linux-stable.git/net/bluetooth, branch v4.9.296

HID: introduce hid_is_using_ll_driver

2021-12-14T09:04:46+00:00

commit fc2237a724a9e448599076d7d23497f51e2f7441 upstream.

Although HID itself is transport-agnostic, occasionally a driver may
want to interact with the low-level transport that a device is connected
through. To do this, we need to know what kind of bus is in use. The
first guess may be to look at the 'bus' field of the 'struct hid_device',
but this field may be emulated in some cases (e.g. uhid).

More ideally, we can check which ll_driver a device is using. This
function introduces a 'hid_is_using_ll_driver' function and makes the
'struct hid_ll_driver' of the four most common transports accessible
through hid.h.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gerecke 
Acked-By: Benjamin Tissoires 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Bluetooth: fix use-after-free error in lock_sock_nested()

2021-11-26T10:48:27+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1bff51ea59a9afb67d2dd78518ab0582a54a472c ]

use-after-free error in lock_sock_nested is reported:

[  179.140137][ T3731] =====================================================
[  179.142675][ T3731] BUG: KMSAN: use-after-free in lock_sock_nested+0x280/0x2c0
[  179.145494][ T3731] CPU: 4 PID: 3731 Comm: kworker/4:2 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc6+ #54
[  179.148432][ T3731] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
[  179.151806][ T3731] Workqueue: events l2cap_chan_timeout
[  179.152730][ T3731] Call Trace:
[  179.153301][ T3731]  dump_stack+0x24c/0x2e0
[  179.154063][ T3731]  kmsan_report+0xfb/0x1e0
[  179.154855][ T3731]  __msan_warning+0x5c/0xa0
[  179.155579][ T3731]  lock_sock_nested+0x280/0x2c0
[  179.156436][ T3731]  ? kmsan_get_metadata+0x116/0x180
[  179.157257][ T3731]  l2cap_sock_teardown_cb+0xb8/0x890
[  179.158154][ T3731]  ? __msan_metadata_ptr_for_load_8+0x10/0x20
[  179.159141][ T3731]  ? kmsan_get_metadata+0x116/0x180
[  179.159994][ T3731]  ? kmsan_get_shadow_origin_ptr+0x84/0xb0
[  179.160959][ T3731]  ? l2cap_sock_recv_cb+0x420/0x420
[  179.161834][ T3731]  l2cap_chan_del+0x3e1/0x1d50
[  179.162608][ T3731]  ? kmsan_get_metadata+0x116/0x180
[  179.163435][ T3731]  ? kmsan_get_shadow_origin_ptr+0x84/0xb0
[  179.164406][ T3731]  l2cap_chan_close+0xeea/0x1050
[  179.165189][ T3731]  ? kmsan_internal_unpoison_shadow+0x42/0x70
[  179.166180][ T3731]  l2cap_chan_timeout+0x1da/0x590
[  179.167066][ T3731]  ? __msan_metadata_ptr_for_load_8+0x10/0x20
[  179.168023][ T3731]  ? l2cap_chan_create+0x560/0x560
[  179.168818][ T3731]  process_one_work+0x121d/0x1ff0
[  179.169598][ T3731]  worker_thread+0x121b/0x2370
[  179.170346][ T3731]  kthread+0x4ef/0x610
[  179.171010][ T3731]  ? process_one_work+0x1ff0/0x1ff0
[  179.171828][ T3731]  ? kthread_blkcg+0x110/0x110
[  179.172587][ T3731]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[  179.173348][ T3731]
[  179.173752][ T3731] Uninit was created at:
[  179.174409][ T3731]  kmsan_internal_poison_shadow+0x5c/0xf0
[  179.175373][ T3731]  kmsan_slab_free+0x76/0xc0
[  179.176060][ T3731]  kfree+0x3a5/0x1180
[  179.176664][ T3731]  __sk_destruct+0x8af/0xb80
[  179.177375][ T3731]  __sk_free+0x812/0x8c0
[  179.178032][ T3731]  sk_free+0x97/0x130
[  179.178686][ T3731]  l2cap_sock_release+0x3d5/0x4d0
[  179.179457][ T3731]  sock_close+0x150/0x450
[  179.180117][ T3731]  __fput+0x6bd/0xf00
[  179.180787][ T3731]  ____fput+0x37/0x40
[  179.181481][ T3731]  task_work_run+0x140/0x280
[  179.182219][ T3731]  do_exit+0xe51/0x3e60
[  179.182930][ T3731]  do_group_exit+0x20e/0x450
[  179.183656][ T3731]  get_signal+0x2dfb/0x38f0
[  179.184344][ T3731]  arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xaa/0xe10
[  179.185266][ T3731]  exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x2d2/0x560
[  179.186136][ T3731]  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x35/0x60
[  179.186984][ T3731]  do_syscall_64+0xc5/0x140
[  179.187681][ T3731]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[  179.188604][ T3731] =====================================================

In our case, there are two Thread A and B:

Context: Thread A:              Context: Thread B:

l2cap_chan_timeout()            __se_sys_shutdown()
  l2cap_chan_close()              l2cap_sock_shutdown()
    l2cap_chan_del()                l2cap_chan_close()
      l2cap_sock_teardown_cb()        l2cap_sock_teardown_cb()

Once l2cap_sock_teardown_cb() excuted, this sock will be marked as SOCK_ZAPPED,
and can be treated as killable in l2cap_sock_kill() if sock_orphan() has
excuted, at this time we close sock through sock_close() which end to call
l2cap_sock_kill() like Thread C:

Context: Thread C:

sock_close()
  l2cap_sock_release()
    sock_orphan()
    l2cap_sock_kill()  #free sock if refcnt is 1

If C completed, Once A or B reaches l2cap_sock_teardown_cb() again,
use-after-free happened.

We should set chan->data to NULL if sock is destructed, for telling teardown
operation is not allowed in l2cap_sock_teardown_cb(), and also we should
avoid killing an already killed socket in l2cap_sock_close_cb().

Signed-off-by: Wang ShaoBo 
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz 
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Bluetooth: sco: Fix lock_sock() blockage by memcpy_from_msg()

2021-11-26T10:48:26+00:00

[ Upstream commit 99c23da0eed4fd20cae8243f2b51e10e66aa0951 ]

The sco_send_frame() also takes lock_sock() during memcpy_from_msg()
call that may be endlessly blocked by a task with userfaultd
technique, and this will result in a hung task watchdog trigger.

Just like the similar fix for hci_sock_sendmsg() in commit
92c685dc5de0 ("Bluetooth: reorganize functions..."), this patch moves
the  memcpy_from_msg() out of lock_sock() for addressing the hang.

This should be the last piece for fixing CVE-2021-3640 after a few
already queued fixes.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai 
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Bluetooth: avoid circular locks in sco_sock_connect

2021-09-22T09:43:07+00:00

[ Upstream commit 734bc5ff783115aa3164f4e9dd5967ae78e0a8ab ]

In a future patch, calls to bh_lock_sock in sco.c should be replaced
by lock_sock now that none of the functions are run in IRQ context.

However, doing so results in a circular locking dependency:

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.14.0-rc4-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.2/14867 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88803e3c1120 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1613 [inline]
ffff88803e3c1120 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
sco_conn_del+0x12a/0x2a0 net/bluetooth/sco.c:191

but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8d2dc7c8 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
hci_disconn_cfm include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h:1497 [inline]
ffffffff8d2dc7c8 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
hci_conn_hash_flush+0xda/0x260 net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c:1608

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:959 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x12a/0x10a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1104
       hci_connect_cfm include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h:1482 [inline]
       hci_remote_features_evt net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:3263 [inline]
       hci_event_packet+0x2f4d/0x7c50 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:6240
       hci_rx_work+0x4f8/0xd30 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:5122
       process_one_work+0x98d/0x1630 kernel/workqueue.c:2276
       worker_thread+0x658/0x11f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2422
       kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295

-> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:959 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x12a/0x10a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1104
       sco_connect net/bluetooth/sco.c:245 [inline]
       sco_sock_connect+0x227/0xa10 net/bluetooth/sco.c:601
       __sys_connect_file+0x155/0x1a0 net/socket.c:1879
       __sys_connect+0x161/0x190 net/socket.c:1896
       __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:1906 [inline]
       __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:1903 [inline]
       __x64_sys_connect+0x6f/0xb0 net/socket.c:1903
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3051 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x2a07/0x54a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5590
       lock_sock_nested+0xca/0x120 net/core/sock.c:3170
       lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1613 [inline]
       sco_conn_del+0x12a/0x2a0 net/bluetooth/sco.c:191
       sco_disconn_cfm+0x71/0xb0 net/bluetooth/sco.c:1202
       hci_disconn_cfm include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h:1500 [inline]
       hci_conn_hash_flush+0x127/0x260 net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c:1608
       hci_dev_do_close+0x528/0x1130 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:1778
       hci_unregister_dev+0x1c0/0x5a0 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:4015
       vhci_release+0x70/0xe0 drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:340
       __fput+0x288/0x920 fs/file_table.c:280
       task_work_run+0xdd/0x1a0 kernel/task_work.c:164
       exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:32 [inline]
       do_exit+0xbd4/0x2a60 kernel/exit.c:825
       do_group_exit+0x125/0x310 kernel/exit.c:922
       get_signal+0x47f/0x2160 kernel/signal.c:2808
       arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x2a9/0x1c40 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:865
       handle_signal_work kernel/entry/common.c:148 [inline]
       exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:172 [inline]
       exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x17d/0x290 kernel/entry/common.c:209
       __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:291 [inline]
       syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x60 kernel/entry/common.c:302
       ret_from_fork+0x15/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:288

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO --> &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(hci_cb_list_lock);
                               lock(&hdev->lock);
                               lock(hci_cb_list_lock);
  lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

The issue is that the lock hierarchy should go from &hdev->lock -->
hci_cb_list_lock --> sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO. For example,
one such call trace is:

  hci_dev_do_close():
    hci_dev_lock();
    hci_conn_hash_flush():
      hci_disconn_cfm():
        mutex_lock(&hci_cb_list_lock);
        sco_disconn_cfm():
        sco_conn_del():
          lock_sock(sk);

However, in sco_sock_connect, we call lock_sock before calling
hci_dev_lock inside sco_connect, thus inverting the lock hierarchy.

We fix this by pulling the call to hci_dev_lock out from sco_connect.

Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi 
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Bluetooth: skip invalid hci_sync_conn_complete_evt

2021-09-22T09:43:06+00:00

[ Upstream commit 92fe24a7db751b80925214ede43f8d2be792ea7b ]

Syzbot reported a corrupted list in kobject_add_internal [1]. This
happens when multiple HCI_EV_SYNC_CONN_COMPLETE event packets with
status 0 are sent for the same HCI connection. This causes us to
register the device more than once which corrupts the kset list.

As this is forbidden behavior, we add a check for whether we're
trying to process the same HCI_EV_SYNC_CONN_COMPLETE event multiple
times for one connection. If that's the case, the event is invalid, so
we report an error that the device is misbehaving, and ignore the
packet.

Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=66264bf2fd0476be7e6c [1]
Reported-by: syzbot+66264bf2fd0476be7e6c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+66264bf2fd0476be7e6c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi 
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Bluetooth: add timeout sanity check to hci_inquiry

2021-09-22T09:43:01+00:00

[ Upstream commit f41a4b2b5eb7872109723dab8ae1603bdd9d9ec1 ]

Syzbot hit "task hung" bug in hci_req_sync(). The problem was in
unreasonable huge inquiry timeout passed from userspace.
Fix it by adding sanity check for timeout value to hci_inquiry().

Since hci_inquiry() is the only user of hci_req_sync() with user
controlled timeout value, it makes sense to check timeout value in
hci_inquiry() and don't touch hci_req_sync().

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+be2baed593ea56c6a84c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin 
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Bluetooth: Move shutdown callback before flushing tx and rx queue

2021-09-22T09:43:01+00:00

[ Upstream commit 0ea53674d07fb6db2dd7a7ec2fdc85a12eb246c2 ]

Commit 0ea9fd001a14 ("Bluetooth: Shutdown controller after workqueues
are flushed or cancelled") introduced a regression that makes mtkbtsdio
driver stops working:
[   36.593956] Bluetooth: hci0: Firmware already downloaded
[   46.814613] Bluetooth: hci0: Execution of wmt command timed out
[   46.814619] Bluetooth: hci0: Failed to send wmt func ctrl (-110)

The shutdown callback depends on the result of hdev->rx_work, so we
should call it before flushing rx_work:
-> btmtksdio_shutdown()
 -> mtk_hci_wmt_sync()
  -> __hci_cmd_send()
   -> wait for BTMTKSDIO_TX_WAIT_VND_EVT gets cleared

-> btmtksdio_recv_event()
 -> hci_recv_frame()
  -> queue_work(hdev->workqueue, &hdev->rx_work)
   -> clears BTMTKSDIO_TX_WAIT_VND_EVT

So move the shutdown callback before flushing TX/RX queue to resolve the
issue.

Reported-and-tested-by: Mattijs Korpershoek 
Tested-by: Hsin-Yi Wang 
Cc: Guenter Roeck 
Fixes: 0ea9fd001a14 ("Bluetooth: Shutdown controller after workqueues are flushed or cancelled")
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng 
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Bluetooth: fix repeated calls to sco_sock_kill

2021-09-22T09:43:00+00:00

[ Upstream commit e1dee2c1de2b4dd00eb44004a4bda6326ed07b59 ]

In commit 4e1a720d0312 ("Bluetooth: avoid killing an already killed
socket"), a check was added to sco_sock_kill to skip killing a socket
if the SOCK_DEAD flag was set.

This was done after a trace for a use-after-free bug showed that the
same sock pointer was being killed twice.

Unfortunately, this check prevents sco_sock_kill from running on any
socket. sco_sock_kill kills a socket only if it's zapped and orphaned,
however sock_orphan announces that the socket is dead before detaching
it. i.e., orphaned sockets have the SOCK_DEAD flag set.

To fix this, we remove the check for SOCK_DEAD, and avoid repeated
calls to sco_sock_kill by removing incorrect calls in:

1. sco_sock_timeout. The socket should not be killed on timeout as
further processing is expected to be done. For example,
sco_sock_connect sets the timer then waits for the socket to be
connected or for an error to be returned.

2. sco_conn_del. This function should clean up resources for the
connection, but the socket itself should be cleaned up in
sco_sock_release.

3. sco_sock_close. Calls to sco_sock_close in sco_sock_cleanup_listen
and sco_sock_release are followed by sco_sock_kill. Hence the
duplicated call should be removed.

Fixes: 4e1a720d0312 ("Bluetooth: avoid killing an already killed socket")
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi 
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Bluetooth: increase BTNAMSIZ to 21 chars to fix potential buffer overflow

2021-09-22T09:43:00+00:00

[ Upstream commit 713baf3dae8f45dc8ada4ed2f5fdcbf94a5c274d ]

An earlier commit replaced using batostr to using %pMR sprintf for the
construction of session->name. Static analysis detected that this new
method can use a total of 21 characters (including the trailing '\0')
so we need to increase the BTNAMSIZ from 18 to 21 to fix potential
buffer overflows.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Out-of-bounds write")
Fixes: fcb73338ed53 ("Bluetooth: Use %pMR in sprintf/seq_printf instead of batostr")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King 
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Bluetooth: sco: prevent information leak in sco_conn_defer_accept()

2021-09-22T09:43:00+00:00

[ Upstream commit 59da0b38bc2ea570ede23a3332ecb3e7574ce6b2 ]

Smatch complains that some of these struct members are not initialized
leading to a stack information disclosure:

    net/bluetooth/sco.c:778 sco_conn_defer_accept() warn:
    check that 'cp.retrans_effort' doesn't leak information

This seems like a valid warning.  I've added a default case to fix
this issue.

Fixes: 2f69a82acf6f ("Bluetooth: Use voice setting in deferred SCO connection request")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter 
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin