linux-stable.git/kernel/trace, branch v5.4.45

Stop the ad-hoc games with -Wno-maybe-initialized

2020-05-20T06:20:28+00:00

commit 78a5255ffb6a1af189a83e493d916ba1c54d8c75 upstream.

We have some rather random rules about when we accept the
"maybe-initialized" warnings, and when we don't.

For example, we consider it unreliable for gcc versions < 4.9, but also
if -O3 is enabled, or if optimizing for size.  And then various kernel
config options disabled it, because they know that they trigger that
warning by confusing gcc sufficiently (ie PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES).

And now gcc-10 seems to be introducing a lot of those warnings too, so
it falls under the same heading as 4.9 did.

At the same time, we have a very straightforward way to _enable_ that
warning when wanted: use "W=2" to enable more warnings.

So stop playing these ad-hoc games, and just disable that warning by
default, with the known and straight-forward "if you want to work on the
extra compiler warnings, use W=123".

Would it be great to have code that is always so obvious that it never
confuses the compiler whether a variable is used initialized or not?
Yes, it would.  In a perfect world, the compilers would be smarter, and
our source code would be simpler.

That's currently not the world we live in, though.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

tracing: Add a vmalloc_sync_mappings() for safe measure

2020-05-14T05:58:25+00:00

commit 11f5efc3ab66284f7aaacc926e9351d658e2577b upstream.

x86_64 lazily maps in the vmalloc pages, and the way this works with per_cpu
areas can be complex, to say the least. Mappings may happen at boot up, and
if nothing synchronizes the page tables, those page mappings may not be
synced till they are used. This causes issues for anything that might touch
one of those mappings in the path of the page fault handler. When one of
those unmapped mappings is touched in the page fault handler, it will cause
another page fault, which in turn will cause a page fault, and leave us in
a loop of page faults.

Commit 763802b53a42 ("x86/mm: split vmalloc_sync_all()") split
vmalloc_sync_all() into vmalloc_sync_unmappings() and
vmalloc_sync_mappings(), as on system exit, it did not need to do a full
sync on x86_64 (although it still needed to be done on x86_32). By chance,
the vmalloc_sync_all() would synchronize the page mappings done at boot up
and prevent the per cpu area from being a problem for tracing in the page
fault handler. But when that synchronization in the exit of a task became a
nop, it caused the problem to appear.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200429054857.66e8e333@oasis.local.home

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 737223fbca3b1 ("tracing: Consolidate buffer allocation code")
Reported-by: "Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)" 
Suggested-by: Joerg Roedel 
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

tracing/kprobes: Fix a double initialization typo

2020-05-14T05:58:18+00:00

[ Upstream commit dcbd21c9fca5e954fd4e3d91884907eb6d47187e ]

Fix a typo that resulted in an unnecessary double
initialization to addr.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/158779374968.6082.2337484008464939919.stgit@devnote2

Cc: Tom Zanussi 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: c7411a1a126f ("tracing/kprobe: Check whether the non-suffixed symbol is notrace")
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu 
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

tracing: Fix memory leaks in trace_events_hist.c

2020-05-10T08:31:28+00:00

[ Upstream commit 9da73974eb9c965dd9989befb593b8c8da9e4bdc ]

kmemleak report 1:
    [<9092c50b>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x138/0x270
    [<05a2c9ed>] create_field_var+0xcf/0x180
    [<528a2d68>] action_create+0xe2/0xc80
    [<63f50b61>] event_hist_trigger_func+0x15b5/0x1920
    [<28ea5d3d>] trigger_process_regex+0x7b/0xc0
    [<3138e86f>] event_trigger_write+0x4d/0xb0
    [] __vfs_write+0x30/0x200
    [<4f424a0d>] vfs_write+0x96/0x1b0
    [] ksys_write+0x53/0xc0
    [<3717101a>] __ia32_sys_write+0x15/0x20
    [] do_fast_syscall_32+0x70/0x250
    [<46e2629c>] entry_SYSENTER_32+0xaf/0x102

This is because save_vars[] of struct hist_trigger_data are
not destroyed

kmemleak report 2:
    [<9092c50b>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x138/0x270
    [<6e5e97c5>] create_var+0x3c/0x110
    [] create_field_var+0xaf/0x180
    [<528a2d68>] action_create+0xe2/0xc80
    [<63f50b61>] event_hist_trigger_func+0x15b5/0x1920
    [<28ea5d3d>] trigger_process_regex+0x7b/0xc0
    [<3138e86f>] event_trigger_write+0x4d/0xb0
    [] __vfs_write+0x30/0x200
    [<4f424a0d>] vfs_write+0x96/0x1b0
    [] ksys_write+0x53/0xc0
    [<3717101a>] __ia32_sys_write+0x15/0x20
    [] do_fast_syscall_32+0x70/0x250
    [<46e2629c>] entry_SYSENTER_32+0xaf/0x102

struct hist_field allocated through create_var() do not initialize
"ref" field to 1. The code in __destroy_hist_field() does not destroy
object if "ref" is initialized to zero, the condition
if (--hist_field->ref > 1) always passes since unsigned int wraps.

kmemleak report 3:
    [] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x139/0x2b0
    [] kstrdup+0x27/0x50
    [<39d70006>] init_var_ref+0x58/0xd0
    [<8ca76370>] create_var_ref+0x89/0xe0
    [] action_create+0x38f/0xc80
    [<7c146821>] event_hist_trigger_func+0x15b5/0x1920
    [<07de3f61>] trigger_process_regex+0x7b/0xc0
    [] event_trigger_write+0x4d/0xb0
    [<19bf1512>] __vfs_write+0x30/0x200
    [<64ce4d27>] vfs_write+0x96/0x1b0
    [] ksys_write+0x53/0xc0
    [<7d4230cd>] __ia32_sys_write+0x15/0x20
    [<8eadca00>] do_fast_syscall_32+0x70/0x250
    [<235cf985>] entry_SYSENTER_32+0xaf/0x102

hist_fields (system & event_name) are not freed

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200422061503.GA5151@cosmos

Signed-off-by: Vamshi K Sthambamkadi 
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

tracing: Fix the race between registering 'snapshot' event trigger and triggering 'snapshot' operation

2020-04-21T07:04:59+00:00

commit 0bbe7f719985efd9adb3454679ecef0984cb6800 upstream.

Traced event can trigger 'snapshot' operation(i.e. calls snapshot_trigger()
or snapshot_count_trigger()) when register_snapshot_trigger() has completed
registration but doesn't allocate buffer for 'snapshot' event trigger.  In
the rare case, 'snapshot' operation always detects the lack of allocated
buffer so make register_snapshot_trigger() allocate buffer first.

trigger-snapshot.tc in kselftest reproduces the issue on slow vm:
-----------------------------------------------------------
cat trace
...
ftracetest-3028  [002] ....   236.784290: sched_process_fork: comm=ftracetest pid=3028 child_comm=ftracetest child_pid=3036
     <...>-2875  [003] ....   240.460335: tracing_snapshot_instance_cond: *** SNAPSHOT NOT ALLOCATED ***
     <...>-2875  [003] ....   240.460338: tracing_snapshot_instance_cond: *** stopping trace here!   ***
-----------------------------------------------------------

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200414015145.66236-1-yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 93e31ffbf417a ("tracing: Add 'snapshot' event trigger command")
Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang 
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ftrace/kprobe: Show the maxactive number on kprobe_events

2020-04-17T08:50:21+00:00

commit 6a13a0d7b4d1171ef9b80ad69abc37e1daa941b3 upstream.

Show maxactive parameter on kprobe_events.
This allows user to save the current configuration and
restore it without losing maxactive parameter.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4762764a-6df7-bc93-ed60-e336146dce1f@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/158503528846.22706.5549974121212526020.stgit@devnote2

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 696ced4fb1d76 ("tracing/kprobes: expose maxactive for kretprobe in kprobe_events")
Reported-by: Taeung Song 
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu 
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Fix deadlock with rq_lock in bpf_send_signal()

2020-04-17T08:49:57+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1bc7896e9ef44fd77858b3ef0b8a6840be3a4494 ]

When experimenting with bpf_send_signal() helper in our production
environment (5.2 based), we experienced a deadlock in NMI mode:
   #5 [ffffc9002219f770] queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff8110be24
   #6 [ffffc9002219f770] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffff81a43012
   #7 [ffffc9002219f780] try_to_wake_up at ffffffff810e7ecd
   #8 [ffffc9002219f7e0] signal_wake_up_state at ffffffff810c7b55
   #9 [ffffc9002219f7f0] __send_signal at ffffffff810c8602
  #10 [ffffc9002219f830] do_send_sig_info at ffffffff810ca31a
  #11 [ffffc9002219f868] bpf_send_signal at ffffffff8119d227
  #12 [ffffc9002219f988] bpf_overflow_handler at ffffffff811d4140
  #13 [ffffc9002219f9e0] __perf_event_overflow at ffffffff811d68cf
  #14 [ffffc9002219fa10] perf_swevent_overflow at ffffffff811d6a09
  #15 [ffffc9002219fa38] ___perf_sw_event at ffffffff811e0f47
  #16 [ffffc9002219fc30] __schedule at ffffffff81a3e04d
  #17 [ffffc9002219fc90] schedule at ffffffff81a3e219
  #18 [ffffc9002219fca0] futex_wait_queue_me at ffffffff8113d1b9
  #19 [ffffc9002219fcd8] futex_wait at ffffffff8113e529
  #20 [ffffc9002219fdf0] do_futex at ffffffff8113ffbc
  #21 [ffffc9002219fec0] __x64_sys_futex at ffffffff81140d1c
  #22 [ffffc9002219ff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff81002602
  #23 [ffffc9002219ff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff81c00068

The above call stack is actually very similar to an issue
reported by Commit eac9153f2b58 ("bpf/stackmap: Fix deadlock with
rq_lock in bpf_get_stack()") by Song Liu. The only difference is
bpf_send_signal() helper instead of bpf_get_stack() helper.

The above deadlock is triggered with a perf_sw_event.
Similar to Commit eac9153f2b58, the below almost identical reproducer
used tracepoint point sched/sched_switch so the issue can be easily caught.
  /* stress_test.c */
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 

  #define THREAD_COUNT 1000
  char *filename;
  void *worker(void *p)
  {
        void *ptr;
        int fd;
        char *pptr;

        fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY);
        if (fd < 0)
                return NULL;
        while (1) {
                struct timespec ts = {0, 1000 + rand() % 2000};

                ptr = mmap(NULL, 4096 * 64, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0);
                usleep(1);
                if (ptr == MAP_FAILED) {
                        printf("failed to mmap\n");
                        break;
                }
                munmap(ptr, 4096 * 64);
                usleep(1);
                pptr = malloc(1);
                usleep(1);
                pptr[0] = 1;
                usleep(1);
                free(pptr);
                usleep(1);
                nanosleep(&ts, NULL);
        }
        close(fd);
        return NULL;
  }

  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
  {
        void *ptr;
        int i;
        pthread_t threads[THREAD_COUNT];

        if (argc < 2)
                return 0;

        filename = argv[1];

        for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) {
                if (pthread_create(threads + i, NULL, worker, NULL)) {
                        fprintf(stderr, "Error creating thread\n");
                        return 0;
                }
        }

        for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++)
                pthread_join(threads[i], NULL);
        return 0;
  }
and the following command:
  1. run `stress_test /bin/ls` in one windown
  2. hack bcc trace.py with the following change:
#     --- a/tools/trace.py
#     +++ b/tools/trace.py
     @@ -513,6 +513,7 @@ BPF_PERF_OUTPUT(%s);
              __data.tgid = __tgid;
              __data.pid = __pid;
              bpf_get_current_comm(&__data.comm, sizeof(__data.comm));
     +        bpf_send_signal(10);
      %s
      %s
              %s.perf_submit(%s, &__data, sizeof(__data));
  3. in a different window run
     ./trace.py -p $(pidof stress_test) t:sched:sched_switch

The deadlock can be reproduced in our production system.

Similar to Song's fix, the fix is to delay sending signal if
irqs is disabled to avoid deadlocks involving with rq_lock.
With this change, my above stress-test in our production system
won't cause deadlock any more.

I also implemented a scale-down version of reproducer in the
selftest (a subsequent commit). With latest bpf-next,
it complains for the following potential deadlock.
  [   32.832450] -> #1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}:
  [   32.833100]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x80
  [   32.833696]        task_rq_lock+0x2c/0xa0
  [   32.834182]        task_sched_runtime+0x59/0xd0
  [   32.834721]        thread_group_cputime+0x250/0x270
  [   32.835304]        thread_group_cputime_adjusted+0x2e/0x70
  [   32.835959]        do_task_stat+0x8a7/0xb80
  [   32.836461]        proc_single_show+0x51/0xb0
  ...
  [   32.839512] -> #0 (&(&sighand->siglock)->rlock){....}:
  [   32.840275]        __lock_acquire+0x1358/0x1a20
  [   32.840826]        lock_acquire+0xc7/0x1d0
  [   32.841309]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x80
  [   32.841916]        __lock_task_sighand+0x79/0x160
  [   32.842465]        do_send_sig_info+0x35/0x90
  [   32.842977]        bpf_send_signal+0xa/0x10
  [   32.843464]        bpf_prog_bc13ed9e4d3163e3_send_signal_tp_sched+0x465/0x1000
  [   32.844301]        trace_call_bpf+0x115/0x270
  [   32.844809]        perf_trace_run_bpf_submit+0x4a/0xc0
  [   32.845411]        perf_trace_sched_switch+0x10f/0x180
  [   32.846014]        __schedule+0x45d/0x880
  [   32.846483]        schedule+0x5f/0xd0
  ...

  [   32.853148] Chain exists of:
  [   32.853148]   &(&sighand->siglock)->rlock --> &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock
  [   32.853148]
  [   32.854451]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
  [   32.854451]
  [   32.855173]        CPU0                    CPU1
  [   32.855745]        ----                    ----
  [   32.856278]   lock(&rq->lock);
  [   32.856671]                                lock(&p->pi_lock);
  [   32.857332]                                lock(&rq->lock);
  [   32.857999]   lock(&(&sighand->siglock)->rlock);

  Deadlock happens on CPU0 when it tries to acquire &sighand->siglock
  but it has been held by CPU1 and CPU1 tries to grab &rq->lock
  and cannot get it.

  This is not exactly the callstack in our production environment,
  but sympotom is similar and both locks are using spin_lock_irqsave()
  to acquire the lock, and both involves rq_lock. The fix to delay
  sending signal when irq is disabled also fixed this issue.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Cc: Song Liu 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200304191104.2796501-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

tracing: Fix number printing bug in print_synth_event()

2020-03-21T07:11:49+00:00

[ Upstream commit 784bd0847eda032ed2f3522f87250655a18c0190 ]

Fix a varargs-related bug in print_synth_event() which resulted in
strange output and oopses on 32-bit x86 systems. The problem is that
trace_seq_printf() expects the varargs to match the format string, but
print_synth_event() was always passing u64 values regardless.  This
results in unspecified behavior when unpacking with va_arg() in
trace_seq_printf().

Add a function that takes the size into account when calling
trace_seq_printf().

Before:

  modprobe-1731  [003] ....   919.039758: gen_synth_test: next_pid_field=777(null)next_comm_field=hula hoops ts_ns=1000000 ts_ms=1000 cpu=3(null)my_string_field=thneed my_int_field=598(null)

After:

 insmod-1136  [001] ....    36.634590: gen_synth_test: next_pid_field=777 next_comm_field=hula hoops ts_ns=1000000 ts_ms=1000 cpu=1 my_string_field=thneed my_int_field=598

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/a9b59eb515dbbd7d4abe53b347dccf7a8e285657.1581720155.git.zanussi@kernel.org

Reported-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) 
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi 
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

blktrace: fix dereference after null check

2020-03-12T12:00:10+00:00

[ Upstream commit 153031a301bb07194e9c37466cfce8eacb977621 ]

There was a recent change in blktrace.c that added a RCU protection to
`q->blk_trace` in order to fix a use-after-free issue during access.

However the change missed an edge case that can lead to dereferencing of
`bt` pointer even when it's NULL:

Coverity static analyzer marked this as a FORWARD_NULL issue with CID
1460458.

```
/kernel/trace/blktrace.c: 1904 in sysfs_blk_trace_attr_store()
1898            ret = 0;
1899            if (bt == NULL)
1900                    ret = blk_trace_setup_queue(q, bdev);
1901
1902            if (ret == 0) {
1903                    if (attr == &dev_attr_act_mask)
>>>     CID 1460458:  Null pointer dereferences  (FORWARD_NULL)
>>>     Dereferencing null pointer "bt".
1904                            bt->act_mask = value;
1905                    else if (attr == &dev_attr_pid)
1906                            bt->pid = value;
1907                    else if (attr == &dev_attr_start_lba)
1908                            bt->start_lba = value;
1909                    else if (attr == &dev_attr_end_lba)
```

Added a reassignment with RCU annotation to fix the issue.

Fixes: c780e86dd48 ("blktrace: Protect q->blk_trace with RCU")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei 
Reviewed-by: Bob Liu 
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) 
Signed-off-by: Cengiz Can 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

blktrace: Protect q->blk_trace with RCU

2020-03-05T15:43:52+00:00

[ Upstream commit c780e86dd48ef6467a1146cf7d0fe1e05a635039 ]

KASAN is reporting that __blk_add_trace() has a use-after-free issue
when accessing q->blk_trace. Indeed the switching of block tracing (and
thus eventual freeing of q->blk_trace) is completely unsynchronized with
the currently running tracing and thus it can happen that the blk_trace
structure is being freed just while __blk_add_trace() works on it.
Protect accesses to q->blk_trace by RCU during tracing and make sure we
wait for the end of RCU grace period when shutting down tracing. Luckily
that is rare enough event that we can afford that. Note that postponing
the freeing of blk_trace to an RCU callback should better be avoided as
it could have unexpected user visible side-effects as debugfs files
would be still existing for a short while block tracing has been shut
down.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205711
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni 
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei 
Tested-by: Ming Lei 
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche 
Reported-by: Tristan Madani 
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin