linux-stable.git/net/vmw_vsock, branch v5.4

vsock/virtio: fix sock refcnt holding during the shutdown

2019-11-08T20:17:50+00:00

The "42f5cda5eaf4" commit rightly set SOCK_DONE on peer shutdown,
but there is an issue if we receive the SHUTDOWN(RDWR) while the
virtio_transport_close_timeout() is scheduled.
In this case, when the timeout fires, the SOCK_DONE is already
set and the virtio_transport_close_timeout() will not call
virtio_transport_reset() and virtio_transport_do_close().
This causes that both sockets remain open and will never be released,
preventing the unloading of [virtio|vhost]_transport modules.

This patch fixes this issue, calling virtio_transport_reset() and
virtio_transport_do_close() when we receive the SHUTDOWN(RDWR)
and there is nothing left to read.

Fixes: 42f5cda5eaf4 ("vsock/virtio: set SOCK_DONE on peer shutdown")
Cc: Stephen Barber 
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net: use skb_queue_empty_lockless() in poll() handlers

2019-10-28T20:33:41+00:00

Many poll() handlers are lockless. Using skb_queue_empty_lockless()
instead of skb_queue_empty() is more appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

vsock/virtio: discard packets if credit is not respected

2019-10-18T17:19:43+00:00

If the remote peer doesn't respect the credit information
(buf_alloc, fwd_cnt), sending more data than it can send,
we should drop the packets to prevent a malicious peer
from using all of our memory.

This is patch follows the VIRTIO spec: "VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW data
packets MUST only be transmitted when the peer has sufficient
free buffer space for the payload"

Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

vsock/virtio: send a credit update when buffer size is changed

2019-10-18T17:19:43+00:00

When the user application set a new buffer size value, we should
update the remote peer about this change, since it uses this
information to calculate the credit available.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

vsock: Fix a lockdep warning in __vsock_release()

2019-10-02T01:23:35+00:00

Lockdep is unhappy if two locks from the same class are held.

Fix the below warning for hyperv and virtio sockets (vmci socket code
doesn't have the issue) by using lock_sock_nested() when __vsock_release()
is called recursively:

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.3.0+ #1 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
server/1795 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880c5158990 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}, at: hvs_release+0x10/0x120 [hv_sock]

but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880c5158150 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}, at: __vsock_release+0x2e/0xf0 [vsock]

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(sk_lock-AF_VSOCK);
  lock(sk_lock-AF_VSOCK);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

2 locks held by server/1795:
 #0: ffff8880c5d05ff8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10){+.+.}, at: __sock_release+0x2d/0xa0
 #1: ffff8880c5158150 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}, at: __vsock_release+0x2e/0xf0 [vsock]

stack backtrace:
CPU: 5 PID: 1795 Comm: server Not tainted 5.3.0+ #1
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x67/0x90
 __lock_acquire.cold.67+0xd2/0x20b
 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x1c0
 lock_sock_nested+0x6d/0x90
 hvs_release+0x10/0x120 [hv_sock]
 __vsock_release+0x24/0xf0 [vsock]
 __vsock_release+0xa0/0xf0 [vsock]
 vsock_release+0x12/0x30 [vsock]
 __sock_release+0x37/0xa0
 sock_close+0x14/0x20
 __fput+0xc1/0x250
 task_work_run+0x98/0xc0
 do_exit+0x344/0xc60
 do_group_exit+0x47/0xb0
 get_signal+0x15c/0xc50
 do_signal+0x30/0x720
 exit_to_usermode_loop+0x50/0xa0
 do_syscall_64+0x24e/0x270
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x7f4184e85f31

Tested-by: Stefano Garzarella 
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui 
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

vsock/virtio: a better comment on credit update

2019-09-05T07:53:01+00:00

The comment we have is just repeating what the code does.
Include the *reason* for the condition instead.

Cc: Stefano Garzarella 
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin 
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net

2019-08-07T01:44:57+00:00

Just minor overlapping changes in the conflicts here.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

hv_sock: Fix hang when a connection is closed

2019-08-03T00:26:27+00:00

There is a race condition for an established connection that is being closed
by the guest: the refcnt is 4 at the end of hvs_release() (Note: here the
'remove_sock' is false):

1 for the initial value;
1 for the sk being in the bound list;
1 for the sk being in the connected list;
1 for the delayed close_work.

After hvs_release() finishes, __vsock_release() -> sock_put(sk) *may*
decrease the refcnt to 3.

Concurrently, hvs_close_connection() runs in another thread:
  calls vsock_remove_sock() to decrease the refcnt by 2;
  call sock_put() to decrease the refcnt to 0, and free the sk;
  next, the "release_sock(sk)" may hang due to use-after-free.

In the above, after hvs_release() finishes, if hvs_close_connection() runs
faster than "__vsock_release() -> sock_put(sk)", then there is not any issue,
because at the beginning of hvs_close_connection(), the refcnt is still 4.

The issue can be resolved if an extra reference is taken when the
connection is established.

Fixes: a9eeb998c28d ("hv_sock: Add support for delayed close")
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui 
Reviewed-by: Sunil Muthuswamy 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

vsock/virtio: change the maximum packet size allowed

2019-07-30T22:00:00+00:00

Since now we are able to split packets, we can avoid limiting
their sizes to VIRTIO_VSOCK_DEFAULT_RX_BUF_SIZE.
Instead, we can use VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE as the max
packet size.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella 
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi 
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

vhost/vsock: split packets to send using multiple buffers

2019-07-30T22:00:00+00:00

If the packets to sent to the guest are bigger than the buffer
available, we can split them, using multiple buffers and fixing
the length in the packet header.
This is safe since virtio-vsock supports only stream sockets.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella 
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi 
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller