[ Upstream commit bf64ff4c2aac65d680dc639a511c781cf6b6ec08 ]
genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() reuses the global family->attrbuf
when family->parallel_ops is false. However, family->attrbuf is not
protected by any lock on the genl_family_rcv_msg_doit() code path.
This leads to several different consequences, one of them is UAF,
like the following:
genl_family_rcv_msg_doit(): genl_start():
genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse()
attrbuf = family->attrbuf
__nlmsg_parse(attrbuf);
genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse()
attrbuf = family->attrbuf
__nlmsg_parse(attrbuf);
info->attrs = attrs;
cb->data = info;
netlink_unicast_kernel():
consume_skb()
genl_lock_dumpit():
genl_dumpit_info(cb)->attrs
Note family->attrbuf is an array of pointers to the skb data, once
the skb is freed, any dereference of family->attrbuf will be a UAF.
Maybe we could serialize the family->attrbuf with genl_mutex too, but
that would make the locking more complicated. Instead, we can just get
rid of family->attrbuf and always allocate attrbuf from heap like the
family->parallel_ops==true code path. This may add some performance
overhead but comparing with taking the global genl_mutex, it still
looks better.
Fixes: 75cdbdd08900 ("net: ieee802154: have genetlink code to parse the attrs during dumpit")
Fixes: 057af7071344 ("net: tipc: have genetlink code to parse the attrs during dumpit")
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+3039ddf6d7b13daf3787@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+80cad1e3cb4c41cde6ff@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+736bcbcb11b60d0c0792@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+520f8704db2b68091d44@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+c96e4dfb32f8987fdeed@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 1e82a62fec613844da9e558f3493540a5b7a7b67 ]
A potential deadlock can occur during registering or unregistering a
new generic netlink family between the main nl_table_lock and the
cb_lock where each thread wants the lock held by the other, as
demonstrated below.
1) Thread 1 is performing a netlink_bind() operation on a socket. As part
of this call, it will call netlink_lock_table(), incrementing the
nl_table_users count to 1.
2) Thread 2 is registering (or unregistering) a genl_family via the
genl_(un)register_family() API. The cb_lock semaphore will be taken for
writing.
3) Thread 1 will call genl_bind() as part of the bind operation to handle
subscribing to GENL multicast groups at the request of the user. It will
attempt to take the cb_lock semaphore for reading, but it will fail and
be scheduled away, waiting for Thread 2 to finish the write.
4) Thread 2 will call netlink_table_grab() during the (un)registration
call. However, as Thread 1 has incremented nl_table_users, it will not
be able to proceed, and both threads will be stuck waiting for the
other.
genl_bind() is a noop, unless a genl_family implements the mcast_bind()
function to handle setting up family-specific multicast operations. Since
no one in-tree uses this functionality as Cong pointed out, simply removing
the genl_bind() function will remove the possibility for deadlock, as there
is no attempt by Thread 1 above to take the cb_lock semaphore.
Fixes: c380d9a7afff ("genetlink: pass multicast bind/unbind to families")
Suggested-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Tranchetti <stranche@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit b65ce380b754e77fbfdcfc83fd6e29c8ceedf431 ]
genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() and genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_free()
take a boolean parameter to determine whether allocate/free the family
attrs. This is unnecessary as we can just check family->parallel_ops.
More importantly, callers would not need to worry about pairing these
parameters correctly after this patch.
And this fixes a memory leak, as after commit c36f05559104
("genetlink: fix memory leaks in genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit()")
we call genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() for both parallel and
non-parallel cases.
Fixes: c36f05559104 ("genetlink: fix memory leaks in genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit()")
Reported-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c36f05559104b66bcd7f617e931e38c680227b74 ]
There are two kinds of memory leaks in genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit():
1. Before we call ops->start(), whenever an error happens, we forget
to free the memory allocated in genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit().
2. When ops->start() fails, the 'info' has been already installed on
the per socket control block, so we should not free it here. More
importantly, nlk->cb_running is still false at this point, so
netlink_sock_destruct() cannot free it either.
The first kind of memory leaks is easier to resolve, but the second
one requires some deeper thoughts.
After reviewing how netfilter handles this, the most elegant solution
I find is just to use a similar way to allocate the memory, that is,
moving memory allocations from caller into ops->start(). With this,
we can solve both kinds of memory leaks: for 1), no memory allocation
happens before ops->start(); for 2), ops->start() handles its own
failures and 'info' is installed to the socket control block only
when success. The only ugliness here is we have to pass all local
variables on stack via a struct, but this is not hard to understand.
Alternatively, we can introduce a ops->free() to solve this too,
but it is overkill as only genetlink has this problem so far.
Fixes: 1927f41a22a0 ("net: genetlink: introduce dump info struct to be available during dumpit op")
Reported-by: syzbot+21f04f481f449c8db840@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Cc: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Cc: Shaochun Chen <cscnull@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Overlapping header include additions in macsec.c A bug fix in 'net' overlapping with the removal of 'version' string in ena_netdev.c Overlapping test additions in selftests Makefile Overlapping PCI ID table adjustments in iwlwifi driver. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Commit ba0dc5f6e0ba ("netlink: allow sending extended ACK with cookie on
success") introduced a cookie which can be sent to userspace as part of
extended ack message in the form of NLMSGERR_ATTR_COOKIE attribute.
Currently the cookie is ignored if error code is non-zero but there is
no technical reason for such limitation and it can be useful to provide
machine parseable information as part of an error message.
Include NLMSGERR_ATTR_COOKIE whenever the cookie has been set,
regardless of error code.
Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Minor overlapping changes, nothing serious. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Sparse reports a warning at netlink_seq_start() warning: context imbalance in netlink_seq_start() - wrong count at exit The root cause is the missing annotation at netlink_seq_start() Add the missing __acquires(RCU) annotation Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Userspace might send a batch that is composed of several netlink
messages. The netlink_ack() function must use the pointer to the netlink
header as base to calculate the bad attribute offset.
Fixes: 2d4bc93368f5 ("netlink: extended ACK reporting")
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The mptcp conflict was overlapping additions. The SMC conflict was an additional and removal happening at the same time. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>