linux-stable.git/net/smc, branch linux-6.14.y Linux kernel stable tree net/smc: use the correct ndev to find pnetid by pnetid table 2025-05-29T09:12:42+00:00 Guangguan Wang guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com 2025-03-04T12:43:04+00:00 a5d9cc35fd0bf6d542f377b8b747573df58f0c18 [ Upstream commit bfc6c67ec2d64d0ca4e5cc3e1ac84298a10b8d62 ] When using smc_pnet in SMC, it will only search the pnetid in the base_ndev of the netdev hierarchy(both HW PNETID and User-defined sw pnetid). This may not work for some scenarios when using SMC in container on cloud environment. In container, there have choices of different container network, such as directly using host network, virtual network IPVLAN, veth, etc. Different choices of container network have different netdev hierarchy. Examples of netdev hierarchy show below. (eth0 and eth1 in host below is the netdev directly related to the physical device). _______________________________ | _________________ | | |POD | | | | | | | | eth0_________ | | | |____| |__| | | | | | | | | | | eth1|base_ndev| eth0_______ | | | | | RDMA || | host |_________| |_______|| --------------------------------- netdev hierarchy if directly using host network ________________________________ | _________________ | | |POD __________ | | | | |upper_ndev| | | | |eth0|__________| | | | |_______|_________| | | |lower netdev | | __|______ | | eth1| | eth0_______ | | |base_ndev| | RDMA || | host |_________| |_______|| --------------------------------- netdev hierarchy if using IPVLAN _______________________________ | _____________________ | | |POD _________ | | | | |base_ndev|| | | |eth0(veth)|_________|| | | |____________|________| | | |pairs | | _______|_ | | | | eth0_______ | | veth|base_ndev| | RDMA || | |_________| |_______|| | _________ | | eth1|base_ndev| | | host |_________| | --------------------------------- netdev hierarchy if using veth Due to some reasons, the eth1 in host is not RDMA attached netdevice, pnetid is needed to map the eth1(in host) with RDMA device so that POD can do SMC-R. Because the eth1(in host) is managed by CNI plugin(such as Terway, network management plugin in container environment), and in cloud environment the eth(in host) can dynamically be inserted by CNI when POD create and dynamically be removed by CNI when POD destroy and no POD related to the eth(in host) anymore. It is hard to config the pnetid to the eth1(in host). But it is easy to config the pnetid to the netdevice which can be seen in POD. When do SMC-R, both the container directly using host network and the container using veth network can successfully match the RDMA device, because the configured pnetid netdev is a base_ndev. But the container using IPVLAN can not successfully match the RDMA device and 0x03030000 fallback happens, because the configured pnetid netdev is not a base_ndev. Additionally, if config pnetid to the eth1(in host) also can not work for matching RDMA device when using veth network and doing SMC-R in POD. To resolve the problems list above, this patch extends to search user -defined sw pnetid in the clc handshake ndev when no pnetid can be found in the base_ndev, and the base_ndev take precedence over ndev for backward compatibility. This patch also can unify the pnetid setup of different network choices list above in container(Config user-defined sw pnetid in the netdevice can be seen in POD). Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit bfc6c67ec2d64d0ca4e5cc3e1ac84298a10b8d62 ]

When using smc_pnet in SMC, it will only search the pnetid in the
base_ndev of the netdev hierarchy(both HW PNETID and User-defined
sw pnetid). This may not work for some scenarios when using SMC in
container on cloud environment.
In container, there have choices of different container network,
such as directly using host network, virtual network IPVLAN, veth,
etc. Different choices of container network have different netdev
hierarchy. Examples of netdev hierarchy show below. (eth0 and eth1
in host below is the netdev directly related to the physical device).
            _______________________________
           |   _________________           |
           |  |POD              |          |
           |  |                 |          |
           |  | eth0_________   |          |
           |  |____|         |__|          |
           |       |         |             |
           |       |         |             |
           |   eth1|base_ndev| eth0_______ |
           |       |         |    | RDMA  ||
           | host  |_________|    |_______||
           ---------------------------------
     netdev hierarchy if directly using host network
           ________________________________
           |   _________________           |
           |  |POD  __________  |          |
           |  |    |upper_ndev| |          |
           |  |eth0|__________| |          |
           |  |_______|_________|          |
           |          |lower netdev        |
           |        __|______              |
           |   eth1|         | eth0_______ |
           |       |base_ndev|    | RDMA  ||
           | host  |_________|    |_______||
           ---------------------------------
            netdev hierarchy if using IPVLAN
            _______________________________
           |   _____________________       |
           |  |POD        _________ |      |
           |  |          |base_ndev||      |
           |  |eth0(veth)|_________||      |
           |  |____________|________|      |
           |               |pairs          |
           |        _______|_              |
           |       |         | eth0_______ |
           |   veth|base_ndev|    | RDMA  ||
           |       |_________|    |_______||
           |        _________              |
           |   eth1|base_ndev|             |
           | host  |_________|             |
           ---------------------------------
             netdev hierarchy if using veth
Due to some reasons, the eth1 in host is not RDMA attached netdevice,
pnetid is needed to map the eth1(in host) with RDMA device so that POD
can do SMC-R. Because the eth1(in host) is managed by CNI plugin(such
as Terway, network management plugin in container environment), and in
cloud environment the eth(in host) can dynamically be inserted by CNI
when POD create and dynamically be removed by CNI when POD destroy and
no POD related to the eth(in host) anymore. It is hard to config the
pnetid to the eth1(in host). But it is easy to config the pnetid to the
netdevice which can be seen in POD. When do SMC-R, both the container
directly using host network and the container using veth network can
successfully match the RDMA device, because the configured pnetid netdev
is a base_ndev. But the container using IPVLAN can not successfully
match the RDMA device and 0x03030000 fallback happens, because the
configured pnetid netdev is not a base_ndev. Additionally, if config
pnetid to the eth1(in host) also can not work for matching RDMA device
when using veth network and doing SMC-R in POD.

To resolve the problems list above, this patch extends to search user
-defined sw pnetid in the clc handshake ndev when no pnetid can be found
in the base_ndev, and the base_ndev take precedence over ndev for backward
compatibility. This patch also can unify the pnetid setup of different
network choices list above in container(Config user-defined sw pnetid in
the netdevice can be seen in POD).

Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
smc: Fix lockdep false-positive for IPPROTO_SMC. 2025-04-25T08:50:52+00:00 Kuniyuki Iwashima kuniyu@amazon.com 2025-04-07T17:03:17+00:00 a7695fcf586142cfad66ed9e10d229446c20f8b8 [ Upstream commit 752e2217d789be2c6a6ac66554b981cd71cd9f31 ] SMC consists of two sockets: smc_sock and kernel TCP socket. Currently, there are two ways of creating the sockets, and syzbot reported a lockdep splat [0] for the newer way introduced by commit d25a92ccae6b ("net/smc: Introduce IPPROTO_SMC"). socket(AF_SMC , SOCK_STREAM, SMCPROTO_SMC or SMCPROTO_SMC6) socket(AF_INET or AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_SMC) When a socket is allocated, sock_lock_init() sets a lockdep lock class to sk->sk_lock.slock based on its protocol family. In the IPPROTO_SMC case, AF_INET or AF_INET6 lock class is assigned to smc_sock. The repro sets IPV6_JOIN_ANYCAST for IPv6 UDP and SMC socket and exercises smc_switch_to_fallback() for IPPROTO_SMC. 1. smc_switch_to_fallback() is called under lock_sock() and holds smc->clcsock_release_lock. sk_lock-AF_INET6 -> &smc->clcsock_release_lock (sk_lock-AF_SMC) 2. Setting IPV6_JOIN_ANYCAST to SMC holds smc->clcsock_release_lock and calls setsockopt() for the kernel TCP socket, which holds RTNL and the kernel socket's lock_sock(). &smc->clcsock_release_lock -> rtnl_mutex (-> k-sk_lock-AF_INET6) 3. Setting IPV6_JOIN_ANYCAST to UDP holds RTNL and lock_sock(). rtnl_mutex -> sk_lock-AF_INET6 Then, lockdep detects a false-positive circular locking, .-> sk_lock-AF_INET6 -> &smc->clcsock_release_lock -> rtnl_mutex -. `-----------------------------------------------------------------' but IPPROTO_SMC should have the same locking rule as AF_SMC. sk_lock-AF_SMC -> &smc->clcsock_release_lock -> rtnl_mutex -> k-sk_lock-AF_INET6 Let's set the same lock class for smc_sock. Given AF_SMC uses the same lock class for SMCPROTO_SMC and SMCPROTO_SMC6, we do not need to separate the class for AF_INET and AF_INET6. [0]: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.14.0-rc3-syzkaller-00267-gff202c5028a1 #0 Not tainted syz.4.1528/11571 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff8fef8de8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ipv6_sock_ac_close+0xd9/0x110 net/ipv6/anycast.c:220 but task is already holding lock: ffff888027f596a8 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: smc_clcsock_release+0x75/0xe0 net/smc/smc_close.c:30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x19b/0xb10 kernel/locking/mutex.c:730 smc_switch_to_fallback+0x2d/0xa00 net/smc/af_smc.c:903 smc_sendmsg+0x13d/0x520 net/smc/af_smc.c:2781 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:718 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:733 [inline] ____sys_sendmsg+0xaaf/0xc90 net/socket.c:2573 ___sys_sendmsg+0x135/0x1e0 net/socket.c:2627 __sys_sendmsg+0x16e/0x220 net/socket.c:2659 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_sock_nested+0x3a/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3645 lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1624 [inline] sockopt_lock_sock net/core/sock.c:1133 [inline] sockopt_lock_sock+0x54/0x70 net/core/sock.c:1124 do_ipv6_setsockopt+0x2160/0x4520 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:567 ipv6_setsockopt+0xcb/0x170 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:993 udpv6_setsockopt+0x7d/0xd0 net/ipv6/udp.c:1850 do_sock_setsockopt+0x222/0x480 net/socket.c:2303 __sys_setsockopt+0x1a0/0x230 net/socket.c:2328 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2334 [inline] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2331 [inline] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xbd/0x160 net/socket.c:2331 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3163 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3282 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3906 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x249e/0x3c40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5228 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x19b/0xb10 kernel/locking/mutex.c:730 ipv6_sock_ac_close+0xd9/0x110 net/ipv6/anycast.c:220 inet6_release+0x47/0x70 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:485 __sock_release net/socket.c:647 [inline] sock_release+0x8e/0x1d0 net/socket.c:675 smc_clcsock_release+0xb7/0xe0 net/smc/smc_close.c:34 __smc_release+0x5c2/0x880 net/smc/af_smc.c:301 smc_release+0x1fc/0x5f0 net/smc/af_smc.c:344 __sock_release+0xb0/0x270 net/socket.c:647 sock_close+0x1c/0x30 net/socket.c:1398 __fput+0x3ff/0xb70 fs/file_table.c:464 task_work_run+0x14e/0x250 kernel/task_work.c:227 resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x27b/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xda/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: rtnl_mutex --> sk_lock-AF_INET6 --> &smc->clcsock_release_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_INET6); lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock); lock(rtnl_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by syz.4.1528/11571: #0: ffff888077e88208 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:877 [inline] #0: ffff888077e88208 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __sock_release+0x86/0x270 net/socket.c:646 #1: ffff888027f596a8 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: smc_clcsock_release+0x75/0xe0 net/smc/smc_close.c:30 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 11571 Comm: syz.4.1528 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc3-syzkaller-00267-gff202c5028a1 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/12/2025 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_circular_bug+0x490/0x760 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2076 check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2208 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3163 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3282 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3906 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x249e/0x3c40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5228 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x19b/0xb10 kernel/locking/mutex.c:730 ipv6_sock_ac_close+0xd9/0x110 net/ipv6/anycast.c:220 inet6_release+0x47/0x70 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:485 __sock_release net/socket.c:647 [inline] sock_release+0x8e/0x1d0 net/socket.c:675 smc_clcsock_release+0xb7/0xe0 net/smc/smc_close.c:34 __smc_release+0x5c2/0x880 net/smc/af_smc.c:301 smc_release+0x1fc/0x5f0 net/smc/af_smc.c:344 __sock_release+0xb0/0x270 net/socket.c:647 sock_close+0x1c/0x30 net/socket.c:1398 __fput+0x3ff/0xb70 fs/file_table.c:464 task_work_run+0x14e/0x250 kernel/task_work.c:227 resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x27b/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xda/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f8b4b38d169 Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffe4efd22d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000001b4 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000000b14a3 RCX: 00007f8b4b38d169 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000001e RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007f8b4b5a7ba0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 000000114efd25cf R10: 00007f8b4b200000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f8b4b5a5fac R13: 00007f8b4b5a5fa0 R14: ffffffffffffffff R15: 00007ffe4efd23f0 </TASK> Fixes: d25a92ccae6b ("net/smc: Introduce IPPROTO_SMC") Reported-by: syzbot+be6f4b383534d88989f7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=be6f4b383534d88989f7 Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250407170332.26959-1-kuniyu@amazon.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 752e2217d789be2c6a6ac66554b981cd71cd9f31 ]

SMC consists of two sockets: smc_sock and kernel TCP socket.

Currently, there are two ways of creating the sockets, and syzbot reported
a lockdep splat [0] for the newer way introduced by commit d25a92ccae6b
("net/smc: Introduce IPPROTO_SMC").

  socket(AF_SMC             , SOCK_STREAM, SMCPROTO_SMC or SMCPROTO_SMC6)
  socket(AF_INET or AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_SMC)

When a socket is allocated, sock_lock_init() sets a lockdep lock class to
sk->sk_lock.slock based on its protocol family.  In the IPPROTO_SMC case,
AF_INET or AF_INET6 lock class is assigned to smc_sock.

The repro sets IPV6_JOIN_ANYCAST for IPv6 UDP and SMC socket and exercises
smc_switch_to_fallback() for IPPROTO_SMC.

  1. smc_switch_to_fallback() is called under lock_sock() and holds
     smc->clcsock_release_lock.

      sk_lock-AF_INET6 -> &smc->clcsock_release_lock
      (sk_lock-AF_SMC)

  2. Setting IPV6_JOIN_ANYCAST to SMC holds smc->clcsock_release_lock
     and calls setsockopt() for the kernel TCP socket, which holds RTNL
     and the kernel socket's lock_sock().

      &smc->clcsock_release_lock -> rtnl_mutex (-> k-sk_lock-AF_INET6)

  3. Setting IPV6_JOIN_ANYCAST to UDP holds RTNL and lock_sock().

      rtnl_mutex -> sk_lock-AF_INET6

Then, lockdep detects a false-positive circular locking,

  .-> sk_lock-AF_INET6 -> &smc->clcsock_release_lock -> rtnl_mutex -.
  `-----------------------------------------------------------------'

but IPPROTO_SMC should have the same locking rule as AF_SMC.

      sk_lock-AF_SMC   -> &smc->clcsock_release_lock -> rtnl_mutex -> k-sk_lock-AF_INET6

Let's set the same lock class for smc_sock.

Given AF_SMC uses the same lock class for SMCPROTO_SMC and SMCPROTO_SMC6,
we do not need to separate the class for AF_INET and AF_INET6.

[0]:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.14.0-rc3-syzkaller-00267-gff202c5028a1 #0 Not tainted

syz.4.1528/11571 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8fef8de8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ipv6_sock_ac_close+0xd9/0x110 net/ipv6/anycast.c:220

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888027f596a8 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: smc_clcsock_release+0x75/0xe0 net/smc/smc_close.c:30

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #2 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x19b/0xb10 kernel/locking/mutex.c:730
       smc_switch_to_fallback+0x2d/0xa00 net/smc/af_smc.c:903
       smc_sendmsg+0x13d/0x520 net/smc/af_smc.c:2781
       sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:718 [inline]
       __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:733 [inline]
       ____sys_sendmsg+0xaaf/0xc90 net/socket.c:2573
       ___sys_sendmsg+0x135/0x1e0 net/socket.c:2627
       __sys_sendmsg+0x16e/0x220 net/socket.c:2659
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

 -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       lock_sock_nested+0x3a/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3645
       lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1624 [inline]
       sockopt_lock_sock net/core/sock.c:1133 [inline]
       sockopt_lock_sock+0x54/0x70 net/core/sock.c:1124
       do_ipv6_setsockopt+0x2160/0x4520 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:567
       ipv6_setsockopt+0xcb/0x170 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:993
       udpv6_setsockopt+0x7d/0xd0 net/ipv6/udp.c:1850
       do_sock_setsockopt+0x222/0x480 net/socket.c:2303
       __sys_setsockopt+0x1a0/0x230 net/socket.c:2328
       __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2334 [inline]
       __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2331 [inline]
       __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xbd/0x160 net/socket.c:2331
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

 -> #0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3163 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3282 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3906 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x249e/0x3c40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5228
       lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x19b/0xb10 kernel/locking/mutex.c:730
       ipv6_sock_ac_close+0xd9/0x110 net/ipv6/anycast.c:220
       inet6_release+0x47/0x70 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:485
       __sock_release net/socket.c:647 [inline]
       sock_release+0x8e/0x1d0 net/socket.c:675
       smc_clcsock_release+0xb7/0xe0 net/smc/smc_close.c:34
       __smc_release+0x5c2/0x880 net/smc/af_smc.c:301
       smc_release+0x1fc/0x5f0 net/smc/af_smc.c:344
       __sock_release+0xb0/0x270 net/socket.c:647
       sock_close+0x1c/0x30 net/socket.c:1398
       __fput+0x3ff/0xb70 fs/file_table.c:464
       task_work_run+0x14e/0x250 kernel/task_work.c:227
       resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline]
       exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline]
       exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline]
       __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline]
       syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x27b/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218
       do_syscall_64+0xda/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  rtnl_mutex --> sk_lock-AF_INET6 --> &smc->clcsock_release_lock

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
                               lock(sk_lock-AF_INET6);
                               lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
  lock(rtnl_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by syz.4.1528/11571:
 #0: ffff888077e88208 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:877 [inline]
 #0: ffff888077e88208 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __sock_release+0x86/0x270 net/socket.c:646
 #1: ffff888027f596a8 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: smc_clcsock_release+0x75/0xe0 net/smc/smc_close.c:30

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 11571 Comm: syz.4.1528 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc3-syzkaller-00267-gff202c5028a1 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/12/2025
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_circular_bug+0x490/0x760 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2076
 check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2208
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3163 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3282 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3906 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x249e/0x3c40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5228
 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851
 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline]
 __mutex_lock+0x19b/0xb10 kernel/locking/mutex.c:730
 ipv6_sock_ac_close+0xd9/0x110 net/ipv6/anycast.c:220
 inet6_release+0x47/0x70 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:485
 __sock_release net/socket.c:647 [inline]
 sock_release+0x8e/0x1d0 net/socket.c:675
 smc_clcsock_release+0xb7/0xe0 net/smc/smc_close.c:34
 __smc_release+0x5c2/0x880 net/smc/af_smc.c:301
 smc_release+0x1fc/0x5f0 net/smc/af_smc.c:344
 __sock_release+0xb0/0x270 net/socket.c:647
 sock_close+0x1c/0x30 net/socket.c:1398
 __fput+0x3ff/0xb70 fs/file_table.c:464
 task_work_run+0x14e/0x250 kernel/task_work.c:227
 resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline]
 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline]
 exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline]
 __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline]
 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x27b/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218
 do_syscall_64+0xda/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f8b4b38d169
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffe4efd22d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000001b4
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000000b14a3 RCX: 00007f8b4b38d169
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000001e RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007f8b4b5a7ba0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 000000114efd25cf
R10: 00007f8b4b200000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f8b4b5a5fac
R13: 00007f8b4b5a5fa0 R14: ffffffffffffffff R15: 00007ffe4efd23f0
 </TASK>

Fixes: d25a92ccae6b ("net/smc: Introduce IPPROTO_SMC")
Reported-by: syzbot+be6f4b383534d88989f7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=be6f4b383534d88989f7
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250407170332.26959-1-kuniyu@amazon.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
net: better track kernel sockets lifetime 2025-02-22T00:00:58+00:00 Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com 2025-02-20T13:18:54+00:00 5c70eb5c593d64d93b178905da215a9fd288a4b5 While kernel sockets are dismantled during pernet_operations->exit(), their freeing can be delayed by any tx packets still held in qdisc or device queues, due to skb_set_owner_w() prior calls. This then trigger the following warning from ref_tracker_dir_exit() [1] To fix this, make sure that kernel sockets own a reference on net->passive. Add sk_net_refcnt_upgrade() helper, used whenever a kernel socket is converted to a refcounted one. [1] [ 136.263918][ T35] ref_tracker: net notrefcnt@ffff8880638f01e0 has 1/2 users at [ 136.263918][ T35] sk_alloc+0x2b3/0x370 [ 136.263918][ T35] inet6_create+0x6ce/0x10f0 [ 136.263918][ T35] __sock_create+0x4c0/0xa30 [ 136.263918][ T35] inet_ctl_sock_create+0xc2/0x250 [ 136.263918][ T35] igmp6_net_init+0x39/0x390 [ 136.263918][ T35] ops_init+0x31e/0x590 [ 136.263918][ T35] setup_net+0x287/0x9e0 [ 136.263918][ T35] copy_net_ns+0x33f/0x570 [ 136.263918][ T35] create_new_namespaces+0x425/0x7b0 [ 136.263918][ T35] unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x124/0x180 [ 136.263918][ T35] ksys_unshare+0x57d/0xa70 [ 136.263918][ T35] __x64_sys_unshare+0x38/0x40 [ 136.263918][ T35] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 [ 136.263918][ T35] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f [ 136.263918][ T35] [ 136.343488][ T35] ref_tracker: net notrefcnt@ffff8880638f01e0 has 1/2 users at [ 136.343488][ T35] sk_alloc+0x2b3/0x370 [ 136.343488][ T35] inet6_create+0x6ce/0x10f0 [ 136.343488][ T35] __sock_create+0x4c0/0xa30 [ 136.343488][ T35] inet_ctl_sock_create+0xc2/0x250 [ 136.343488][ T35] ndisc_net_init+0xa7/0x2b0 [ 136.343488][ T35] ops_init+0x31e/0x590 [ 136.343488][ T35] setup_net+0x287/0x9e0 [ 136.343488][ T35] copy_net_ns+0x33f/0x570 [ 136.343488][ T35] create_new_namespaces+0x425/0x7b0 [ 136.343488][ T35] unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x124/0x180 [ 136.343488][ T35] ksys_unshare+0x57d/0xa70 [ 136.343488][ T35] __x64_sys_unshare+0x38/0x40 [ 136.343488][ T35] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 [ 136.343488][ T35] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: 0cafd77dcd03 ("net: add a refcount tracker for kernel sockets") Reported-by: syzbot+30a19e01a97420719891@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/67b72aeb.050a0220.14d86d.0283.GAE@google.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250220131854.4048077-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> 
While kernel sockets are dismantled during pernet_operations->exit(),
their freeing can be delayed by any tx packets still held in qdisc
or device queues, due to skb_set_owner_w() prior calls.

This then trigger the following warning from ref_tracker_dir_exit() [1]

To fix this, make sure that kernel sockets own a reference on net->passive.

Add sk_net_refcnt_upgrade() helper, used whenever a kernel socket
is converted to a refcounted one.

[1]

[  136.263918][   T35] ref_tracker: net notrefcnt@ffff8880638f01e0 has 1/2 users at
[  136.263918][   T35]      sk_alloc+0x2b3/0x370
[  136.263918][   T35]      inet6_create+0x6ce/0x10f0
[  136.263918][   T35]      __sock_create+0x4c0/0xa30
[  136.263918][   T35]      inet_ctl_sock_create+0xc2/0x250
[  136.263918][   T35]      igmp6_net_init+0x39/0x390
[  136.263918][   T35]      ops_init+0x31e/0x590
[  136.263918][   T35]      setup_net+0x287/0x9e0
[  136.263918][   T35]      copy_net_ns+0x33f/0x570
[  136.263918][   T35]      create_new_namespaces+0x425/0x7b0
[  136.263918][   T35]      unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x124/0x180
[  136.263918][   T35]      ksys_unshare+0x57d/0xa70
[  136.263918][   T35]      __x64_sys_unshare+0x38/0x40
[  136.263918][   T35]      do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230
[  136.263918][   T35]      entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
[  136.263918][   T35]
[  136.343488][   T35] ref_tracker: net notrefcnt@ffff8880638f01e0 has 1/2 users at
[  136.343488][   T35]      sk_alloc+0x2b3/0x370
[  136.343488][   T35]      inet6_create+0x6ce/0x10f0
[  136.343488][   T35]      __sock_create+0x4c0/0xa30
[  136.343488][   T35]      inet_ctl_sock_create+0xc2/0x250
[  136.343488][   T35]      ndisc_net_init+0xa7/0x2b0
[  136.343488][   T35]      ops_init+0x31e/0x590
[  136.343488][   T35]      setup_net+0x287/0x9e0
[  136.343488][   T35]      copy_net_ns+0x33f/0x570
[  136.343488][   T35]      create_new_namespaces+0x425/0x7b0
[  136.343488][   T35]      unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x124/0x180
[  136.343488][   T35]      ksys_unshare+0x57d/0xa70
[  136.343488][   T35]      __x64_sys_unshare+0x38/0x40
[  136.343488][   T35]      do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230
[  136.343488][   T35]      entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

Fixes: 0cafd77dcd03 ("net: add a refcount tracker for kernel sockets")
Reported-by: syzbot+30a19e01a97420719891@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/67b72aeb.050a0220.14d86d.0283.GAE@google.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250220131854.4048077-1-edumazet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
net/smc: fix data error when recvmsg with MSG_PEEK flag 2025-01-14T02:59:00+00:00 Guangguan Wang guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com 2025-01-04T14:32:01+00:00 a4b6539038c1aa1ae871aacf6e41b566c3613993 When recvmsg with MSG_PEEK flag, the data will be copied to user's buffer without advancing consume cursor and without reducing the length of rx available data. Once the expected peek length is larger than the value of bytes_to_rcv, in the loop of do while in smc_rx_recvmsg, the first loop will copy bytes_to_rcv bytes of data from the position local_tx_ctrl.cons, the second loop will copy the min(bytes_to_rcv, read_remaining) bytes from the position local_tx_ctrl.cons again because of the lacking of process with advancing consume cursor and reducing the length of available data. So do the subsequent loops. The data copied in the second loop and the subsequent loops will result in data error, as it should not be copied if no more data arrives and it should be copied from the position advancing bytes_to_rcv bytes from the local_tx_ctrl.cons if more data arrives. This issue can be reproduce by the following python script: server.py: import socket import time server_ip = '0.0.0.0' server_port = 12346 server_socket = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) server_socket.bind((server_ip, server_port)) server_socket.listen(1) print('Server is running and listening for connections...') conn, addr = server_socket.accept() print('Connected by', addr) while True: data = conn.recv(1024) if not data: break print('Received request:', data.decode()) conn.sendall(b'Hello, client!\n') time.sleep(5) conn.sendall(b'Hello, again!\n') conn.close() client.py: import socket server_ip = '<server ip>' server_port = 12346 resp=b'Hello, client!\nHello, again!\n' client_socket = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) client_socket.connect((server_ip, server_port)) request = 'Hello, server!' client_socket.sendall(request.encode()) peek_data = client_socket.recv(len(resp), socket.MSG_PEEK | socket.MSG_WAITALL) print('Peeked data:', peek_data.decode()) client_socket.close() Fixes: 952310ccf2d8 ("smc: receive data from RMBE") Reported-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250104143201.35529-1-guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> 
When recvmsg with MSG_PEEK flag, the data will be copied to
user's buffer without advancing consume cursor and without
reducing the length of rx available data. Once the expected
peek length is larger than the value of bytes_to_rcv, in the
loop of do while in smc_rx_recvmsg, the first loop will copy
bytes_to_rcv bytes of data from the position local_tx_ctrl.cons,
the second loop will copy the min(bytes_to_rcv, read_remaining)
bytes from the position local_tx_ctrl.cons again because of the
lacking of process with advancing consume cursor and reducing
the length of available data. So do the subsequent loops. The
data copied in the second loop and the subsequent loops will
result in data error, as it should not be copied if no more data
arrives and it should be copied from the position advancing
bytes_to_rcv bytes from the local_tx_ctrl.cons if more data arrives.

This issue can be reproduce by the following python script:
server.py:
import socket
import time
server_ip = '0.0.0.0'
server_port = 12346
server_socket = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
server_socket.bind((server_ip, server_port))
server_socket.listen(1)
print('Server is running and listening for connections...')
conn, addr = server_socket.accept()
print('Connected by', addr)
while True:
    data = conn.recv(1024)
    if not data:
        break
    print('Received request:', data.decode())
    conn.sendall(b'Hello, client!\n')
    time.sleep(5)
    conn.sendall(b'Hello, again!\n')
conn.close()

client.py:
import socket
server_ip = '<server ip>'
server_port = 12346
resp=b'Hello, client!\nHello, again!\n'
client_socket = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
client_socket.connect((server_ip, server_port))
request = 'Hello, server!'
client_socket.sendall(request.encode())
peek_data = client_socket.recv(len(resp),
    socket.MSG_PEEK | socket.MSG_WAITALL)
print('Peeked data:', peek_data.decode())
client_socket.close()

Fixes: 952310ccf2d8 ("smc: receive data from RMBE")
Reported-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250104143201.35529-1-guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
net/smc: delete pointless divide by one 2025-01-11T21:08:54+00:00 Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@linaro.org 2025-01-08T09:26:06+00:00 10bc9761d12e440656062ef78cd889bbfa827dcf Here "buf" is a void pointer so sizeof(*buf) is one. Doing a divide by one makes the code less readable. Delete it. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/ee1a790b-f874-4512-b3ae-9c45f99dc640@stanley.mountain Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> 
Here "buf" is a void pointer so sizeof(*buf) is one.  Doing a divide
by one makes the code less readable.  Delete it.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/ee1a790b-f874-4512-b3ae-9c45f99dc640@stanley.mountain
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net 2024-12-19T19:35:07+00:00 Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org 2024-12-05T19:48:58+00:00 07e5c4eb94e6aba96fa11b424b39c5e5576a7713 Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR (net-6.13-rc4). No conflicts. Adjacent changes: drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.h 32fd46f5b69e ("net: renesas: rswitch: remove speed from gwca structure") 922b4b955a03 ("net: renesas: rswitch: rework ts tags management") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> 
Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR (net-6.13-rc4).

No conflicts.

Adjacent changes:

drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.h
  32fd46f5b69e ("net: renesas: rswitch: remove speed from gwca structure")
  922b4b955a03 ("net: renesas: rswitch: rework ts tags management")

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
net/smc: check return value of sock_recvmsg when draining clc data 2024-12-15T12:34:59+00:00 Guangguan Wang guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com 2024-12-11T09:21:21+00:00 c5b8ee5022a19464783058dc6042e8eefa34e8cd When receiving clc msg, the field length in smc_clc_msg_hdr indicates the length of msg should be received from network and the value should not be fully trusted as it is from the network. Once the value of length exceeds the value of buflen in function smc_clc_wait_msg it may run into deadloop when trying to drain the remaining data exceeding buflen. This patch checks the return value of sock_recvmsg when draining data in case of deadloop in draining. Fixes: fb4f79264c0f ("net/smc: tolerate future SMCD versions") Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
When receiving clc msg, the field length in smc_clc_msg_hdr indicates the
length of msg should be received from network and the value should not be
fully trusted as it is from the network. Once the value of length exceeds
the value of buflen in function smc_clc_wait_msg it may run into deadloop
when trying to drain the remaining data exceeding buflen.

This patch checks the return value of sock_recvmsg when draining data in
case of deadloop in draining.

Fixes: fb4f79264c0f ("net/smc: tolerate future SMCD versions")
Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
net/smc: check smcd_v2_ext_offset when receiving proposal msg 2024-12-15T12:34:59+00:00 Guangguan Wang guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com 2024-12-11T09:21:20+00:00 9ab332deb671d8f7e66d82a2ff2b3f715bc3a4ad When receiving proposal msg in server, the field smcd_v2_ext_offset in proposal msg is from the remote client and can not be fully trusted. Once the value of smcd_v2_ext_offset exceed the max value, there has the chance to access wrong address, and crash may happen. This patch checks the value of smcd_v2_ext_offset before using it. Fixes: 5c21c4ccafe8 ("net/smc: determine accepted ISM devices") Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
When receiving proposal msg in server, the field smcd_v2_ext_offset in
proposal msg is from the remote client and can not be fully trusted.
Once the value of smcd_v2_ext_offset exceed the max value, there has
the chance to access wrong address, and crash may happen.

This patch checks the value of smcd_v2_ext_offset before using it.

Fixes: 5c21c4ccafe8 ("net/smc: determine accepted ISM devices")
Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
net/smc: check v2_ext_offset/eid_cnt/ism_gid_cnt when receiving proposal msg 2024-12-15T12:34:59+00:00 Guangguan Wang guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com 2024-12-11T09:21:19+00:00 7863c9f3d24ba49dbead7e03dfbe40deb5888fdf When receiving proposal msg in server, the fields v2_ext_offset/ eid_cnt/ism_gid_cnt in proposal msg are from the remote client and can not be fully trusted. Especially the field v2_ext_offset, once exceed the max value, there has the chance to access wrong address, and crash may happen. This patch checks the fields v2_ext_offset/eid_cnt/ism_gid_cnt before using them. Fixes: 8c3dca341aea ("net/smc: build and send V2 CLC proposal") Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
When receiving proposal msg in server, the fields v2_ext_offset/
eid_cnt/ism_gid_cnt in proposal msg are from the remote client
and can not be fully trusted. Especially the field v2_ext_offset,
once exceed the max value, there has the chance to access wrong
address, and crash may happen.

This patch checks the fields v2_ext_offset/eid_cnt/ism_gid_cnt
before using them.

Fixes: 8c3dca341aea ("net/smc: build and send V2 CLC proposal")
Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
net/smc: check iparea_offset and ipv6_prefixes_cnt when receiving proposal msg 2024-12-15T12:34:59+00:00 Guangguan Wang guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com 2024-12-11T09:21:18+00:00 a29e220d3c8edbf0e1beb0f028878a4a85966556 When receiving proposal msg in server, the field iparea_offset and the field ipv6_prefixes_cnt in proposal msg are from the remote client and can not be fully trusted. Especially the field iparea_offset, once exceed the max value, there has the chance to access wrong address, and crash may happen. This patch checks iparea_offset and ipv6_prefixes_cnt before using them. Fixes: e7b7a64a8493 ("smc: support variable CLC proposal messages") Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
When receiving proposal msg in server, the field iparea_offset
and the field ipv6_prefixes_cnt in proposal msg are from the
remote client and can not be fully trusted. Especially the
field iparea_offset, once exceed the max value, there has the
chance to access wrong address, and crash may happen.

This patch checks iparea_offset and ipv6_prefixes_cnt before using them.

Fixes: e7b7a64a8493 ("smc: support variable CLC proposal messages")
Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>