linux-stable.git/kernel, branch v3.16.71

ptrace: Fix ->ptracer_cred handling for PTRACE_TRACEME

2019-07-23T18:43:17+00:00

commit 6994eefb0053799d2e07cd140df6c2ea106c41ee upstream.

Fix two issues:

When called for PTRACE_TRACEME, ptrace_link() would obtain an RCU
reference to the parent's objective credentials, then give that pointer
to get_cred().  However, the object lifetime rules for things like
struct cred do not permit unconditionally turning an RCU reference into
a stable reference.

PTRACE_TRACEME records the parent's credentials as if the parent was
acting as the subject, but that's not the case.  If a malicious
unprivileged child uses PTRACE_TRACEME and the parent is privileged, and
at a later point, the parent process becomes attacker-controlled
(because it drops privileges and calls execve()), the attacker ends up
with control over two processes with a privileged ptrace relationship,
which can be abused to ptrace a suid binary and obtain root privileges.

Fix both of these by always recording the credentials of the process
that is requesting the creation of the ptrace relationship:
current_cred() can't change under us, and current is the proper subject
for access control.

This change is theoretically userspace-visible, but I am not aware of
any code that it will actually break.

Fixes: 64b875f7ac8a ("ptrace: Capture the ptracer's creds not PT_PTRACE_CAP")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn 
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

kernel/sysctl.c: add missing range check in do_proc_dointvec_minmax_conv

2019-07-09T21:04:16+00:00

commit 8cf7630b29701d364f8df4a50e4f1f5e752b2778 upstream.

This bug has apparently existed since the introduction of this function
in the pre-git era (4500e91754d3 in Thomas Gleixner's history.git,
"[NET]: Add proc_dointvec_userhz_jiffies, use it for proper handling of
neighbour sysctls.").

As a minimal fix we can simply duplicate the corresponding check in
do_proc_dointvec_conv().

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190207123426.9202-3-zev@bewilderbeest.net
Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss 
Cc: Brendan Higgins 
Cc: Iurii Zaikin 
Cc: Kees Cook 
Cc: Luis Chamberlain 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

rcu: Do RCU GP kthread self-wakeup from softirq and interrupt

2019-07-09T21:03:50+00:00

commit 1d1f898df6586c5ea9aeaf349f13089c6fa37903 upstream.

The rcu_gp_kthread_wake() function is invoked when it might be necessary
to wake the RCU grace-period kthread.  Because self-wakeups are normally
a useless waste of CPU cycles, if rcu_gp_kthread_wake() is invoked from
this kthread, it naturally refuses to do the wakeup.

Unfortunately, natural though it might be, this heuristic fails when
rcu_gp_kthread_wake() is invoked from an interrupt or softirq handler
that interrupted the grace-period kthread just after the final check of
the wait-event condition but just before the schedule() call.  In this
case, a wakeup is required, even though the call to rcu_gp_kthread_wake()
is within the RCU grace-period kthread's context.  Failing to provide
this wakeup can result in grace periods failing to start, which in turn
results in out-of-memory conditions.

This race window is quite narrow, but it actually did happen during real
testing.  It would of course need to be fixed even if it was strictly
theoretical in nature.

This patch does not Cc stable because it does not apply cleanly to
earlier kernel versions.

Fixes: 48a7639ce80c ("rcu: Make callers awaken grace-period kthread")
Reported-by: "He, Bo" 
Co-developed-by: "Zhang, Jun" 
Co-developed-by: "He, Bo" 
Co-developed-by: "xiao, jin" 
Co-developed-by: Bai, Jie A 
Signed-off: "Zhang, Jun" 
Signed-off: "He, Bo" 
Signed-off: "xiao, jin" 
Signed-off: Bai, Jie A 
Signed-off-by: "Zhang, Jun" 
[ paulmck: Switch from !in_softirq() to "!in_interrupt() &&
  !in_serving_softirq() to avoid redundant wakeups and to also handle the
  interrupt-handler scenario as well as the softirq-handler scenario that
  actually occurred in testing. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney 
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CD6925E8781EFD4D8E11882D20FC406D52A11F61@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

cpu/speculation: Add 'mitigations=' cmdline option

2019-05-22T22:15:26+00:00

commit 98af8452945c55652de68536afdde3b520fec429 upstream.

Keeping track of the number of mitigations for all the CPU speculation
bugs has become overwhelming for many users.  It's getting more and more
complicated to decide which mitigations are needed for a given
architecture.  Complicating matters is the fact that each arch tends to
have its own custom way to mitigate the same vulnerability.

Most users fall into a few basic categories:

a) they want all mitigations off;

b) they want all reasonable mitigations on, with SMT enabled even if
   it's vulnerable; or

c) they want all reasonable mitigations on, with SMT disabled if
   vulnerable.

Define a set of curated, arch-independent options, each of which is an
aggregation of existing options:

- mitigations=off: Disable all mitigations.

- mitigations=auto: [default] Enable all the default mitigations, but
  leave SMT enabled, even if it's vulnerable.

- mitigations=auto,nosmt: Enable all the default mitigations, disabling
  SMT if needed by a mitigation.

Currently, these options are placeholders which don't actually do
anything.  They will be fleshed out in upcoming patches.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Tested-by: Jiri Kosina  (on x86)
Reviewed-by: Jiri Kosina 
Cc: Borislav Petkov 
Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" 
Cc: Andy Lutomirski 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Jiri Kosina 
Cc: Waiman Long 
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli 
Cc: Jon Masters 
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
Cc: Paul Mackerras 
Cc: Michael Ellerman 
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky 
Cc: Heiko Carstens 
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas 
Cc: Will Deacon 
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Cc: Tyler Hicks 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Randy Dunlap 
Cc: Steven Price 
Cc: Phil Auld 
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b07a8ef9b7c5055c3a4637c87d07c296d5016fe0.1555085500.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
[bwh: Backported to 3.16:
 - Drop the auto,nosmt option which we can't support
 - Adjust filename]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

x86/speculation: Rework SMT state change

2019-05-22T22:15:14+00:00

commit a74cfffb03b73d41e08f84c2e5c87dec0ce3db9f upstream.

arch_smt_update() is only called when the sysfs SMT control knob is
changed. This means that when SMT is enabled in the sysfs control knob the
system is considered to have SMT active even if all siblings are offline.

To allow finegrained control of the speculation mitigations, the actual SMT
state is more interesting than the fact that siblings could be enabled.

Rework the code, so arch_smt_update() is invoked from each individual CPU
hotplug function, and simplify the update function while at it.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Andy Lutomirski 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Jiri Kosina 
Cc: Tom Lendacky 
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf 
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli 
Cc: David Woodhouse 
Cc: Tim Chen 
Cc: Andi Kleen 
Cc: Dave Hansen 
Cc: Casey Schaufler 
Cc: Asit Mallick 
Cc: Arjan van de Ven 
Cc: Jon Masters 
Cc: Waiman Long 
Cc: Greg KH 
Cc: Dave Stewart 
Cc: Kees Cook 
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181125185004.521974984@linutronix.de
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

sched: Add sched_smt_active()

2019-05-22T22:15:13+00:00

Add the sched_smt_active() function needed for some x86 speculation
mitigations.  This was introduced upstream by commits 1b568f0aabf2
"sched/core: Optimize SCHED_SMT", ba2591a5993e "sched/smt: Update
sched_smt_present at runtime", c5511d03ec09 "sched/smt: Make
sched_smt_present track topology", and 321a874a7ef8 "sched/smt: Expose
sched_smt_present static key".  The upstream implementation uses the
static_key_{disable,enable}_cpuslocked() functions, which aren't
practical to backport.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

x86/speculation: Apply IBPB more strictly to avoid cross-process data leak

2019-05-22T22:15:10+00:00

commit dbfe2953f63c640463c630746cd5d9de8b2f63ae upstream.

Currently, IBPB is only issued in cases when switching into a non-dumpable
process, the rationale being to protect such 'important and security
sensitive' processess (such as GPG) from data leaking into a different
userspace process via spectre v2.

This is however completely insufficient to provide proper userspace-to-userpace
spectrev2 protection, as any process can poison branch buffers before being
scheduled out, and the newly scheduled process immediately becomes spectrev2
victim.

In order to minimize the performance impact (for usecases that do require
spectrev2 protection), issue the barrier only in cases when switching between
processess where the victim can't be ptraced by the potential attacker (as in
such cases, the attacker doesn't have to bother with branch buffers at all).

[ tglx: Split up PTRACE_MODE_NOACCESS_CHK into PTRACE_MODE_SCHED and
  PTRACE_MODE_IBPB to be able to do ptrace() context tracking reasonably
  fine-grained ]

Fixes: 18bf3c3ea8 ("x86/speculation: Use Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier in context switch")
Originally-by: Tim Chen 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf 
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli 
Cc:  "WoodhouseDavid" 
Cc: Andi Kleen 
Cc:  "SchauflerCasey" 
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/nycvar.YFH.7.76.1809251437340.15880@cbobk.fhfr.pm
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: we still can't use ctx_id to optimise the check]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

locking/static_key: Fix concurrent static_key_slow_inc()

2019-05-22T22:15:08+00:00

commit 4c5ea0a9cd02d6aa8adc86e100b2a4cff8d614ff upstream.

The following scenario is possible:

    CPU 1                                   CPU 2
    static_key_slow_inc()
     atomic_inc_not_zero()
      -> key.enabled == 0, no increment
     jump_label_lock()
     atomic_inc_return()
      -> key.enabled == 1 now
                                            static_key_slow_inc()
                                             atomic_inc_not_zero()
                                              -> key.enabled == 1, inc to 2
                                             return
                                            ** static key is wrong!
     jump_label_update()
     jump_label_unlock()

Testing the static key at the point marked by (**) will follow the
wrong path for jumps that have not been patched yet.  This can
actually happen when creating many KVM virtual machines with userspace
LAPIC emulation; just run several copies of the following program:

    #include 
    #include 
    #include 
    #include 

    int main(void)
    {
        for (;;) {
            int kvmfd = open("/dev/kvm", O_RDONLY);
            int vmfd = ioctl(kvmfd, KVM_CREATE_VM, 0);
            close(ioctl(vmfd, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, 1));
            close(vmfd);
            close(kvmfd);
        }
        return 0;
    }

Every KVM_CREATE_VCPU ioctl will attempt a static_key_slow_inc() call.
The static key's purpose is to skip NULL pointer checks and indeed one
of the processes eventually dereferences NULL.

As explained in the commit that introduced the bug:

  706249c222f6 ("locking/static_keys: Rework update logic")

jump_label_update() needs key.enabled to be true.  The solution adopted
here is to temporarily make key.enabled == -1, and use go down the
slow path when key.enabled <= 0.

Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov 
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Fixes: 706249c222f6 ("locking/static_keys: Rework update logic")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466527937-69798-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com
[ Small stylistic edits to the changelog and the code. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

locking/static_keys: Add a new static_key interface

2019-05-22T22:15:05+00:00

commit 11276d5306b8e5b438a36bbff855fe792d7eaa61 upstream.

There are various problems and short-comings with the current
static_key interface:

 - static_key_{true,false}() read like a branch depending on the key
   value, instead of the actual likely/unlikely branch depending on
   init value.

 - static_key_{true,false}() are, as stated above, tied to the
   static_key init values STATIC_KEY_INIT_{TRUE,FALSE}.

 - we're limited to the 2 (out of 4) possible options that compile to
   a default NOP because that's what our arch_static_branch() assembly
   emits.

So provide a new static_key interface:

  DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(name);
  DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(name);

Which define a key of different types with an initial true/false
value.

Then allow:

   static_branch_likely()
   static_branch_unlikely()

to take a key of either type and emit the right instruction for the
case.

This means adding a second arch_static_branch_jump() assembly helper
which emits a JMP per default.

In order to determine the right instruction for the right state,
encode the branch type in the LSB of jump_entry::key.

This is the final step in removing the naming confusion that has led to
a stream of avoidable bugs such as:

  a833581e372a ("x86, perf: Fix static_key bug in load_mm_cr4()")

... but it also allows new static key combinations that will give us
performance enhancements in the subsequent patches.

Tested-by: Rabin Vincent  # arm
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman  # ppc
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens  # s390
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Paul E. McKenney 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar 
[bwh: Backported to 3.16:
 - For s390, use the 31-bit-compatible macros in arch_static_branch_jump()
 - 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

locking/static_keys: Rework update logic

2019-05-22T22:15:04+00:00

commit 706249c222f68471b6f8e9e8e9b77665c404b226 upstream.

Instead of spreading the branch_default logic all over the place,
concentrate it into the one jump_label_type() function.

This does mean we need to actually increment/decrement the enabled
count _before_ calling the update path, otherwise jump_label_type()
will not see the right state.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Paul E. McKenney 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings