linux-stable.git/net/vmw_vsock, branch v5.4.78

vsock: use ns_capable_noaudit() on socket create

2020-11-10T11:37:30+00:00

[ Upstream commit af545bb5ee53f5261db631db2ac4cde54038bdaf ]

During __vsock_create() CAP_NET_ADMIN is used to determine if the
vsock_sock->trusted should be set to true. This value is used later
for determing if a remote connection should be allowed to connect
to a restricted VM. Unfortunately, if the caller doesn't have
CAP_NET_ADMIN, an audit message such as an selinux denial is
generated even if the caller does not want a trusted socket.

Logging errors on success is confusing. To avoid this, switch the
capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN) check to the noaudit version.

Reported-by: Roman Kiryanov 
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/device/generic/goldfish/+/1468545/
Signed-off-by: Jeff Vander Stoep 
Reviewed-by: James Morris 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201023143757.377574-1-jeffv@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

net: virtio_vsock: Enhance connection semantics

2020-10-07T06:01:24+00:00

[ Upstream commit df12eb6d6cd920ab2f0e0a43cd6e1c23a05cea91 ]

Whenever the vsock backend on the host sends a packet through the RX
queue, it expects an answer on the TX queue. Unfortunately, there is one
case where the host side will hang waiting for the answer and might
effectively never recover if no timeout mechanism was implemented.

This issue happens when the guest side starts binding to the socket,
which insert a new bound socket into the list of already bound sockets.
At this time, we expect the guest to also start listening, which will
trigger the sk_state to move from TCP_CLOSE to TCP_LISTEN. The problem
occurs if the host side queued a RX packet and triggered an interrupt
right between the end of the binding process and the beginning of the
listening process. In this specific case, the function processing the
packet virtio_transport_recv_pkt() will find a bound socket, which means
it will hit the switch statement checking for the sk_state, but the
state won't be changed into TCP_LISTEN yet, which leads the code to pick
the default statement. This default statement will only free the buffer,
while it should also respond to the host side, by sending a packet on
its TX queue.

In order to simply fix this unfortunate chain of events, it is important
that in case the default statement is entered, and because at this stage
we know the host side is waiting for an answer, we must send back a
packet containing the operation VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RST.

One could say that a proper timeout mechanism on the host side will be
enough to avoid the backend to hang. But the point of this patch is to
ensure the normal use case will be provided with proper responsiveness
when it comes to establishing the connection.

Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

vsock/virtio: add transport parameter to the virtio_transport_reset_no_sock()

2020-10-07T06:01:24+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4c7246dc45e2706770d5233f7ce1597a07e069ba ]

We are going to add 'struct vsock_sock *' parameter to
virtio_transport_get_ops().

In some cases, like in the virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(),
we don't have any socket assigned to the packet received,
so we can't use the virtio_transport_get_ops().

In order to allow virtio_transport_reset_no_sock() to use the
'.send_pkt' callback from the 'vhost_transport' or 'virtio_transport',
we add the 'struct virtio_transport *' to it and to its caller:
virtio_transport_recv_pkt().

We moved the 'vhost_transport' and 'virtio_transport' definition,
to pass their address to the virtio_transport_recv_pkt().

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi 
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

vsock/virtio: annotate 'the_virtio_vsock' RCU pointer

2020-07-29T08:18:31+00:00

[ Upstream commit f961134a612c793d5901a93d85a29337c74af978 ]

Commit 0deab087b16a ("vsock/virtio: use RCU to avoid use-after-free
on the_virtio_vsock") starts to use RCU to protect 'the_virtio_vsock'
pointer, but we forgot to annotate it.

This patch adds the annotation to fix the following sparse errors:

    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:73:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:73:17:    struct virtio_vsock [noderef] __rcu *
    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:73:17:    struct virtio_vsock *
    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:171:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:171:17:    struct virtio_vsock [noderef] __rcu *
    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:171:17:    struct virtio_vsock *
    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:207:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:207:17:    struct virtio_vsock [noderef] __rcu *
    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:207:17:    struct virtio_vsock *
    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:561:13: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:561:13:    struct virtio_vsock [noderef] __rcu *
    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:561:13:    struct virtio_vsock *
    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:612:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:612:9:    struct virtio_vsock [noderef] __rcu *
    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:612:9:    struct virtio_vsock *
    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:631:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:631:9:    struct virtio_vsock [noderef] __rcu *
    net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:631:9:    struct virtio_vsock *

Fixes: 0deab087b16a ("vsock/virtio: use RCU to avoid use-after-free on the_virtio_vsock")
Reported-by: Michael S. Tsirkin 
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella 
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi 
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin 
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

vsock: fix timeout in vsock_accept()

2020-06-10T18:24:55+00:00

[ Upstream commit 7e0afbdfd13d1e708fe96e31c46c4897101a6a43 ]

The accept(2) is an "input" socket interface, so we should use
SO_RCVTIMEO instead of SO_SNDTIMEO to set the timeout.

So this patch replace sock_sndtimeo() with sock_rcvtimeo() to
use the right timeout in the vsock_accept().

Fixes: d021c344051a ("VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets")
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella 
Reviewed-by: Jorgen Hansen 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

hv_sock: Remove the accept port restriction

2020-02-14T21:34:07+00:00

[ Upstream commit c742c59e1fbd022b64d91aa9a0092b3a699d653c ]

Currently, hv_sock restricts the port the guest socket can accept
connections on. hv_sock divides the socket port namespace into two parts
for server side (listening socket), 0-0x7FFFFFFF & 0x80000000-0xFFFFFFFF
(there are no restrictions on client port namespace). The first part
(0-0x7FFFFFFF) is reserved for sockets where connections can be accepted.
The second part (0x80000000-0xFFFFFFFF) is reserved for allocating ports
for the peer (host) socket, once a connection is accepted.
This reservation of the port namespace is specific to hv_sock and not
known by the generic vsock library (ex: af_vsock). This is problematic
because auto-binds/ephemeral ports are handled by the generic vsock
library and it has no knowledge of this port reservation and could
allocate a port that is not compatible with hv_sock (and legitimately so).
The issue hasn't surfaced so far because the auto-bind code of vsock
(__vsock_bind_stream) prior to the change 'VSOCK: bind to random port for
VMADDR_PORT_ANY' would start walking up from LAST_RESERVED_PORT (1023) and
start assigning ports. That will take a large number of iterations to hit
0x7FFFFFFF. But, after the above change to randomize port selection, the
issue has started coming up more frequently.
There has really been no good reason to have this port reservation logic
in hv_sock from the get go. Reserving a local port for peer ports is not
how things are handled generally. Peer ports should reflect the peer port.
This fixes the issue by lifting the port reservation, and also returns the
right peer port. Since the code converts the GUID to the peer port (by
using the first 4 bytes), there is a possibility of conflicts, but that
seems like a reasonable risk to take, given this is limited to vsock and
that only applies to all local sockets.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Muthuswamy 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

vsock/virtio: fix sock refcnt holding during the shutdown

2019-11-08T20:17:50+00:00

The "42f5cda5eaf4" commit rightly set SOCK_DONE on peer shutdown,
but there is an issue if we receive the SHUTDOWN(RDWR) while the
virtio_transport_close_timeout() is scheduled.
In this case, when the timeout fires, the SOCK_DONE is already
set and the virtio_transport_close_timeout() will not call
virtio_transport_reset() and virtio_transport_do_close().
This causes that both sockets remain open and will never be released,
preventing the unloading of [virtio|vhost]_transport modules.

This patch fixes this issue, calling virtio_transport_reset() and
virtio_transport_do_close() when we receive the SHUTDOWN(RDWR)
and there is nothing left to read.

Fixes: 42f5cda5eaf4 ("vsock/virtio: set SOCK_DONE on peer shutdown")
Cc: Stephen Barber 
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net: use skb_queue_empty_lockless() in poll() handlers

2019-10-28T20:33:41+00:00

Many poll() handlers are lockless. Using skb_queue_empty_lockless()
instead of skb_queue_empty() is more appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

vsock/virtio: discard packets if credit is not respected

2019-10-18T17:19:43+00:00

If the remote peer doesn't respect the credit information
(buf_alloc, fwd_cnt), sending more data than it can send,
we should drop the packets to prevent a malicious peer
from using all of our memory.

This is patch follows the VIRTIO spec: "VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW data
packets MUST only be transmitted when the peer has sufficient
free buffer space for the payload"

Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

vsock/virtio: send a credit update when buffer size is changed

2019-10-18T17:19:43+00:00

When the user application set a new buffer size value, we should
update the remote peer about this change, since it uses this
information to calculate the credit available.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller