Bitmaps are fairly popular for their space efficiency, but we don't have generic iterators available. Make percpu's bitmap region iterators available to everyone. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
One of the more common cases of allocation size calculations is finding
the size of a structure that has a zero-sized array at the end, along
with memory for some number of elements for that array. For example:
struct pcpu_alloc_info {
...
struct pcpu_group_info groups[];
};
Make use of the struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded version
in order to avoid any potential type mistakes.
So, replace the following form:
sizeof(*ai) + nr_groups * sizeof(ai->groups[0])
with:
struct_size(ai, groups, nr_groups)
This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
s/perpcu/percpu/ Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> [Dennis: updated title]
pcpu_setup_first_chunk() will panic or BUG_ON if the are some error and doesn't return any error, hence it can be defined to return void. Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> [Dennis: fixed kbuild warning for pcpu_page_first_chunk()]
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this file is released under the gplv2 extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 68 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Armijn Hemel <armijn@tjaldur.nl> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190531190114.292346262@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Pull percpu updates from Dennis Zhou: - scan hint update which helps address performance issues with heavily fragmented blocks - lockdep fix when freeing an allocation causes balance work to be scheduled * 'for-5.2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dennis/percpu: percpu: remove spurious lock dependency between percpu and sched percpu: use chunk scan_hint to skip some scanning percpu: convert chunk hints to be based on pcpu_block_md percpu: make pcpu_block_md generic percpu: use block scan_hint to only scan forward percpu: remember largest area skipped during allocation percpu: add block level scan_hint percpu: set PCPU_BITMAP_BLOCK_SIZE to PAGE_SIZE percpu: relegate chunks unusable when failing small allocations percpu: manage chunks based on contig_bits instead of free_bytes percpu: introduce helper to determine if two regions overlap percpu: do not search past bitmap when allocating an area percpu: update free path with correct new free region
In free_percpu() we sometimes call pcpu_schedule_balance_work() to
queue a work item (which does a wakeup) while holding pcpu_lock.
This creates an unnecessary lock dependency between pcpu_lock and
the scheduler's pi_lock. There are other places where we call
pcpu_schedule_balance_work() without hold pcpu_lock, and this case
doesn't need to be different.
Moving the call outside the lock prevents the following lockdep splat
when running tools/testing/selftests/bpf/{test_maps,test_progs} in
sequence with lockdep enabled:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.1.0-dbg-DEV #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/23:255/18872 is trying to acquire lock:
000000000bc79290 (&(&pool->lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: __queue_work+0xb2/0x520
but task is already holding lock:
00000000e3e7a6aa (pcpu_lock){..-.}, at: free_percpu+0x36/0x260
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #4 (pcpu_lock){..-.}:
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x180
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x50
pcpu_alloc+0xfa/0x780
__alloc_percpu_gfp+0x12/0x20
alloc_htab_elem+0x184/0x2b0
__htab_percpu_map_update_elem+0x252/0x290
bpf_percpu_hash_update+0x7c/0x130
__do_sys_bpf+0x1912/0x1be0
__x64_sys_bpf+0x1a/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x59/0x400
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
-> #3 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){....}:
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x180
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x50
htab_map_update_elem+0x1af/0x3a0
-> #2 (&rq->lock){-.-.}:
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x180
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40
task_fork_fair+0x37/0x160
sched_fork+0x211/0x310
copy_process.part.43+0x7b1/0x2160
_do_fork+0xda/0x6b0
kernel_thread+0x29/0x30
rest_init+0x22/0x260
arch_call_rest_init+0xe/0x10
start_kernel+0x4fd/0x520
x86_64_start_reservations+0x24/0x26
x86_64_start_kernel+0x6f/0x72
secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
-> #1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}:
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x180
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x50
try_to_wake_up+0x41/0x600
wake_up_process+0x15/0x20
create_worker+0x16b/0x1e0
workqueue_init+0x279/0x2ee
kernel_init_freeable+0xf7/0x288
kernel_init+0xf/0x180
ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
-> #0 (&(&pool->lock)->rlock){-.-.}:
__lock_acquire+0x101f/0x12a0
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x180
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40
__queue_work+0xb2/0x520
queue_work_on+0x38/0x80
free_percpu+0x221/0x260
pcpu_freelist_destroy+0x11/0x20
stack_map_free+0x2a/0x40
bpf_map_free_deferred+0x3c/0x50
process_one_work+0x1f7/0x580
worker_thread+0x54/0x410
kthread+0x10f/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&(&pool->lock)->rlock --> &htab->buckets[i].lock --> pcpu_lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(pcpu_lock);
lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock);
lock(pcpu_lock);
lock(&(&pool->lock)->rlock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by kworker/23:255/18872:
#0: 00000000b36a6e16 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.},
at: process_one_work+0x17a/0x580
#1: 00000000dfd966f0 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.},
at: process_one_work+0x17a/0x580
#2: 00000000e3e7a6aa (pcpu_lock){..-.},
at: free_percpu+0x36/0x260
stack backtrace:
CPU: 23 PID: 18872 Comm: kworker/23:255 Not tainted 5.1.0-dbg-DEV #1
Hardware name: ...
Workqueue: events bpf_map_free_deferred
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x67/0x95
print_circular_bug.isra.38+0x1c6/0x220
check_prev_add.constprop.50+0x9f6/0xd20
__lock_acquire+0x101f/0x12a0
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x180
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40
__queue_work+0xb2/0x520
queue_work_on+0x38/0x80
free_percpu+0x221/0x260
pcpu_freelist_destroy+0x11/0x20
stack_map_free+0x2a/0x40
bpf_map_free_deferred+0x3c/0x50
process_one_work+0x1f7/0x580
worker_thread+0x54/0x410
kthread+0x10f/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Since commit ad67b74d2469d9b8 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p"),
at boot "____ptrval____" is printed instead of actual addresses:
percpu: Embedded 38 pages/cpu @(____ptrval____) s124376 r0 d31272 u524288
Instead of changing the print to "%px", and leaking kernel addresses,
just remove the print completely, cfr. e.g. commit 071929dbdd865f77
("arm64: Stop printing the virtual memory layout").
Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Just like blocks, chunks now maintain a scan_hint. This can be used to skip some scanning by promoting the scan_hint to be the contig_hint. The chunk's scan_hint is primarily updated on the backside and relies on full scanning when a block becomes free or the free region spans across blocks. Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
As mentioned in the last patch, a chunk's hints are no different than a block just responsible for more bits. This converts chunk level hints to use a pcpu_block_md to maintain them. This lets us reuse the same hint helper functions as a block. The left_free and right_free are unused by the chunk's pcpu_block_md. Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>