linux-stable.git/kernel, branch v5.15.151

bpf: Fix racing between bpf_timer_cancel_and_free and bpf_timer_cancel

2024-03-01T12:21:59+00:00

[ Upstream commit 0281b919e175bb9c3128bd3872ac2903e9436e3f ]

The following race is possible between bpf_timer_cancel_and_free
and bpf_timer_cancel. It will lead a UAF on the timer->timer.

bpf_timer_cancel();
	spin_lock();
	t = timer->time;
	spin_unlock();

					bpf_timer_cancel_and_free();
						spin_lock();
						t = timer->timer;
						timer->timer = NULL;
						spin_unlock();
						hrtimer_cancel(&t->timer);
						kfree(t);

	/* UAF on t */
	hrtimer_cancel(&t->timer);

In bpf_timer_cancel_and_free, this patch frees the timer->timer
after a rcu grace period. This requires a rcu_head addition
to the "struct bpf_hrtimer". Another kfree(t) happens in bpf_timer_init,
this does not need a kfree_rcu because it is still under the
spin_lock and timer->timer has not been visible by others yet.

In bpf_timer_cancel, rcu_read_lock() is added because this helper
can be used in a non rcu critical section context (e.g. from
a sleepable bpf prog). Other timer->timer usages in helpers.c
have been audited, bpf_timer_cancel() is the only place where
timer->timer is used outside of the spin_lock.

Another solution considered is to mark a t->flag in bpf_timer_cancel
and clear it after hrtimer_cancel() is done.  In bpf_timer_cancel_and_free,
it busy waits for the flag to be cleared before kfree(t). This patch
goes with a straight forward solution and frees timer->timer after
a rcu grace period.

Fixes: b00628b1c7d5 ("bpf: Introduce bpf timers.")
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Acked-by: Hou Tao 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240215211218.990808-1-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Address KCSAN report on bpf_lru_list

2024-03-01T12:21:55+00:00

[ Upstream commit ee9fd0ac3017c4313be91a220a9ac4c99dde7ad4 ]

KCSAN reported a data-race when accessing node->ref.
Although node->ref does not have to be accurate,
take this chance to use a more common READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE()
pattern instead of data_race().

There is an existing bpf_lru_node_is_ref() and bpf_lru_node_set_ref().
This patch also adds bpf_lru_node_clear_ref() to do the
WRITE_ONCE(node->ref, 0) also.

==================================================================
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __bpf_lru_list_rotate / __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem

write to 0xffff888137038deb of 1 bytes by task 11240 on cpu 1:
__bpf_lru_node_move kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:113 [inline]
__bpf_lru_list_rotate_active kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:149 [inline]
__bpf_lru_list_rotate+0x1bf/0x750 kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:240
bpf_lru_list_pop_free_to_local kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:329 [inline]
bpf_common_lru_pop_free kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:447 [inline]
bpf_lru_pop_free+0x638/0xe20 kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:499
prealloc_lru_pop kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:290 [inline]
__htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem+0xe7/0x820 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1316
bpf_percpu_hash_update+0x5e/0x90 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:2313
bpf_map_update_value+0x2a9/0x370 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:200
generic_map_update_batch+0x3ae/0x4f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1687
bpf_map_do_batch+0x2d9/0x3d0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4534
__sys_bpf+0x338/0x810
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5096 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5094 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x43/0x50 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5094
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

read to 0xffff888137038deb of 1 bytes by task 11241 on cpu 0:
bpf_lru_node_set_ref kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h:70 [inline]
__htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem+0x2f1/0x820 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1332
bpf_percpu_hash_update+0x5e/0x90 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:2313
bpf_map_update_value+0x2a9/0x370 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:200
generic_map_update_batch+0x3ae/0x4f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1687
bpf_map_do_batch+0x2d9/0x3d0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4534
__sys_bpf+0x338/0x810
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5096 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5094 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x43/0x50 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5094
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

value changed: 0x01 -> 0x00

Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
CPU: 0 PID: 11241 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc7-syzkaller-00136-g6a66fdd29ea1 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/30/2023
==================================================================

Reported-by: syzbot+ebe648a84e8784763f82@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau 
Acked-by: Yonghong Song 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230511043748.1384166-1-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

sched/fair: Don't balance task to its current running CPU

2024-03-01T12:21:55+00:00

[ Upstream commit 0dd37d6dd33a9c23351e6115ae8cdac7863bc7de ]

We've run into the case that the balancer tries to balance a migration
disabled task and trigger the warning in set_task_cpu() like below:

 ------------[ cut here ]------------
 WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 0 at kernel/sched/core.c:3115 set_task_cpu+0x188/0x240
 Modules linked in: hclgevf xt_CHECKSUM ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 <...snip>
 CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G           O       6.1.0-rc4+ #1
 Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDC, BIOS 2280-V2 CS V5.B221.01 12/09/2021
 pstate: 604000c9 (nZCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
 pc : set_task_cpu+0x188/0x240
 lr : load_balance+0x5d0/0xc60
 sp : ffff80000803bc70
 x29: ffff80000803bc70 x28: ffff004089e190e8 x27: ffff004089e19040
 x26: ffff007effcabc38 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000001
 x23: ffff80000803be84 x22: 000000000000000c x21: ffffb093e79e2a78
 x20: 000000000000000c x19: ffff004089e19040 x18: 0000000000000000
 x17: 0000000000001fad x16: 0000000000000030 x15: 0000000000000000
 x14: 0000000000000003 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
 x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000400 x9 : ffffb093e4cee530
 x8 : 00000000fffffffe x7 : 0000000000ce168a x6 : 000000000000013e
 x5 : 00000000ffffffe1 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : 0000000000000b2a
 x2 : 0000000000000b2a x1 : ffffb093e6d6c510 x0 : 0000000000000001
 Call trace:
  set_task_cpu+0x188/0x240
  load_balance+0x5d0/0xc60
  rebalance_domains+0x26c/0x380
  _nohz_idle_balance.isra.0+0x1e0/0x370
  run_rebalance_domains+0x6c/0x80
  __do_softirq+0x128/0x3d8
  ____do_softirq+0x18/0x24
  call_on_irq_stack+0x2c/0x38
  do_softirq_own_stack+0x24/0x3c
  __irq_exit_rcu+0xcc/0xf4
  irq_exit_rcu+0x18/0x24
  el1_interrupt+0x4c/0xe4
  el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x2c
  el1h_64_irq+0x74/0x78
  arch_cpu_idle+0x18/0x4c
  default_idle_call+0x58/0x194
  do_idle+0x244/0x2b0
  cpu_startup_entry+0x30/0x3c
  secondary_start_kernel+0x14c/0x190
  __secondary_switched+0xb0/0xb4
 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Further investigation shows that the warning is superfluous, the migration
disabled task is just going to be migrated to its current running CPU.
This is because that on load balance if the dst_cpu is not allowed by the
task, we'll re-select a new_dst_cpu as a candidate. If no task can be
balanced to dst_cpu we'll try to balance the task to the new_dst_cpu
instead. In this case when the migration disabled task is not on CPU it
only allows to run on its current CPU, load balance will select its
current CPU as new_dst_cpu and later triggers the warning above.

The new_dst_cpu is chosen from the env->dst_grpmask. Currently it
contains CPUs in sched_group_span() and if we have overlapped groups it's
possible to run into this case. This patch makes env->dst_grpmask of
group_balance_mask() which exclude any CPUs from the busiest group and
solve the issue. For balancing in a domain with no overlapped groups
the behaviour keeps same as before.

Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot 
Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230530082507.10444-1-yangyicong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

posix-timers: Ensure timer ID search-loop limit is valid

2024-03-01T12:21:55+00:00

[ Upstream commit 8ce8849dd1e78dadcee0ec9acbd259d239b7069f ]

posix_timer_add() tries to allocate a posix timer ID by starting from the
cached ID which was stored by the last successful allocation.

This is done in a loop searching the ID space for a free slot one by
one. The loop has to terminate when the search wrapped around to the
starting point.

But that's racy vs. establishing the starting point. That is read out
lockless, which leads to the following problem:

CPU0	  	      	     	   CPU1
posix_timer_add()
  start = sig->posix_timer_id;
  lock(hash_lock);
  ...				   posix_timer_add()
  if (++sig->posix_timer_id < 0)
      			             start = sig->posix_timer_id;
     sig->posix_timer_id = 0;

So CPU1 can observe a negative start value, i.e. -1, and the loop break
never happens because the condition can never be true:

  if (sig->posix_timer_id == start)
     break;

While this is unlikely to ever turn into an endless loop as the ID space is
huge (INT_MAX), the racy read of the start value caught the attention of
KCSAN and Dmitry unearthed that incorrectness.

Rewrite it so that all id operations are under the hash lock.

Reported-by: syzbot+5c54bd3eb218bb595aa9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87bkhzdn6g.ffs@tglx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

sched/rt: Disallow writing invalid values to sched_rt_period_us

2024-03-01T12:21:43+00:00

commit 079be8fc630943d9fc70a97807feb73d169ee3fc upstream.

The validation of the value written to sched_rt_period_us was broken
because:

  - the sysclt_sched_rt_period is declared as unsigned int
  - parsed by proc_do_intvec()
  - the range is asserted after the value parsed by proc_do_intvec()

Because of this negative values written to the file were written into a
unsigned integer that were later on interpreted as large positive
integers which did passed the check:

  if (sysclt_sched_rt_period <= 0)
	return EINVAL;

This commit fixes the parsing by setting explicit range for both
perid_us and runtime_us into the sched_rt_sysctls table and processes
the values with proc_dointvec_minmax() instead.

Alternatively if we wanted to use full range of unsigned int for the
period value we would have to split the proc_handler and use
proc_douintvec() for it however even the
Documentation/scheduller/sched-rt-group.rst describes the range as 1 to
INT_MAX.

As far as I can tell the only problem this causes is that the sysctl
file allows writing negative values which when read back may confuse
userspace.

There is also a LTP test being submitted for these sysctl files at:

  http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20230901144433.2526-1-chrubis@suse.cz/

Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis 
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115553.3007-2-chrubis@suse.cz
[ pvorel: rebased for 5.15, 5.10 ]
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel 
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/rt: Fix sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice intial value

2024-03-01T12:21:43+00:00

commit c7fcb99877f9f542c918509b2801065adcaf46fa upstream.

There is a 10% rounding error in the intial value of the
sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice with CONFIG_HZ_300=y.

This was found with LTP test sched_rr_get_interval01:

sched_rr_get_interval01.c:57: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed
sched_rr_get_interval01.c:64: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 99999990ns
sched_rr_get_interval01.c:72: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got 90
sched_rr_get_interval01.c:57: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed
sched_rr_get_interval01.c:64: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 99999990ns
sched_rr_get_interval01.c:72: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got 90

What this test does is to compare the return value from the
sched_rr_get_interval() and the sched_rr_timeslice_ms sysctl file and
fails if they do not match.

The problem it found is the intial sysctl file value which was computed as:

static int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice = (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * RR_TIMESLICE;

which works fine as long as MSEC_PER_SEC is multiple of HZ, however it
introduces 10% rounding error for CONFIG_HZ_300:

(MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * (100 * HZ / 1000)

(1000 / 300) * (100 * 300 / 1000)

3 * 30 = 90

This can be easily fixed by reversing the order of the multiplication
and division. After this fix we get:

(MSEC_PER_SEC * (100 * HZ / 1000)) / HZ

(1000 * (100 * 300 / 1000)) / 300

(1000 * 30) / 300 = 100

Fixes: 975e155ed873 ("sched/rt: Show the 'sched_rr_timeslice' SCHED_RR timeslice tuning knob in milliseconds")
Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel 
Acked-by: Mel Gorman 
Tested-by: Petr Vorel 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230802151906.25258-2-chrubis@suse.cz
[ pvorel: rebased for 5.15, 5.10 ]
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Remove trace_printk_lock

2024-03-01T12:21:43+00:00

commit e2bb9e01d589f7fa82573aedd2765ff9b277816a upstream.

Both bpf_trace_printk and bpf_trace_vprintk helpers use static buffer guarded
with trace_printk_lock spin lock.

The spin lock contention causes issues with bpf programs attached to
contention_begin tracepoint [1][2].

Andrii suggested we could get rid of the contention by using trylock, but we
could actually get rid of the spinlock completely by using percpu buffers the
same way as for bin_args in bpf_bprintf_prepare function.

Adding new return 'buf' argument to struct bpf_bprintf_data and making
bpf_bprintf_prepare to return also the buffer for printk helpers.

  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACkBjsakT_yWxnSWr4r-0TpPvbKm9-OBmVUhJb7hV3hY8fdCkw@mail.gmail.com/
  [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACkBjsaCsTovQHFfkqJKto6S4Z8d02ud1D7MPESrHa1cVNNTrw@mail.gmail.com/

Reported-by: Hao Sun 
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Acked-by: Yonghong Song 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221215214430.1336195-4-jolsa@kernel.org
[cascardo: there is no bpf_trace_vprintk in 5.15]
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Do cleanup in bpf_bprintf_cleanup only when needed

2024-03-01T12:21:43+00:00

commit f19a4050455aad847fb93f18dc1fe502eb60f989 upstream.

Currently we always cleanup/decrement bpf_bprintf_nest_level variable
in bpf_bprintf_cleanup if it's > 0.

There's possible scenario where this could cause a problem, when
bpf_bprintf_prepare does not get bin_args buffer (because num_args is 0)
and following bpf_bprintf_cleanup call decrements bpf_bprintf_nest_level
variable, like:

  in task context:
    bpf_bprintf_prepare(num_args != 0) increments 'bpf_bprintf_nest_level = 1'
    -> first irq :
       bpf_bprintf_prepare(num_args == 0)
       bpf_bprintf_cleanup decrements 'bpf_bprintf_nest_level = 0'
    -> second irq:
       bpf_bprintf_prepare(num_args != 0) bpf_bprintf_nest_level = 1
       gets same buffer as task context above

Adding check to bpf_bprintf_cleanup and doing the real cleanup only if we
got bin_args data in the first place.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Acked-by: Yonghong Song 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221215214430.1336195-3-jolsa@kernel.org
[cascardo: there is no bpf_trace_vprintk in 5.15]
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Add struct for bin_args arg in bpf_bprintf_prepare

2024-03-01T12:21:43+00:00

commit 78aa1cc9404399a15d2a1205329c6a06236f5378 upstream.

Adding struct bpf_bprintf_data to hold bin_args argument for
bpf_bprintf_prepare function.

We will add another return argument to bpf_bprintf_prepare and
pass the struct to bpf_bprintf_cleanup for proper cleanup in
following changes.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Acked-by: Yonghong Song 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221215214430.1336195-2-jolsa@kernel.org
[cascardo: there is no bpf_trace_vprintk in 5.15]
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Merge printk and seq_printf VARARG max macros

2024-03-01T12:21:43+00:00

commit 335ff4990cf3bfa42d8846f9b3d8c09456f51801 upstream.

MAX_SNPRINTF_VARARGS and MAX_SEQ_PRINTF_VARARGS are used by bpf helpers
bpf_snprintf and bpf_seq_printf to limit their varargs. Both call into
bpf_bprintf_prepare for print formatting logic and have convenience
macros in libbpf (BPF_SNPRINTF, BPF_SEQ_PRINTF) which use the same
helper macros to convert varargs to a byte array.

Changing shared functionality to support more varargs for either bpf
helper would affect the other as well, so let's combine the _VARARGS
macros to make this more obvious.

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210917182911.2426606-2-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman