linux-stable.git/lib/test_bpf.c, branch v4.17.2

test_bpf: Fix NULL vs IS_ERR() check in test_skb_segment()

2018-03-29T18:33:29+00:00

The skb_segment() function returns error pointers on error.  It never
returns NULL.

Fixes: 76db8087c4c9 ("net: bpf: add a test for skb_segment in test_bpf module")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter 
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Song 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net: bpf: add a test for skb_segment in test_bpf module

2018-03-25T20:46:05+00:00

Without the previous commit,
"modprobe test_bpf" will have the following errors:
...
[   98.149165] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   98.159362] kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:3667!
[   98.169756] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[   98.179370] Modules linked in:
[   98.179371]  test_bpf(+)
...
which triggers the bug the previous commit intends to fix.

The skbs are constructed to mimic what mlx5 may generate.
The packet size/header may not mimic real cases in production. But
the processing flow is similar.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

test_bpf: Fix testing with CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y on other arches

2018-03-20T22:04:30+00:00

Function bpf_fill_maxinsns11 is designed to not be able to be JITed on
x86_64. So, it fails when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y, and
commit 09584b406742 ("bpf: fix selftests/bpf test_kmod.sh failure when
CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y") makes sure that failure is detected on that
case.

However, it does not fail on other architectures, which have a different
JIT compiler design. So, test_bpf has started to fail to load on those.

After this fix, test_bpf loads fine on both x86_64 and ppc64el.

Fixes: 09584b406742 ("bpf: fix selftests/bpf test_kmod.sh failure when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y")
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo 
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Song 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

test_bpf: reduce MAX_TESTRUNS

2018-02-28T16:49:18+00:00

For tests that are using the maximal number of BPF instruction, each
run takes 20 usec. Looping 10,000 times on them totals 200 ms, which
is bad when the loop is not preemptible.

test_bpf: #264 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:1 19248
18548 PASS
test_bpf: #269 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id jited:1 20896 PASS

Lets divide by ten the number of iterations, so that max latency is
20ms. We could use need_resched() to break the loop earlier if we
believe 20 ms is too much.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

test_bpf: add a schedule point

2018-02-26T20:06:56+00:00

test_bpf() is taking 1.6 seconds nowadays, it is time
to add a schedule point in it.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: fix selftests/bpf test_kmod.sh failure when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y

2018-02-04T23:31:57+00:00

With CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is defined in the config file,
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh failed like below:
  [root@localhost bpf]# ./test_kmod.sh
  sysctl: setting key "net.core.bpf_jit_enable": Invalid argument
  [ JIT enabled:0 hardened:0 ]
  [  132.175681] test_bpf: #297 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump, gap, jump, ... FAIL to prog_create err=-524 len=4096
  [  132.458834] test_bpf: Summary: 348 PASSED, 1 FAILED, [340/340 JIT'ed]
  [ JIT enabled:1 hardened:0 ]
  [  133.456025] test_bpf: #297 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump, gap, jump, ... FAIL to prog_create err=-524 len=4096
  [  133.730935] test_bpf: Summary: 348 PASSED, 1 FAILED, [340/340 JIT'ed]
  [ JIT enabled:1 hardened:1 ]
  [  134.769730] test_bpf: #297 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump, gap, jump, ... FAIL to prog_create err=-524 len=4096
  [  135.050864] test_bpf: Summary: 348 PASSED, 1 FAILED, [340/340 JIT'ed]
  [ JIT enabled:1 hardened:2 ]
  [  136.442882] test_bpf: #297 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump, gap, jump, ... FAIL to prog_create err=-524 len=4096
  [  136.821810] test_bpf: Summary: 348 PASSED, 1 FAILED, [340/340 JIT'ed]
  [root@localhost bpf]#

The test_kmod.sh load/remove test_bpf.ko multiple times with different
settings for sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_{enable,harden}. The failed test #297
of test_bpf.ko is designed such that JIT always fails.

Commit 290af86629b2 (bpf: introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config)
introduced the following tightening logic:
    ...
        if (!bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(fp->aux)) {
                fp = bpf_int_jit_compile(fp);
    #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
                if (!fp->jited) {
                        *err = -ENOTSUPP;
                        return fp;
                }
    #endif
    ...
With this logic, Test #297 always gets return value -ENOTSUPP
when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is defined, causing the test failure.

This patch fixed the failure by marking Test #297 as expected failure
when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is defined.

Fixes: 290af86629b2 (bpf: introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config)
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: add further test cases around div/mod and others

2018-01-27T00:42:07+00:00

Update selftests to relfect recent changes and add various new
test cases.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: add couple of test cases for signed extended imms

2018-01-20T02:36:59+00:00

Add a couple of test cases for interpreter and JIT that are
related to an issue we faced some time ago in Cilium [1],
which is fixed in LLVM with commit e53750e1e086 ("bpf: fix
bug on silently truncating 64-bit immediate").

Test cases were run-time checking kernel to behave as intended
which should also provide some guidance for current or new
JITs in case they should trip over this. Added for cBPF and
eBPF.

  [1] https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/2162

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config

2018-01-09T21:25:26+00:00

The BPF interpreter has been used as part of the spectre 2 attack CVE-2017-5715.

A quote from goolge project zero blog:
"At this point, it would normally be necessary to locate gadgets in
the host kernel code that can be used to actually leak data by reading
from an attacker-controlled location, shifting and masking the result
appropriately and then using the result of that as offset to an
attacker-controlled address for a load. But piecing gadgets together
and figuring out which ones work in a speculation context seems annoying.
So instead, we decided to use the eBPF interpreter, which is built into
the host kernel - while there is no legitimate way to invoke it from inside
a VM, the presence of the code in the host kernel's text section is sufficient
to make it usable for the attack, just like with ordinary ROP gadgets."

To make attacker job harder introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config
option that removes interpreter from the kernel in favor of JIT-only mode.
So far eBPF JIT is supported by:
x64, arm64, arm32, sparc64, s390, powerpc64, mips64

The start of JITed program is randomized and code page is marked as read-only.
In addition "constant blinding" can be turned on with net.core.bpf_jit_harden

v2->v3:
- move __bpf_prog_ret0 under ifdef (Daniel)

v1->v2:
- fix init order, test_bpf and cBPF (Daniel's feedback)
- fix offloaded bpf (Jakub's feedback)
- add 'return 0' dummy in case something can invoke prog->bpf_func
- retarget bpf tree. For bpf-next the patch would need one extra hunk.
  It will be sent when the trees are merged back to net-next

Considered doing:
  int bpf_jit_enable __read_mostly = BPF_EBPF_JIT_DEFAULT;
but it seems better to land the patch as-is and in bpf-next remove
bpf_jit_enable global variable from all JITs, consolidate in one place
and remove this jit_init() function.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: add test case for ld_abs and helper changing pkt data

2017-12-15T17:19:36+00:00

Add a test that i) uses LD_ABS, ii) zeroing R6 before call, iii) calls
a helper that triggers reload of cached skb data, iv) uses LD_ABS again.
It's added for test_bpf in order to do runtime testing after JITing as
well as test_verifier to test that the sequence is allowed.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov