linux-stable.git/net/decnet, branch v3.18.26

net: add validation for the socket syscall protocol argument

2016-01-15T23:41:51+00:00

[ Upstream commit 79462ad02e861803b3840cc782248c7359451cd9 ]

郭永刚 reported that one could simply crash the kernel as root by
using a simple program:

	int socket_fd;
	struct sockaddr_in addr;
	addr.sin_port = 0;
	addr.sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY;
	addr.sin_family = 10;

	socket_fd = socket(10,3,0x40000000);
	connect(socket_fd , &addr,16);

AF_INET, AF_INET6 sockets actually only support 8-bit protocol
identifiers. inet_sock's skc_protocol field thus is sized accordingly,
thus larger protocol identifiers simply cut off the higher bits and
store a zero in the protocol fields.

This could lead to e.g. NULL function pointer because as a result of
the cut off inet_num is zero and we call down to inet_autobind, which
is NULL for raw sockets.

kernel: Call Trace:
kernel:  [] ? inet_autobind+0x2e/0x70
kernel:  [] inet_dgram_connect+0x54/0x80
kernel:  [] SYSC_connect+0xd9/0x110
kernel:  [] ? ptrace_notify+0x5b/0x80
kernel:  [] ? syscall_trace_enter_phase2+0x108/0x200
kernel:  [] SyS_connect+0xe/0x10
kernel:  [] tracesys_phase2+0x84/0x89

I found no particular commit which introduced this problem.

CVE: CVE-2015-8543
Cc: Cong Wang 
Reported-by: 郭永刚 
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

af_decnet: Use time_after_eq

2014-08-22T19:23:11+00:00

The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.

A simplified version of the Coccinelle semantic patch making this change
is as follows:

@change@
expression E1,E2,E3;
@@
- jiffies - E1 >= (E2*E3)
+ time_after_eq(jiffies, E1+E2*E3)

Signed-off-by: Himangi Saraogi 
Acked-by: Julia Lawall 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

decnet: Use time_after_eq

2014-08-22T19:23:11+00:00

The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.

A simplified version of the Coccinelle semantic patch making this change
is as follows:

@change@
expression E1,E2;
@@
- (jiffies - E1) >= E2
+ time_after_eq(jiffies, E1+E2)

Signed-off-by: Himangi Saraogi 
Acked-by: Julia Lawall 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

dn_dev: Use time_before

2014-08-22T19:23:11+00:00

The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.

A simplified version of the Coccinelle semantic patch making this change
is as follows:

@change@
expression E1,E2;
@@

(
- (jiffies - E1) < E2
+ time_before(jiffies, E1+E2)
)

Signed-off-by: Himangi Saraogi 
Acked-by: Julia Lawall 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net: Split sk_no_check into sk_no_check_{rx,tx}

2014-05-23T20:28:53+00:00

Define separate fields in the sock structure for configuring disabling
checksums in both TX and RX-- sk_no_check_tx and sk_no_check_rx.
The SO_NO_CHECK socket option only affects sk_no_check_tx. Also,
removed UDP_CSUM_* defines since they are no longer necessary.

Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net: Use netlink_ns_capable to verify the permisions of netlink messages

2014-04-24T17:44:54+00:00

It is possible by passing a netlink socket to a more privileged
executable and then to fool that executable into writing to the socket
data that happens to be valid netlink message to do something that
privileged executable did not intend to do.

To keep this from happening replace bare capable and ns_capable calls
with netlink_capable, netlink_net_calls and netlink_ns_capable calls.
Which act the same as the previous calls except they verify that the
opener of the socket had the desired permissions as well.

Reported-by: Andy Lutomirski 
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

ipv4: add a sock pointer to dst->output() path.

2014-04-15T17:47:15+00:00

In the dst->output() path for ipv4, the code assumes the skb it has to
transmit is attached to an inet socket, specifically via
ip_mc_output() : The sk_mc_loop() test triggers a WARN_ON() when the
provider of the packet is an AF_PACKET socket.

The dst->output() method gets an additional 'struct sock *sk'
parameter. This needs a cascade of changes so that this parameter can
be propagated from vxlan to final consumer.

Fixes: 8f646c922d55 ("vxlan: keep original skb ownership")
Reported-by: lucien xin 
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net: Fix use after free by removing length arg from sk_data_ready callbacks.

2014-04-11T20:15:36+00:00

Several spots in the kernel perform a sequence like:

	skb_queue_tail(&sk->s_receive_queue, skb);
	sk->sk_data_ready(sk, skb->len);

But at the moment we place the SKB onto the socket receive queue it
can be consumed and freed up.  So this skb->len access is potentially
to freed up memory.

Furthermore, the skb->len can be modified by the consumer so it is
possible that the value isn't accurate.

And finally, no actual implementation of this callback actually uses
the length argument.  And since nobody actually cared about it's
value, lots of call sites pass arbitrary values in such as '0' and
even '1'.

So just remove the length argument from the callback, that way there
is no confusion whatsoever and all of these use-after-free cases get
fixed as a side effect.

Based upon a patch by Eric Dumazet and his suggestion to audit this
issue tree-wide.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net: Move prototype declaration to header file include/net/dn.h from net/decnet/af_decnet.c

2014-02-10T01:32:49+00:00

Move prototype declaration of functions to header file include/net/dn.h
from net/decnet/af_decnet.c because they are used by more than one file.

This eliminates the following warning in net/decnet/af_decnet.c:
net/decnet/sysctl_net_decnet.c:354:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dn_register_sysctl’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
net/decnet/sysctl_net_decnet.c:359:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dn_unregister_sysctl’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]

Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria 
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net: Move prototype declaration to appropriate header file from decnet/af_decnet.c

2014-02-10T01:32:49+00:00

Move prototype declaration of functions to header file include/net/dn_route.h
from net/decnet/af_decnet.c because it is used by more than one file.

This eliminates the following warning in net/decnet/dn_route.c:
net/decnet/dn_route.c:629:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dn_route_rcv’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]

Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria 
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller