linux-stable.git/mm/internal.h, branch linux-4.4.y

mm: add 'try_get_page()' helper function

2020-03-11T06:51:15+00:00

commit 88b1a17dfc3ed7728316478fae0f5ad508f50397 upsteam.

This is the same as the traditional 'get_page()' function, but instead
of unconditionally incrementing the reference count of the page, it only
does so if the count was "safe".  It returns whether the reference count
was incremented (and is marked __must_check, since the caller obviously
has to be aware of it).

Also like 'get_page()', you can't use this function unless you already
had a reference to the page.  The intent is that you can use this
exactly like get_page(), but in situations where you want to limit the
maximum reference count.

The code currently does an unconditional WARN_ON_ONCE() if we ever hit
the reference count issues (either zero or negative), as a notification
that the conditional non-increment actually happened.

NOTE! The count access for the "safety" check is inherently racy, but
that doesn't matter since the buffer we use is basically half the range
of the reference count (ie we look at the sign of the count).

Acked-by: Matthew Wilcox 
Cc: Jann Horn 
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
[ 4.4.y backport notes:
  Srivatsa:
  - Adapted try_get_page() to match the get_page()
    implementation in 4.4.y, except for the refcount check.
  - Added try_get_page_foll() which will be needed
    in a subsequent patch. ]
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) 
Signed-off-by: Ajay Kaher 
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: make page ref count overflow check tighter and more explicit

2020-03-11T06:51:15+00:00

commit f958d7b528b1b40c44cfda5eabe2d82760d868c3 upsteam.

We have a VM_BUG_ON() to check that the page reference count doesn't
underflow (or get close to overflow) by checking the sign of the count.

That's all fine, but we actually want to allow people to use a "get page
ref unless it's already very high" helper function, and we want that one
to use the sign of the page ref (without triggering this VM_BUG_ON).

Change the VM_BUG_ON to only check for small underflows (or _very_ close
to overflowing), and ignore overflows which have strayed into negative
territory.

Acked-by: Matthew Wilcox 
Cc: Jann Horn 
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
[ 4.4.y backport notes:
  Ajay: Open-coded atomic refcount access due to missing
  page_ref_count() helper in 4.4.y
  Srivatsa: Added overflow check to get_page_foll() and related code. ]
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) 
Signed-off-by: Ajay Kaher 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm, mprotect: flush TLB if potentially racing with a parallel reclaim leaving stale TLB entries

2017-08-11T16:08:50+00:00

commit 3ea277194daaeaa84ce75180ec7c7a2075027a68 upstream.

Stable note for 4.4: The upstream patch patches madvise(MADV_FREE) but 4.4
	does not have support for that feature. The changelog is left
	as-is but the hunk related to madvise is omitted from the backport.

Nadav Amit identified a theoritical race between page reclaim and
mprotect due to TLB flushes being batched outside of the PTL being held.

He described the race as follows:

        CPU0                            CPU1
        ----                            ----
                                        user accesses memory using RW PTE
                                        [PTE now cached in TLB]
        try_to_unmap_one()
        ==> ptep_get_and_clear()
        ==> set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending()
                                        mprotect(addr, PROT_READ)
                                        ==> change_pte_range()
                                        ==> [ PTE non-present - no flush ]

                                        user writes using cached RW PTE
        ...

        try_to_unmap_flush()

The same type of race exists for reads when protecting for PROT_NONE and
also exists for operations that can leave an old TLB entry behind such
as munmap, mremap and madvise.

For some operations like mprotect, it's not necessarily a data integrity
issue but it is a correctness issue as there is a window where an
mprotect that limits access still allows access.  For munmap, it's
potentially a data integrity issue although the race is massive as an
munmap, mmap and return to userspace must all complete between the
window when reclaim drops the PTL and flushes the TLB.  However, it's
theoritically possible so handle this issue by flushing the mm if
reclaim is potentially currently batching TLB flushes.

Other instances where a flush is required for a present pte should be ok
as either the page lock is held preventing parallel reclaim or a page
reference count is elevated preventing a parallel free leading to
corruption.  In the case of page_mkclean there isn't an obvious path
that userspace could take advantage of without using the operations that
are guarded by this patch.  Other users such as gup as a race with
reclaim looks just at PTEs.  huge page variants should be ok as they
don't race with reclaim.  mincore only looks at PTEs.  userfault also
should be ok as if a parallel reclaim takes place, it will either fault
the page back in or read some of the data before the flush occurs
triggering a fault.

Note that a variant of this patch was acked by Andy Lutomirski but this
was for the x86 parts on top of his PCID work which didn't make the 4.13
merge window as expected.  His ack is dropped from this version and
there will be a follow-on patch on top of PCID that will include his
ack.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak comments]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix spello]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170717155523.emckq2esjro6hf3z@suse.de
Reported-by: Nadav Amit 
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman 
Cc: Andy Lutomirski 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm, sl[au]b: add __GFP_ATOMIC to the GFP reclaim mask

2016-08-10T09:49:25+00:00

commit e838a45f9392a5bd2be1cd3ab0b16ae85857461c upstream.

Commit d0164adc89f6 ("mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable
to sleep, unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking kswapd") modified
__GFP_WAIT to explicitly identify the difference between atomic callers
and those that were unwilling to sleep.  Later the definition was
removed entirely.

The GFP_RECLAIM_MASK is the set of flags that affect watermark checking
and reclaim behaviour but __GFP_ATOMIC was never added.  Without it,
atomic users of the slab allocator strip the __GFP_ATOMIC flag and
cannot access the page allocator atomic reserves.  This patch addresses
the problem.

The user-visible impact depends on the workload but potentially atomic
allocations unnecessarily fail without this path.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160610093832.GK2527@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman 
Reported-by: Marcin Wojtas 
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: use 'unsigned int' for page order

2015-11-07T01:50:42+00:00

Let's try to be consistent about data type of page order.

[sfr@canb.auug.org.au: fix build (type of pageblock_order)]
[hughd@google.com: some configs end up with MAX_ORDER and pageblock_order having different types]
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka 
Reviewed-by: Andrea Arcangeli 
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" 
Cc: Andi Kleen 
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V 
Cc: Christoph Lameter 
Cc: David Rientjes 
Cc: Joonsoo Kim 
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky 
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell 
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: make compound_head() robust

2015-11-07T01:50:42+00:00

Hugh has pointed that compound_head() call can be unsafe in some
context. There's one example:

	CPU0					CPU1

isolate_migratepages_block()
  page_count()
    compound_head()
      !!PageTail() == true
					put_page()
					  tail->first_page = NULL
      head = tail->first_page
					alloc_pages(__GFP_COMP)
					   prep_compound_page()
					     tail->first_page = head
					     __SetPageTail(p);
      !!PageTail() == true
    

The race is pure theoretical. I don't it's possible to trigger it in
practice. But who knows.

We can fix the race by changing how encode PageTail() and compound_head()
within struct page to be able to update them in one shot.

The patch introduces page->compound_head into third double word block in
front of compound_dtor and compound_order. Bit 0 encodes PageTail() and
the rest bits are pointer to head page if bit zero is set.

The patch moves page->pmd_huge_pte out of word, just in case if an
architecture defines pgtable_t into something what can have the bit 0
set.

hugetlb_cgroup uses page->lru.next in the second tail page to store
pointer struct hugetlb_cgroup. The patch switch it to use page->private
in the second tail page instead. The space is free since ->first_page is
removed from the union.

The patch also opens possibility to remove HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER
limitation, since there's now space in first tail page to store struct
hugetlb_cgroup pointer. But that's out of scope of the patch.

That means page->compound_head shares storage space with:

 - page->lru.next;
 - page->next;
 - page->rcu_head.next;

That's too long list to be absolutely sure, but looks like nobody uses
bit 0 of the word.

page->rcu_head.next guaranteed[1] to have bit 0 clean as long as we use
call_rcu(), call_rcu_bh(), call_rcu_sched(), or call_srcu(). But future
call_rcu_lazy() is not allowed as it makes use of the bit and we can
get false positive PageTail().

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20150827163634.GD4029@linux.vnet.ibm.com

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Reviewed-by: Andrea Arcangeli 
Cc: Hugh Dickins 
Cc: David Rientjes 
Cc: Vlastimil Babka 
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney 
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V 
Cc: Andi Kleen 
Cc: Christoph Lameter 
Cc: Joonsoo Kim 
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: page_alloc: hide some GFP internals and document the bits and flag combinations

2015-11-07T01:50:42+00:00

Andrew stated the following

	We have quite a history of remote parts of the kernel using
	weird/wrong/inexplicable combinations of __GFP_ flags.	I tend
	to think that this is because we didn't adequately explain the
	interface.

	And I don't think that gfp.h really improved much in this area as
	a result of this patchset.  Could you go through it some time and
	decide if we've adequately documented all this stuff?

This patches first moves some GFP flag combinations that are part of the MM
internals to mm/internal.h. The rest of the patch documents the __GFP_FOO
bits under various headings and then documents the flag combinations. It
will not help callers that are brain damaged but the clarity might motivate
some fixes and avoid future mistakes.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman 
Cc: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Rik van Riel 
Cc: Vlastimil Babka 
Cc: David Rientjes 
Cc: Joonsoo Kim 
Cc: Michal Hocko 
Cc: Vitaly Wool 
Cc: Rik van Riel 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, page_alloc: remove unnecessary recalculations for dirty zone balancing

2015-11-07T01:50:42+00:00

File-backed pages that will be immediately written are balanced between
zones.  This heuristic tries to avoid having a single zone filled with
recently dirtied pages but the checks are unnecessarily expensive.  Move
consider_zone_balanced into the alloc_context instead of checking bitmaps
multiple times.  The patch also gives the parameter a more meaningful
name.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman 
Acked-by: David Rientjes 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka 
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Christoph Lameter 
Cc: Vitaly Wool 
Cc: Rik van Riel 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: page migration fix PageMlocked on migrated pages

2015-11-06T03:34:48+00:00

Commit e6c509f85455 ("mm: use clear_page_mlock() in page_remove_rmap()")
in v3.7 inadvertently made mlock_migrate_page() impotent: page migration
unmaps the page from userspace before migrating, and that commit clears
PageMlocked on the final unmap, leaving mlock_migrate_page() with
nothing to do.  Not a serious bug, the next attempt at reclaiming the
page would fix it up; but a betrayal of page migration's intent - the
new page ought to emerge as PageMlocked.

I don't see how to fix it for mlock_migrate_page() itself; but easily
fixed in remove_migration_pte(), by calling mlock_vma_page() when the vma
is VM_LOCKED - under pte lock as in try_to_unmap_one().

Delete mlock_migrate_page()?  Not quite, it does still serve a purpose for
migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(): where we could replace it by a test,
clear_page_mlock(), mlock_vma_page() sequence; but would that be an
improvement?  mlock_migrate_page() is fairly lean, and let's make it
leaner by skipping the irq save/restore now clearly not needed.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins 
Cc: Christoph Lameter 
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" 
Cc: Rik van Riel 
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka 
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso 
Cc: Oleg Nesterov 
Cc: Sasha Levin 
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov 
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/compaction: correct to flush migrated pages if pageblock skip happens

2015-09-08T22:35:28+00:00

We cache isolate_start_pfn before entering isolate_migratepages().  If
pageblock is skipped in isolate_migratepages() due to whatever reason,
cc->migrate_pfn can be far from isolate_start_pfn hence we flush pages
that were freed.  For example, the following scenario can be possible:

- assume order-9 compaction, pageblock order is 9
- start_isolate_pfn is 0x200
- isolate_migratepages()
  - skip a number of pageblocks
  - start to isolate from pfn 0x600
  - cc->migrate_pfn = 0x620
  - return
- last_migrated_pfn is set to 0x200
- check flushing condition
  - current_block_start is set to 0x600
  - last_migrated_pfn < current_block_start then do useless flush

This wrong flush would not help the performance and success rate so this
patch tries to fix it.  One simple way to know the exact position where
we start to isolate migratable pages is that we cache it in
isolate_migratepages() before entering actual isolation.  This patch
implements that and fixes the problem.

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim 
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka 
Cc: Mel Gorman 
Cc: Rik van Riel 
Cc: David Rientjes 
Cc: Minchan Kim 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds