linux-stable.git/kernel/time, branch v6.12.35

clocksource: Fix the CPUs' choice in the watchdog per CPU verification

2025-06-27T10:11:26+00:00

[ Upstream commit 08d7becc1a6b8c936e25d827becabfe3bff72a36 ]

Right now, if the clocksource watchdog detects a clocksource skew, it might
perform a per CPU check, for example in the TSC case on x86.  In other
words: supposing TSC is detected as unstable by the clocksource watchdog
running at CPU1, as part of marking TSC unstable the kernel will also run a
check of TSC readings on some CPUs to be sure it is synced between them
all.

But that check happens only on some CPUs, not all of them; this choice is
based on the parameter "verify_n_cpus" and in some random cpumask
calculation. So, the watchdog runs such per CPU checks on up to
"verify_n_cpus" random CPUs among all online CPUs, with the risk of
repeating CPUs (that aren't double checked) in the cpumask random
calculation.

But if "verify_n_cpus" > num_online_cpus(), it should skip the random
calculation and just go ahead and check the clocksource sync between
all online CPUs, without the risk of skipping some CPUs due to
duplicity in the random cpumask calculation.

Tests in a 4 CPU laptop with TSC skew detected led to some cases of the per
CPU verification skipping some CPU even with verify_n_cpus=8, due to the
duplicity on random cpumask generation. Skipping the randomization when the
number of online CPUs is smaller than verify_n_cpus, solves that.

Suggested-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo 
Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250323173857.372390-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers() and posix_cpu_timer_del()

2025-06-19T13:32:34+00:00

commit f90fff1e152dedf52b932240ebbd670d83330eca upstream.

If an exiting non-autoreaping task has already passed exit_notify() and
calls handle_posix_cpu_timers() from IRQ, it can be reaped by its parent
or debugger right after unlock_task_sighand().

If a concurrent posix_cpu_timer_del() runs at that moment, it won't be
able to detect timer->it.cpu.firing != 0: cpu_timer_task_rcu() and/or
lock_task_sighand() will fail.

Add the tsk->exit_state check into run_posix_cpu_timers() to fix this.

This fix is not needed if CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK=y, because
exit_task_work() is called before exit_notify(). But the check still
makes sense, task_work_add(&tsk->posix_cputimers_work.work) will fail
anyway in this case.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Benoît Sevens 
Fixes: 0bdd2ed4138e ("sched: run_posix_cpu_timers: Don't check ->exit_state, use lock_task_sighand()")
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

hrtimers: Replace hrtimer_clock_to_base_table with switch-case

2025-05-29T09:02:46+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4441b976dfeff0d3579e8da3c0283300c618a553 ]

Clang and GCC complain about overlapped initialisers in the
hrtimer_clock_to_base_table definition. With `make W=1` and CONFIG_WERROR=y
(which is default nowadays) this breaks the build:

  CC      kernel/time/hrtimer.o
kernel/time/hrtimer.c:124:21: error: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Werror,-Winitializer-overrides]
  124 |         [CLOCK_REALTIME]        = HRTIMER_BASE_REALTIME,

kernel/time/hrtimer.c:122:27: note: previous initialization is here
  122 |         [0 ... MAX_CLOCKS - 1]  = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,

(and similar for CLOCK_MONOTONIC, CLOCK_BOOTTIME, and CLOCK_TAI).

hrtimer_clockid_to_base(), which uses the table, is only used in
__hrtimer_init(), which is not a hotpath.

Therefore replace the table lookup with a switch case in
hrtimer_clockid_to_base() to avoid this warning.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250214134424.3367619-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

timer_list: Don't use %pK through printk()

2025-05-29T09:02:20+00:00

[ Upstream commit a52067c24ccf6ee4c85acffa0f155e9714f9adce ]

This reverts commit f590308536db ("timer debug: Hide kernel addresses via
%pK in /proc/timer_list")

The timer list helper SEQ_printf() uses either the real seq_printf() for
procfs output or vprintk() to print to the kernel log, when invoked from
SysRq-q. It uses %pK for printing pointers.

In the past %pK was prefered over %p as it would not leak raw pointer
values into the kernel log. Since commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash
addresses printed with %p") the regular %p has been improved to avoid this
issue.

Furthermore, restricted pointers ("%pK") were never meant to be used
through printk(). They can still unintentionally leak raw pointers or
acquire sleeping looks in atomic contexts.

Switch to the regular pointer formatting which is safer, easier to reason
about and sufficient here.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250113171731-dc10e3c1-da64-4af0-b767-7c7070468023@linutronix.de/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250311-restricted-pointers-timer-v1-1-6626b91e54ab@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

posix-timers: Ensure that timer initialization is fully visible

2025-05-29T09:02:20+00:00

[ Upstream commit 2389c6efd3ad8edb3bcce0019b4edcc7d9c7de19 ]

Frederic pointed out that the memory operations to initialize the timer are
not guaranteed to be visible, when __lock_timer() observes timer::it_signal
valid under timer::it_lock:

  T0                                      T1
  ---------                               -----------
  do_timer_create()
      // A
      new_timer->.... = ....
      spin_lock(current->sighand)
      // B
      WRITE_ONCE(new_timer->it_signal, current->signal)
      spin_unlock(current->sighand)
					sys_timer_*()
					   t =  __lock_timer()
						  spin_lock(&timr->it_lock)
						  // observes B
						  if (timr->it_signal == current->signal)
						    return timr;
			                   if (!t)
					       return;
					// Is not guaranteed to observe A

Protect the write of timer::it_signal, which makes the timer valid, with
timer::it_lock as well. This guarantees that T1 must observe the
initialization A completely, when it observes the valid signal pointer
under timer::it_lock. sighand::siglock must still be taken to protect the
signal::posix_timers list.

Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker 
Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250308155623.507944489@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

posix-timers: Add cond_resched() to posix_timer_add() search loop

2025-05-29T09:02:19+00:00

[ Upstream commit 5f2909c6cd13564a07ae692a95457f52295c4f22 ]

With a large number of POSIX timers the search for a valid ID might cause a
soft lockup on PREEMPT_NONE/VOLUNTARY kernels.

Add cond_resched() to the loop to prevent that.

[ tglx: Split out from Eric's series ]

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250214135911.2037402-2-edumazet@google.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250308155623.635612865@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

timekeeping: Add a lockdep override in tick_freeze()

2025-05-02T05:59:25+00:00

[ Upstream commit 92e250c624ea37fde64bfd624fd2556f0d846f18 ]

tick_freeze() acquires a raw spinlock (tick_freeze_lock). Later in the
callchain (timekeeping_suspend() -> mc146818_avoid_UIP()) the RTC driver
acquires a spinlock which becomes a sleeping lock on PREEMPT_RT.  Lockdep
complains about this lock nesting.

Add a lockdep override for this special case and a comment explaining
why it is okay.

Reported-by: Borislav Petkov 
Reported-by: Chris Bainbridge 
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250404133429.pnAzf-eF@linutronix.de
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250330113202.GAZ-krsjAnurOlTcp-@fat_crate.local/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAP-bSRZ0CWyZZsMtx046YV8L28LhY0fson2g4EqcwRAVN1Jk+Q@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

hrtimers: Mark is_migration_base() with __always_inline

2025-03-22T19:54:14+00:00

[ Upstream commit 27af31e44949fa85550176520ef7086a0d00fd7b ]

When is_migration_base() is unused, it prevents kernel builds
with clang, `make W=1` and CONFIG_WERROR=y:

kernel/time/hrtimer.c:156:20: error: unused function 'is_migration_base' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
  156 | static inline bool is_migration_base(struct hrtimer_clock_base *base)
      |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Fix this by marking it with __always_inline.

[ tglx: Use __always_inline instead of __maybe_unused and move it into the
  	usage sites conditional ]

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250116160745.243358-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

clocksource: Use migrate_disable() to avoid calling get_random_u32() in atomic context

2025-02-21T13:01:38+00:00

[ Upstream commit 6bb05a33337b2c842373857b63de5c9bf1ae2a09 ]

The following bug report happened with a PREEMPT_RT kernel:

  BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48
  in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 2012, name: kwatchdog
  preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
  RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
  get_random_u32+0x4f/0x110
  clocksource_verify_choose_cpus+0xab/0x1a0
  clocksource_verify_percpu.part.0+0x6b/0x330
  clocksource_watchdog_kthread+0x193/0x1a0

It is due to the fact that clocksource_verify_choose_cpus() is invoked with
preemption disabled.  This function invokes get_random_u32() to obtain
random numbers for choosing CPUs.  The batched_entropy_32 local lock and/or
the base_crng.lock spinlock in driver/char/random.c will be acquired during
the call. In PREEMPT_RT kernel, they are both sleeping locks and so cannot
be acquired in atomic context.

Fix this problem by using migrate_disable() to allow smp_processor_id() to
be reliably used without introducing atomic context. preempt_disable() is
then called after clocksource_verify_choose_cpus() but before the
clocksource measurement is being run to avoid introducing unexpected
latency.

Fixes: 7560c02bdffb ("clocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable")
Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney 
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250131173323.891943-2-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

clocksource: Use pr_info() for "Checking clocksource synchronization" message

2025-02-21T13:01:38+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1f566840a82982141f94086061927a90e79440e5 ]

The "Checking clocksource synchronization" message is normally printed
when clocksource_verify_percpu() is called for a given clocksource if
both the CLOCK_SOURCE_UNSTABLE and CLOCK_SOURCE_VERIFY_PERCPU flags
are set.

It is an informational message and so pr_info() is the correct choice.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney 
Acked-by: John Stultz 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250125015442.3740588-1-longman@redhat.com
Stable-dep-of: 6bb05a33337b ("clocksource: Use migrate_disable() to avoid calling get_random_u32() in atomic context")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin