<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux-stable.git/net/rose, branch linux-4.9.y</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>rose: Fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()</title>
<updated>2022-11-10T14:46:05+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Zhang Qilong</name>
<email>zhangqilong3@huawei.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-10-28T16:10:49+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=01b9c68c121847d05a4ccef68244dadf82bfa331'/>
<id>01b9c68c121847d05a4ccef68244dadf82bfa331</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit e97c089d7a49f67027395ddf70bf327eeac2611e ]

The syzkaller reported an issue:

KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000380-0x0000000000000387]
CPU: 0 PID: 4069 Comm: kworker/0:15 Not tainted 6.0.0-syzkaller-02734-g0326074ff465 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/22/2022
Workqueue: rcu_gp srcu_invoke_callbacks
RIP: 0010:rose_send_frame+0x1dd/0x2f0 net/rose/rose_link.c:101
Call Trace:
 &lt;IRQ&gt;
 rose_transmit_clear_request+0x1d5/0x290 net/rose/rose_link.c:255
 rose_rx_call_request+0x4c0/0x1bc0 net/rose/af_rose.c:1009
 rose_loopback_timer+0x19e/0x590 net/rose/rose_loopback.c:111
 call_timer_fn+0x1a0/0x6b0 kernel/time/timer.c:1474
 expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1519 [inline]
 __run_timers.part.0+0x674/0xa80 kernel/time/timer.c:1790
 __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1768 [inline]
 run_timer_softirq+0xb3/0x1d0 kernel/time/timer.c:1803
 __do_softirq+0x1d0/0x9c8 kernel/softirq.c:571
 [...]
 &lt;/IRQ&gt;

It triggers NULL pointer dereference when 'neigh-&gt;dev-&gt;dev_addr' is
called in the rose_send_frame(). It's the first occurrence of the
`neigh` is in rose_loopback_timer() as `rose_loopback_neigh', and
the 'dev' in 'rose_loopback_neigh' is initialized sa nullptr.

It had been fixed by commit 3b3fd068c56e3fbea30090859216a368398e39bf
("rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()") ever.
But it's introduced by commit 3c53cd65dece47dd1f9d3a809f32e59d1d87b2b8
("rose: check NULL rose_loopback_neigh-&gt;loopback") again.

We fix it by add NULL check in rose_transmit_clear_request(). When
the 'dev' in 'neigh' is NULL, we don't reply the request and just
clear it.

syzkaller don't provide repro, and I provide a syz repro like:
r0 = syz_init_net_socket$bt_sco(0x1f, 0x5, 0x2)
ioctl$sock_inet_SIOCSIFFLAGS(r0, 0x8914, &amp;(0x7f0000000180)={'rose0\x00', 0x201})
r1 = syz_init_net_socket$rose(0xb, 0x5, 0x0)
bind$rose(r1, &amp;(0x7f00000000c0)=@full={0xb, @dev, @null, 0x0, [@null, @null, @netrom, @netrom, @default, @null]}, 0x40)
connect$rose(r1, &amp;(0x7f0000000240)=@short={0xb, @dev={0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0x1, 0x0}, @remote={0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0x1}, 0x1, @netrom={0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0x0, 0x0}}, 0x1c)

Fixes: 3c53cd65dece ("rose: check NULL rose_loopback_neigh-&gt;loopback")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong &lt;zhangqilong3@huawei.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit e97c089d7a49f67027395ddf70bf327eeac2611e ]

The syzkaller reported an issue:

KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000380-0x0000000000000387]
CPU: 0 PID: 4069 Comm: kworker/0:15 Not tainted 6.0.0-syzkaller-02734-g0326074ff465 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/22/2022
Workqueue: rcu_gp srcu_invoke_callbacks
RIP: 0010:rose_send_frame+0x1dd/0x2f0 net/rose/rose_link.c:101
Call Trace:
 &lt;IRQ&gt;
 rose_transmit_clear_request+0x1d5/0x290 net/rose/rose_link.c:255
 rose_rx_call_request+0x4c0/0x1bc0 net/rose/af_rose.c:1009
 rose_loopback_timer+0x19e/0x590 net/rose/rose_loopback.c:111
 call_timer_fn+0x1a0/0x6b0 kernel/time/timer.c:1474
 expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1519 [inline]
 __run_timers.part.0+0x674/0xa80 kernel/time/timer.c:1790
 __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1768 [inline]
 run_timer_softirq+0xb3/0x1d0 kernel/time/timer.c:1803
 __do_softirq+0x1d0/0x9c8 kernel/softirq.c:571
 [...]
 &lt;/IRQ&gt;

It triggers NULL pointer dereference when 'neigh-&gt;dev-&gt;dev_addr' is
called in the rose_send_frame(). It's the first occurrence of the
`neigh` is in rose_loopback_timer() as `rose_loopback_neigh', and
the 'dev' in 'rose_loopback_neigh' is initialized sa nullptr.

It had been fixed by commit 3b3fd068c56e3fbea30090859216a368398e39bf
("rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()") ever.
But it's introduced by commit 3c53cd65dece47dd1f9d3a809f32e59d1d87b2b8
("rose: check NULL rose_loopback_neigh-&gt;loopback") again.

We fix it by add NULL check in rose_transmit_clear_request(). When
the 'dev' in 'neigh' is NULL, we don't reply the request and just
clear it.

syzkaller don't provide repro, and I provide a syz repro like:
r0 = syz_init_net_socket$bt_sco(0x1f, 0x5, 0x2)
ioctl$sock_inet_SIOCSIFFLAGS(r0, 0x8914, &amp;(0x7f0000000180)={'rose0\x00', 0x201})
r1 = syz_init_net_socket$rose(0xb, 0x5, 0x0)
bind$rose(r1, &amp;(0x7f00000000c0)=@full={0xb, @dev, @null, 0x0, [@null, @null, @netrom, @netrom, @default, @null]}, 0x40)
connect$rose(r1, &amp;(0x7f0000000240)=@short={0xb, @dev={0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0x1, 0x0}, @remote={0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0x1}, 0x1, @netrom={0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0x0, 0x0}}, 0x1c)

Fixes: 3c53cd65dece ("rose: check NULL rose_loopback_neigh-&gt;loopback")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong &lt;zhangqilong3@huawei.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rose: check NULL rose_loopback_neigh-&gt;loopback</title>
<updated>2022-09-05T08:23:54+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Bernard Pidoux</name>
<email>f6bvp@free.fr</email>
</author>
<published>2022-08-18T00:02:13+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=76885373129b13df35ecc9b4ee86ea5840f12133'/>
<id>76885373129b13df35ecc9b4ee86ea5840f12133</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 3c53cd65dece47dd1f9d3a809f32e59d1d87b2b8 ]

Commit 3b3fd068c56e3fbea30090859216a368398e39bf added NULL check for
`rose_loopback_neigh-&gt;dev` in rose_loopback_timer() but omitted to
check rose_loopback_neigh-&gt;loopback.

It thus prevents *all* rose connect.

The reason is that a special rose_neigh loopback has a NULL device.

/proc/net/rose_neigh illustrates it via rose_neigh_show() function :
[...]
seq_printf(seq, "%05d %-9s %-4s   %3d %3d  %3s     %3s %3lu %3lu",
	   rose_neigh-&gt;number,
	   (rose_neigh-&gt;loopback) ? "RSLOOP-0" : ax2asc(buf, &amp;rose_neigh-&gt;callsign),
	   rose_neigh-&gt;dev ? rose_neigh-&gt;dev-&gt;name : "???",
	   rose_neigh-&gt;count,

/proc/net/rose_neigh displays special rose_loopback_neigh-&gt;loopback as
callsign RSLOOP-0:

addr  callsign  dev  count use mode restart  t0  tf digipeaters
00001 RSLOOP-0  ???      1   2  DCE     yes   0   0

By checking rose_loopback_neigh-&gt;loopback, rose_rx_call_request() is called
even in case rose_loopback_neigh-&gt;dev is NULL. This repairs rose connections.

Verification with rose client application FPAC:

FPAC-Node v 4.1.3 (built Aug  5 2022) for LINUX (help = h)
F6BVP-4 (Commands = ?) : u
Users - AX.25 Level 2 sessions :
Port   Callsign     Callsign  AX.25 state  ROSE state  NetRom status
axudp  F6BVP-5   -&gt; F6BVP-9   Connected    Connected   ---------

Fixes: 3b3fd068c56e ("rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()")
Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux &lt;f6bvp@free.fr&gt;
Suggested-by: Francois Romieu &lt;romieu@fr.zoreil.com&gt;
Cc: Thomas DL9SAU Osterried &lt;thomas@osterried.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 3c53cd65dece47dd1f9d3a809f32e59d1d87b2b8 ]

Commit 3b3fd068c56e3fbea30090859216a368398e39bf added NULL check for
`rose_loopback_neigh-&gt;dev` in rose_loopback_timer() but omitted to
check rose_loopback_neigh-&gt;loopback.

It thus prevents *all* rose connect.

The reason is that a special rose_neigh loopback has a NULL device.

/proc/net/rose_neigh illustrates it via rose_neigh_show() function :
[...]
seq_printf(seq, "%05d %-9s %-4s   %3d %3d  %3s     %3s %3lu %3lu",
	   rose_neigh-&gt;number,
	   (rose_neigh-&gt;loopback) ? "RSLOOP-0" : ax2asc(buf, &amp;rose_neigh-&gt;callsign),
	   rose_neigh-&gt;dev ? rose_neigh-&gt;dev-&gt;name : "???",
	   rose_neigh-&gt;count,

/proc/net/rose_neigh displays special rose_loopback_neigh-&gt;loopback as
callsign RSLOOP-0:

addr  callsign  dev  count use mode restart  t0  tf digipeaters
00001 RSLOOP-0  ???      1   2  DCE     yes   0   0

By checking rose_loopback_neigh-&gt;loopback, rose_rx_call_request() is called
even in case rose_loopback_neigh-&gt;dev is NULL. This repairs rose connections.

Verification with rose client application FPAC:

FPAC-Node v 4.1.3 (built Aug  5 2022) for LINUX (help = h)
F6BVP-4 (Commands = ?) : u
Users - AX.25 Level 2 sessions :
Port   Callsign     Callsign  AX.25 state  ROSE state  NetRom status
axudp  F6BVP-5   -&gt; F6BVP-9   Connected    Connected   ---------

Fixes: 3b3fd068c56e ("rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()")
Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux &lt;f6bvp@free.fr&gt;
Suggested-by: Francois Romieu &lt;romieu@fr.zoreil.com&gt;
Cc: Thomas DL9SAU Osterried &lt;thomas@osterried.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>net: rose: fix UAF bug caused by rose_t0timer_expiry</title>
<updated>2022-07-12T14:26:24+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Duoming Zhou</name>
<email>duoming@zju.edu.cn</email>
</author>
<published>2022-07-05T12:56:10+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=625425bc893499329824574eddc30adaa71ab91f'/>
<id>625425bc893499329824574eddc30adaa71ab91f</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 148ca04518070910739dfc4eeda765057856403d upstream.

There are UAF bugs caused by rose_t0timer_expiry(). The
root cause is that del_timer() could not stop the timer
handler that is running and there is no synchronization.
One of the race conditions is shown below:

    (thread 1)             |        (thread 2)
                           | rose_device_event
                           |   rose_rt_device_down
                           |     rose_remove_neigh
rose_t0timer_expiry        |       rose_stop_t0timer(rose_neigh)
  ...                      |         del_timer(&amp;neigh-&gt;t0timer)
                           |         kfree(rose_neigh) //[1]FREE
  neigh-&gt;dce_mode //[2]USE |

The rose_neigh is deallocated in position [1] and use in
position [2].

The crash trace triggered by POC is like below:

BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in expire_timers+0x144/0x320
Write of size 8 at addr ffff888009b19658 by task swapper/0/0
...
Call Trace:
 &lt;IRQ&gt;
 dump_stack_lvl+0xbf/0xee
 print_address_description+0x7b/0x440
 print_report+0x101/0x230
 ? expire_timers+0x144/0x320
 kasan_report+0xed/0x120
 ? expire_timers+0x144/0x320
 expire_timers+0x144/0x320
 __run_timers+0x3ff/0x4d0
 run_timer_softirq+0x41/0x80
 __do_softirq+0x233/0x544
 ...

This patch changes rose_stop_ftimer() and rose_stop_t0timer()
in rose_remove_neigh() to del_timer_sync() in order that the
timer handler could be finished before the resources such as
rose_neigh and so on are deallocated. As a result, the UAF
bugs could be mitigated.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou &lt;duoming@zju.edu.cn&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705125610.77971-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 148ca04518070910739dfc4eeda765057856403d upstream.

There are UAF bugs caused by rose_t0timer_expiry(). The
root cause is that del_timer() could not stop the timer
handler that is running and there is no synchronization.
One of the race conditions is shown below:

    (thread 1)             |        (thread 2)
                           | rose_device_event
                           |   rose_rt_device_down
                           |     rose_remove_neigh
rose_t0timer_expiry        |       rose_stop_t0timer(rose_neigh)
  ...                      |         del_timer(&amp;neigh-&gt;t0timer)
                           |         kfree(rose_neigh) //[1]FREE
  neigh-&gt;dce_mode //[2]USE |

The rose_neigh is deallocated in position [1] and use in
position [2].

The crash trace triggered by POC is like below:

BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in expire_timers+0x144/0x320
Write of size 8 at addr ffff888009b19658 by task swapper/0/0
...
Call Trace:
 &lt;IRQ&gt;
 dump_stack_lvl+0xbf/0xee
 print_address_description+0x7b/0x440
 print_report+0x101/0x230
 ? expire_timers+0x144/0x320
 kasan_report+0xed/0x120
 ? expire_timers+0x144/0x320
 expire_timers+0x144/0x320
 __run_timers+0x3ff/0x4d0
 run_timer_softirq+0x41/0x80
 __do_softirq+0x233/0x544
 ...

This patch changes rose_stop_ftimer() and rose_stop_t0timer()
in rose_remove_neigh() to del_timer_sync() in order that the
timer handler could be finished before the resources such as
rose_neigh and so on are deallocated. As a result, the UAF
bugs could be mitigated.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou &lt;duoming@zju.edu.cn&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705125610.77971-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>net: rose: fix UAF bugs caused by timer handler</title>
<updated>2022-07-07T15:30:10+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Duoming Zhou</name>
<email>duoming@zju.edu.cn</email>
</author>
<published>2022-06-29T00:26:40+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=3ab68a9528780870b84200bbd91efaa47a586a3c'/>
<id>3ab68a9528780870b84200bbd91efaa47a586a3c</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 9cc02ede696272c5271a401e4f27c262359bc2f6 upstream.

There are UAF bugs in rose_heartbeat_expiry(), rose_timer_expiry()
and rose_idletimer_expiry(). The root cause is that del_timer()
could not stop the timer handler that is running and the refcount
of sock is not managed properly.

One of the UAF bugs is shown below:

    (thread 1)          |        (thread 2)
                        |  rose_bind
                        |  rose_connect
                        |    rose_start_heartbeat
rose_release            |    (wait a time)
  case ROSE_STATE_0     |
  rose_destroy_socket   |  rose_heartbeat_expiry
    rose_stop_heartbeat |
    sock_put(sk)        |    ...
  sock_put(sk) // FREE  |
                        |    bh_lock_sock(sk) // USE

The sock is deallocated by sock_put() in rose_release() and
then used by bh_lock_sock() in rose_heartbeat_expiry().

Although rose_destroy_socket() calls rose_stop_heartbeat(),
it could not stop the timer that is running.

The KASAN report triggered by POC is shown below:

BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
Write of size 4 at addr ffff88800ae59098 by task swapper/3/0
...
Call Trace:
 &lt;IRQ&gt;
 dump_stack_lvl+0xbf/0xee
 print_address_description+0x7b/0x440
 print_report+0x101/0x230
 ? irq_work_single+0xbb/0x140
 ? _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
 kasan_report+0xed/0x120
 ? _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
 kasan_check_range+0x2bd/0x2e0
 _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
 rose_heartbeat_expiry+0x39/0x370
 ? rose_start_heartbeat+0xb0/0xb0
 call_timer_fn+0x2d/0x1c0
 ? rose_start_heartbeat+0xb0/0xb0
 expire_timers+0x1f3/0x320
 __run_timers+0x3ff/0x4d0
 run_timer_softirq+0x41/0x80
 __do_softirq+0x233/0x544
 irq_exit_rcu+0x41/0xa0
 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8c/0xb0
 &lt;/IRQ&gt;
 &lt;TASK&gt;
 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1b/0x20
RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xb/0x10
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000012fea0 EFLAGS: 00000202
RAX: 000000000000bcae RBX: ffff888006660f00 RCX: 000000000000bcae
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff843a11c0 RDI: ffffffff843a1180
RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: dffffc0000000000 R09: ffffed100da36d46
R10: dfffe9100da36d47 R11: ffffffff83cf0950 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 1ffff11000ccc1e0 R14: ffffffff8542af28 R15: dffffc0000000000
...
Allocated by task 146:
 __kasan_kmalloc+0xc4/0xf0
 sk_prot_alloc+0xdd/0x1a0
 sk_alloc+0x2d/0x4e0
 rose_create+0x7b/0x330
 __sock_create+0x2dd/0x640
 __sys_socket+0xc7/0x270
 __x64_sys_socket+0x71/0x80
 do_syscall_64+0x43/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

Freed by task 152:
 kasan_set_track+0x4c/0x70
 kasan_set_free_info+0x1f/0x40
 ____kasan_slab_free+0x124/0x190
 kfree+0xd3/0x270
 __sk_destruct+0x314/0x460
 rose_release+0x2fa/0x3b0
 sock_close+0xcb/0x230
 __fput+0x2d9/0x650
 task_work_run+0xd6/0x160
 exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xc7/0xd0
 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x4e/0x80
 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x20/0x40
 do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

This patch adds refcount of sock when we use functions
such as rose_start_heartbeat() and so on to start timer,
and decreases the refcount of sock when timer is finished
or deleted by functions such as rose_stop_heartbeat()
and so on. As a result, the UAF bugs could be mitigated.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou &lt;duoming@zju.edu.cn&gt;
Tested-by: Duoming Zhou &lt;duoming@zju.edu.cn&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220629002640.5693-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni &lt;pabeni@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 9cc02ede696272c5271a401e4f27c262359bc2f6 upstream.

There are UAF bugs in rose_heartbeat_expiry(), rose_timer_expiry()
and rose_idletimer_expiry(). The root cause is that del_timer()
could not stop the timer handler that is running and the refcount
of sock is not managed properly.

One of the UAF bugs is shown below:

    (thread 1)          |        (thread 2)
                        |  rose_bind
                        |  rose_connect
                        |    rose_start_heartbeat
rose_release            |    (wait a time)
  case ROSE_STATE_0     |
  rose_destroy_socket   |  rose_heartbeat_expiry
    rose_stop_heartbeat |
    sock_put(sk)        |    ...
  sock_put(sk) // FREE  |
                        |    bh_lock_sock(sk) // USE

The sock is deallocated by sock_put() in rose_release() and
then used by bh_lock_sock() in rose_heartbeat_expiry().

Although rose_destroy_socket() calls rose_stop_heartbeat(),
it could not stop the timer that is running.

The KASAN report triggered by POC is shown below:

BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
Write of size 4 at addr ffff88800ae59098 by task swapper/3/0
...
Call Trace:
 &lt;IRQ&gt;
 dump_stack_lvl+0xbf/0xee
 print_address_description+0x7b/0x440
 print_report+0x101/0x230
 ? irq_work_single+0xbb/0x140
 ? _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
 kasan_report+0xed/0x120
 ? _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
 kasan_check_range+0x2bd/0x2e0
 _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
 rose_heartbeat_expiry+0x39/0x370
 ? rose_start_heartbeat+0xb0/0xb0
 call_timer_fn+0x2d/0x1c0
 ? rose_start_heartbeat+0xb0/0xb0
 expire_timers+0x1f3/0x320
 __run_timers+0x3ff/0x4d0
 run_timer_softirq+0x41/0x80
 __do_softirq+0x233/0x544
 irq_exit_rcu+0x41/0xa0
 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8c/0xb0
 &lt;/IRQ&gt;
 &lt;TASK&gt;
 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1b/0x20
RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xb/0x10
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000012fea0 EFLAGS: 00000202
RAX: 000000000000bcae RBX: ffff888006660f00 RCX: 000000000000bcae
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff843a11c0 RDI: ffffffff843a1180
RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: dffffc0000000000 R09: ffffed100da36d46
R10: dfffe9100da36d47 R11: ffffffff83cf0950 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 1ffff11000ccc1e0 R14: ffffffff8542af28 R15: dffffc0000000000
...
Allocated by task 146:
 __kasan_kmalloc+0xc4/0xf0
 sk_prot_alloc+0xdd/0x1a0
 sk_alloc+0x2d/0x4e0
 rose_create+0x7b/0x330
 __sock_create+0x2dd/0x640
 __sys_socket+0xc7/0x270
 __x64_sys_socket+0x71/0x80
 do_syscall_64+0x43/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

Freed by task 152:
 kasan_set_track+0x4c/0x70
 kasan_set_free_info+0x1f/0x40
 ____kasan_slab_free+0x124/0x190
 kfree+0xd3/0x270
 __sk_destruct+0x314/0x460
 rose_release+0x2fa/0x3b0
 sock_close+0xcb/0x230
 __fput+0x2d9/0x650
 task_work_run+0xd6/0x160
 exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xc7/0xd0
 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x4e/0x80
 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x20/0x40
 do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

This patch adds refcount of sock when we use functions
such as rose_start_heartbeat() and so on to start timer,
and decreases the refcount of sock when timer is finished
or deleted by functions such as rose_stop_heartbeat()
and so on. As a result, the UAF bugs could be mitigated.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou &lt;duoming@zju.edu.cn&gt;
Tested-by: Duoming Zhou &lt;duoming@zju.edu.cn&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220629002640.5693-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni &lt;pabeni@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()</title>
<updated>2020-12-11T12:37:56+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Anmol Karn</name>
<email>anmol.karan123@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-11-19T19:10:43+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=edc9b3113b50f3f2af7a1a803a026e903c947800'/>
<id>edc9b3113b50f3f2af7a1a803a026e903c947800</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 3b3fd068c56e3fbea30090859216a368398e39bf ]

rose_send_frame() dereferences `neigh-&gt;dev` when called from
rose_transmit_clear_request(), and the first occurrence of the
`neigh` is in rose_loopback_timer() as `rose_loopback_neigh`,
and it is initialized in rose_add_loopback_neigh() as NULL.
i.e when `rose_loopback_neigh` used in rose_loopback_timer()
its `-&gt;dev` was still NULL and rose_loopback_timer() was calling
rose_rx_call_request() without checking for NULL.

- net/rose/rose_link.c
This bug seems to get triggered in this line:

rose_call = (ax25_address *)neigh-&gt;dev-&gt;dev_addr;

Fix it by adding NULL checking for `rose_loopback_neigh-&gt;dev`
in rose_loopback_timer().

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Reported-by: syzbot+a1c743815982d9496393@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+a1c743815982d9496393@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9d2a7ca8c7f2e4b682c97578dfa3f236258300b3
Signed-off-by: Anmol Karn &lt;anmol.karan123@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119191043.28813-1-anmol.karan123@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 3b3fd068c56e3fbea30090859216a368398e39bf ]

rose_send_frame() dereferences `neigh-&gt;dev` when called from
rose_transmit_clear_request(), and the first occurrence of the
`neigh` is in rose_loopback_timer() as `rose_loopback_neigh`,
and it is initialized in rose_add_loopback_neigh() as NULL.
i.e when `rose_loopback_neigh` used in rose_loopback_timer()
its `-&gt;dev` was still NULL and rose_loopback_timer() was calling
rose_rx_call_request() without checking for NULL.

- net/rose/rose_link.c
This bug seems to get triggered in this line:

rose_call = (ax25_address *)neigh-&gt;dev-&gt;dev_addr;

Fix it by adding NULL checking for `rose_loopback_neigh-&gt;dev`
in rose_loopback_timer().

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Reported-by: syzbot+a1c743815982d9496393@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+a1c743815982d9496393@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9d2a7ca8c7f2e4b682c97578dfa3f236258300b3
Signed-off-by: Anmol Karn &lt;anmol.karan123@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119191043.28813-1-anmol.karan123@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>net: rose: fix a possible stack overflow</title>
<updated>2019-04-03T04:24:14+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Eric Dumazet</name>
<email>edumazet@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-03-15T17:41:14+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=65a1ff925de6a83c33e15f4160a858ceee093a30'/>
<id>65a1ff925de6a83c33e15f4160a858ceee093a30</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit e5dcc0c3223c45c94100f05f28d8ef814db3d82c ]

rose_write_internal() uses a temp buffer of 100 bytes, but a manual
inspection showed that given arbitrary input, rose_create_facilities()
can fill up to 110 bytes.

Lets use a tailroom of 256 bytes for peace of mind, and remove
the bounce buffer : we can simply allocate a big enough skb
and adjust its length as needed.

syzbot report :

BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in memcpy include/linux/string.h:352 [inline]
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in rose_create_facilities net/rose/rose_subr.c:521 [inline]
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in rose_write_internal+0x597/0x15d0 net/rose/rose_subr.c:116
Write of size 7 at addr ffff88808b1ffbef by task syz-executor.0/24854

CPU: 0 PID: 24854 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.0.0+ #97
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113
 print_address_description.cold+0x7c/0x20d mm/kasan/report.c:187
 kasan_report.cold+0x1b/0x40 mm/kasan/report.c:317
 check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:185 [inline]
 check_memory_region+0x123/0x190 mm/kasan/generic.c:191
 memcpy+0x38/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:131
 memcpy include/linux/string.h:352 [inline]
 rose_create_facilities net/rose/rose_subr.c:521 [inline]
 rose_write_internal+0x597/0x15d0 net/rose/rose_subr.c:116
 rose_connect+0x7cb/0x1510 net/rose/af_rose.c:826
 __sys_connect+0x266/0x330 net/socket.c:1685
 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:1696 [inline]
 __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:1693 [inline]
 __x64_sys_connect+0x73/0xb0 net/socket.c:1693
 do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x458079
Code: ad b8 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 &lt;48&gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 7b b8 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007f47b8d9dc78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002a
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000000458079
RDX: 000000000000001c RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 000000000073bf00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f47b8d9e6d4
R13: 00000000004be4a4 R14: 00000000004ceca8 R15: 00000000ffffffff

The buggy address belongs to the page:
page:ffffea00022c7fc0 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0
flags: 0x1fffc0000000000()
raw: 01fffc0000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff022c0101 0000000000000000
raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected

Memory state around the buggy address:
 ffff88808b1ffa80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 ffff88808b1ffb00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 03
&gt;ffff88808b1ffb80: f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 f3
                                                             ^
 ffff88808b1ffc00: f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 ffff88808b1ffc80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 01 f2 01

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet &lt;edumazet@google.com&gt;
Reported-by: syzbot &lt;syzkaller@googlegroups.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit e5dcc0c3223c45c94100f05f28d8ef814db3d82c ]

rose_write_internal() uses a temp buffer of 100 bytes, but a manual
inspection showed that given arbitrary input, rose_create_facilities()
can fill up to 110 bytes.

Lets use a tailroom of 256 bytes for peace of mind, and remove
the bounce buffer : we can simply allocate a big enough skb
and adjust its length as needed.

syzbot report :

BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in memcpy include/linux/string.h:352 [inline]
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in rose_create_facilities net/rose/rose_subr.c:521 [inline]
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in rose_write_internal+0x597/0x15d0 net/rose/rose_subr.c:116
Write of size 7 at addr ffff88808b1ffbef by task syz-executor.0/24854

CPU: 0 PID: 24854 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.0.0+ #97
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113
 print_address_description.cold+0x7c/0x20d mm/kasan/report.c:187
 kasan_report.cold+0x1b/0x40 mm/kasan/report.c:317
 check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:185 [inline]
 check_memory_region+0x123/0x190 mm/kasan/generic.c:191
 memcpy+0x38/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:131
 memcpy include/linux/string.h:352 [inline]
 rose_create_facilities net/rose/rose_subr.c:521 [inline]
 rose_write_internal+0x597/0x15d0 net/rose/rose_subr.c:116
 rose_connect+0x7cb/0x1510 net/rose/af_rose.c:826
 __sys_connect+0x266/0x330 net/socket.c:1685
 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:1696 [inline]
 __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:1693 [inline]
 __x64_sys_connect+0x73/0xb0 net/socket.c:1693
 do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x458079
Code: ad b8 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 &lt;48&gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 7b b8 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007f47b8d9dc78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002a
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000000458079
RDX: 000000000000001c RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 000000000073bf00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f47b8d9e6d4
R13: 00000000004be4a4 R14: 00000000004ceca8 R15: 00000000ffffffff

The buggy address belongs to the page:
page:ffffea00022c7fc0 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0
flags: 0x1fffc0000000000()
raw: 01fffc0000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff022c0101 0000000000000000
raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected

Memory state around the buggy address:
 ffff88808b1ffa80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 ffff88808b1ffb00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 03
&gt;ffff88808b1ffb80: f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 f3
                                                             ^
 ffff88808b1ffc00: f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 ffff88808b1ffc80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 01 f2 01

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet &lt;edumazet@google.com&gt;
Reported-by: syzbot &lt;syzkaller@googlegroups.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>net/rose: fix NULL ax25_cb kernel panic</title>
<updated>2019-02-06T16:33:27+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Bernard Pidoux</name>
<email>f6bvp@free.fr</email>
</author>
<published>2019-01-25T10:46:40+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=5d16d812d92337fddc1fd2e9c79ec26d7cd3bbdd'/>
<id>5d16d812d92337fddc1fd2e9c79ec26d7cd3bbdd</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit b0cf029234f9b18e10703ba5147f0389c382bccc ]

When an internally generated frame is handled by rose_xmit(),
rose_route_frame() is called:

        if (!rose_route_frame(skb, NULL)) {
                dev_kfree_skb(skb);
                stats-&gt;tx_errors++;
                return NETDEV_TX_OK;
        }

We have the same code sequence in Net/Rom where an internally generated
frame is handled by nr_xmit() calling nr_route_frame(skb, NULL).
However, in this function NULL argument is tested while it is not in
rose_route_frame().
Then kernel panic occurs later on when calling ax25cmp() with a NULL
ax25_cb argument as reported many times and recently with syzbot.

We need to test if ax25 is NULL before using it.

Testing:
Built kernel with CONFIG_ROSE=y.

Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux &lt;f6bvp@free.fr&gt;
Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov &lt;dvyukov@google.com&gt;
Reported-by: syzbot+1a2c456a1ea08fa5b5f7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: "David S. Miller" &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
Cc: Ralf Baechle &lt;ralf@linux-mips.org&gt;
Cc: Bernard Pidoux &lt;f6bvp@free.fr&gt;
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit b0cf029234f9b18e10703ba5147f0389c382bccc ]

When an internally generated frame is handled by rose_xmit(),
rose_route_frame() is called:

        if (!rose_route_frame(skb, NULL)) {
                dev_kfree_skb(skb);
                stats-&gt;tx_errors++;
                return NETDEV_TX_OK;
        }

We have the same code sequence in Net/Rom where an internally generated
frame is handled by nr_xmit() calling nr_route_frame(skb, NULL).
However, in this function NULL argument is tested while it is not in
rose_route_frame().
Then kernel panic occurs later on when calling ax25cmp() with a NULL
ax25_cb argument as reported many times and recently with syzbot.

We need to test if ax25 is NULL before using it.

Testing:
Built kernel with CONFIG_ROSE=y.

Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux &lt;f6bvp@free.fr&gt;
Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov &lt;dvyukov@google.com&gt;
Reported-by: syzbot+1a2c456a1ea08fa5b5f7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: "David S. Miller" &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
Cc: Ralf Baechle &lt;ralf@linux-mips.org&gt;
Cc: Bernard Pidoux &lt;f6bvp@free.fr&gt;
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rose: limit sk_filter trim to payload</title>
<updated>2016-07-13T18:53:40+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Willem de Bruijn</name>
<email>willemb@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-07-12T22:18:56+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=f4979fcea7fd36d8e2f556abef86f80e0d5af1ba'/>
<id>f4979fcea7fd36d8e2f556abef86f80e0d5af1ba</id>
<content type='text'>
Sockets can have a filter program attached that drops or trims
incoming packets based on the filter program return value.

Rose requires data packets to have at least ROSE_MIN_LEN bytes. It
verifies this on arrival in rose_route_frame and unconditionally pulls
the bytes in rose_recvmsg. The filter can trim packets to below this
value in-between, causing pull to fail, leaving the partial header at
the time of skb_copy_datagram_msg.

Place a lower bound on the size to which sk_filter may trim packets
by introducing sk_filter_trim_cap and call this for rose packets.

Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn &lt;willemb@google.com&gt;
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Sockets can have a filter program attached that drops or trims
incoming packets based on the filter program return value.

Rose requires data packets to have at least ROSE_MIN_LEN bytes. It
verifies this on arrival in rose_route_frame and unconditionally pulls
the bytes in rose_recvmsg. The filter can trim packets to below this
value in-between, causing pull to fail, leaving the partial header at
the time of skb_copy_datagram_msg.

Place a lower bound on the size to which sk_filter may trim packets
by introducing sk_filter_trim_cap and call this for rose packets.

Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn &lt;willemb@google.com&gt;
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net</title>
<updated>2015-06-24T09:58:51+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>David S. Miller</name>
<email>davem@davemloft.net</email>
</author>
<published>2015-06-24T09:58:51+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=3a07bd6fead4f00f67b1bf5f551e686661c4f52c'/>
<id>3a07bd6fead4f00f67b1bf5f551e686661c4f52c</id>
<content type='text'>
Conflicts:
	drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
	net/packet/af_packet.c

Both conflicts were cases of simple overlapping changes.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Conflicts:
	drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
	net/packet/af_packet.c

Both conflicts were cases of simple overlapping changes.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>NET: ROSE: Don't dereference NULL neighbour pointer.</title>
<updated>2015-06-23T10:26:27+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Ralf Baechle</name>
<email>ralf@linux-mips.org</email>
</author>
<published>2015-06-18T22:46:53+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=d496f7842aada20c61e6044b3395383fa972872c'/>
<id>d496f7842aada20c61e6044b3395383fa972872c</id>
<content type='text'>
A ROSE socket doesn't necessarily always have a neighbour pointer so check
if the neighbour pointer is valid before dereferencing it.

Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle &lt;ralf@linux-mips.org&gt;
Tested-by: Bernard Pidoux &lt;f6bvp@free.fr&gt;
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #2.6.11+
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
A ROSE socket doesn't necessarily always have a neighbour pointer so check
if the neighbour pointer is valid before dereferencing it.

Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle &lt;ralf@linux-mips.org&gt;
Tested-by: Bernard Pidoux &lt;f6bvp@free.fr&gt;
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #2.6.11+
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
