[ Upstream commit 388a1fb7da6aaa1970c7e2a7d7fcd983a87a8484 ]
Thomas reported that commit 652ffc2104ec ("perf/core: Fix narrow
startup race when creating the perf nr_addr_filters sysfs file") made
the entire attribute group vanish, instead of only the nr_addr_filters
attribute.
Additionally a stray return.
Insufficient coffee was involved with both writing and merging the
patch.
Fixes: 652ffc2104ec ("perf/core: Fix narrow startup race when creating the perf nr_addr_filters sysfs file")
Reported-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231122100756.GP8262@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 852486b35f344887786d63250946dd921a05d7e8 ] As per the earlier patches, BPF sub-programs have bpf_callback_t signature and CFI expects callers to have matching signature. This is violated by bpf_prog_aux::bpf_exception_cb(). [peterz: Changelog] Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAADnVQ+Z7UcXXBBhMubhcMM=R-dExk-uHtfOLtoLxQ1XxEpqEA@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215092707.910319166@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 06e5c999f10269a532304e89a6adb2fbfeb0593c ]
generic_map_{delete,update}_batch() doesn't set uattr->batch.count as
zero before it tries to allocate memory for key. If the memory
allocation fails, the value of uattr->batch.count will be incorrect.
Fix it by setting uattr->batch.count as zero beore batched update or
deletion.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208102355.2628918-6-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 79d93b3c6ffd79abcd8e43345980aa1e904879c4 ] Both map deletion operation, map release and map free operation use fd_array_map_delete_elem() to remove the element from fd array and need_defer is always true in fd_array_map_delete_elem(). For the map deletion operation and map release operation, need_defer=true is necessary, because the bpf program, which accesses the element in fd array, may still alive. However for map free operation, it is certain that the bpf program which owns the fd array has already been exited, so setting need_defer as false is appropriate for map free operation. So fix it by adding need_defer parameter to bpf_fd_array_map_clear() and adding a new helper __fd_array_map_delete_elem() to handle the map deletion, map release and map free operations correspondingly. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204140425.1480317-4-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 169410eba271afc9f0fb476d996795aa26770c6d ]
These three bpf_map_{lookup,update,delete}_elem() helpers are also
available for sleepable bpf program, so add the corresponding lock
assertion for sleepable bpf program, otherwise the following warning
will be reported when a sleepable bpf program manipulates bpf map under
interpreter mode (aka bpf_jit_enable=0):
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4985 at kernel/bpf/helpers.c:40 ......
CPU: 3 PID: 4985 Comm: test_progs Not tainted 6.6.0+ #2
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) ......
RIP: 0010:bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60
......
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __warn+0xa5/0x240
? bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60
? report_bug+0x1ba/0x1f0
? handle_bug+0x40/0x80
? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x50
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20
? __pfx_bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x10/0x10
? rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online+0x65/0xb0
? rcu_is_watching+0x23/0x50
? bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60
? __pfx_bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x10/0x10
___bpf_prog_run+0x513/0x3b70
__bpf_prog_run32+0x9d/0xd0
? __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur+0xad/0x120
? __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur+0x3e/0x120
bpf_trampoline_6442580665+0x4d/0x1000
__x64_sys_getpgid+0x5/0x30
? do_syscall_64+0x36/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
</TASK>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204140425.1480317-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 022732e3d846e197539712e51ecada90ded0572a ] When auditd_set sets the auditd_conn pointer, audit messages can immediately be put on the socket by other kernel threads. If the backlog is large or the rate is high, this can immediately fill the socket buffer. If the audit daemon requested an ACK for this operation, a full socket buffer causes the ACK to get dropped, also setting ENOBUFS on the socket. To avoid this race and ensure ACKs get through, fast-track the ACK in this specific case to ensure it is sent before auditd_conn is set. Signed-off-by: Chris Riches <chris.riches@nutanix.com> [PM: fix some tab vs space damage] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit f60a631ab9ed5df15e446269ea515f2b8948ba0c ]
When a CPU is taken offline, the contribution of its cfs_rqs to task_groups'
load may remain and will negatively impact the calculation of the share of
the online CPUs.
To fix this bug, clear the contribution of an offlining CPU to task groups'
load and skip its contribution while it is inactive.
Here's the reproducer of the anomaly, by Imran Khan:
"So far I have encountered only one rather lengthy way of reproducing this issue,
which is as follows:
1. Take a KVM guest (booted with 4 CPUs and can be scaled up to 124 CPUs) and
create 2 custom cgroups: /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/test_group_1 and /sys/fs/cgroup/
cpu/test_group_2
2. Assign a CPU intensive workload to each of these cgroups and start the
workload.
For my tests I am using following app:
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
unsigned long count, i, val;
if (argc != 2) {
printf("usage: ./a.out <number of random nums to generate> \n");
return 0;
}
count = strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 10);
printf("Generating %lu random numbers \n", count);
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
val = rand();
val = val % 2;
//usleep(1);
}
printf("Generated %lu random numbers \n", count);
return 0;
}
Also since the system is booted with 4 CPUs, in order to completely load the
system I am also launching 4 instances of same test app under:
/sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/
3. We can see that both of the cgroups get similar CPU time:
# systemd-cgtop --depth 1
Path Tasks %CPU Memory Input/s Output/s
/ 659 - 5.5G - -
/system.slice - - 5.7G - -
/test_group_1 4 - - - -
/test_group_2 3 - - - -
/user.slice 31 - 56.5M - -
Path Tasks %CPU Memory Input/s Output/s
/ 659 394.6 5.5G - -
/test_group_2 3 65.7 - - -
/user.slice 29 55.1 48.0M - -
/test_group_1 4 47.3 - - -
/system.slice - 2.2 5.7G - -
Path Tasks %CPU Memory Input/s Output/s
/ 659 394.8 5.5G - -
/test_group_1 4 62.9 - - -
/user.slice 28 44.9 54.2M - -
/test_group_2 3 44.7 - - -
/system.slice - 0.9 5.7G - -
Path Tasks %CPU Memory Input/s Output/s
/ 659 394.4 5.5G - -
/test_group_2 3 58.8 - - -
/test_group_1 4 51.9 - - -
/user.slice 30 39.3 59.6M - -
/system.slice - 1.9 5.7G - -
Path Tasks %CPU Memory Input/s Output/s
/ 659 394.7 5.5G - -
/test_group_1 4 60.9 - - -
/test_group_2 3 57.9 - - -
/user.slice 28 43.5 36.9M - -
/system.slice - 3.0 5.7G - -
Path Tasks %CPU Memory Input/s Output/s
/ 659 395.0 5.5G - -
/test_group_1 4 66.8 - - -
/test_group_2 3 56.3 - - -
/user.slice 29 43.1 51.8M - -
/system.slice - 0.7 5.7G - -
4. Now move systemd-udevd to one of these test groups, say test_group_1, and
perform scale up to 124 CPUs followed by scale down back to 4 CPUs from the
host side.
5. Run the same workload i.e 4 instances of CPU hogger under /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu
and one instance of CPU hogger each in /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/test_group_1 and
/sys/fs/cgroup/test_group_2.
It can be seen that test_group_1 (the one where systemd-udevd was moved) is getting
much less CPU time than the test_group_2, even though at this point of time both of
these groups have only CPU hogger running:
# systemd-cgtop --depth 1
Path Tasks %CPU Memory Input/s Output/s
/ 1219 - 5.4G - -
/system.slice - - 5.6G - -
/test_group_1 4 - - - -
/test_group_2 3 - - - -
/user.slice 26 - 91.3M - -
Path Tasks %CPU Memory Input/s Output/s
/ 1221 394.3 5.4G - -
/test_group_2 3 82.7 - - -
/test_group_1 4 14.3 - - -
/system.slice - 0.8 5.6G - -
/user.slice 26 0.4 91.2M - -
Path Tasks %CPU Memory Input/s Output/s
/ 1221 394.6 5.4G - -
/test_group_2 3 67.4 - - -
/system.slice - 24.6 5.6G - -
/test_group_1 4 12.5 - - -
/user.slice 26 0.4 91.2M - -
Path Tasks %CPU Memory Input/s Output/s
/ 1221 395.2 5.4G - -
/test_group_2 3 60.9 - - -
/system.slice - 27.9 5.6G - -
/test_group_1 4 12.2 - - -
/user.slice 26 0.4 91.2M - -
Path Tasks %CPU Memory Input/s Output/s
/ 1221 395.2 5.4G - -
/test_group_2 3 69.4 - - -
/test_group_1 4 13.9 - - -
/user.slice 28 1.6 92.0M - -
/system.slice - 1.0 5.6G - -
Path Tasks %CPU Memory Input/s Output/s
/ 1221 395.6 5.4G - -
/test_group_2 3 59.3 - - -
/test_group_1 4 14.1 - - -
/user.slice 28 1.3 92.2M - -
/system.slice - 0.7 5.6G - -
Path Tasks %CPU Memory Input/s Output/s
/ 1221 395.5 5.4G - -
/test_group_2 3 67.2 - - -
/test_group_1 4 11.5 - - -
/user.slice 28 1.3 92.5M - -
/system.slice - 0.6 5.6G - -
Path Tasks %CPU Memory Input/s Output/s
/ 1221 395.1 5.4G - -
/test_group_2 3 76.8 - - -
/test_group_1 4 12.9 - - -
/user.slice 28 1.3 92.8M - -
/system.slice - 1.2 5.6G - -
From sched_debug data it can be seen that in bad case the load.weight of per-CPU
sched entities corresponding to test_group_1 has reduced significantly and
also load_avg of test_group_1 remains much higher than that of test_group_2,
even though systemd-udevd stopped running long time back and at this point of
time both cgroups just have the CPU hogger app as running entity."
[ mingo: Added details from the original discussion, plus minor edits to the patch. ]
Reported-by: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231223111545.62135-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 652ffc2104ec1f69dd4a46313888c33527145ccf ] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2023061204-decal-flyable-6090@gregkh Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 84db47ca7146d7bd00eb5cf2b93989a971c84650 ]
Since commit fc137c0ddab2 ("sched/numa: enhance vma scanning logic")
NUMA Balancing allows updating PTEs to trap NUMA hinting faults if the
task had previously accessed VMA. However unconditional scan of VMAs are
allowed during initial phase of VMA creation until process's
mm numa_scan_seq reaches 2 even though current task had not accessed VMA.
Rationale:
- Without initial scan subsequent PTE update may never happen.
- Give fair opportunity to all the VMAs to be scanned and subsequently
understand the access pattern of all the VMAs.
But it has a corner case where, if a VMA is created after some time,
process's mm numa_scan_seq could be already greater than 2.
For e.g., values of mm numa_scan_seq when VMAs are created by running
mmtest autonuma benchmark briefly looks like:
start_seq=0 : 459
start_seq=2 : 138
start_seq=3 : 144
start_seq=4 : 8
start_seq=8 : 1
start_seq=9 : 1
This results in no unconditional PTE updates for those VMAs created after
some time.
Fix:
- Note down the initial value of mm numa_scan_seq in per VMA start_seq.
- Allow unconditional scan till start_seq + 2.
Result:
SUT: AMD EPYC Milan with 2 NUMA nodes 256 cpus.
base kernel: upstream 6.6-rc6 with Mels patches [1] applied.
kernbench
========== base patched %gain
Amean elsp-128 165.09 ( 0.00%) 164.78 * 0.19%*
Duration User 41404.28 41375.08
Duration System 9862.22 9768.48
Duration Elapsed 519.87 518.72
Ops NUMA PTE updates 1041416.00 831536.00
Ops NUMA hint faults 263296.00 220966.00
Ops NUMA pages migrated 258021.00 212769.00
Ops AutoNUMA cost 1328.67 1114.69
autonumabench
NUMA01_THREADLOCAL
==================
Amean elsp-NUMA01_THREADLOCAL 81.79 (0.00%) 67.74 * 17.18%*
Duration User 54832.73 47379.67
Duration System 75.00 185.75
Duration Elapsed 576.72 476.09
Ops NUMA PTE updates 394429.00 11121044.00
Ops NUMA hint faults 1001.00 8906404.00
Ops NUMA pages migrated 288.00 2998694.00
Ops AutoNUMA cost 7.77 44666.84
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2ea7cbce80ac7c62e90cbfb9653a7972f902439f.1697816692.git.raghavendra.kt@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 9a574ea9069be30b835a3da772c039993c43369b upstream.
Commit 71fee48f ("tick-sched: Fix idle and iowait sleeptime accounting vs
CPU hotplug") preserved total idle sleep time and iowait sleeptime across
CPU hotplug events.
Similar reasoning applies to the number of idle calls and idle sleeps to
get the proper average of sleep time per idle invocation.
Preserve those fields too.
Fixes: 71fee48f ("tick-sched: Fix idle and iowait sleeptime accounting vs CPU hotplug")
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240122233534.3094238-1-tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>