linux-stable.git/mm/backing-dev.c, branch v4.14.331

mm: bdi: initialize bdi_min_ratio when bdi is unregistered

2021-12-14T09:16:54+00:00

commit 3c376dfafbf7a8ea0dea212d095ddd83e93280bb upstream.

Initialize min_ratio if it is set during bdi unregistration.  This can
prevent problems that may occur a when bdi is removed without resetting
min_ratio.

For example.
1) insert external sdcard
2) set external sdcard's min_ratio 70
3) remove external sdcard without setting min_ratio 0
4) insert external sdcard
5) set external sdcard's min_ratio 70 << error occur(can't set)

Because when an sdcard is removed, the present bdi_min_ratio value will
remain.  Currently, the only way to reset bdi_min_ratio is to reboot.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak comment and coding style]

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211021161942.5983-1-mj0123.lee@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Manjong Lee 
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Changheun Lee 
Cc: Jens Axboe 
Cc: Christoph Hellwig 
Cc: Matthew Wilcox 
Cc: 
Cc: 
Cc: 
Cc: 
Cc: 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bdi: Do not use freezable workqueue

2021-07-20T14:17:45+00:00

commit a2b90f11217790ec0964ba9c93a4abb369758c26 upstream.

A removable block device, such as NVMe or SSD connected over Thunderbolt
can be hot-removed any time including when the system is suspended. When
device is hot-removed during suspend and the system gets resumed, kernel
first resumes devices and then thaws the userspace including freezable
workqueues. What happens in that case is that the NVMe driver notices
that the device is unplugged and removes it from the system. This ends
up calling bdi_unregister() for the gendisk which then schedules
wb_workfn() to be run one more time.

However, since the bdi_wq is still frozen flush_delayed_work() call in
wb_shutdown() blocks forever halting system resume process. User sees
this as hang as nothing is happening anymore.

Triggering sysrq-w reveals this:

  Workqueue: nvme-wq nvme_remove_dead_ctrl_work [nvme]
  Call Trace:
   ? __schedule+0x2c5/0x630
   ? wait_for_completion+0xa4/0x120
   schedule+0x3e/0xc0
   schedule_timeout+0x1c9/0x320
   ? resched_curr+0x1f/0xd0
   ? wait_for_completion+0xa4/0x120
   wait_for_completion+0xc3/0x120
   ? wake_up_q+0x60/0x60
   __flush_work+0x131/0x1e0
   ? flush_workqueue_prep_pwqs+0x130/0x130
   bdi_unregister+0xb9/0x130
   del_gendisk+0x2d2/0x2e0
   nvme_ns_remove+0xed/0x110 [nvme_core]
   nvme_remove_namespaces+0x96/0xd0 [nvme_core]
   nvme_remove+0x5b/0x160 [nvme]
   pci_device_remove+0x36/0x90
   device_release_driver_internal+0xdf/0x1c0
   nvme_remove_dead_ctrl_work+0x14/0x30 [nvme]
   process_one_work+0x1c2/0x3f0
   worker_thread+0x48/0x3e0
   kthread+0x100/0x140
   ? current_work+0x30/0x30
   ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
   ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40

This is not limited to NVMes so exactly same issue can be reproduced by
hot-removing SSD (over Thunderbolt) while the system is suspended.

Prevent this from happening by removing WQ_FREEZABLE from bdi_wq.

Reported-by: AceLan Kao 
Link: https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=138695698516487
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204385
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191002122136.GD2819@lahna.fi.intel.com/#t
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Cc: Macpaul Lin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

memcg: fix a crash in wb_workfn when a device disappears

2021-02-23T13:00:30+00:00

[ Upstream commit 68f23b89067fdf187763e75a56087550624fdbee ]

Without memcg, there is a one-to-one mapping between the bdi and
bdi_writeback structures.  In this world, things are fairly
straightforward; the first thing bdi_unregister() does is to shutdown
the bdi_writeback structure (or wb), and part of that writeback ensures
that no other work queued against the wb, and that the wb is fully
drained.

With memcg, however, there is a one-to-many relationship between the bdi
and bdi_writeback structures; that is, there are multiple wb objects
which can all point to a single bdi.  There is a refcount which prevents
the bdi object from being released (and hence, unregistered).  So in
theory, the bdi_unregister() *should* only get called once its refcount
goes to zero (bdi_put will drop the refcount, and when it is zero,
release_bdi gets called, which calls bdi_unregister).

Unfortunately, del_gendisk() in block/gen_hd.c never got the memo about
the Brave New memcg World, and calls bdi_unregister directly.  It does
this without informing the file system, or the memcg code, or anything
else.  This causes the root wb associated with the bdi to be
unregistered, but none of the memcg-specific wb's are shutdown.  So when
one of these wb's are woken up to do delayed work, they try to
dereference their wb->bdi->dev to fetch the device name, but
unfortunately bdi->dev is now NULL, thanks to the bdi_unregister()
called by del_gendisk().  As a result, *boom*.

Fortunately, it looks like the rest of the writeback path is perfectly
happy with bdi->dev and bdi->owner being NULL, so the simplest fix is to
create a bdi_dev_name() function which can handle bdi->dev being NULL.
This also allows us to bulletproof the writeback tracepoints to prevent
them from dereferencing a NULL pointer and crashing the kernel if one is
tracing with memcg's enabled, and an iSCSI device dies or a USB storage
stick is pulled.

The most common way of triggering this will be hotremoval of a device
while writeback with memcg enabled is going on.  It was triggering
several times a day in a heavily loaded production environment.

Google Bug Id: 145475544

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191227194829.150110-1-tytso@mit.edu
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191228005211.163952-1-tytso@mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Cc: Chris Mason 
Cc: Tejun Heo 
Cc: Jens Axboe 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

writeback: synchronize sync(2) against cgroup writeback membership switches

2019-03-05T16:58:01+00:00

[ Upstream commit 7fc5854f8c6efae9e7624970ab49a1eac2faefb1 ]

sync_inodes_sb() can race against cgwb (cgroup writeback) membership
switches and fail to writeback some inodes.  For example, if an inode
switches to another wb while sync_inodes_sb() is in progress, the new
wb might not be visible to bdi_split_work_to_wbs() at all or the inode
might jump from a wb which hasn't issued writebacks yet to one which
already has.

This patch adds backing_dev_info->wb_switch_rwsem to synchronize cgwb
switch path against sync_inodes_sb() so that sync_inodes_sb() is
guaranteed to see all the target wbs and inodes can't jump wbs to
escape syncing.

v2: Fixed misplaced rwsem init.  Spotted by Jiufei.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo 
Reported-by: Jiufei Xue 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/dc694ae2-f07f-61e1-7097-7c8411cee12d@gmail.com
Acked-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bdi: Fix another oops in wb_workfn()

2018-07-22T12:28:49+00:00

commit 3ee7e8697d5860b173132606d80a9cd35e7113ee upstream.

syzbot is reporting NULL pointer dereference at wb_workfn() [1] due to
wb->bdi->dev being NULL. And Dmitry confirmed that wb->state was
WB_shutting_down after wb->bdi->dev became NULL. This indicates that
unregister_bdi() failed to call wb_shutdown() on one of wb objects.

The problem is in cgwb_bdi_unregister() which does cgwb_kill() and thus
drops bdi's reference to wb structures before going through the list of
wbs again and calling wb_shutdown() on each of them. This way the loop
iterating through all wbs can easily miss a wb if that wb has already
passed through cgwb_remove_from_bdi_list() called from wb_shutdown()
from cgwb_release_workfn() and as a result fully shutdown bdi although
wb_workfn() for this wb structure is still running. In fact there are
also other ways cgwb_bdi_unregister() can race with
cgwb_release_workfn() leading e.g. to use-after-free issues:

CPU1                            CPU2
                                cgwb_bdi_unregister()
                                  cgwb_kill(*slot);

cgwb_release()
  queue_work(cgwb_release_wq, &wb->release_work);
cgwb_release_workfn()
                                  wb = list_first_entry(&bdi->wb_list, ...)
                                  spin_unlock_irq(&cgwb_lock);
  wb_shutdown(wb);
  ...
  kfree_rcu(wb, rcu);
                                  wb_shutdown(wb); -> oops use-after-free

We solve these issues by synchronizing writeback structure shutdown from
cgwb_bdi_unregister() with cgwb_release_workfn() using a new mutex. That
way we also no longer need synchronization using WB_shutting_down as the
mutex provides it for CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK case and without
CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK wb_shutdown() can be called only once from
bdi_unregister().

Reported-by: syzbot 
Acked-by: Tejun Heo 
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bdi: Move cgroup bdi_writeback to a dedicated low concurrency workqueue

2018-06-26T00:06:32+00:00

commit f183464684190bacbfb14623bd3e4e51b7575b4c upstream.

From 0aa2e9b921d6db71150633ff290199554f0842a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo 
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 10:29:00 -0700

cgwb_release() punts the actual release to cgwb_release_workfn() on
system_wq.  Depending on the number of cgroups or block devices, there
can be a lot of cgwb_release_workfn() in flight at the same time.

We're periodically seeing close to 256 kworkers getting stuck with the
following stack trace and overtime the entire system gets stuck.

  [] _synchronize_rcu_expedited.constprop.72+0x2fc/0x330
  [] synchronize_rcu_expedited+0x24/0x30
  [] bdi_unregister+0x53/0x290
  [] release_bdi+0x89/0xc0
  [] wb_exit+0x85/0xa0
  [] cgwb_release_workfn+0x54/0xb0
  [] process_one_work+0x150/0x410
  [] worker_thread+0x6d/0x520
  [] kthread+0x12c/0x160
  [] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x40
  [] 0xffffffffffffffff

The events leading to the lockup are...

1. A lot of cgwb_release_workfn() is queued at the same time and all
   system_wq kworkers are assigned to execute them.

2. They all end up calling synchronize_rcu_expedited().  One of them
   wins and tries to perform the expedited synchronization.

3. However, that invovles queueing rcu_exp_work to system_wq and
   waiting for it.  Because #1 is holding all available kworkers on
   system_wq, rcu_exp_work can't be executed.  cgwb_release_workfn()
   is waiting for synchronize_rcu_expedited() which in turn is waiting
   for cgwb_release_workfn() to free up some of the kworkers.

We shouldn't be scheduling hundreds of cgwb_release_workfn() at the
same time.  There's nothing to be gained from that.  This patch
updates cgwb release path to use a dedicated percpu workqueue with
@max_active of 1.

While this resolves the problem at hand, it might be a good idea to
isolate rcu_exp_work to its own workqueue too as it can be used from
various paths and is prone to this sort of indirect A-A deadlocks.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo 
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bdi: wake up concurrent wb_shutdown() callers.

2018-05-16T08:10:25+00:00

commit 8236b0ae31c837d2b3a2565c5f8d77f637e824cc upstream.

syzbot is reporting hung tasks at wait_on_bit(WB_shutting_down) in
wb_shutdown() [1]. This seems to be because commit 5318ce7d46866e1d ("bdi:
Shutdown writeback on all cgwbs in cgwb_bdi_destroy()") forgot to call
wake_up_bit(WB_shutting_down) after clear_bit(WB_shutting_down).

Introduce a helper function clear_and_wake_up_bit() and use it, in order
to avoid similar errors in future.

[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=b297474817af98d5796bc544e1bb806fc3da0e5e

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa 
Reported-by: syzbot 
Fixes: 5318ce7d46866e1d ("bdi: Shutdown writeback on all cgwbs in cgwb_bdi_destroy()")
Cc: Tejun Heo 
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara 
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/backing-dev.c: fix an error handling path in 'cgwb_create()'

2017-09-11T20:16:44+00:00

If the 'kmalloc' fails, we must go through the existing error handling
path.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET 
Fixes: 52ebea749aae ("writeback: make backing_dev_info host cgroup-specific bdi_writebacks")
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bdi: Drop 'parent' argument from bdi_register[_va]()

2017-04-20T18:09:55+00:00

Drop 'parent' argument of bdi_register() and bdi_register_va().  It is
always NULL.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig 
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

block: Remove unused functions

2017-04-20T18:09:55+00:00

Now that all backing_dev_info structure are allocated separately, we can
drop some unused functions.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig 
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe