This testcase

	#include <stdio.h>
	#include <unistd.h>
	#include <signal.h>
	#include <sys/ptrace.h>
	#include <sys/wait.h>
	#include <pthread.h>
	#include <assert.h>

	void *tf(void *arg)
	{
		return NULL;
	}

	int main(void)
	{
		int pid = fork();
		if (!pid) {
			kill(getpid(), SIGSTOP);

			pthread_t th;
			pthread_create(&th, NULL, tf, NULL);

			return 0;
		}

		waitpid(pid, NULL, WSTOPPED);

		ptrace(PTRACE_SEIZE, pid, 0, PTRACE_O_TRACECLONE);
		waitpid(pid, NULL, 0);

		ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, pid, 0,0);
		waitpid(pid, NULL, 0);

		int status;
		int thread = waitpid(-1, &status, 0);
		assert(thread > 0 && thread != pid);
		assert(status == 0x80137f);

		return 0;
	}

fails and triggers WARN_ON_ONCE(!signr) in do_jobctl_trap().

This is because task_join_group_stop() has 2 problems when current is traced:

	1. We can't rely on the "JOBCTL_STOP_PENDING" check, a stopped tracee
	   can be woken up by debugger and it can clone another thread which
	   should join the group-stop.

	   We need to check group_stop_count || SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED.

	2. If SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED is already set, we should not increment
	   sig->group_stop_count and add JOBCTL_STOP_CONSUME. The new thread
	   should stop without another do_notify_parent_cldstop() report.

To clarify, the problem is very old and we should blame
ptrace_init_task().  But now that we have task_join_group_stop() it makes
more sense to fix this helper to avoid the code duplication.

Reported-by: syzbot+3485e3773f7da290eecc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201019134237.GA18810@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with
the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary
fall-through markings when it is the case.

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.7/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>

If JOBCTL_TASK_WORK is already set on the targeted task, then we need
not go through {lock,unlock}_task_sighand() to set it again and queue
a signal wakeup. This is safe as we're checking it _after_ adding the
new task_work with cmpxchg().

The ordering is as follows:

task_work_add()				get_signal()
--------------------------------------------------------------
STORE(task->task_works, new_work);	STORE(task->jobctl);
mb();					mb();
LOAD(task->jobctl);			LOAD(task->task_works);

This speeds up TWA_SIGNAL handling quite a bit, which is important now
that io_uring is relying on it for all task_work deliveries.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

s/postive/positive/

Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724090531.GA14409@amd
[christian.brauner@ubuntu.com: tweak commit message]
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>

So that the target task will exit the wait_event_interruptible-like
loop and call task_work_run() asap.

The patch turns "bool notify" into 0,TWA_RESUME,TWA_SIGNAL enum, the
new TWA_SIGNAL flag implies signal_wake_up().  However, it needs to
avoid the race with recalc_sigpending(), so the patch also adds the
new JOBCTL_TASK_WORK bit included in JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK.

TODO: once this patch is merged we need to change all current users
of task_work_add(notify = true) to use TWA_RESUME.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Pull uaccess/coredump updates from Al Viro:
 "set_fs() removal in coredump-related area - mostly Christoph's
  stuff..."

* 'work.set_fs-exec' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs:
  binfmt_elf_fdpic: remove the set_fs(KERNEL_DS) in elf_fdpic_core_dump
  binfmt_elf: remove the set_fs(KERNEL_DS) in elf_core_dump
  binfmt_elf: remove the set_fs in fill_siginfo_note
  signal: refactor copy_siginfo_to_user32
  powerpc/spufs: simplify spufs core dumping
  powerpc/spufs: stop using access_ok
  powerpc/spufs: fix copy_to_user while atomic

Factor out a copy_siginfo_to_external32 helper from
copy_siginfo_to_user32 that fills out the compat_siginfo, but does so
on a kernel space data structure.  With that we can let architectures
override copy_siginfo_to_user32 with their own implementations using
copy_siginfo_to_external32.  That allows moving the x32 SIGCHLD purely
to x86 architecture code.

As a nice side effect copy_siginfo_to_external32 also comes in handy
for avoiding a set_fs() call in the coredump code later on.

Contains improvements from Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
and Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Pull SIGCHLD fix from Eric Biederman:
 "Christof Meerwald reported that do_notify_parent has not been
  successfully populating si_pid and si_uid for multi-threaded
  processes.

  This is the one-liner fix. Strictly speaking a one-liner plus
  comment"

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace:
  signal: Avoid corrupting si_pid and si_uid in do_notify_parent

Christof Meerwald <cmeerw@cmeerw.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> this is probably related to commit
> 7a0cf094944e2540758b7f957eb6846d5126f535 (signal: Correct namespace
> fixups of si_pid and si_uid).
>
> With a 5.6.5 kernel I am seeing SIGCHLD signals that don't include a
> properly set si_pid field - this seems to happen for multi-threaded
> child processes.
>
> A simple test program (based on the sample from the signalfd man page):
>
> #include <sys/signalfd.h>
> #include <signal.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <spawn.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> #define handle_error(msg) \
>     do { perror(msg); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } while (0)
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
>   sigset_t mask;
>   int sfd;
>   struct signalfd_siginfo fdsi;
>   ssize_t s;
>
>   sigemptyset(&mask);
>   sigaddset(&mask, SIGCHLD);
>
>   if (sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &mask, NULL) == -1)
>     handle_error("sigprocmask");
>
>   pid_t chldpid;
>   char *chldargv[] = { "./sfdclient", NULL };
>   posix_spawn(&chldpid, "./sfdclient", NULL, NULL, chldargv, NULL);
>
>   sfd = signalfd(-1, &mask, 0);
>   if (sfd == -1)
>     handle_error("signalfd");
>
>   for (;;) {
>     s = read(sfd, &fdsi, sizeof(struct signalfd_siginfo));
>     if (s != sizeof(struct signalfd_siginfo))
>       handle_error("read");
>
>     if (fdsi.ssi_signo == SIGCHLD) {
>       printf("Got SIGCHLD %d %d %d %d\n",
>           fdsi.ssi_status, fdsi.ssi_code,
>           fdsi.ssi_uid, fdsi.ssi_pid);
>       return 0;
>     } else {
>       printf("Read unexpected signal\n");
>     }
>   }
> }
>
>
> and a multi-threaded client to test with:
>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <pthread.h>
>
> void *f(void *arg)
> {
>   sleep(100);
> }
>
> int main()
> {
>   pthread_t t[8];
>
>   for (int i = 0; i != 8; ++i)
>   {
>     pthread_create(&t[i], NULL, f, NULL);
>   }
> }
>
> I tried to do a bit of debugging and what seems to be happening is
> that
>
>   /* From an ancestor pid namespace? */
>   if (!task_pid_nr_ns(current, task_active_pid_ns(t))) {
>
> fails inside task_pid_nr_ns because the check for "pid_alive" fails.
>
> This code seems to be called from do_notify_parent and there we
> actually have "tsk != current" (I am assuming both are threads of the
> current process?)

I instrumented the code with a warning and received the following backtrace:
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 777 at kernel/pid.c:501 __task_pid_nr_ns.cold.6+0xc/0x15
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 PID: 777 Comm: sfdclient Not tainted 5.7.0-rc1userns+ #2924
> Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> RIP: 0010:__task_pid_nr_ns.cold.6+0xc/0x15
> Code: ff 66 90 48 83 ec 08 89 7c 24 04 48 8d 7e 08 48 8d 74 24 04 e8 9a b6 44 00 48 83 c4 08 c3 48 c7 c7 59 9f ac 82 e8 c2 c4 04 00 <0f> 0b e9 3fd
> RSP: 0018:ffffc9000042fbf8 EFLAGS: 00010046
> RAX: 000000000000000c RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffc9000042faf4
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff81193d29
> RBP: ffffc9000042fc18 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
> R10: 000000100f938416 R11: 0000000000000309 R12: ffff8880b941c140
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8880b941c140
> FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880bca00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00007f2e8c0a32e0 CR3: 0000000002e10000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
> Call Trace:
>  send_signal+0x1c8/0x310
>  do_notify_parent+0x50f/0x550
>  release_task.part.21+0x4fd/0x620
>  do_exit+0x6f6/0xaf0
>  do_group_exit+0x42/0xb0
>  get_signal+0x13b/0xbb0
>  do_signal+0x2b/0x670
>  ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x24d/0x2b0
>  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x4d/0x60
>  ? kfree+0x24c/0x2b0
>  do_syscall_64+0x176/0x640
>  ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3

The immediate problem is as Christof noticed that "pid_alive(current) == false".
This happens because do_notify_parent is called from the last thread to exit
in a process after that thread has been reaped.

The bigger issue is that do_notify_parent can be called from any
process that manages to wait on a thread of a multi-threaded process
from wait_task_zombie.  So any logic based upon current for
do_notify_parent is just nonsense, as current can be pretty much
anything.

So change do_notify_parent to call __send_signal directly.

Inspecting the code it appears this problem has existed since the pid
namespace support started handling this case in 2.6.30.  This fix only
backports to 7a0cf094944e ("signal: Correct namespace fixups of si_pid and si_uid")
where the problem logic was moved out of __send_signal and into send_signal.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 6588c1e3ff01 ("signals: SI_USER: Masquerade si_pid when crossing pid ns boundary")
Ref: 921cf9f63089 ("signals: protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200419201336.GI22017@edge.cmeerw.net/
Reported-by: Christof Meerwald <cmeerw@cmeerw.org>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

signal.c provides kill_proc_info, we can use it instead of kill_pid_info
in kill_something_info func gracefully.

Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/80236965-f0b5-c888-95ff-855bdec75bb3@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>