linux-stable.git/mm/memory.c, branch v3.12.35

mm: make copy_pte_range static again

2014-09-26T09:52:07+00:00

commit 21bda264f4243f61dfcc485174055f12ad0530b4 upstream.

Commit 71e3aac0724f ("thp: transparent hugepage core") adds
copy_pte_range prototype to huge_mm.h.  I'm not sure why (or if) this
function have been used outside of memory.c, but it currently isn't.
This patch makes copy_pte_range() static again.

Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand 
Acked-by: David Rientjes 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby

mm/memory.c: use entry = ACCESS_ONCE(*pte) in handle_pte_fault()

2014-09-26T09:52:06+00:00

commit c0d73261f5c1355a35b8b40e871d31578ce0c044 upstream.

Use ACCESS_ONCE() in handle_pte_fault() when getting the entry or
orig_pte upon which all subsequent decisions and pte_same() tests will
be made.

I have no evidence that its lack is responsible for the mm/filemap.c:202
BUG_ON(page_mapped(page)) in __delete_from_page_cache() found by
trinity, and I am not optimistic that it will fix it.  But I have found
no other explanation, and ACCESS_ONCE() here will surely not hurt.

If gcc does re-access the pte before passing it down, then that would be
disastrous for correct page fault handling, and certainly could explain
the page_mapped() BUGs seen (concurrent fault causing page to be mapped
in a second time on top of itself: mapcount 2 for a single pte).

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins 
Cc: Sasha Levin 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" 
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby

mm: make fixup_user_fault() check the vma access rights too

2014-06-06T09:40:21+00:00

commit 1b17844b29ae042576bea588164f2f1e9590a8bc upstream.

fixup_user_fault() is used by the futex code when the direct user access
fails, and the futex code wants it to either map in the page in a usable
form or return an error.  It relied on handle_mm_fault() to map the
page, and correctly checked the error return from that, but while that
does map the page, it doesn't actually guarantee that the page will be
mapped with sufficient permissions to be then accessed.

So do the appropriate tests of the vma access rights by hand.

[ Side note: arguably handle_mm_fault() could just do that itself, but
  we have traditionally done it in the caller, because some callers -
  notably get_user_pages() - have been able to access pages even when
  they are mapped with PROT_NONE.  Maybe we should re-visit that design
  decision, but in the meantime this is the minimal patch. ]

Found by Dave Jones running his trinity tool.

Reported-by: Dave Jones 
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby

mm, thp: fix infinite loop on memcg OOM

2014-03-05T16:13:54+00:00

commit 9845cbbd113fbb5b769a45d8e88dc47bc12df4e0 upstream.

Masayoshi Mizuma reported a bug with the hang of an application under
the memcg limit.  It happens on write-protection fault to huge zero page

If we successfully allocate a huge page to replace zero page but hit the
memcg limit we need to split the zero page with split_huge_page_pmd()
and fallback to small pages.

The other part of the problem is that VM_FAULT_OOM has special meaning
in do_huge_pmd_wp_page() context.  __handle_mm_fault() expects the page
to be split if it sees VM_FAULT_OOM and it will will retry page fault
handling.  This causes an infinite loop if the page was not split.

do_huge_pmd_wp_zero_page_fallback() can return VM_FAULT_OOM if it failed
to allocate one small page, so fallback to small pages will not help.

The solution for this part is to replace VM_FAULT_OOM with
VM_FAULT_FALLBACK is fallback required.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov 
Reported-by: Masayoshi Mizuma 
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko 
Cc: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli 
Cc: David Rientjes 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby

mm: numa: Sanitize task_numa_fault() callsites

2013-10-29T10:37:52+00:00

There are three callers of task_numa_fault():

 - do_huge_pmd_numa_page():
     Accounts against the current node, not the node where the
     page resides, unless we migrated, in which case it accounts
     against the node we migrated to.

 - do_numa_page():
     Accounts against the current node, not the node where the
     page resides, unless we migrated, in which case it accounts
     against the node we migrated to.

 - do_pmd_numa_page():
     Accounts not at all when the page isn't migrated, otherwise
     accounts against the node we migrated towards.

This seems wrong to me; all three sites should have the same
sementaics, furthermore we should accounts against where the page
really is, we already know where the task is.

So modify all three sites to always account; we did after all receive
the fault; and always account to where the page is after migration,
regardless of success.

They all still differ on when they clear the PTE/PMD; ideally that
would get sorted too.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman 
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel 
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli 
Cc: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1381141781-10992-8-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

mm: memcg: handle non-error OOM situations more gracefully

2013-10-17T04:35:53+00:00

Commit 3812c8c8f395 ("mm: memcg: do not trap chargers with full
callstack on OOM") assumed that only a few places that can trigger a
memcg OOM situation do not return VM_FAULT_OOM, like optional page cache
readahead.  But there are many more and it's impractical to annotate
them all.

First of all, we don't want to invoke the OOM killer when the failed
allocation is gracefully handled, so defer the actual kill to the end of
the fault handling as well.  This simplifies the code quite a bit for
added bonus.

Second, since a failed allocation might not be the abrupt end of the
fault, the memcg OOM handler needs to be re-entrant until the fault
finishes for subsequent allocation attempts.  If an allocation is
attempted after the task already OOMed, allow it to bypass the limit so
that it can quickly finish the fault and invoke the OOM killer.

Reported-by: azurIt 
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Michal Hocko 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: migration: do not lose soft dirty bit if page is in migration state

2013-10-17T04:35:52+00:00

If page migration is turned on in config and the page is migrating, we
may lose the soft dirty bit.  If fork and mprotect are called on
migrating pages (once migration is complete) pages do not obtain the
soft dirty bit in the correspond pte entries.  Fix it adding an
appropriate test on swap entries.

Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov 
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov 
Cc: Andy Lutomirski 
Cc: Matt Mackall 
Cc: Xiao Guangrong 
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti 
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro 
Cc: Stephen Rothwell 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" 
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi 
Cc: Mel Gorman 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

thp: consolidate code between handle_mm_fault() and do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page()

2013-09-12T22:38:03+00:00

do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() has copy-pasted piece of handle_mm_fault()
to handle fallback path.

Let's consolidate code back by introducing VM_FAULT_FALLBACK return
code.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov 
Acked-by: Hillf Danton 
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli 
Cc: Al Viro 
Cc: Hugh Dickins 
Cc: Wu Fengguang 
Cc: Jan Kara 
Cc: Mel Gorman 
Cc: Andi Kleen 
Cc: Matthew Wilcox 
Cc: Dave Hansen 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: memcg: do not trap chargers with full callstack on OOM

2013-09-12T22:38:02+00:00

The memcg OOM handling is incredibly fragile and can deadlock.  When a
task fails to charge memory, it invokes the OOM killer and loops right
there in the charge code until it succeeds.  Comparably, any other task
that enters the charge path at this point will go to a waitqueue right
then and there and sleep until the OOM situation is resolved.  The problem
is that these tasks may hold filesystem locks and the mmap_sem; locks that
the selected OOM victim may need to exit.

For example, in one reported case, the task invoking the OOM killer was
about to charge a page cache page during a write(), which holds the
i_mutex.  The OOM killer selected a task that was just entering truncate()
and trying to acquire the i_mutex:

OOM invoking task:
  mem_cgroup_handle_oom+0x241/0x3b0
  mem_cgroup_cache_charge+0xbe/0xe0
  add_to_page_cache_locked+0x4c/0x140
  add_to_page_cache_lru+0x22/0x50
  grab_cache_page_write_begin+0x8b/0xe0
  ext3_write_begin+0x88/0x270
  generic_file_buffered_write+0x116/0x290
  __generic_file_aio_write+0x27c/0x480
  generic_file_aio_write+0x76/0xf0           # takes ->i_mutex
  do_sync_write+0xea/0x130
  vfs_write+0xf3/0x1f0
  sys_write+0x51/0x90
  system_call_fastpath+0x18/0x1d

OOM kill victim:
  do_truncate+0x58/0xa0              # takes i_mutex
  do_last+0x250/0xa30
  path_openat+0xd7/0x440
  do_filp_open+0x49/0xa0
  do_sys_open+0x106/0x240
  sys_open+0x20/0x30
  system_call_fastpath+0x18/0x1d

The OOM handling task will retry the charge indefinitely while the OOM
killed task is not releasing any resources.

A similar scenario can happen when the kernel OOM killer for a memcg is
disabled and a userspace task is in charge of resolving OOM situations.
In this case, ALL tasks that enter the OOM path will be made to sleep on
the OOM waitqueue and wait for userspace to free resources or increase
the group's limit.  But a userspace OOM handler is prone to deadlock
itself on the locks held by the waiting tasks.  For example one of the
sleeping tasks may be stuck in a brk() call with the mmap_sem held for
writing but the userspace handler, in order to pick an optimal victim,
may need to read files from /proc/, which tries to acquire the same
mmap_sem for reading and deadlocks.

This patch changes the way tasks behave after detecting a memcg OOM and
makes sure nobody loops or sleeps with locks held:

1. When OOMing in a user fault, invoke the OOM killer and restart the
   fault instead of looping on the charge attempt.  This way, the OOM
   victim can not get stuck on locks the looping task may hold.

2. When OOMing in a user fault but somebody else is handling it
   (either the kernel OOM killer or a userspace handler), don't go to
   sleep in the charge context.  Instead, remember the OOMing memcg in
   the task struct and then fully unwind the page fault stack with
   -ENOMEM.  pagefault_out_of_memory() will then call back into the
   memcg code to check if the -ENOMEM came from the memcg, and then
   either put the task to sleep on the memcg's OOM waitqueue or just
   restart the fault.  The OOM victim can no longer get stuck on any
   lock a sleeping task may hold.

Debugged by Michal Hocko.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner 
Reported-by: azurIt 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Cc: David Rientjes 
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: memcg: enable memcg OOM killer only for user faults

2013-09-12T22:38:01+00:00

System calls and kernel faults (uaccess, gup) can handle an out of memory
situation gracefully and just return -ENOMEM.

Enable the memcg OOM killer only for user faults, where it's really the
only option available.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Cc: David Rientjes 
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 
Cc: azurIt 
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds