linux-stable.git/net/rxrpc/protocol.h, branch v6.2 Linux kernel stable tree rxrpc: Clone received jumbo subpackets and queue separately 2022-11-08T16:42:28+00:00 David Howells dhowells@redhat.com 2022-10-07T16:44:39+00:00 d4d02d8bb5c412d977af7ea7c7ea91977a6a64dc Split up received jumbo packets into separate skbuffs by cloning the original skbuff for each subpacket and setting the offset and length of the data in that subpacket in the skbuff's private data. The subpackets are then placed on the recvmsg queue separately. The security class then gets to revise the offset and length to remove its metadata. If we fail to clone a packet, we just drop it and let the peer resend it. The original packet gets used for the final subpacket. This should make it easier to handle parallel decryption of the subpackets. It also simplifies the handling of lost or misordered packets in the queuing/buffering loop as the possibility of overlapping jumbo packets no longer needs to be considered. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org 
Split up received jumbo packets into separate skbuffs by cloning the
original skbuff for each subpacket and setting the offset and length of the
data in that subpacket in the skbuff's private data.  The subpackets are
then placed on the recvmsg queue separately.  The security class then gets
to revise the offset and length to remove its metadata.

If we fail to clone a packet, we just drop it and let the peer resend it.
The original packet gets used for the final subpacket.

This should make it easier to handle parallel decryption of the subpackets.
It also simplifies the handling of lost or misordered packets in the
queuing/buffering loop as the possibility of overlapping jumbo packets no
longer needs to be considered.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
rxrpc: Clean up ACK handling 2022-11-08T16:42:28+00:00 David Howells dhowells@redhat.com 2020-01-30T21:48:14+00:00 530403d9ba1c3f51c721a394f642e56309072295 Clean up the rxrpc_propose_ACK() function. If deferred PING ACK proposal is split out, it's only really needed for deferred DELAY ACKs. All other ACKs, bar terminal IDLE ACK are sent immediately. The deferred IDLE ACK submission can be handled by conversion of a DELAY ACK into an IDLE ACK if there's nothing to be SACK'd. Also, because there's a delay between an ACK being generated and being transmitted, it's possible that other ACKs of the same type will be generated during that interval. Apart from the ACK time and the serial number responded to, most of the ACK body, including window and SACK parameters, are not filled out till the point of transmission - so we can avoid generating a new ACK if there's one pending that will cover the SACK data we need to convey. Therefore, don't propose a new DELAY or IDLE ACK for a call if there's one already pending. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org 
Clean up the rxrpc_propose_ACK() function.  If deferred PING ACK proposal
is split out, it's only really needed for deferred DELAY ACKs.  All other
ACKs, bar terminal IDLE ACK are sent immediately.  The deferred IDLE ACK
submission can be handled by conversion of a DELAY ACK into an IDLE ACK if
there's nothing to be SACK'd.

Also, because there's a delay between an ACK being generated and being
transmitted, it's possible that other ACKs of the same type will be
generated during that interval.  Apart from the ACK time and the serial
number responded to, most of the ACK body, including window and SACK
parameters, are not filled out till the point of transmission - so we can
avoid generating a new ACK if there's one pending that will cover the SACK
data we need to convey.

Therefore, don't propose a new DELAY or IDLE ACK for a call if there's one
already pending.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
net: delete extra space and tab in blank line 2022-07-26T02:38:31+00:00 William Dean williamsukatube@gmail.com 2022-07-23T07:32:22+00:00 aa246499bb5f44bf4822ff1966213c14912c732c delete extra space and tab in blank line, there is no functional change. Reported-by: Hacash Robot <hacashRobot@santino.com> Signed-off-by: William Dean <williamsukatube@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220723073222.2961602-1-williamsukatube@163.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> 
delete extra space and tab in blank line, there is no functional change.

Reported-by: Hacash Robot <hacashRobot@santino.com>
Signed-off-by: William Dean <williamsukatube@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220723073222.2961602-1-williamsukatube@163.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
rxrpc: Improve jumbo packet counting 2019-08-27T08:48:37+00:00 David Howells dhowells@redhat.com 2019-08-19T08:25:37+00:00 c3c9e3df49f8d83db09d1f61c8bed54e7fed8662 Improve the information stored about jumbo packets so that we don't need to reparse them so much later. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com> 
Improve the information stored about jumbo packets so that we don't need to
reparse them so much later.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 152 2019-05-30T18:26:32+00:00 Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de 2019-05-27T06:55:01+00:00 2874c5fd284268364ece81a7bd936f3c8168e567 Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 3029 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070032.746973796@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

  this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
  it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
  the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
  your option any later version

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

  GPL-2.0-or-later

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 3029 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070032.746973796@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rxrpc: Improve up-front incoming packet checking 2018-09-28T09:32:31+00:00 David Howells dhowells@redhat.com 2018-09-27T14:13:08+00:00 403fc2a138457f1071b186786a7589ef7382c8bc Do more up-front checking on incoming packets to weed out invalid ones and also ones aimed at services that we don't support. Whilst we're at it, replace the clearing of call and skew if we don't find a connection with just initialising the variables to zero at the top of the function. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> 
Do more up-front checking on incoming packets to weed out invalid ones and
also ones aimed at services that we don't support.

Whilst we're at it, replace the clearing of call and skew if we don't find
a connection with just initialising the variables to zero at the top of the
function.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
rxrpc: Fix undefined packet handling 2018-04-04T15:04:08+00:00 David Howells dhowells@redhat.com 2018-04-02T22:51:39+00:00 b41d7cfef5696b4fb17a122d16e2fbf2a3bc0d9e By analogy with other Rx implementations, RxRPC packet types 9, 10 and 11 should just be discarded rather than being aborted like other undefined packet types. Reported-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
By analogy with other Rx implementations, RxRPC packet types 9, 10 and 11
should just be discarded rather than being aborted like other undefined
packet types.

Reported-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
rxrpc: Move the packet.h include file into net/rxrpc/ 2017-07-21T10:00:20+00:00 David Howells dhowells@redhat.com 2017-07-21T09:07:10+00:00 ddc6c70f07bb1f6dd39a2c6c430f7b4fa95199c8 Move the protocol description header file into net/rxrpc/ and rename it to protocol.h. It's no longer necessary to expose it as packets are no longer exposed to kernel services (such as AFS) that use the facility. The abort codes are transferred to the UAPI header instead as we pass these back to userspace and also to kernel services. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> 
Move the protocol description header file into net/rxrpc/ and rename it to
protocol.h.  It's no longer necessary to expose it as packets are no longer
exposed to kernel services (such as AFS) that use the facility.

The abort codes are transferred to the UAPI header instead as we pass these
back to userspace and also to kernel services.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>