when freed

2022-10-21T10:39:07+00:00

[ Upstream commit 8a04d2fc700f717104bfb95b0f6694e448a4537f ]

Currently if ipcomp_alloc_scratches() fails to allocate memory
ipcomp_scratches holds obsolete address. So when we try to free the
percpu scratches using ipcomp_free_scratches() it tries to vfree non
existent vm area. Described below:

static void * __percpu *ipcomp_alloc_scratches(void)
{
        ...
        scratches = alloc_percpu(void *);
        if (!scratches)
                return NULL;
ipcomp_scratches does not know about this allocation failure.
Therefore holding the old obsolete address.
        ...
}

So when we free,

static void ipcomp_free_scratches(void)
{
        ...
        scratches = ipcomp_scratches;
Assigning obsolete address from ipcomp_scratches

        if (!scratches)
                return;

        for_each_possible_cpu(i)
               vfree(*per_cpu_ptr(scratches, i));
Trying to free non existent page, causing warning: trying to vfree
existent vm area.
        ...
}

Fix this breakage by updating ipcomp_scrtches with NULL when scratches
is freed

Suggested-by: Herbert Xu 
Reported-by: syzbot+5ec9bb042ddfe9644773@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+5ec9bb042ddfe9644773@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Khalid Masum 
Acked-by: Herbert Xu 
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin