<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux-stable.git/kernel, branch v6.15.3</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>ring-buffer: Move cpus_read_lock() outside of buffer-&gt;mutex</title>
<updated>2025-06-19T13:41:06+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Steven Rostedt</name>
<email>rostedt@goodmis.org</email>
</author>
<published>2025-05-27T14:58:20+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=ea97c04a29dc9f6e4d8623d445eb3cf63abf4f4c'/>
<id>ea97c04a29dc9f6e4d8623d445eb3cf63abf4f4c</id>
<content type='text'>
commit c98cc9797b7009308fff73d41bc1d08642dab77a upstream.

Running a modified trace-cmd record --nosplice where it does a mmap of the
ring buffer when '--nosplice' is set, caused the following lockdep splat:

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 6.15.0-rc7-test-00002-gfb7d03d8a82f #551 Not tainted
 ------------------------------------------------------
 trace-cmd/1113 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff888100062888 (&amp;buffer-&gt;mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff888100a5f9f8 (&amp;cpu_buffer-&gt;mapping_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ring_buffer_map+0xcf/0xe70

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -&gt; #5 (&amp;cpu_buffer-&gt;mapping_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0
        ring_buffer_map+0xcf/0xe70
        tracing_buffers_mmap+0x1c4/0x3b0
        __mmap_region+0xd8d/0x1f70
        do_mmap+0x9d7/0x1010
        vm_mmap_pgoff+0x20b/0x390
        ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x2e9/0x440
        do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 -&gt; #4 (&amp;mm-&gt;mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
        __might_fault+0xa5/0x110
        _copy_to_user+0x22/0x80
        _perf_ioctl+0x61b/0x1b70
        perf_ioctl+0x62/0x90
        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x134/0x190
        do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 -&gt; #3 (&amp;cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0
        perf_event_init_cpu+0x325/0x7c0
        perf_event_init+0x52a/0x5b0
        start_kernel+0x263/0x3e0
        x86_64_start_reservations+0x24/0x30
        x86_64_start_kernel+0x95/0xa0
        common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141

 -&gt; #2 (pmus_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0
        perf_event_init_cpu+0xb7/0x7c0
        cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x2c0/0x1030
        __cpuhp_invoke_callback_range+0xbf/0x1f0
        _cpu_up+0x2e7/0x690
        cpu_up+0x117/0x170
        cpuhp_bringup_mask+0xd5/0x120
        bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x13d/0x170
        smp_init+0x2b/0xf0
        kernel_init_freeable+0x441/0x6d0
        kernel_init+0x1e/0x160
        ret_from_fork+0x34/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -&gt; #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
        cpus_read_lock+0x2a/0xd0
        ring_buffer_resize+0x610/0x14e0
        __tracing_resize_ring_buffer.part.0+0x42/0x120
        tracing_set_tracer+0x7bd/0xa80
        tracing_set_trace_write+0x132/0x1e0
        vfs_write+0x21c/0xe80
        ksys_write+0xf9/0x1c0
        do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 -&gt; #0 (&amp;buffer-&gt;mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __lock_acquire+0x1405/0x2210
        lock_acquire+0x174/0x310
        __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0
        ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
        tracing_buffers_mmap+0x1c4/0x3b0
        __mmap_region+0xd8d/0x1f70
        do_mmap+0x9d7/0x1010
        vm_mmap_pgoff+0x20b/0x390
        ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x2e9/0x440
        do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   &amp;buffer-&gt;mutex --&gt; &amp;mm-&gt;mmap_lock --&gt; &amp;cpu_buffer-&gt;mapping_lock

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&amp;cpu_buffer-&gt;mapping_lock);
                                lock(&amp;mm-&gt;mmap_lock);
                                lock(&amp;cpu_buffer-&gt;mapping_lock);
   lock(&amp;buffer-&gt;mutex);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 2 locks held by trace-cmd/1113:
  #0: ffff888106b847e0 (&amp;mm-&gt;mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x192/0x390
  #1: ffff888100a5f9f8 (&amp;cpu_buffer-&gt;mapping_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ring_buffer_map+0xcf/0xe70

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1113 Comm: trace-cmd Not tainted 6.15.0-rc7-test-00002-gfb7d03d8a82f #551 PREEMPT
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  &lt;TASK&gt;
  dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xa0
  print_circular_bug.cold+0x178/0x1be
  check_noncircular+0x146/0x160
  __lock_acquire+0x1405/0x2210
  lock_acquire+0x174/0x310
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? __mutex_lock+0x169/0x18c0
  __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? function_trace_call+0x296/0x370
  ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_function_trace_call+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10
  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2d/0x50
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? __mutex_lock+0x5/0x18c0
  ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x12d/0x270
  ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2d/0x50
  ? rcu_is_watching+0x15/0xb0
  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2d/0x50
  ? trace_preempt_on+0xd0/0x110
  tracing_buffers_mmap+0x1c4/0x3b0
  __mmap_region+0xd8d/0x1f70
  ? ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x99/0xff0
  ? __pfx___mmap_region+0x10/0x10
  ? ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x99/0xff0
  ? __pfx_ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x10/0x10
  ? bpf_lsm_mmap_addr+0x4/0x10
  ? security_mmap_addr+0x46/0xd0
  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd9/0x130
  do_mmap+0x9d7/0x1010
  ? 0xffffffffc0370095
  ? __pfx_do_mmap+0x10/0x10
  vm_mmap_pgoff+0x20b/0x390
  ? __pfx_vm_mmap_pgoff+0x10/0x10
  ? 0xffffffffc0370095
  ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x2e9/0x440
  do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 RIP: 0033:0x7fb0963a7de2
 Code: 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 f7 c1 ff 0f 00 00 75 27 55 89 cd 53 48 89 fb 48 85 ff 74 3b 41 89 ea 48 89 df b8 09 00 00 00 0f 05 &lt;48&gt; 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 76 5b 5d c3 0f 1f 00 48 8b 05 e1 9f 0d 00 64
 RSP: 002b:00007ffdcc8fb878 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000009
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fb0963a7de2
 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000001000 RDI: 0000000000000000
 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000006 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 00007ffdcc8fbe68 R14: 00007fb096628000 R15: 00005633e01a5c90
  &lt;/TASK&gt;

The issue is that cpus_read_lock() is taken within buffer-&gt;mutex. The
memory mapped pages are taken with the mmap_lock held. The buffer-&gt;mutex
is taken within the cpu_buffer-&gt;mapping_lock. There's quite a chain with
all these locks, where the deadlock can be fixed by moving the
cpus_read_lock() outside the taking of the buffer-&gt;mutex.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu &lt;mhiramat@kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers &lt;mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com&gt;
Cc: Vincent Donnefort &lt;vdonnefort@google.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250527105820.0f45d045@gandalf.local.home
Fixes: 117c39200d9d7 ("ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) &lt;rostedt@goodmis.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit c98cc9797b7009308fff73d41bc1d08642dab77a upstream.

Running a modified trace-cmd record --nosplice where it does a mmap of the
ring buffer when '--nosplice' is set, caused the following lockdep splat:

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 6.15.0-rc7-test-00002-gfb7d03d8a82f #551 Not tainted
 ------------------------------------------------------
 trace-cmd/1113 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff888100062888 (&amp;buffer-&gt;mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff888100a5f9f8 (&amp;cpu_buffer-&gt;mapping_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ring_buffer_map+0xcf/0xe70

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -&gt; #5 (&amp;cpu_buffer-&gt;mapping_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0
        ring_buffer_map+0xcf/0xe70
        tracing_buffers_mmap+0x1c4/0x3b0
        __mmap_region+0xd8d/0x1f70
        do_mmap+0x9d7/0x1010
        vm_mmap_pgoff+0x20b/0x390
        ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x2e9/0x440
        do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 -&gt; #4 (&amp;mm-&gt;mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
        __might_fault+0xa5/0x110
        _copy_to_user+0x22/0x80
        _perf_ioctl+0x61b/0x1b70
        perf_ioctl+0x62/0x90
        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x134/0x190
        do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 -&gt; #3 (&amp;cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0
        perf_event_init_cpu+0x325/0x7c0
        perf_event_init+0x52a/0x5b0
        start_kernel+0x263/0x3e0
        x86_64_start_reservations+0x24/0x30
        x86_64_start_kernel+0x95/0xa0
        common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141

 -&gt; #2 (pmus_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0
        perf_event_init_cpu+0xb7/0x7c0
        cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x2c0/0x1030
        __cpuhp_invoke_callback_range+0xbf/0x1f0
        _cpu_up+0x2e7/0x690
        cpu_up+0x117/0x170
        cpuhp_bringup_mask+0xd5/0x120
        bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x13d/0x170
        smp_init+0x2b/0xf0
        kernel_init_freeable+0x441/0x6d0
        kernel_init+0x1e/0x160
        ret_from_fork+0x34/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -&gt; #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
        cpus_read_lock+0x2a/0xd0
        ring_buffer_resize+0x610/0x14e0
        __tracing_resize_ring_buffer.part.0+0x42/0x120
        tracing_set_tracer+0x7bd/0xa80
        tracing_set_trace_write+0x132/0x1e0
        vfs_write+0x21c/0xe80
        ksys_write+0xf9/0x1c0
        do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 -&gt; #0 (&amp;buffer-&gt;mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __lock_acquire+0x1405/0x2210
        lock_acquire+0x174/0x310
        __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0
        ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
        tracing_buffers_mmap+0x1c4/0x3b0
        __mmap_region+0xd8d/0x1f70
        do_mmap+0x9d7/0x1010
        vm_mmap_pgoff+0x20b/0x390
        ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x2e9/0x440
        do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   &amp;buffer-&gt;mutex --&gt; &amp;mm-&gt;mmap_lock --&gt; &amp;cpu_buffer-&gt;mapping_lock

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&amp;cpu_buffer-&gt;mapping_lock);
                                lock(&amp;mm-&gt;mmap_lock);
                                lock(&amp;cpu_buffer-&gt;mapping_lock);
   lock(&amp;buffer-&gt;mutex);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 2 locks held by trace-cmd/1113:
  #0: ffff888106b847e0 (&amp;mm-&gt;mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x192/0x390
  #1: ffff888100a5f9f8 (&amp;cpu_buffer-&gt;mapping_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ring_buffer_map+0xcf/0xe70

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1113 Comm: trace-cmd Not tainted 6.15.0-rc7-test-00002-gfb7d03d8a82f #551 PREEMPT
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  &lt;TASK&gt;
  dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xa0
  print_circular_bug.cold+0x178/0x1be
  check_noncircular+0x146/0x160
  __lock_acquire+0x1405/0x2210
  lock_acquire+0x174/0x310
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? __mutex_lock+0x169/0x18c0
  __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? function_trace_call+0x296/0x370
  ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_function_trace_call+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10
  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2d/0x50
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? __mutex_lock+0x5/0x18c0
  ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x12d/0x270
  ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2d/0x50
  ? rcu_is_watching+0x15/0xb0
  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2d/0x50
  ? trace_preempt_on+0xd0/0x110
  tracing_buffers_mmap+0x1c4/0x3b0
  __mmap_region+0xd8d/0x1f70
  ? ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x99/0xff0
  ? __pfx___mmap_region+0x10/0x10
  ? ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x99/0xff0
  ? __pfx_ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x10/0x10
  ? bpf_lsm_mmap_addr+0x4/0x10
  ? security_mmap_addr+0x46/0xd0
  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd9/0x130
  do_mmap+0x9d7/0x1010
  ? 0xffffffffc0370095
  ? __pfx_do_mmap+0x10/0x10
  vm_mmap_pgoff+0x20b/0x390
  ? __pfx_vm_mmap_pgoff+0x10/0x10
  ? 0xffffffffc0370095
  ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x2e9/0x440
  do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 RIP: 0033:0x7fb0963a7de2
 Code: 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 f7 c1 ff 0f 00 00 75 27 55 89 cd 53 48 89 fb 48 85 ff 74 3b 41 89 ea 48 89 df b8 09 00 00 00 0f 05 &lt;48&gt; 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 76 5b 5d c3 0f 1f 00 48 8b 05 e1 9f 0d 00 64
 RSP: 002b:00007ffdcc8fb878 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000009
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fb0963a7de2
 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000001000 RDI: 0000000000000000
 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000006 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 00007ffdcc8fbe68 R14: 00007fb096628000 R15: 00005633e01a5c90
  &lt;/TASK&gt;

The issue is that cpus_read_lock() is taken within buffer-&gt;mutex. The
memory mapped pages are taken with the mmap_lock held. The buffer-&gt;mutex
is taken within the cpu_buffer-&gt;mapping_lock. There's quite a chain with
all these locks, where the deadlock can be fixed by moving the
cpus_read_lock() outside the taking of the buffer-&gt;mutex.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu &lt;mhiramat@kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers &lt;mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com&gt;
Cc: Vincent Donnefort &lt;vdonnefort@google.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250527105820.0f45d045@gandalf.local.home
Fixes: 117c39200d9d7 ("ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) &lt;rostedt@goodmis.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ring-buffer: Fix buffer locking in ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set()</title>
<updated>2025-06-19T13:41:06+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Dmitry Antipov</name>
<email>dmantipov@yandex.ru</email>
</author>
<published>2025-06-06T11:22:42+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=0fc9a295cd8e59c3636e97395e7c74a9c89fee42'/>
<id>0fc9a295cd8e59c3636e97395e7c74a9c89fee42</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 40ee2afafc1d9fe3aa44a6fbe440d78a5c96a72e upstream.

Enlarge the critical section in ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set() to
ensure that error handling takes place with per-buffer mutex held,
thus preventing list corruption and other concurrency-related issues.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu &lt;mhiramat@kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers &lt;mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com&gt;
Cc: Tzvetomir Stoyanov &lt;tz.stoyanov@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250606112242.1510605-1-dmantipov@yandex.ru
Reported-by: syzbot+05d673e83ec640f0ced9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=05d673e83ec640f0ced9
Fixes: f9b94daa542a8 ("ring-buffer: Set new size of the ring buffer sub page")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov &lt;dmantipov@yandex.ru&gt;
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) &lt;rostedt@goodmis.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 40ee2afafc1d9fe3aa44a6fbe440d78a5c96a72e upstream.

Enlarge the critical section in ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set() to
ensure that error handling takes place with per-buffer mutex held,
thus preventing list corruption and other concurrency-related issues.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu &lt;mhiramat@kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers &lt;mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com&gt;
Cc: Tzvetomir Stoyanov &lt;tz.stoyanov@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250606112242.1510605-1-dmantipov@yandex.ru
Reported-by: syzbot+05d673e83ec640f0ced9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=05d673e83ec640f0ced9
Fixes: f9b94daa542a8 ("ring-buffer: Set new size of the ring buffer sub page")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov &lt;dmantipov@yandex.ru&gt;
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) &lt;rostedt@goodmis.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ring-buffer: Do not trigger WARN_ON() due to a commit_overrun</title>
<updated>2025-06-19T13:41:06+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Steven Rostedt</name>
<email>rostedt@goodmis.org</email>
</author>
<published>2025-05-28T16:15:55+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=e018053632bad8ee0752242c7d2cffb0bbf45404'/>
<id>e018053632bad8ee0752242c7d2cffb0bbf45404</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 4fc78a7c9ca994e1da5d3940704d4e8f0ea8c5e4 upstream.

When reading a memory mapped buffer the reader page is just swapped out
with the last page written in the write buffer. If the reader page is the
same as the commit buffer (the buffer that is currently being written to)
it was assumed that it should never have missed events. If it does, it
triggers a WARN_ON_ONCE().

But there just happens to be one scenario where this can legitimately
happen. That is on a commit_overrun. A commit overrun is when an interrupt
preempts an event being written to the buffer and then the interrupt adds
so many new events that it fills and wraps the buffer back to the commit.
Any new events would then be dropped and be reported as "missed_events".

In this case, the next page to read is the commit buffer and after the
swap of the reader page, the reader page will be the commit buffer, but
this time there will be missed events and this triggers the following
warning:

 ------------[ cut here ]------------
 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1127 at kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:7357 ring_buffer_map_get_reader+0x49a/0x780
 Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass
 CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 1127 Comm: trace-cmd Not tainted 6.15.0-rc7-test-00004-g478bc2824b45-dirty #564 PREEMPT
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
 RIP: 0010:ring_buffer_map_get_reader+0x49a/0x780
 Code: 00 00 00 48 89 fe 48 c1 ee 03 80 3c 2e 00 0f 85 ec 01 00 00 4d 3b a6 a8 00 00 00 0f 85 8a fd ff ff 48 85 c0 0f 84 55 fe ff ff &lt;0f&gt; 0b e9 4e fe ff ff be 08 00 00 00 4c 89 54 24 58 48 89 54 24 50
 RSP: 0018:ffff888121787dc0 EFLAGS: 00010002
 RAX: 00000000000006a2 RBX: ffff888100062800 RCX: ffffffff8190cb49
 RDX: ffff888126934c00 RSI: 1ffff11020200a15 RDI: ffff8881010050a8
 RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffed1024d26982
 R10: ffff888126934c17 R11: ffff8881010050a8 R12: ffff888126934c00
 R13: ffff8881010050b8 R14: ffff888101005000 R15: ffff888126930008
 FS:  00007f95c8cd7540(0000) GS:ffff8882b576e000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 00007f95c8de4dc0 CR3: 0000000128452002 CR4: 0000000000172ef0
 Call Trace:
  &lt;TASK&gt;
  ? __pfx_ring_buffer_map_get_reader+0x10/0x10
  tracing_buffers_ioctl+0x283/0x370
  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x134/0x190
  do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 RIP: 0033:0x7f95c8de48db
 Code: 00 48 89 44 24 18 31 c0 48 8d 44 24 60 c7 04 24 10 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 48 8d 44 24 20 48 89 44 24 10 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 &lt;89&gt; c2 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 1c 48 8b 44 24 18 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 00
 RSP: 002b:00007ffe037ba110 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe037bb2b0 RCX: 00007f95c8de48db
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000005220 RDI: 0000000000000006
 RBP: 00007ffe037ba180 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 00007ffe037bb6f8 R14: 00007f95c9065000 R15: 00005575c7492c90
  &lt;/TASK&gt;
 irq event stamp: 5080
 hardirqs last  enabled at (5079): [&lt;ffffffff83e0adb0&gt;] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x50/0x70
 hardirqs last disabled at (5080): [&lt;ffffffff83e0aa83&gt;] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x63/0x70
 softirqs last  enabled at (4182): [&lt;ffffffff81516122&gt;] handle_softirqs+0x552/0x710
 softirqs last disabled at (4159): [&lt;ffffffff815163f7&gt;] __irq_exit_rcu+0x107/0x210
 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

The above was triggered by running on a kernel with both lockdep and KASAN
as well as kmemleak enabled and executing the following command:

 # perf record -o perf-test.dat -a -- trace-cmd record --nosplice  -e all -p function hackbench 50

With perf interjecting a lot of interrupts and trace-cmd enabling all
events as well as function tracing, with lockdep, KASAN and kmemleak
enabled, it could cause an interrupt preempting an event being written to
add enough events to wrap the buffer. trace-cmd was modified to have
--nosplice use mmap instead of reading the buffer.

The way to differentiate this case from the normal case of there only
being one page written to where the swap of the reader page received that
one page (which is the commit page), check if the tail page is on the
reader page. The difference between the commit page and the tail page is
that the tail page is where new writes go to, and the commit page holds
the first write that hasn't been committed yet. In the case of an
interrupt preempting the write of an event and filling the buffer, it
would move the tail page but not the commit page.

Have the warning only trigger if the tail page is also on the reader page,
and also print out the number of events dropped by a commit overrun as
that can not yet be safely added to the page so that the reader can see
there were events dropped.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers &lt;mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com&gt;
Cc: Vincent Donnefort &lt;vdonnefort@google.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250528121555.2066527e@gandalf.local.home
Fixes: fe832be05a8ee ("ring-buffer: Have mmapped ring buffer keep track of missed events")
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) &lt;mhiramat@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) &lt;rostedt@goodmis.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 4fc78a7c9ca994e1da5d3940704d4e8f0ea8c5e4 upstream.

When reading a memory mapped buffer the reader page is just swapped out
with the last page written in the write buffer. If the reader page is the
same as the commit buffer (the buffer that is currently being written to)
it was assumed that it should never have missed events. If it does, it
triggers a WARN_ON_ONCE().

But there just happens to be one scenario where this can legitimately
happen. That is on a commit_overrun. A commit overrun is when an interrupt
preempts an event being written to the buffer and then the interrupt adds
so many new events that it fills and wraps the buffer back to the commit.
Any new events would then be dropped and be reported as "missed_events".

In this case, the next page to read is the commit buffer and after the
swap of the reader page, the reader page will be the commit buffer, but
this time there will be missed events and this triggers the following
warning:

 ------------[ cut here ]------------
 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1127 at kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:7357 ring_buffer_map_get_reader+0x49a/0x780
 Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass
 CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 1127 Comm: trace-cmd Not tainted 6.15.0-rc7-test-00004-g478bc2824b45-dirty #564 PREEMPT
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
 RIP: 0010:ring_buffer_map_get_reader+0x49a/0x780
 Code: 00 00 00 48 89 fe 48 c1 ee 03 80 3c 2e 00 0f 85 ec 01 00 00 4d 3b a6 a8 00 00 00 0f 85 8a fd ff ff 48 85 c0 0f 84 55 fe ff ff &lt;0f&gt; 0b e9 4e fe ff ff be 08 00 00 00 4c 89 54 24 58 48 89 54 24 50
 RSP: 0018:ffff888121787dc0 EFLAGS: 00010002
 RAX: 00000000000006a2 RBX: ffff888100062800 RCX: ffffffff8190cb49
 RDX: ffff888126934c00 RSI: 1ffff11020200a15 RDI: ffff8881010050a8
 RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffed1024d26982
 R10: ffff888126934c17 R11: ffff8881010050a8 R12: ffff888126934c00
 R13: ffff8881010050b8 R14: ffff888101005000 R15: ffff888126930008
 FS:  00007f95c8cd7540(0000) GS:ffff8882b576e000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 00007f95c8de4dc0 CR3: 0000000128452002 CR4: 0000000000172ef0
 Call Trace:
  &lt;TASK&gt;
  ? __pfx_ring_buffer_map_get_reader+0x10/0x10
  tracing_buffers_ioctl+0x283/0x370
  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x134/0x190
  do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 RIP: 0033:0x7f95c8de48db
 Code: 00 48 89 44 24 18 31 c0 48 8d 44 24 60 c7 04 24 10 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 48 8d 44 24 20 48 89 44 24 10 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 &lt;89&gt; c2 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 1c 48 8b 44 24 18 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 00
 RSP: 002b:00007ffe037ba110 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe037bb2b0 RCX: 00007f95c8de48db
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000005220 RDI: 0000000000000006
 RBP: 00007ffe037ba180 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 00007ffe037bb6f8 R14: 00007f95c9065000 R15: 00005575c7492c90
  &lt;/TASK&gt;
 irq event stamp: 5080
 hardirqs last  enabled at (5079): [&lt;ffffffff83e0adb0&gt;] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x50/0x70
 hardirqs last disabled at (5080): [&lt;ffffffff83e0aa83&gt;] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x63/0x70
 softirqs last  enabled at (4182): [&lt;ffffffff81516122&gt;] handle_softirqs+0x552/0x710
 softirqs last disabled at (4159): [&lt;ffffffff815163f7&gt;] __irq_exit_rcu+0x107/0x210
 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

The above was triggered by running on a kernel with both lockdep and KASAN
as well as kmemleak enabled and executing the following command:

 # perf record -o perf-test.dat -a -- trace-cmd record --nosplice  -e all -p function hackbench 50

With perf interjecting a lot of interrupts and trace-cmd enabling all
events as well as function tracing, with lockdep, KASAN and kmemleak
enabled, it could cause an interrupt preempting an event being written to
add enough events to wrap the buffer. trace-cmd was modified to have
--nosplice use mmap instead of reading the buffer.

The way to differentiate this case from the normal case of there only
being one page written to where the swap of the reader page received that
one page (which is the commit page), check if the tail page is on the
reader page. The difference between the commit page and the tail page is
that the tail page is where new writes go to, and the commit page holds
the first write that hasn't been committed yet. In the case of an
interrupt preempting the write of an event and filling the buffer, it
would move the tail page but not the commit page.

Have the warning only trigger if the tail page is also on the reader page,
and also print out the number of events dropped by a commit overrun as
that can not yet be safely added to the page so that the reader can see
there were events dropped.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers &lt;mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com&gt;
Cc: Vincent Donnefort &lt;vdonnefort@google.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250528121555.2066527e@gandalf.local.home
Fixes: fe832be05a8ee ("ring-buffer: Have mmapped ring buffer keep track of missed events")
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) &lt;mhiramat@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) &lt;rostedt@goodmis.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers() and posix_cpu_timer_del()</title>
<updated>2025-06-19T13:41:04+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Oleg Nesterov</name>
<email>oleg@redhat.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-06-13T17:26:50+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=460188bc042a3f40f72d34b9f7fc6ee66b0b757b'/>
<id>460188bc042a3f40f72d34b9f7fc6ee66b0b757b</id>
<content type='text'>
commit f90fff1e152dedf52b932240ebbd670d83330eca upstream.

If an exiting non-autoreaping task has already passed exit_notify() and
calls handle_posix_cpu_timers() from IRQ, it can be reaped by its parent
or debugger right after unlock_task_sighand().

If a concurrent posix_cpu_timer_del() runs at that moment, it won't be
able to detect timer-&gt;it.cpu.firing != 0: cpu_timer_task_rcu() and/or
lock_task_sighand() will fail.

Add the tsk-&gt;exit_state check into run_posix_cpu_timers() to fix this.

This fix is not needed if CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK=y, because
exit_task_work() is called before exit_notify(). But the check still
makes sense, task_work_add(&amp;tsk-&gt;posix_cputimers_work.work) will fail
anyway in this case.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Benoît Sevens &lt;bsevens@google.com&gt;
Fixes: 0bdd2ed4138e ("sched: run_posix_cpu_timers: Don't check -&gt;exit_state, use lock_task_sighand()")
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov &lt;oleg@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds &lt;torvalds@linux-foundation.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit f90fff1e152dedf52b932240ebbd670d83330eca upstream.

If an exiting non-autoreaping task has already passed exit_notify() and
calls handle_posix_cpu_timers() from IRQ, it can be reaped by its parent
or debugger right after unlock_task_sighand().

If a concurrent posix_cpu_timer_del() runs at that moment, it won't be
able to detect timer-&gt;it.cpu.firing != 0: cpu_timer_task_rcu() and/or
lock_task_sighand() will fail.

Add the tsk-&gt;exit_state check into run_posix_cpu_timers() to fix this.

This fix is not needed if CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK=y, because
exit_task_work() is called before exit_notify(). But the check still
makes sense, task_work_add(&amp;tsk-&gt;posix_cputimers_work.work) will fail
anyway in this case.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Benoît Sevens &lt;bsevens@google.com&gt;
Fixes: 0bdd2ed4138e ("sched: run_posix_cpu_timers: Don't check -&gt;exit_state, use lock_task_sighand()")
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov &lt;oleg@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds &lt;torvalds@linux-foundation.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>perf: Ensure bpf_perf_link path is properly serialized</title>
<updated>2025-06-19T13:41:01+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Peter Zijlstra</name>
<email>peterz@infradead.org</email>
</author>
<published>2025-01-17T09:54:50+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=f957ad4c6822196ce0fd5c6e0ae03961b6e089e5'/>
<id>f957ad4c6822196ce0fd5c6e0ae03961b6e089e5</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 7ed9138a72829d2035ecbd8dbd35b1bc3c137c40 ]

Ravi reported that the bpf_perf_link_attach() usage of
perf_event_set_bpf_prog() is not serialized by ctx-&gt;mutex, unlike the
PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_BPF case.

Reported-by: Ravi Bangoria &lt;ravi.bangoria@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria &lt;ravi.bangoria@amd.com&gt;
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250307193305.486326750@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 7ed9138a72829d2035ecbd8dbd35b1bc3c137c40 ]

Ravi reported that the bpf_perf_link_attach() usage of
perf_event_set_bpf_prog() is not serialized by ctx-&gt;mutex, unlike the
PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_BPF case.

Reported-by: Ravi Bangoria &lt;ravi.bangoria@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria &lt;ravi.bangoria@amd.com&gt;
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250307193305.486326750@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>sched_ext: idle: Skip cross-node search with !CONFIG_NUMA</title>
<updated>2025-06-19T13:40:29+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Andrea Righi</name>
<email>arighi@nvidia.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-06-03T08:22:01+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=9219079c52821246b2395bd30a4a2ffb9681e9e6'/>
<id>9219079c52821246b2395bd30a4a2ffb9681e9e6</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 9960be72a54cf0e4d47abdd4cacd1278835a3bb4 ]

In the idle CPU selection logic, attempting cross-node searches adds
unnecessary complexity when CONFIG_NUMA is disabled.

Since there's no meaningful concept of nodes in this case, simplify the
logic by restricting the idle CPU search to the current node only.

Fixes: 48849271e6611 ("sched_ext: idle: Per-node idle cpumasks")
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi &lt;arighi@nvidia.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo &lt;tj@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 9960be72a54cf0e4d47abdd4cacd1278835a3bb4 ]

In the idle CPU selection logic, attempting cross-node searches adds
unnecessary complexity when CONFIG_NUMA is disabled.

Since there's no meaningful concept of nodes in this case, simplify the
logic by restricting the idle CPU search to the current node only.

Fixes: 48849271e6611 ("sched_ext: idle: Per-node idle cpumasks")
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi &lt;arighi@nvidia.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo &lt;tj@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Do not include stack ptr register in precision backtracking bookkeeping</title>
<updated>2025-06-19T13:40:02+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yonghong Song</name>
<email>yonghong.song@linux.dev</email>
</author>
<published>2025-05-24T04:13:35+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=ac49b7560b4b08b1e4043a29214cc7ad77644c00'/>
<id>ac49b7560b4b08b1e4043a29214cc7ad77644c00</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit e2d2115e56c4a02377189bfc3a9a7933552a7b0f ]

Yi Lai reported an issue ([1]) where the following warning appears
in kernel dmesg:
  [   60.643604] verifier backtracking bug
  [   60.643635] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 2315 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:4302 __mark_chain_precision+0x3a6c/0x3e10
  [   60.648428] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE)
  [   60.650471] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 2315 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G           OE       6.15.0-rc4-gef11287f8289-dirty #327 PREEMPT(full)
  [   60.654385] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
  [   60.656682] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  [   60.660475] RIP: 0010:__mark_chain_precision+0x3a6c/0x3e10
  [   60.662814] Code: 5a 30 84 89 ea e8 c4 d9 01 00 80 3d 3e 7d d8 04 00 0f 85 60 fa ff ff c6 05 31 7d d8 04
                       01 48 c7 c7 00 58 30 84 e8 c4 06 a5 ff &lt;0f&gt; 0b e9 46 fa ff ff 48 ...
  [   60.668720] RSP: 0018:ffff888116cc7298 EFLAGS: 00010246
  [   60.671075] RAX: 54d70e82dfd31900 RBX: ffff888115b65e20 RCX: 0000000000000000
  [   60.673659] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
  [   60.676241] RBP: 0000000000000400 R08: ffff8881f6f23bd3 R09: 1ffff1103ede477a
  [   60.678787] R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed103ede477b R12: ffff888115b60ae8
  [   60.681420] R13: 1ffff11022b6cbc4 R14: 00000000fffffff2 R15: 0000000000000001
  [   60.684030] FS:  00007fc2aedd80c0(0000) GS:ffff88826fa8a000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [   60.686837] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [   60.689027] CR2: 000056325369e000 CR3: 000000011088b002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0
  [   60.691623] Call Trace:
  [   60.692821]  &lt;TASK&gt;
  [   60.693960]  ? __pfx_verbose+0x10/0x10
  [   60.695656]  ? __pfx_disasm_kfunc_name+0x10/0x10
  [   60.697495]  check_cond_jmp_op+0x16f7/0x39b0
  [   60.699237]  do_check+0x58fa/0xab10
  ...

Further analysis shows the warning is at line 4302 as below:

  4294                 /* static subprog call instruction, which
  4295                  * means that we are exiting current subprog,
  4296                  * so only r1-r5 could be still requested as
  4297                  * precise, r0 and r6-r10 or any stack slot in
  4298                  * the current frame should be zero by now
  4299                  */
  4300                 if (bt_reg_mask(bt) &amp; ~BPF_REGMASK_ARGS) {
  4301                         verbose(env, "BUG regs %x\n", bt_reg_mask(bt));
  4302                         WARN_ONCE(1, "verifier backtracking bug");
  4303                         return -EFAULT;
  4304                 }

With the below test (also in the next patch):
  __used __naked static void __bpf_jmp_r10(void)
  {
	asm volatile (
	"r2 = 2314885393468386424 ll;"
	"goto +0;"
	"if r2 &lt;= r10 goto +3;"
	"if r1 &gt;= -1835016 goto +0;"
	"if r2 &lt;= 8 goto +0;"
	"if r3 &lt;= 0 goto +0;"
	"exit;"
	::: __clobber_all);
  }

  SEC("?raw_tp")
  __naked void bpf_jmp_r10(void)
  {
	asm volatile (
	"r3 = 0 ll;"
	"call __bpf_jmp_r10;"
	"r0 = 0;"
	"exit;"
	::: __clobber_all);
  }

The following is the verifier failure log:
  0: (18) r3 = 0x0                      ; R3_w=0
  2: (85) call pc+2
  caller:
   R10=fp0
  callee:
   frame1: R1=ctx() R3_w=0 R10=fp0
  5: frame1: R1=ctx() R3_w=0 R10=fp0
  ; asm volatile ("                                 \ @ verifier_precision.c:184
  5: (18) r2 = 0x20202000256c6c78       ; frame1: R2_w=0x20202000256c6c78
  7: (05) goto pc+0
  8: (bd) if r2 &lt;= r10 goto pc+3        ; frame1: R2_w=0x20202000256c6c78 R10=fp0
  9: (35) if r1 &gt;= 0xffe3fff8 goto pc+0         ; frame1: R1=ctx()
  10: (b5) if r2 &lt;= 0x8 goto pc+0
  mark_precise: frame1: last_idx 10 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1
  mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2 stack= before 9: (35) if r1 &gt;= 0xffe3fff8 goto pc+0
  mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2 stack= before 8: (bd) if r2 &lt;= r10 goto pc+3
  mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2,r10 stack= before 7: (05) goto pc+0
  mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2,r10 stack= before 5: (18) r2 = 0x20202000256c6c78
  mark_precise: frame1: regs=r10 stack= before 2: (85) call pc+2
  BUG regs 400

The main failure reason is due to r10 in precision backtracking bookkeeping.
Actually r10 is always precise and there is no need to add it for the precision
backtracking bookkeeping.

One way to fix the issue is to prevent bt_set_reg() if any src/dst reg is
r10. Andrii suggested to go with push_insn_history() approach to avoid
explicitly checking r10 in backtrack_insn().

This patch added push_insn_history() support for cond_jmp like 'rX &lt;op&gt; rY'
operations. In check_cond_jmp_op(), if any of rX or rY is a stack pointer,
push_insn_history() will record such information, and later backtrack_insn()
will do bt_set_reg() properly for those register(s).

  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Z%2F8q3xzpU59CIYQE@ly-workstation/

Reported by: Yi Lai &lt;yi1.lai@linux.intel.com&gt;

Fixes: 407958a0e980 ("bpf: encapsulate precision backtracking bookkeeping")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yonghong.song@linux.dev&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250524041335.4046126-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit e2d2115e56c4a02377189bfc3a9a7933552a7b0f ]

Yi Lai reported an issue ([1]) where the following warning appears
in kernel dmesg:
  [   60.643604] verifier backtracking bug
  [   60.643635] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 2315 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:4302 __mark_chain_precision+0x3a6c/0x3e10
  [   60.648428] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE)
  [   60.650471] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 2315 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G           OE       6.15.0-rc4-gef11287f8289-dirty #327 PREEMPT(full)
  [   60.654385] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
  [   60.656682] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  [   60.660475] RIP: 0010:__mark_chain_precision+0x3a6c/0x3e10
  [   60.662814] Code: 5a 30 84 89 ea e8 c4 d9 01 00 80 3d 3e 7d d8 04 00 0f 85 60 fa ff ff c6 05 31 7d d8 04
                       01 48 c7 c7 00 58 30 84 e8 c4 06 a5 ff &lt;0f&gt; 0b e9 46 fa ff ff 48 ...
  [   60.668720] RSP: 0018:ffff888116cc7298 EFLAGS: 00010246
  [   60.671075] RAX: 54d70e82dfd31900 RBX: ffff888115b65e20 RCX: 0000000000000000
  [   60.673659] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
  [   60.676241] RBP: 0000000000000400 R08: ffff8881f6f23bd3 R09: 1ffff1103ede477a
  [   60.678787] R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed103ede477b R12: ffff888115b60ae8
  [   60.681420] R13: 1ffff11022b6cbc4 R14: 00000000fffffff2 R15: 0000000000000001
  [   60.684030] FS:  00007fc2aedd80c0(0000) GS:ffff88826fa8a000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [   60.686837] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [   60.689027] CR2: 000056325369e000 CR3: 000000011088b002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0
  [   60.691623] Call Trace:
  [   60.692821]  &lt;TASK&gt;
  [   60.693960]  ? __pfx_verbose+0x10/0x10
  [   60.695656]  ? __pfx_disasm_kfunc_name+0x10/0x10
  [   60.697495]  check_cond_jmp_op+0x16f7/0x39b0
  [   60.699237]  do_check+0x58fa/0xab10
  ...

Further analysis shows the warning is at line 4302 as below:

  4294                 /* static subprog call instruction, which
  4295                  * means that we are exiting current subprog,
  4296                  * so only r1-r5 could be still requested as
  4297                  * precise, r0 and r6-r10 or any stack slot in
  4298                  * the current frame should be zero by now
  4299                  */
  4300                 if (bt_reg_mask(bt) &amp; ~BPF_REGMASK_ARGS) {
  4301                         verbose(env, "BUG regs %x\n", bt_reg_mask(bt));
  4302                         WARN_ONCE(1, "verifier backtracking bug");
  4303                         return -EFAULT;
  4304                 }

With the below test (also in the next patch):
  __used __naked static void __bpf_jmp_r10(void)
  {
	asm volatile (
	"r2 = 2314885393468386424 ll;"
	"goto +0;"
	"if r2 &lt;= r10 goto +3;"
	"if r1 &gt;= -1835016 goto +0;"
	"if r2 &lt;= 8 goto +0;"
	"if r3 &lt;= 0 goto +0;"
	"exit;"
	::: __clobber_all);
  }

  SEC("?raw_tp")
  __naked void bpf_jmp_r10(void)
  {
	asm volatile (
	"r3 = 0 ll;"
	"call __bpf_jmp_r10;"
	"r0 = 0;"
	"exit;"
	::: __clobber_all);
  }

The following is the verifier failure log:
  0: (18) r3 = 0x0                      ; R3_w=0
  2: (85) call pc+2
  caller:
   R10=fp0
  callee:
   frame1: R1=ctx() R3_w=0 R10=fp0
  5: frame1: R1=ctx() R3_w=0 R10=fp0
  ; asm volatile ("                                 \ @ verifier_precision.c:184
  5: (18) r2 = 0x20202000256c6c78       ; frame1: R2_w=0x20202000256c6c78
  7: (05) goto pc+0
  8: (bd) if r2 &lt;= r10 goto pc+3        ; frame1: R2_w=0x20202000256c6c78 R10=fp0
  9: (35) if r1 &gt;= 0xffe3fff8 goto pc+0         ; frame1: R1=ctx()
  10: (b5) if r2 &lt;= 0x8 goto pc+0
  mark_precise: frame1: last_idx 10 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1
  mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2 stack= before 9: (35) if r1 &gt;= 0xffe3fff8 goto pc+0
  mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2 stack= before 8: (bd) if r2 &lt;= r10 goto pc+3
  mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2,r10 stack= before 7: (05) goto pc+0
  mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2,r10 stack= before 5: (18) r2 = 0x20202000256c6c78
  mark_precise: frame1: regs=r10 stack= before 2: (85) call pc+2
  BUG regs 400

The main failure reason is due to r10 in precision backtracking bookkeeping.
Actually r10 is always precise and there is no need to add it for the precision
backtracking bookkeeping.

One way to fix the issue is to prevent bt_set_reg() if any src/dst reg is
r10. Andrii suggested to go with push_insn_history() approach to avoid
explicitly checking r10 in backtrack_insn().

This patch added push_insn_history() support for cond_jmp like 'rX &lt;op&gt; rY'
operations. In check_cond_jmp_op(), if any of rX or rY is a stack pointer,
push_insn_history() will record such information, and later backtrack_insn()
will do bt_set_reg() properly for those register(s).

  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Z%2F8q3xzpU59CIYQE@ly-workstation/

Reported by: Yi Lai &lt;yi1.lai@linux.intel.com&gt;

Fixes: 407958a0e980 ("bpf: encapsulate precision backtracking bookkeeping")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yonghong.song@linux.dev&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250524041335.4046126-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Avoid __bpf_prog_ret0_warn when jit fails</title>
<updated>2025-06-19T13:40:01+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>KaFai Wan</name>
<email>mannkafai@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-05-26T13:33:58+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=0b9bb52796b239de6792d0d68cdc6eb505ebff96'/>
<id>0b9bb52796b239de6792d0d68cdc6eb505ebff96</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 86bc9c742426a16b52a10ef61f5b721aecca2344 ]

syzkaller reported an issue:

WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 217 at kernel/bpf/core.c:2357 __bpf_prog_ret0_warn+0xa/0x20 kernel/bpf/core.c:2357
Modules linked in:
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 217 Comm: kworker/u32:6 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc4-syzkaller-00040-g8bac8898fe39
RIP: 0010:__bpf_prog_ret0_warn+0xa/0x20 kernel/bpf/core.c:2357
Call Trace:
 &lt;TASK&gt;
 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1316 [inline]
 __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:718 [inline]
 bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:725 [inline]
 cls_bpf_classify+0x74a/0x1110 net/sched/cls_bpf.c:105
 ...

When creating bpf program, 'fp-&gt;jit_requested' depends on bpf_jit_enable.
This issue is triggered because of CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set
and bpf_jit_enable is set to 1, causing the arch to attempt JIT the prog,
but jit failed due to FAULT_INJECTION. As a result, incorrectly
treats the program as valid, when the program runs it calls
`__bpf_prog_ret0_warn` and triggers the WARN_ON_ONCE(1).

Reported-by: syzbot+0903f6d7f285e41cdf10@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/6816e34e.a70a0220.254cdc.002c.GAE@google.com
Fixes: fa9dd599b4da ("bpf: get rid of pure_initcall dependency to enable jits")
Signed-off-by: KaFai Wan &lt;mannkafai@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250526133358.2594176-1-mannkafai@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 86bc9c742426a16b52a10ef61f5b721aecca2344 ]

syzkaller reported an issue:

WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 217 at kernel/bpf/core.c:2357 __bpf_prog_ret0_warn+0xa/0x20 kernel/bpf/core.c:2357
Modules linked in:
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 217 Comm: kworker/u32:6 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc4-syzkaller-00040-g8bac8898fe39
RIP: 0010:__bpf_prog_ret0_warn+0xa/0x20 kernel/bpf/core.c:2357
Call Trace:
 &lt;TASK&gt;
 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1316 [inline]
 __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:718 [inline]
 bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:725 [inline]
 cls_bpf_classify+0x74a/0x1110 net/sched/cls_bpf.c:105
 ...

When creating bpf program, 'fp-&gt;jit_requested' depends on bpf_jit_enable.
This issue is triggered because of CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set
and bpf_jit_enable is set to 1, causing the arch to attempt JIT the prog,
but jit failed due to FAULT_INJECTION. As a result, incorrectly
treats the program as valid, when the program runs it calls
`__bpf_prog_ret0_warn` and triggers the WARN_ON_ONCE(1).

Reported-by: syzbot+0903f6d7f285e41cdf10@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/6816e34e.a70a0220.254cdc.002c.GAE@google.com
Fixes: fa9dd599b4da ("bpf: get rid of pure_initcall dependency to enable jits")
Signed-off-by: KaFai Wan &lt;mannkafai@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250526133358.2594176-1-mannkafai@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Revert "bpf: remove unnecessary rcu_read_{lock,unlock}() in multi-uprobe attach logic"</title>
<updated>2025-06-19T13:39:59+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Di Shen</name>
<email>di.shen@unisoc.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-05-20T05:49:43+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=b397b309456b7671dbb0a18d9d32dfb8d93fb8f0'/>
<id>b397b309456b7671dbb0a18d9d32dfb8d93fb8f0</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 4e2e6841ff761cc15a54e8bebcf35d7325ec78a2 ]

This reverts commit 4a8f635a6054.

Althought get_pid_task() internally already calls rcu_read_lock() and
rcu_read_unlock(), the find_vpid() was not.

The documentation for find_vpid() clearly states:
"Must be called with the tasklist_lock or rcu_read_lock() held."

Add proper rcu_read_lock/unlock() to protect the find_vpid().

Fixes: 4a8f635a6054 ("bpf: remove unnecessary rcu_read_{lock,unlock}() in multi-uprobe attach logic")
Reported-by: Xuewen Yan &lt;xuewen.yan@unisoc.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Di Shen &lt;di.shen@unisoc.com&gt;
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250520054943.5002-1-xuewen.yan@unisoc.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 4e2e6841ff761cc15a54e8bebcf35d7325ec78a2 ]

This reverts commit 4a8f635a6054.

Althought get_pid_task() internally already calls rcu_read_lock() and
rcu_read_unlock(), the find_vpid() was not.

The documentation for find_vpid() clearly states:
"Must be called with the tasklist_lock or rcu_read_lock() held."

Add proper rcu_read_lock/unlock() to protect the find_vpid().

Fixes: 4a8f635a6054 ("bpf: remove unnecessary rcu_read_{lock,unlock}() in multi-uprobe attach logic")
Reported-by: Xuewen Yan &lt;xuewen.yan@unisoc.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Di Shen &lt;di.shen@unisoc.com&gt;
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250520054943.5002-1-xuewen.yan@unisoc.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Fix WARN() in get_bpf_raw_tp_regs</title>
<updated>2025-06-19T13:39:52+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Tao Chen</name>
<email>chen.dylane@linux.dev</email>
</author>
<published>2025-05-13T04:27:47+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=18e8cbbae79cb35bdce8a01c889827b9799c762e'/>
<id>18e8cbbae79cb35bdce8a01c889827b9799c762e</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 3880cdbed1c4607e378f58fa924c5d6df900d1d3 ]

syzkaller reported an issue:

WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 5971 at kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1861 get_bpf_raw_tp_regs+0xa4/0x100 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1861
Modules linked in:
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 5971 Comm: syz-executor205 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc5-syzkaller-00038-g707df3375124 #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:get_bpf_raw_tp_regs+0xa4/0x100 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1861
RSP: 0018:ffffc90003636fa8 EFLAGS: 00010293
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: ffffffff81c6bc4c
RDX: ffff888032efc880 RSI: ffffffff81c6bc83 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: ffff88806a730860 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000003
R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000004
R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffc90003637008 R15: 0000000000000900
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880d6cdf000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f7baee09130 CR3: 0000000029f5a000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 &lt;TASK&gt;
 ____bpf_get_stack_raw_tp kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1934 [inline]
 bpf_get_stack_raw_tp+0x24/0x160 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1931
 bpf_prog_ec3b2eefa702d8d3+0x43/0x47
 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1316 [inline]
 __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:718 [inline]
 bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:725 [inline]
 __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2363 [inline]
 bpf_trace_run3+0x23f/0x5a0 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2405
 __bpf_trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned+0xfc/0x140 include/trace/events/mmap_lock.h:47
 __traceiter_mmap_lock_acquire_returned+0x79/0xc0 include/trace/events/mmap_lock.h:47
 __do_trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned include/trace/events/mmap_lock.h:47 [inline]
 trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned include/trace/events/mmap_lock.h:47 [inline]
 __mmap_lock_do_trace_acquire_returned+0x138/0x1f0 mm/mmap_lock.c:35
 __mmap_lock_trace_acquire_returned include/linux/mmap_lock.h:36 [inline]
 mmap_read_trylock include/linux/mmap_lock.h:204 [inline]
 stack_map_get_build_id_offset+0x535/0x6f0 kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:157
 __bpf_get_stack+0x307/0xa10 kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:483
 ____bpf_get_stack kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:499 [inline]
 bpf_get_stack+0x32/0x40 kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:496
 ____bpf_get_stack_raw_tp kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1941 [inline]
 bpf_get_stack_raw_tp+0x124/0x160 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1931
 bpf_prog_ec3b2eefa702d8d3+0x43/0x47

Tracepoint like trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned may cause nested call
as the corner case show above, which will be resolved with more general
method in the future. As a result, WARN_ON_ONCE will be triggered. As
Alexei suggested, remove the WARN_ON_ONCE first.

Fixes: 9594dc3c7e71 ("bpf: fix nested bpf tracepoints with per-cpu data")
Reported-by: syzbot+45b0c89a0fc7ae8dbadc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tao Chen &lt;chen.dylane@linux.dev&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250513042747.757042-1-chen.dylane@linux.dev

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/8bc2554d-1052-4922-8832-e0078a033e1d@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 3880cdbed1c4607e378f58fa924c5d6df900d1d3 ]

syzkaller reported an issue:

WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 5971 at kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1861 get_bpf_raw_tp_regs+0xa4/0x100 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1861
Modules linked in:
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 5971 Comm: syz-executor205 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc5-syzkaller-00038-g707df3375124 #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:get_bpf_raw_tp_regs+0xa4/0x100 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1861
RSP: 0018:ffffc90003636fa8 EFLAGS: 00010293
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: ffffffff81c6bc4c
RDX: ffff888032efc880 RSI: ffffffff81c6bc83 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: ffff88806a730860 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000003
R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000004
R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffc90003637008 R15: 0000000000000900
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880d6cdf000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f7baee09130 CR3: 0000000029f5a000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 &lt;TASK&gt;
 ____bpf_get_stack_raw_tp kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1934 [inline]
 bpf_get_stack_raw_tp+0x24/0x160 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1931
 bpf_prog_ec3b2eefa702d8d3+0x43/0x47
 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1316 [inline]
 __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:718 [inline]
 bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:725 [inline]
 __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2363 [inline]
 bpf_trace_run3+0x23f/0x5a0 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2405
 __bpf_trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned+0xfc/0x140 include/trace/events/mmap_lock.h:47
 __traceiter_mmap_lock_acquire_returned+0x79/0xc0 include/trace/events/mmap_lock.h:47
 __do_trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned include/trace/events/mmap_lock.h:47 [inline]
 trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned include/trace/events/mmap_lock.h:47 [inline]
 __mmap_lock_do_trace_acquire_returned+0x138/0x1f0 mm/mmap_lock.c:35
 __mmap_lock_trace_acquire_returned include/linux/mmap_lock.h:36 [inline]
 mmap_read_trylock include/linux/mmap_lock.h:204 [inline]
 stack_map_get_build_id_offset+0x535/0x6f0 kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:157
 __bpf_get_stack+0x307/0xa10 kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:483
 ____bpf_get_stack kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:499 [inline]
 bpf_get_stack+0x32/0x40 kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:496
 ____bpf_get_stack_raw_tp kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1941 [inline]
 bpf_get_stack_raw_tp+0x124/0x160 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1931
 bpf_prog_ec3b2eefa702d8d3+0x43/0x47

Tracepoint like trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned may cause nested call
as the corner case show above, which will be resolved with more general
method in the future. As a result, WARN_ON_ONCE will be triggered. As
Alexei suggested, remove the WARN_ON_ONCE first.

Fixes: 9594dc3c7e71 ("bpf: fix nested bpf tracepoints with per-cpu data")
Reported-by: syzbot+45b0c89a0fc7ae8dbadc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tao Chen &lt;chen.dylane@linux.dev&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250513042747.757042-1-chen.dylane@linux.dev

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/8bc2554d-1052-4922-8832-e0078a033e1d@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
