linux-stable.git/net/rose, branch v4.14.331 Linux kernel stable tree net/rose: Fix to not accept on connected socket 2023-02-22T11:46:05+00:00 Hyunwoo Kim v4bel@theori.io 2023-01-25T10:59:44+00:00 d044166dde7345333cd05389ad45033ebd1e6852 [ Upstream commit 14caefcf9837a2be765a566005ad82cd0d2a429f ] If you call listen() and accept() on an already connect()ed rose socket, accept() can successfully connect. This is because when the peer socket sends data to sendmsg, the skb with its own sk stored in the connected socket's sk->sk_receive_queue is connected, and rose_accept() dequeues the skb waiting in the sk->sk_receive_queue. This creates a child socket with the sk of the parent rose socket, which can cause confusion. Fix rose_listen() to return -EINVAL if the socket has already been successfully connected, and add lock_sock to prevent this issue. Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@theori.io> Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230125105944.GA133314@ubuntu Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 14caefcf9837a2be765a566005ad82cd0d2a429f ]

If you call listen() and accept() on an already connect()ed
rose socket, accept() can successfully connect.
This is because when the peer socket sends data to sendmsg,
the skb with its own sk stored in the connected socket's
sk->sk_receive_queue is connected, and rose_accept() dequeues
the skb waiting in the sk->sk_receive_queue.

This creates a child socket with the sk of the parent
rose socket, which can cause confusion.

Fix rose_listen() to return -EINVAL if the socket has
already been successfully connected, and add lock_sock
to prevent this issue.

Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@theori.io>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230125105944.GA133314@ubuntu
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rose: Fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_send_frame() 2022-11-10T14:47:21+00:00 Zhang Qilong zhangqilong3@huawei.com 2022-10-28T16:10:49+00:00 bbc03d74e641e824754443b908454ca9e203773e [ Upstream commit e97c089d7a49f67027395ddf70bf327eeac2611e ] The syzkaller reported an issue: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000380-0x0000000000000387] CPU: 0 PID: 4069 Comm: kworker/0:15 Not tainted 6.0.0-syzkaller-02734-g0326074ff465 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/22/2022 Workqueue: rcu_gp srcu_invoke_callbacks RIP: 0010:rose_send_frame+0x1dd/0x2f0 net/rose/rose_link.c:101 Call Trace: <IRQ> rose_transmit_clear_request+0x1d5/0x290 net/rose/rose_link.c:255 rose_rx_call_request+0x4c0/0x1bc0 net/rose/af_rose.c:1009 rose_loopback_timer+0x19e/0x590 net/rose/rose_loopback.c:111 call_timer_fn+0x1a0/0x6b0 kernel/time/timer.c:1474 expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1519 [inline] __run_timers.part.0+0x674/0xa80 kernel/time/timer.c:1790 __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1768 [inline] run_timer_softirq+0xb3/0x1d0 kernel/time/timer.c:1803 __do_softirq+0x1d0/0x9c8 kernel/softirq.c:571 [...] </IRQ> It triggers NULL pointer dereference when 'neigh->dev->dev_addr' is called in the rose_send_frame(). It's the first occurrence of the `neigh` is in rose_loopback_timer() as `rose_loopback_neigh', and the 'dev' in 'rose_loopback_neigh' is initialized sa nullptr. It had been fixed by commit 3b3fd068c56e3fbea30090859216a368398e39bf ("rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()") ever. But it's introduced by commit 3c53cd65dece47dd1f9d3a809f32e59d1d87b2b8 ("rose: check NULL rose_loopback_neigh->loopback") again. We fix it by add NULL check in rose_transmit_clear_request(). When the 'dev' in 'neigh' is NULL, we don't reply the request and just clear it. syzkaller don't provide repro, and I provide a syz repro like: r0 = syz_init_net_socket$bt_sco(0x1f, 0x5, 0x2) ioctl$sock_inet_SIOCSIFFLAGS(r0, 0x8914, &(0x7f0000000180)={'rose0\x00', 0x201}) r1 = syz_init_net_socket$rose(0xb, 0x5, 0x0) bind$rose(r1, &(0x7f00000000c0)=@full={0xb, @dev, @null, 0x0, [@null, @null, @netrom, @netrom, @default, @null]}, 0x40) connect$rose(r1, &(0x7f0000000240)=@short={0xb, @dev={0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0x1, 0x0}, @remote={0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0x1}, 0x1, @netrom={0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0x0, 0x0}}, 0x1c) Fixes: 3c53cd65dece ("rose: check NULL rose_loopback_neigh->loopback") Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit e97c089d7a49f67027395ddf70bf327eeac2611e ]

The syzkaller reported an issue:

KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000380-0x0000000000000387]
CPU: 0 PID: 4069 Comm: kworker/0:15 Not tainted 6.0.0-syzkaller-02734-g0326074ff465 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/22/2022
Workqueue: rcu_gp srcu_invoke_callbacks
RIP: 0010:rose_send_frame+0x1dd/0x2f0 net/rose/rose_link.c:101
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
 rose_transmit_clear_request+0x1d5/0x290 net/rose/rose_link.c:255
 rose_rx_call_request+0x4c0/0x1bc0 net/rose/af_rose.c:1009
 rose_loopback_timer+0x19e/0x590 net/rose/rose_loopback.c:111
 call_timer_fn+0x1a0/0x6b0 kernel/time/timer.c:1474
 expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1519 [inline]
 __run_timers.part.0+0x674/0xa80 kernel/time/timer.c:1790
 __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1768 [inline]
 run_timer_softirq+0xb3/0x1d0 kernel/time/timer.c:1803
 __do_softirq+0x1d0/0x9c8 kernel/softirq.c:571
 [...]
 </IRQ>

It triggers NULL pointer dereference when 'neigh->dev->dev_addr' is
called in the rose_send_frame(). It's the first occurrence of the
`neigh` is in rose_loopback_timer() as `rose_loopback_neigh', and
the 'dev' in 'rose_loopback_neigh' is initialized sa nullptr.

It had been fixed by commit 3b3fd068c56e3fbea30090859216a368398e39bf
("rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()") ever.
But it's introduced by commit 3c53cd65dece47dd1f9d3a809f32e59d1d87b2b8
("rose: check NULL rose_loopback_neigh->loopback") again.

We fix it by add NULL check in rose_transmit_clear_request(). When
the 'dev' in 'neigh' is NULL, we don't reply the request and just
clear it.

syzkaller don't provide repro, and I provide a syz repro like:
r0 = syz_init_net_socket$bt_sco(0x1f, 0x5, 0x2)
ioctl$sock_inet_SIOCSIFFLAGS(r0, 0x8914, &(0x7f0000000180)={'rose0\x00', 0x201})
r1 = syz_init_net_socket$rose(0xb, 0x5, 0x0)
bind$rose(r1, &(0x7f00000000c0)=@full={0xb, @dev, @null, 0x0, [@null, @null, @netrom, @netrom, @default, @null]}, 0x40)
connect$rose(r1, &(0x7f0000000240)=@short={0xb, @dev={0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0x1, 0x0}, @remote={0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0x1}, 0x1, @netrom={0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0x0, 0x0}}, 0x1c)

Fixes: 3c53cd65dece ("rose: check NULL rose_loopback_neigh->loopback")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rose: check NULL rose_loopback_neigh->loopback 2022-09-05T08:25:03+00:00 Bernard Pidoux f6bvp@free.fr 2022-08-18T00:02:13+00:00 b8f9de195d6303f52bae16c7911f35ac14ba7e3d [ Upstream commit 3c53cd65dece47dd1f9d3a809f32e59d1d87b2b8 ] Commit 3b3fd068c56e3fbea30090859216a368398e39bf added NULL check for `rose_loopback_neigh->dev` in rose_loopback_timer() but omitted to check rose_loopback_neigh->loopback. It thus prevents *all* rose connect. The reason is that a special rose_neigh loopback has a NULL device. /proc/net/rose_neigh illustrates it via rose_neigh_show() function : [...] seq_printf(seq, "%05d %-9s %-4s %3d %3d %3s %3s %3lu %3lu", rose_neigh->number, (rose_neigh->loopback) ? "RSLOOP-0" : ax2asc(buf, &rose_neigh->callsign), rose_neigh->dev ? rose_neigh->dev->name : "???", rose_neigh->count, /proc/net/rose_neigh displays special rose_loopback_neigh->loopback as callsign RSLOOP-0: addr callsign dev count use mode restart t0 tf digipeaters 00001 RSLOOP-0 ??? 1 2 DCE yes 0 0 By checking rose_loopback_neigh->loopback, rose_rx_call_request() is called even in case rose_loopback_neigh->dev is NULL. This repairs rose connections. Verification with rose client application FPAC: FPAC-Node v 4.1.3 (built Aug 5 2022) for LINUX (help = h) F6BVP-4 (Commands = ?) : u Users - AX.25 Level 2 sessions : Port Callsign Callsign AX.25 state ROSE state NetRom status axudp F6BVP-5 -> F6BVP-9 Connected Connected --------- Fixes: 3b3fd068c56e ("rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()") Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@free.fr> Suggested-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> Cc: Thomas DL9SAU Osterried <thomas@osterried.de> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 3c53cd65dece47dd1f9d3a809f32e59d1d87b2b8 ]

Commit 3b3fd068c56e3fbea30090859216a368398e39bf added NULL check for
`rose_loopback_neigh->dev` in rose_loopback_timer() but omitted to
check rose_loopback_neigh->loopback.

It thus prevents *all* rose connect.

The reason is that a special rose_neigh loopback has a NULL device.

/proc/net/rose_neigh illustrates it via rose_neigh_show() function :
[...]
seq_printf(seq, "%05d %-9s %-4s   %3d %3d  %3s     %3s %3lu %3lu",
	   rose_neigh->number,
	   (rose_neigh->loopback) ? "RSLOOP-0" : ax2asc(buf, &rose_neigh->callsign),
	   rose_neigh->dev ? rose_neigh->dev->name : "???",
	   rose_neigh->count,

/proc/net/rose_neigh displays special rose_loopback_neigh->loopback as
callsign RSLOOP-0:

addr  callsign  dev  count use mode restart  t0  tf digipeaters
00001 RSLOOP-0  ???      1   2  DCE     yes   0   0

By checking rose_loopback_neigh->loopback, rose_rx_call_request() is called
even in case rose_loopback_neigh->dev is NULL. This repairs rose connections.

Verification with rose client application FPAC:

FPAC-Node v 4.1.3 (built Aug  5 2022) for LINUX (help = h)
F6BVP-4 (Commands = ?) : u
Users - AX.25 Level 2 sessions :
Port   Callsign     Callsign  AX.25 state  ROSE state  NetRom status
axudp  F6BVP-5   -> F6BVP-9   Connected    Connected   ---------

Fixes: 3b3fd068c56e ("rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()")
Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@free.fr>
Suggested-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Cc: Thomas DL9SAU Osterried <thomas@osterried.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
net: rose: fix netdev reference changes 2022-08-25T09:11:20+00:00 Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com 2022-07-29T09:12:32+00:00 fbc166dce6e2abeaff238e38e6673daf0b7d6d31 [ Upstream commit 931027820e4dafabc78aff82af59f8c1c4bd3128 ] Bernard reported that trying to unload rose module would lead to infamous messages: unregistered_netdevice: waiting for rose0 to become free. Usage count = xx This patch solves the issue, by making sure each socket referring to a netdevice holds a reference count on it, and properly releases it in rose_release(). rose_dev_first() is also fixed to take a device reference before leaving the rcu_read_locked section. Following patch will add ref_tracker annotations to ease future bug hunting. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reported-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Tested-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 931027820e4dafabc78aff82af59f8c1c4bd3128 ]

Bernard reported that trying to unload rose module would lead
to infamous messages:

unregistered_netdevice: waiting for rose0 to become free. Usage count = xx

This patch solves the issue, by making sure each socket referring to
a netdevice holds a reference count on it, and properly releases it
in rose_release().

rose_dev_first() is also fixed to take a device reference
before leaving the rcu_read_locked section.

Following patch will add ref_tracker annotations to ease
future bug hunting.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Reported-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Tested-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
net: rose: fix UAF bug caused by rose_t0timer_expiry 2022-07-12T14:27:28+00:00 Duoming Zhou duoming@zju.edu.cn 2022-07-05T12:56:10+00:00 f89c7ae9025dd547b233089e8f928903ef2cbf6a commit 148ca04518070910739dfc4eeda765057856403d upstream. There are UAF bugs caused by rose_t0timer_expiry(). The root cause is that del_timer() could not stop the timer handler that is running and there is no synchronization. One of the race conditions is shown below: (thread 1) | (thread 2) | rose_device_event | rose_rt_device_down | rose_remove_neigh rose_t0timer_expiry | rose_stop_t0timer(rose_neigh) ... | del_timer(&neigh->t0timer) | kfree(rose_neigh) //[1]FREE neigh->dce_mode //[2]USE | The rose_neigh is deallocated in position [1] and use in position [2]. The crash trace triggered by POC is like below: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in expire_timers+0x144/0x320 Write of size 8 at addr ffff888009b19658 by task swapper/0/0 ... Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0xbf/0xee print_address_description+0x7b/0x440 print_report+0x101/0x230 ? expire_timers+0x144/0x320 kasan_report+0xed/0x120 ? expire_timers+0x144/0x320 expire_timers+0x144/0x320 __run_timers+0x3ff/0x4d0 run_timer_softirq+0x41/0x80 __do_softirq+0x233/0x544 ... This patch changes rose_stop_ftimer() and rose_stop_t0timer() in rose_remove_neigh() to del_timer_sync() in order that the timer handler could be finished before the resources such as rose_neigh and so on are deallocated. As a result, the UAF bugs could be mitigated. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705125610.77971-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 148ca04518070910739dfc4eeda765057856403d upstream.

There are UAF bugs caused by rose_t0timer_expiry(). The
root cause is that del_timer() could not stop the timer
handler that is running and there is no synchronization.
One of the race conditions is shown below:

    (thread 1)             |        (thread 2)
                           | rose_device_event
                           |   rose_rt_device_down
                           |     rose_remove_neigh
rose_t0timer_expiry        |       rose_stop_t0timer(rose_neigh)
  ...                      |         del_timer(&neigh->t0timer)
                           |         kfree(rose_neigh) //[1]FREE
  neigh->dce_mode //[2]USE |

The rose_neigh is deallocated in position [1] and use in
position [2].

The crash trace triggered by POC is like below:

BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in expire_timers+0x144/0x320
Write of size 8 at addr ffff888009b19658 by task swapper/0/0
...
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
 dump_stack_lvl+0xbf/0xee
 print_address_description+0x7b/0x440
 print_report+0x101/0x230
 ? expire_timers+0x144/0x320
 kasan_report+0xed/0x120
 ? expire_timers+0x144/0x320
 expire_timers+0x144/0x320
 __run_timers+0x3ff/0x4d0
 run_timer_softirq+0x41/0x80
 __do_softirq+0x233/0x544
 ...

This patch changes rose_stop_ftimer() and rose_stop_t0timer()
in rose_remove_neigh() to del_timer_sync() in order that the
timer handler could be finished before the resources such as
rose_neigh and so on are deallocated. As a result, the UAF
bugs could be mitigated.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705125610.77971-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
net: rose: fix UAF bugs caused by timer handler 2022-07-07T15:31:16+00:00 Duoming Zhou duoming@zju.edu.cn 2022-06-29T00:26:40+00:00 597b3bbe230caca60c321eeb08de14b9bc4d47c0 commit 9cc02ede696272c5271a401e4f27c262359bc2f6 upstream. There are UAF bugs in rose_heartbeat_expiry(), rose_timer_expiry() and rose_idletimer_expiry(). The root cause is that del_timer() could not stop the timer handler that is running and the refcount of sock is not managed properly. One of the UAF bugs is shown below: (thread 1) | (thread 2) | rose_bind | rose_connect | rose_start_heartbeat rose_release | (wait a time) case ROSE_STATE_0 | rose_destroy_socket | rose_heartbeat_expiry rose_stop_heartbeat | sock_put(sk) | ... sock_put(sk) // FREE | | bh_lock_sock(sk) // USE The sock is deallocated by sock_put() in rose_release() and then used by bh_lock_sock() in rose_heartbeat_expiry(). Although rose_destroy_socket() calls rose_stop_heartbeat(), it could not stop the timer that is running. The KASAN report triggered by POC is shown below: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110 Write of size 4 at addr ffff88800ae59098 by task swapper/3/0 ... Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0xbf/0xee print_address_description+0x7b/0x440 print_report+0x101/0x230 ? irq_work_single+0xbb/0x140 ? _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110 kasan_report+0xed/0x120 ? _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110 kasan_check_range+0x2bd/0x2e0 _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110 rose_heartbeat_expiry+0x39/0x370 ? rose_start_heartbeat+0xb0/0xb0 call_timer_fn+0x2d/0x1c0 ? rose_start_heartbeat+0xb0/0xb0 expire_timers+0x1f3/0x320 __run_timers+0x3ff/0x4d0 run_timer_softirq+0x41/0x80 __do_softirq+0x233/0x544 irq_exit_rcu+0x41/0xa0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8c/0xb0 </IRQ> <TASK> asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1b/0x20 RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xb/0x10 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000012fea0 EFLAGS: 00000202 RAX: 000000000000bcae RBX: ffff888006660f00 RCX: 000000000000bcae RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff843a11c0 RDI: ffffffff843a1180 RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: dffffc0000000000 R09: ffffed100da36d46 R10: dfffe9100da36d47 R11: ffffffff83cf0950 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 1ffff11000ccc1e0 R14: ffffffff8542af28 R15: dffffc0000000000 ... Allocated by task 146: __kasan_kmalloc+0xc4/0xf0 sk_prot_alloc+0xdd/0x1a0 sk_alloc+0x2d/0x4e0 rose_create+0x7b/0x330 __sock_create+0x2dd/0x640 __sys_socket+0xc7/0x270 __x64_sys_socket+0x71/0x80 do_syscall_64+0x43/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 Freed by task 152: kasan_set_track+0x4c/0x70 kasan_set_free_info+0x1f/0x40 ____kasan_slab_free+0x124/0x190 kfree+0xd3/0x270 __sk_destruct+0x314/0x460 rose_release+0x2fa/0x3b0 sock_close+0xcb/0x230 __fput+0x2d9/0x650 task_work_run+0xd6/0x160 exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xc7/0xd0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x4e/0x80 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x20/0x40 do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 This patch adds refcount of sock when we use functions such as rose_start_heartbeat() and so on to start timer, and decreases the refcount of sock when timer is finished or deleted by functions such as rose_stop_heartbeat() and so on. As a result, the UAF bugs could be mitigated. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn> Tested-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220629002640.5693-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 9cc02ede696272c5271a401e4f27c262359bc2f6 upstream.

There are UAF bugs in rose_heartbeat_expiry(), rose_timer_expiry()
and rose_idletimer_expiry(). The root cause is that del_timer()
could not stop the timer handler that is running and the refcount
of sock is not managed properly.

One of the UAF bugs is shown below:

    (thread 1)          |        (thread 2)
                        |  rose_bind
                        |  rose_connect
                        |    rose_start_heartbeat
rose_release            |    (wait a time)
  case ROSE_STATE_0     |
  rose_destroy_socket   |  rose_heartbeat_expiry
    rose_stop_heartbeat |
    sock_put(sk)        |    ...
  sock_put(sk) // FREE  |
                        |    bh_lock_sock(sk) // USE

The sock is deallocated by sock_put() in rose_release() and
then used by bh_lock_sock() in rose_heartbeat_expiry().

Although rose_destroy_socket() calls rose_stop_heartbeat(),
it could not stop the timer that is running.

The KASAN report triggered by POC is shown below:

BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
Write of size 4 at addr ffff88800ae59098 by task swapper/3/0
...
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
 dump_stack_lvl+0xbf/0xee
 print_address_description+0x7b/0x440
 print_report+0x101/0x230
 ? irq_work_single+0xbb/0x140
 ? _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
 kasan_report+0xed/0x120
 ? _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
 kasan_check_range+0x2bd/0x2e0
 _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
 rose_heartbeat_expiry+0x39/0x370
 ? rose_start_heartbeat+0xb0/0xb0
 call_timer_fn+0x2d/0x1c0
 ? rose_start_heartbeat+0xb0/0xb0
 expire_timers+0x1f3/0x320
 __run_timers+0x3ff/0x4d0
 run_timer_softirq+0x41/0x80
 __do_softirq+0x233/0x544
 irq_exit_rcu+0x41/0xa0
 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8c/0xb0
 </IRQ>
 <TASK>
 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1b/0x20
RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xb/0x10
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000012fea0 EFLAGS: 00000202
RAX: 000000000000bcae RBX: ffff888006660f00 RCX: 000000000000bcae
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff843a11c0 RDI: ffffffff843a1180
RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: dffffc0000000000 R09: ffffed100da36d46
R10: dfffe9100da36d47 R11: ffffffff83cf0950 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 1ffff11000ccc1e0 R14: ffffffff8542af28 R15: dffffc0000000000
...
Allocated by task 146:
 __kasan_kmalloc+0xc4/0xf0
 sk_prot_alloc+0xdd/0x1a0
 sk_alloc+0x2d/0x4e0
 rose_create+0x7b/0x330
 __sock_create+0x2dd/0x640
 __sys_socket+0xc7/0x270
 __x64_sys_socket+0x71/0x80
 do_syscall_64+0x43/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

Freed by task 152:
 kasan_set_track+0x4c/0x70
 kasan_set_free_info+0x1f/0x40
 ____kasan_slab_free+0x124/0x190
 kfree+0xd3/0x270
 __sk_destruct+0x314/0x460
 rose_release+0x2fa/0x3b0
 sock_close+0xcb/0x230
 __fput+0x2d9/0x650
 task_work_run+0xd6/0x160
 exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xc7/0xd0
 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x4e/0x80
 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x20/0x40
 do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

This patch adds refcount of sock when we use functions
such as rose_start_heartbeat() and so on to start timer,
and decreases the refcount of sock when timer is finished
or deleted by functions such as rose_stop_heartbeat()
and so on. As a result, the UAF bugs could be mitigated.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
Tested-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220629002640.5693-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame() 2020-12-08T09:17:32+00:00 Anmol Karn anmol.karan123@gmail.com 2020-11-19T19:10:43+00:00 bbcdbd1d3a9401870aada16b57932123dac69405 [ Upstream commit 3b3fd068c56e3fbea30090859216a368398e39bf ] rose_send_frame() dereferences `neigh->dev` when called from rose_transmit_clear_request(), and the first occurrence of the `neigh` is in rose_loopback_timer() as `rose_loopback_neigh`, and it is initialized in rose_add_loopback_neigh() as NULL. i.e when `rose_loopback_neigh` used in rose_loopback_timer() its `->dev` was still NULL and rose_loopback_timer() was calling rose_rx_call_request() without checking for NULL. - net/rose/rose_link.c This bug seems to get triggered in this line: rose_call = (ax25_address *)neigh->dev->dev_addr; Fix it by adding NULL checking for `rose_loopback_neigh->dev` in rose_loopback_timer(). Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Reported-by: syzbot+a1c743815982d9496393@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+a1c743815982d9496393@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9d2a7ca8c7f2e4b682c97578dfa3f236258300b3 Signed-off-by: Anmol Karn <anmol.karan123@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119191043.28813-1-anmol.karan123@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
[ Upstream commit 3b3fd068c56e3fbea30090859216a368398e39bf ]

rose_send_frame() dereferences `neigh->dev` when called from
rose_transmit_clear_request(), and the first occurrence of the
`neigh` is in rose_loopback_timer() as `rose_loopback_neigh`,
and it is initialized in rose_add_loopback_neigh() as NULL.
i.e when `rose_loopback_neigh` used in rose_loopback_timer()
its `->dev` was still NULL and rose_loopback_timer() was calling
rose_rx_call_request() without checking for NULL.

- net/rose/rose_link.c
This bug seems to get triggered in this line:

rose_call = (ax25_address *)neigh->dev->dev_addr;

Fix it by adding NULL checking for `rose_loopback_neigh->dev`
in rose_loopback_timer().

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reported-by: syzbot+a1c743815982d9496393@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+a1c743815982d9496393@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9d2a7ca8c7f2e4b682c97578dfa3f236258300b3
Signed-off-by: Anmol Karn <anmol.karan123@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119191043.28813-1-anmol.karan123@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
net/rose: fix unbound loop in rose_loopback_timer() 2019-05-02T07:40:34+00:00 Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com 2019-04-24T12:35:00+00:00 51ba221aef55daa8102ec2469099ea9b60ae2bfb [ Upstream commit 0453c682459583910d611a96de928f4442205493 ] This patch adds a limit on the number of skbs that fuzzers can queue into loopback_queue. 1000 packets for rose loopback seems more than enough. Then, since we now have multiple cpus in most linux hosts, we also need to limit the number of skbs rose_loopback_timer() can dequeue at each round. rose_loopback_queue() can be drop-monitor friendly, calling consume_skb() or kfree_skb() appropriately. Finally, use mod_timer() instead of del_timer() + add_timer() syzbot report was : rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 0-...!: (10499 ticks this GP) idle=536/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=103291/103291 fqs=34 rcu: (t=10500 jiffies g=140321 q=323) rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 10426 jiffies! g140321 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x402 ->cpu=1 rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump: rcu_preempt I29168 10 2 0x80000000 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:2877 [inline] __schedule+0x813/0x1cc0 kernel/sched/core.c:3518 schedule+0x92/0x180 kernel/sched/core.c:3562 schedule_timeout+0x4db/0xfd0 kernel/time/timer.c:1803 rcu_gp_fqs_loop kernel/rcu/tree.c:1971 [inline] rcu_gp_kthread+0x962/0x17b0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2128 kthread+0x357/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:253 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352 NMI backtrace for cpu 0 CPU: 0 PID: 7632 Comm: kworker/0:4 Not tainted 5.1.0-rc5+ #172 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Workqueue: events iterate_cleanup_work Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113 nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold+0x63/0xa4 lib/nmi_backtrace.c:101 nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0x1be/0x236 lib/nmi_backtrace.c:62 arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0x14/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c:38 trigger_single_cpu_backtrace include/linux/nmi.h:164 [inline] rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0x183/0x1cf kernel/rcu/tree.c:1223 print_cpu_stall kernel/rcu/tree.c:1360 [inline] check_cpu_stall kernel/rcu/tree.c:1434 [inline] rcu_pending kernel/rcu/tree.c:3103 [inline] rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold+0x500/0xa4a kernel/rcu/tree.c:2544 update_process_times+0x32/0x80 kernel/time/timer.c:1635 tick_sched_handle+0xa2/0x190 kernel/time/tick-sched.c:161 tick_sched_timer+0x47/0x130 kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1271 __run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1389 [inline] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x33e/0xde0 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1451 hrtimer_interrupt+0x314/0x770 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1509 local_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1035 [inline] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x120/0x570 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1060 apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:807 RIP: 0010:__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x0/0x50 kernel/kcov.c:95 Code: 89 25 b4 6e ec 08 41 bc f4 ff ff ff e8 cd 5d ea ff 48 c7 05 9e 6e ec 08 00 00 00 00 e9 a4 e9 ff ff 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 <55> 48 89 e5 48 8b 75 08 65 48 8b 04 25 00 ee 01 00 65 8b 15 c8 60 RSP: 0018:ffff8880ae807ce0 EFLAGS: 00000286 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13 RAX: ffff88806fd40640 RBX: dffffc0000000000 RCX: ffffffff863fbc56 RDX: 0000000000000100 RSI: ffffffff863fbc1d RDI: ffff88808cf94228 RBP: ffff8880ae807d10 R08: ffff88806fd40640 R09: ffffed1015d00f8b R10: ffffed1015d00f8a R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffff88808cf941c0 R13: 00000000fffff034 R14: ffff8882166cd840 R15: 0000000000000000 rose_loopback_timer+0x30d/0x3f0 net/rose/rose_loopback.c:91 call_timer_fn+0x190/0x720 kernel/time/timer.c:1325 expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1362 [inline] __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1681 [inline] __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1649 [inline] run_timer_softirq+0x652/0x1700 kernel/time/timer.c:1694 __do_softirq+0x266/0x95a kernel/softirq.c:293 do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1027 Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
[ Upstream commit 0453c682459583910d611a96de928f4442205493 ]

This patch adds a limit on the number of skbs that fuzzers can queue
into loopback_queue. 1000 packets for rose loopback seems more than enough.

Then, since we now have multiple cpus in most linux hosts,
we also need to limit the number of skbs rose_loopback_timer()
can dequeue at each round.

rose_loopback_queue() can be drop-monitor friendly, calling
consume_skb() or kfree_skb() appropriately.

Finally, use mod_timer() instead of del_timer() + add_timer()

syzbot report was :

rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
rcu:    0-...!: (10499 ticks this GP) idle=536/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=103291/103291 fqs=34
rcu:     (t=10500 jiffies g=140321 q=323)
rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 10426 jiffies! g140321 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x402 ->cpu=1
rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
rcu_preempt     I29168    10      2 0x80000000
Call Trace:
 context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:2877 [inline]
 __schedule+0x813/0x1cc0 kernel/sched/core.c:3518
 schedule+0x92/0x180 kernel/sched/core.c:3562
 schedule_timeout+0x4db/0xfd0 kernel/time/timer.c:1803
 rcu_gp_fqs_loop kernel/rcu/tree.c:1971 [inline]
 rcu_gp_kthread+0x962/0x17b0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2128
 kthread+0x357/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:253
 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352
NMI backtrace for cpu 0
CPU: 0 PID: 7632 Comm: kworker/0:4 Not tainted 5.1.0-rc5+ #172
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Workqueue: events iterate_cleanup_work
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113
 nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold+0x63/0xa4 lib/nmi_backtrace.c:101
 nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0x1be/0x236 lib/nmi_backtrace.c:62
 arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0x14/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c:38
 trigger_single_cpu_backtrace include/linux/nmi.h:164 [inline]
 rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0x183/0x1cf kernel/rcu/tree.c:1223
 print_cpu_stall kernel/rcu/tree.c:1360 [inline]
 check_cpu_stall kernel/rcu/tree.c:1434 [inline]
 rcu_pending kernel/rcu/tree.c:3103 [inline]
 rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold+0x500/0xa4a kernel/rcu/tree.c:2544
 update_process_times+0x32/0x80 kernel/time/timer.c:1635
 tick_sched_handle+0xa2/0x190 kernel/time/tick-sched.c:161
 tick_sched_timer+0x47/0x130 kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1271
 __run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1389 [inline]
 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x33e/0xde0 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1451
 hrtimer_interrupt+0x314/0x770 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1509
 local_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1035 [inline]
 smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x120/0x570 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1060
 apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:807
RIP: 0010:__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x0/0x50 kernel/kcov.c:95
Code: 89 25 b4 6e ec 08 41 bc f4 ff ff ff e8 cd 5d ea ff 48 c7 05 9e 6e ec 08 00 00 00 00 e9 a4 e9 ff ff 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 <55> 48 89 e5 48 8b 75 08 65 48 8b 04 25 00 ee 01 00 65 8b 15 c8 60
RSP: 0018:ffff8880ae807ce0 EFLAGS: 00000286 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13
RAX: ffff88806fd40640 RBX: dffffc0000000000 RCX: ffffffff863fbc56
RDX: 0000000000000100 RSI: ffffffff863fbc1d RDI: ffff88808cf94228
RBP: ffff8880ae807d10 R08: ffff88806fd40640 R09: ffffed1015d00f8b
R10: ffffed1015d00f8a R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffff88808cf941c0
R13: 00000000fffff034 R14: ffff8882166cd840 R15: 0000000000000000
 rose_loopback_timer+0x30d/0x3f0 net/rose/rose_loopback.c:91
 call_timer_fn+0x190/0x720 kernel/time/timer.c:1325
 expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1362 [inline]
 __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1681 [inline]
 __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1649 [inline]
 run_timer_softirq+0x652/0x1700 kernel/time/timer.c:1694
 __do_softirq+0x266/0x95a kernel/softirq.c:293
 do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1027

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
net/rose: Convert timers to use timer_setup() 2019-05-02T07:40:34+00:00 Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org 2017-10-17T00:28:47+00:00 0cf41a93387a4db81ff499af52217305e7cb8f1a commit 4966babd904d7f8e9e20735f3637a98fd7ca538c upstream. In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer() to pass the timer pointer explicitly. Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 4966babd904d7f8e9e20735f3637a98fd7ca538c upstream.

In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
to pass the timer pointer explicitly.

Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
net: rose: fix a possible stack overflow 2019-04-03T04:25:08+00:00 Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com 2019-03-15T17:41:14+00:00 7ce391ed729b5bf5c4aa909dd5b9e7ffb63879f1 [ Upstream commit e5dcc0c3223c45c94100f05f28d8ef814db3d82c ] rose_write_internal() uses a temp buffer of 100 bytes, but a manual inspection showed that given arbitrary input, rose_create_facilities() can fill up to 110 bytes. Lets use a tailroom of 256 bytes for peace of mind, and remove the bounce buffer : we can simply allocate a big enough skb and adjust its length as needed. syzbot report : BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in memcpy include/linux/string.h:352 [inline] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in rose_create_facilities net/rose/rose_subr.c:521 [inline] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in rose_write_internal+0x597/0x15d0 net/rose/rose_subr.c:116 Write of size 7 at addr ffff88808b1ffbef by task syz-executor.0/24854 CPU: 0 PID: 24854 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.0.0+ #97 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_address_description.cold+0x7c/0x20d mm/kasan/report.c:187 kasan_report.cold+0x1b/0x40 mm/kasan/report.c:317 check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:185 [inline] check_memory_region+0x123/0x190 mm/kasan/generic.c:191 memcpy+0x38/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:131 memcpy include/linux/string.h:352 [inline] rose_create_facilities net/rose/rose_subr.c:521 [inline] rose_write_internal+0x597/0x15d0 net/rose/rose_subr.c:116 rose_connect+0x7cb/0x1510 net/rose/af_rose.c:826 __sys_connect+0x266/0x330 net/socket.c:1685 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:1696 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:1693 [inline] __x64_sys_connect+0x73/0xb0 net/socket.c:1693 do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe RIP: 0033:0x458079 Code: ad b8 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 7b b8 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 RSP: 002b:00007f47b8d9dc78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002a RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000000458079 RDX: 000000000000001c RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 000000000073bf00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f47b8d9e6d4 R13: 00000000004be4a4 R14: 00000000004ceca8 R15: 00000000ffffffff The buggy address belongs to the page: page:ffffea00022c7fc0 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 flags: 0x1fffc0000000000() raw: 01fffc0000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff022c0101 0000000000000000 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected Memory state around the buggy address: ffff88808b1ffa80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff88808b1ffb00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 03 >ffff88808b1ffb80: f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 f3 ^ ffff88808b1ffc00: f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff88808b1ffc80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 01 f2 01 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
[ Upstream commit e5dcc0c3223c45c94100f05f28d8ef814db3d82c ]

rose_write_internal() uses a temp buffer of 100 bytes, but a manual
inspection showed that given arbitrary input, rose_create_facilities()
can fill up to 110 bytes.

Lets use a tailroom of 256 bytes for peace of mind, and remove
the bounce buffer : we can simply allocate a big enough skb
and adjust its length as needed.

syzbot report :

BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in memcpy include/linux/string.h:352 [inline]
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in rose_create_facilities net/rose/rose_subr.c:521 [inline]
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in rose_write_internal+0x597/0x15d0 net/rose/rose_subr.c:116
Write of size 7 at addr ffff88808b1ffbef by task syz-executor.0/24854

CPU: 0 PID: 24854 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.0.0+ #97
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113
 print_address_description.cold+0x7c/0x20d mm/kasan/report.c:187
 kasan_report.cold+0x1b/0x40 mm/kasan/report.c:317
 check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:185 [inline]
 check_memory_region+0x123/0x190 mm/kasan/generic.c:191
 memcpy+0x38/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:131
 memcpy include/linux/string.h:352 [inline]
 rose_create_facilities net/rose/rose_subr.c:521 [inline]
 rose_write_internal+0x597/0x15d0 net/rose/rose_subr.c:116
 rose_connect+0x7cb/0x1510 net/rose/af_rose.c:826
 __sys_connect+0x266/0x330 net/socket.c:1685
 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:1696 [inline]
 __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:1693 [inline]
 __x64_sys_connect+0x73/0xb0 net/socket.c:1693
 do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x458079
Code: ad b8 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 7b b8 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007f47b8d9dc78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002a
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000000458079
RDX: 000000000000001c RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 000000000073bf00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f47b8d9e6d4
R13: 00000000004be4a4 R14: 00000000004ceca8 R15: 00000000ffffffff

The buggy address belongs to the page:
page:ffffea00022c7fc0 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0
flags: 0x1fffc0000000000()
raw: 01fffc0000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff022c0101 0000000000000000
raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected

Memory state around the buggy address:
 ffff88808b1ffa80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 ffff88808b1ffb00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 03
>ffff88808b1ffb80: f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 f3
                                                             ^
 ffff88808b1ffc00: f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 ffff88808b1ffc80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 01 f2 01

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>