linux-stable.git/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c, branch linux-4.9.y

rxrpc: Return an error to sendmsg if call failed

2022-06-14T14:52:30+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4ba68c5192554876bd8c3afd904e3064d2915341 ]

If at the end of rxrpc sendmsg() or rxrpc_kernel_send_data() the call that
was being given data was aborted remotely or otherwise failed, return an
error rather than returning the amount of data buffered for transmission.

The call (presumably) did not complete, so there's not much point
continuing with it.  AF_RXRPC considers it "complete" and so will be
unwilling to do anything else with it - and won't send a notification for
it, deeming the return from sendmsg sufficient.

Not returning an error causes afs to incorrectly handle a StoreData
operation that gets interrupted by a change of address due to NAT
reconfiguration.

This doesn't normally affect most operations since their request parameters
tend to fit into a single UDP packet and afs_make_call() returns before the
server responds; StoreData is different as it involves transmission of a
lot of data.

This can be triggered on a client by doing something like:

	dd if=/dev/zero of=/afs/example.com/foo bs=1M count=512

at one prompt, and then changing the network address at another prompt,
e.g.:

	ifconfig enp6s0 inet 192.168.6.2 && route add 192.168.6.1 dev enp6s0

Tracing packets on an Auristor fileserver looks something like:

192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.3  RX 107 ACK Idle  Seq: 0  Call: 4  Source Port: 7000  Destination Port: 7001
192.168.6.3 -> 192.168.6.1  AFS (RX) 1482 FS Request: Unknown(64538) (64538)
192.168.6.3 -> 192.168.6.1  AFS (RX) 1482 FS Request: Unknown(64538) (64538)
192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.3  RX 107 ACK Idle  Seq: 0  Call: 4  Source Port: 7000  Destination Port: 7001

192.168.6.2 -> 192.168.6.1  AFS (RX) 1482 FS Request: Unknown(0) (0)
192.168.6.2 -> 192.168.6.1  AFS (RX) 1482 FS Request: Unknown(0) (0)
192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.2  RX 107 ACK Exceeds Window  Seq: 0  Call: 4  Source Port: 7000  Destination Port: 7001
192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.2  RX 74 ABORT  Seq: 0  Call: 4  Source Port: 7000  Destination Port: 7001
192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.2  RX 74 ABORT  Seq: 29321  Call: 4  Source Port: 7000  Destination Port: 7001

The Auristor fileserver logs code -453 (RXGEN_SS_UNMARSHAL), but the abort
code received by kafs is -5 (RX_PROTOCOL_ERROR) as the rx layer sees the
condition and generates an abort first and the unmarshal error is a
consequence of that at the application layer.

Reported-by: Marc Dionne 
Signed-off-by: David Howells 
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2021-December/004810.html # v1
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rxrpc: Fix sendmsg() returning EPIPE due to recvmsg() returning ENODATA

2020-07-31T14:44:06+00:00

[ Upstream commit 639f181f0ee20d3249dbc55f740f0167267180f0 ]

rxrpc_sendmsg() returns EPIPE if there's an outstanding error, such as if
rxrpc_recvmsg() indicating ENODATA if there's nothing for it to read.

Change rxrpc_recvmsg() to return EAGAIN instead if there's nothing to read
as this particular error doesn't get stored in ->sk_err by the networking
core.

Also change rxrpc_sendmsg() so that it doesn't fail with delayed receive
errors (there's no way for it to report which call, if any, the error was
caused by).

Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both")
Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rxrpc: Fix Tx ring annotation after initial Tx failure

2018-05-30T05:50:42+00:00

[ Upstream commit 03877bf6a30cca7d4bc3ffabd3c3e9464a7a1a19 ]

rxrpc calls have a ring of packets that are awaiting ACK or retransmission
and a parallel ring of annotations that tracks the state of those packets.
If the initial transmission of a packet on the underlying UDP socket fails
then the packet annotation is marked for resend - but the setting of this
mark accidentally erases the last-packet mark also stored in the same
annotation slot.  If this happens, a call won't switch out of the Tx phase
when all the packets have been transmitted.

Fix this by retaining the last-packet mark and only altering the packet
state.

Fixes: 248f219cb8bc ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code")
Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rxrpc: Need to produce an ACK for service op if op takes a long time

2016-10-06T07:11:50+00:00

We need to generate a DELAY ACK from the service end of an operation if we
start doing the actual operation work and it takes longer than expected.
This will hard-ACK the request data and allow the client to release its
resources.

To make this work:

 (1) We have to set the ack timer and propose an ACK when the call moves to
     the RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_ACK_REQUEST and clear the pending ACK and cancel
     the timer when we start transmitting the reply (the first DATA packet
     of the reply implicitly ACKs the request phase).

 (2) It must be possible to set the timer when the caller is holding
     call->state_lock, so split the lock-getting part of the timer function
     out.

 (3) Add trace notes for the ACK we're requesting and the timer we clear.

Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Fix loss of PING RESPONSE ACK production due to PING ACKs

2016-10-06T07:11:49+00:00

Separate the output of PING ACKs from the output of other sorts of ACK so
that if we receive a PING ACK and schedule transmission of a PING RESPONSE
ACK, the response doesn't get cancelled by a PING ACK we happen to be
scheduling transmission of at the same time.

If a PING RESPONSE gets lost, the other side might just sit there waiting
for it and refuse to proceed otherwise.

Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Fix warning by splitting rxrpc_send_call_packet()

2016-10-06T07:11:49+00:00

Split rxrpc_send_data_packet() to separate ACK generation (which is more
complicated) from ABORT generation.  This simplifies the code a bit and
fixes the following warning:

In file included from ../net/rxrpc/output.c:20:0:
net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_send_call_packet':
net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h:1187:27: error: 'top' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
net/rxrpc/output.c:103:24: note: 'top' was declared here
net/rxrpc/output.c:225:25: error: 'hard_ack' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann 
Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Keep the call timeouts as ktimes rather than jiffies

2016-09-30T13:40:11+00:00

Keep that call timeouts as ktimes rather than jiffies so that they can be
expressed as functions of RTT.

Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Make Tx loss-injection go through normal return and adjust tracing

2016-09-29T21:37:15+00:00

In rxrpc_send_data_packet() make the loss-injection path return through the
same code as the transmission path so that the RTT determination is
initiated and any future timer shuffling will be done, despite the packet
having been binned.

Whilst we're at it:

 (1) Add to the tx_data tracepoint an indication of whether or not we're
     retransmitting a data packet.

 (2) When we're deciding whether or not to request an ACK, rather than
     checking if we're in fast-retransmit mode check instead if we're
     retransmitting.

 (3) Don't invoke the lose_skb tracepoint when losing a Tx packet as we're
     not altering the sk_buff refcount nor are we just seeing it after
     getting it off the Tx list.

 (4) The rxrpc_skb_tx_lost note is then no longer used so remove it.

 (5) rxrpc_lose_skb() no longer needs to deal with rxrpc_skb_tx_lost.

Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Implement slow-start

2016-09-24T22:49:46+00:00

Implement RxRPC slow-start, which is similar to RFC 5681 for TCP.  A
tracepoint is added to log the state of the congestion management algorithm
and the decisions it makes.

Notes:

 (1) Since we send fixed-size DATA packets (apart from the final packet in
     each phase), counters and calculations are in terms of packets rather
     than bytes.

 (2) The ACK packet carries the equivalent of TCP SACK.

 (3) The FLIGHT_SIZE calculation in RFC 5681 doesn't seem particularly
     suited to SACK of a small number of packets.  It seems that, almost
     inevitably, by the time three 'duplicate' ACKs have been seen, we have
     narrowed the loss down to one or two missing packets, and the
     FLIGHT_SIZE calculation ends up as 2.

 (4) In rxrpc_resend(), if there was no data that apparently needed
     retransmission, we transmit a PING ACK to ask the peer to tell us what
     its Rx window state is.

Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Add a tracepoint for the call timer

2016-09-23T14:49:19+00:00

Add a tracepoint to log call timer initiation, setting and expiry.

Signed-off-by: David Howells