[ Upstream commit 9bdaf3b91efd229dd272b228e13df10310c80d19 ]

There's a race condition in the netdev registration in that
NETDEV_REGISTER actually happens after the netdev is available,
and so if we initialize things only there, we might get called
with an uninitialized wdev through nl80211 - not using a wdev
but using a netdev interface index.

I found this while looking into a syzbot report, but it doesn't
really seem to be related, and unfortunately there's no repro
for it (yet). I can't (yet) explain how it managed to get into
cfg80211_release_pmsr() from nl80211_netlink_notify() without
the wdev having been initialized, as the latter only iterates
the wdevs that are linked into the rdev, which even without the
change here happened after init.

However, looking at this, it seems fairly clear that the init
needs to be done earlier, otherwise we might even re-init on a
netns move, when data might still be pending.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201009135821.fdcbba3aad65.Ie9201d91dbcb7da32318812effdc1561aeaf4cdc@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit 0bbab5f0301587cad4e923ccc49bb910db86162c upstream.

Removing the "if (IS_ERR(dir)) dir = NULL;" check only works
if we adjust the remaining code to not rely on it being NULL.
Check IS_ERR_OR_NULL() before attempting to dereference it.

I'm not actually entirely sure this fixes the syzbot crash as
the kernel config indicates that they do have DEBUG_FS in the
kernel, but this is what I found when looking there.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: d82574a8e5a4 ("cfg80211: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions")
Reported-by: syzbot+fd5332e429401bf42d18@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200525113816.fc4da3ec3d4b.Ica63a110679819eaa9fb3bc1b7437d96b1fd187d@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit 56cb31e185adb61f930743a9b70e700a43625386 ]

If wdev->wext.keys was initialized it didn't get reset to NULL on
unregister (and it doesn't get set in cfg80211_init_wdev either), but
wdev is reused if unregister was triggered through
cfg80211_switch_netns.

The next unregister (for whatever reason) will try to free
wdev->wext.keys again.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Bühler <source@stbuehler.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191126100543.782023-1-stefan.buehler@tik.uni-stuttgart.de
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

When the RFKILL subsystem isn't available, then rfkill_blocked()
always returns false. In the case of hardware rfkill this will
be wrong though, as if the hardware reported being killed then
it cannot operate any longer.

Since we only ever call the rfkill_sync work in this case, just
rename it to rfkill_block and always pass "true" for the blocked
parameter, rather than passing rfkill_blocked().

We rely on the underlying driver to still reject any new attempt
to bring up the device by itself.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190830112451.21655-2-luca@coelho.fi
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Just minor overlapping changes in the conflicts here.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Commit 33d915d9e8ce ("{nl,mac}80211: allow 4addr AP operation on
crypto controlled devices") has introduced a change which allows
4addr operation on crypto controlled devices (ex: ath10k). This
change has inadvertently impacted the interface combinations logic
on such devices.

General rule is that software interfaces like AP/VLAN should not be
listed under supported interface combinations and should not be
considered during validation of these combinations; because of the
aforementioned change, AP/VLAN interfaces(if present) will be checked
against interfaces supported by the device and blocks valid interface
combinations.

Consider a case where an AP and AP/VLAN are up and running; when a
second AP device is brought up on the same physical device, this AP
will be checked against the AP/VLAN interface (which will not be
part of supported interface combinations of the device) and blocks
second AP to come up.

Add a new API cfg80211_iftype_allowed() to fix the problem, this
API works for all devices with/without SW crypto control.

Signed-off-by: Manikanta Pubbisetty <mpubbise@codeaurora.org>
Fixes: 33d915d9e8ce ("{nl,mac}80211: allow 4addr AP operation on crypto controlled devices")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1563779690-9716-1-git-send-email-mpubbise@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
return value.  The function can work or not, but the code logic should
never do something different based on this.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190703070142.GA29993@kroah.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Honestly all the conflicts were simple overlapping changes,
nothing really interesting to report.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Johannes Berg says:

====================
Various fixes, all over:
 * a few memory leaks
 * fixes for management frame protection security
   and A2/A3 confusion (affecting TDLS as well)
 * build fix for certificates
 * etc.
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In wiphy_new_nm(), if an error occurs after dev_set_name() and
device_initialize() have already been called, it's necessary to call
put_device() (via wiphy_free()) to avoid a memory leak.

Reported-by: syzbot+7fddca22578bc67c3fe4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 1f87f7d3a3b4 ("cfg80211: add rfkill support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>