linux-stable.git/kernel/sched, branch v5.17.2 Linux kernel stable tree sched/rt: Plug rt_mutex_setprio() vs push_rt_task() race 2022-04-08T11:57:40+00:00 Valentin Schneider valentin.schneider@arm.com 2022-01-27T15:40:59+00:00 feedbfeb225c034043fd8a873d4cc44141d88c56 [ Upstream commit 49bef33e4b87b743495627a529029156c6e09530 ] John reported that push_rt_task() can end up invoking find_lowest_rq(rq->curr) when curr is not an RT task (in this case a CFS one), which causes mayhem down convert_prio(). This can happen when current gets demoted to e.g. CFS when releasing an rt_mutex, and the local CPU gets hit with an rto_push_work irqwork before getting the chance to reschedule. Exactly who triggers this work isn't entirely clear to me - switched_from_rt() only invokes rt_queue_pull_task() if there are no RT tasks on the local RQ, which means the local CPU can't be in the rto_mask. My current suspected sequence is something along the lines of the below, with the demoted task being current. mark_wakeup_next_waiter() rt_mutex_adjust_prio() rt_mutex_setprio() // deboost originally-CFS task check_class_changed() switched_from_rt() // Only rt_queue_pull_task() if !rq->rt.rt_nr_running switched_to_fair() // Sets need_resched __balance_callbacks() // if pull_rt_task(), tell_cpu_to_push() can't select local CPU per the above raw_spin_rq_unlock(rq) // need_resched is set, so task_woken_rt() can't // invoke push_rt_tasks(). Best I can come up with is // local CPU has rt_nr_migratory >= 2 after the demotion, so stays // in the rto_mask, and then: <some other CPU running rto_push_irq_work_func() queues rto_push_work on this CPU> push_rt_task() // breakage follows here as rq->curr is CFS Move an existing check to check rq->curr vs the next pushable task's priority before getting anywhere near find_lowest_rq(). While at it, add an explicit sched_class of rq->curr check prior to invoking find_lowest_rq(rq->curr). Align the DL logic to also reschedule regardless of next_task's migratability. Fixes: a7c81556ec4d ("sched: Fix migrate_disable() vs rt/dl balancing") Reported-by: John Keeping <john@metanate.com> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Tested-by: John Keeping <john@metanate.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127154059.974729-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 49bef33e4b87b743495627a529029156c6e09530 ]

John reported that push_rt_task() can end up invoking
find_lowest_rq(rq->curr) when curr is not an RT task (in this case a CFS
one), which causes mayhem down convert_prio().

This can happen when current gets demoted to e.g. CFS when releasing an
rt_mutex, and the local CPU gets hit with an rto_push_work irqwork before
getting the chance to reschedule. Exactly who triggers this work isn't
entirely clear to me - switched_from_rt() only invokes rt_queue_pull_task()
if there are no RT tasks on the local RQ, which means the local CPU can't
be in the rto_mask.

My current suspected sequence is something along the lines of the below,
with the demoted task being current.

  mark_wakeup_next_waiter()
    rt_mutex_adjust_prio()
      rt_mutex_setprio() // deboost originally-CFS task
	check_class_changed()
	  switched_from_rt() // Only rt_queue_pull_task() if !rq->rt.rt_nr_running
	  switched_to_fair() // Sets need_resched
      __balance_callbacks() // if pull_rt_task(), tell_cpu_to_push() can't select local CPU per the above
      raw_spin_rq_unlock(rq)

       // need_resched is set, so task_woken_rt() can't
       // invoke push_rt_tasks(). Best I can come up with is
       // local CPU has rt_nr_migratory >= 2 after the demotion, so stays
       // in the rto_mask, and then:

       <some other CPU running rto_push_irq_work_func() queues rto_push_work on this CPU>
	 push_rt_task()
	   // breakage follows here as rq->curr is CFS

Move an existing check to check rq->curr vs the next pushable task's
priority before getting anywhere near find_lowest_rq(). While at it, add an
explicit sched_class of rq->curr check prior to invoking
find_lowest_rq(rq->curr). Align the DL logic to also reschedule regardless
of next_task's migratability.

Fixes: a7c81556ec4d ("sched: Fix migrate_disable() vs rt/dl balancing")
Reported-by: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Tested-by: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127154059.974729-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
sched/cpuacct: Fix charge percpu cpuusage 2022-04-08T11:57:40+00:00 Chengming Zhou zhouchengming@bytedance.com 2022-02-20T05:14:24+00:00 ccd5b65aeea993b742f31893b868b5eaf08fbeec [ Upstream commit 248cc9993d1cc12b8e9ed716cc3fc09f6c3517dd ] The cpuacct_account_field() is always called by the current task itself, so it's ok to use __this_cpu_add() to charge the tick time. But cpuacct_charge() maybe called by update_curr() in load_balance() on a random CPU, different from the CPU on which the task is running. So __this_cpu_add() will charge that cputime to a random incorrect CPU. Fixes: 73e6aafd9ea8 ("sched/cpuacct: Simplify the cpuacct code") Reported-by: Minye Zhu <zhuminye@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220220051426.5274-1-zhouchengming@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 248cc9993d1cc12b8e9ed716cc3fc09f6c3517dd ]

The cpuacct_account_field() is always called by the current task
itself, so it's ok to use __this_cpu_add() to charge the tick time.

But cpuacct_charge() maybe called by update_curr() in load_balance()
on a random CPU, different from the CPU on which the task is running.
So __this_cpu_add() will charge that cputime to a random incorrect CPU.

Fixes: 73e6aafd9ea8 ("sched/cpuacct: Simplify the cpuacct code")
Reported-by: Minye Zhu <zhuminye@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220220051426.5274-1-zhouchengming@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
sched/fair: Improve consistency of allowed NUMA balance calculations 2022-04-08T11:57:39+00:00 Mel Gorman mgorman@techsingularity.net 2022-02-08T09:43:33+00:00 38ab4d5d48866e01f4d6328e3be8d3cc18237257 [ Upstream commit 2cfb7a1b031b0e816af7a6ee0c6ab83b0acdf05a ] There are inconsistencies when determining if a NUMA imbalance is allowed that should be corrected. o allow_numa_imbalance changes types and is not always examining the destination group so both the type should be corrected as well as the naming. o find_idlest_group uses the sched_domain's weight instead of the group weight which is different to find_busiest_group o find_busiest_group uses the source group instead of the destination which is different to task_numa_find_cpu o Both find_idlest_group and find_busiest_group should account for the number of running tasks if a move was allowed to be consistent with task_numa_find_cpu Fixes: 7d2b5dd0bcc4 ("sched/numa: Allow a floating imbalance between NUMA nodes") Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220208094334.16379-2-mgorman@techsingularity.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 2cfb7a1b031b0e816af7a6ee0c6ab83b0acdf05a ]

There are inconsistencies when determining if a NUMA imbalance is allowed
that should be corrected.

o allow_numa_imbalance changes types and is not always examining
  the destination group so both the type should be corrected as
  well as the naming.
o find_idlest_group uses the sched_domain's weight instead of the
  group weight which is different to find_busiest_group
o find_busiest_group uses the source group instead of the destination
  which is different to task_numa_find_cpu
o Both find_idlest_group and find_busiest_group should account
  for the number of running tasks if a move was allowed to be
  consistent with task_numa_find_cpu

Fixes: 7d2b5dd0bcc4 ("sched/numa: Allow a floating imbalance between NUMA nodes")
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220208094334.16379-2-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
sched/uclamp: Fix iowait boost escaping uclamp restriction 2022-04-08T11:57:39+00:00 Qais Yousef qais.yousef@arm.com 2021-12-16T22:53:20+00:00 88e4d8c3cf083604e7e34f758100921a3367bf63 [ Upstream commit d37aee9018e68b0d356195caefbb651910e0bbfa ] iowait_boost signal is applied independently of util and doesn't take into account uclamp settings of the rq. An io heavy task that is capped by uclamp_max could still request higher frequency because sugov_iowait_apply() doesn't clamp the boost via uclamp_rq_util_with() like effective_cpu_util() does. Make sure that iowait_boost honours uclamp requests by calling uclamp_rq_util_with() when applying the boost. Fixes: 982d9cdc22c9 ("sched/cpufreq, sched/uclamp: Add clamps for FAIR and RT tasks") Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211216225320.2957053-3-qais.yousef@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit d37aee9018e68b0d356195caefbb651910e0bbfa ]

iowait_boost signal is applied independently of util and doesn't take
into account uclamp settings of the rq. An io heavy task that is capped
by uclamp_max could still request higher frequency because
sugov_iowait_apply() doesn't clamp the boost via uclamp_rq_util_with()
like effective_cpu_util() does.

Make sure that iowait_boost honours uclamp requests by calling
uclamp_rq_util_with() when applying the boost.

Fixes: 982d9cdc22c9 ("sched/cpufreq, sched/uclamp: Add clamps for FAIR and RT tasks")
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211216225320.2957053-3-qais.yousef@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
sched/sugov: Ignore 'busy' filter when rq is capped by uclamp_max 2022-04-08T11:57:39+00:00 Qais Yousef qais.yousef@arm.com 2021-12-16T22:53:19+00:00 d9f51b85bfd88918951e157d5e8cd9a1b4ad6a25 [ Upstream commit 7a17e1db1265471f7718af100cfc5e41280d53a7 ] sugov_update_single_{freq, perf}() contains a 'busy' filter that ensures we don't bring the frqeuency down if there's no idle time (CPU is busy). The problem is that with uclamp_max we will have scenarios where a busy task is capped to run at a lower frequency and this filter prevents applying the capping when this task starts running. We handle this by skipping the filter when uclamp is enabled and the rq is being capped by uclamp_max. We introduce a new function uclamp_rq_is_capped() to help detecting when this capping is taking effect. Some code shuffling was required to allow using cpu_util_{cfs, rt}() in this new function. On 2 Core SMT2 Intel laptop I see: Without this patch: uclampset -M 0 sysbench --test=cpu --threads = 4 run produces a score of ~3200 consistently. Which is the highest possible. Compiling the kernel also results in frequency running at max 3.1GHz all the time - running uclampset -M 400 to cap it has no effect without this patch. With this patch: uclampset -M 0 sysbench --test=cpu --threads = 4 run produces a score of ~1100 with some outliers in ~1700. Uclamp max aggregates the performance requirements, so having high values sometimes is expected if some other task happens to require that frequency starts running at the same time. When compiling the kernel with uclampset -M 400 I can see the frequencies mostly in the ~2GHz region. Helpful to conserve power and prevent heating when not plugged in. Fixes: 982d9cdc22c9 ("sched/cpufreq, sched/uclamp: Add clamps for FAIR and RT tasks") Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211216225320.2957053-2-qais.yousef@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 7a17e1db1265471f7718af100cfc5e41280d53a7 ]

sugov_update_single_{freq, perf}() contains a 'busy' filter that ensures
we don't bring the frqeuency down if there's no idle time (CPU is busy).

The problem is that with uclamp_max we will have scenarios where a busy
task is capped to run at a lower frequency and this filter prevents
applying the capping when this task starts running.

We handle this by skipping the filter when uclamp is enabled and the rq
is being capped by uclamp_max.

We introduce a new function uclamp_rq_is_capped() to help detecting when
this capping is taking effect. Some code shuffling was required to allow
using cpu_util_{cfs, rt}() in this new function.

On 2 Core SMT2 Intel laptop I see:

Without this patch:

	uclampset -M 0 sysbench --test=cpu --threads = 4 run

produces a score of ~3200 consistently. Which is the highest possible.

Compiling the kernel also results in frequency running at max 3.1GHz all
the time - running uclampset -M 400 to cap it has no effect without this
patch.

With this patch:

	uclampset -M 0 sysbench --test=cpu --threads = 4 run

produces a score of ~1100 with some outliers in ~1700. Uclamp max
aggregates the performance requirements, so having high values sometimes
is expected if some other task happens to require that frequency starts
running at the same time.

When compiling the kernel with uclampset -M 400 I can see the
frequencies mostly in the ~2GHz region. Helpful to conserve power and
prevent heating when not plugged in.

Fixes: 982d9cdc22c9 ("sched/cpufreq, sched/uclamp: Add clamps for FAIR and RT tasks")
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211216225320.2957053-2-qais.yousef@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
sched/core: Export pelt_thermal_tp 2022-04-08T11:57:39+00:00 Qais Yousef qais.yousef@arm.com 2021-10-28T11:50:05+00:00 dd282f7aea3d5a10ea88d5aa1da651877ece8963 [ Upstream commit 77cf151b7bbdfa3577b3c3f3a5e267a6c60a263b ] We can't use this tracepoint in modules without having the symbol exported first, fix that. Fixes: 765047932f15 ("sched/pelt: Add support to track thermal pressure") Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211028115005.873539-1-qais.yousef@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 77cf151b7bbdfa3577b3c3f3a5e267a6c60a263b ]

We can't use this tracepoint in modules without having the symbol
exported first, fix that.

Fixes: 765047932f15 ("sched/pelt: Add support to track thermal pressure")
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211028115005.873539-1-qais.yousef@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
sched/debug: Remove mpol_get/put and task_lock/unlock from sched_show_numa 2022-04-08T11:57:39+00:00 Bharata B Rao bharata@amd.com 2022-01-18T05:05:15+00:00 7d81adcaf441e26d33c85eb1b124980d5b06a09f [ Upstream commit 28c988c3ec29db74a1dda631b18785958d57df4f ] The older format of /proc/pid/sched printed home node info which required the mempolicy and task lock around mpol_get(). However the format has changed since then and there is no need for sched_show_numa() any more to have mempolicy argument, asssociated mpol_get/put and task_lock/unlock. Remove them. Fixes: 397f2378f1361 ("sched/numa: Fix numa balancing stats in /proc/pid/sched") Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220118050515.2973-1-bharata@amd.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 28c988c3ec29db74a1dda631b18785958d57df4f ]

The older format of /proc/pid/sched printed home node info which
required the mempolicy and task lock around mpol_get(). However
the format has changed since then and there is no need for
sched_show_numa() any more to have mempolicy argument,
asssociated mpol_get/put and task_lock/unlock. Remove them.

Fixes: 397f2378f1361 ("sched/numa: Fix numa balancing stats in /proc/pid/sched")
Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220118050515.2973-1-bharata@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
sched: Fix yet more sched_fork() races 2022-02-19T10:11:05+00:00 Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org 2022-02-14T09:16:57+00:00 b1e8206582f9d680cff7d04828708c8b6ab32957 Where commit 4ef0c5c6b5ba ("kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an invalid sched_task_group") fixed a fork race vs cgroup, it opened up a race vs syscalls by not placing the task on the runqueue before it gets exposed through the pidhash. Commit 13765de8148f ("sched/fair: Fix fault in reweight_entity") is trying to fix a single instance of this, instead fix the whole class of issues, effectively reverting this commit. Fixes: 4ef0c5c6b5ba ("kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an invalid sched_task_group") Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@linaro.org> Tested-by: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@huawei.com> Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YgoeCbwj5mbCR0qA@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net 
Where commit 4ef0c5c6b5ba ("kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an
invalid sched_task_group") fixed a fork race vs cgroup, it opened up a
race vs syscalls by not placing the task on the runqueue before it
gets exposed through the pidhash.

Commit 13765de8148f ("sched/fair: Fix fault in reweight_entity") is
trying to fix a single instance of this, instead fix the whole class
of issues, effectively reverting this commit.

Fixes: 4ef0c5c6b5ba ("kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an invalid sched_task_group")
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YgoeCbwj5mbCR0qA@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
sched/fair: Fix fault in reweight_entity 2022-02-06T21:37:26+00:00 Tadeusz Struk tadeusz.struk@linaro.org 2022-02-03T16:18:46+00:00 13765de8148f71fa795e0a6607de37c49ea5915a Syzbot found a GPF in reweight_entity. This has been bisected to commit 4ef0c5c6b5ba ("kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an invalid sched_task_group") There is a race between sched_post_fork() and setpriority(PRIO_PGRP) within a thread group that causes a null-ptr-deref in reweight_entity() in CFS. The scenario is that the main process spawns number of new threads, which then call setpriority(PRIO_PGRP, 0, -20), wait, and exit. For each of the new threads the copy_process() gets invoked, which adds the new task_struct and calls sched_post_fork() for it. In the above scenario there is a possibility that setpriority(PRIO_PGRP) and set_one_prio() will be called for a thread in the group that is just being created by copy_process(), and for which the sched_post_fork() has not been executed yet. This will trigger a null pointer dereference in reweight_entity(), as it will try to access the run queue pointer, which hasn't been set. Before the mentioned change the cfs_rq pointer for the task has been set in sched_fork(), which is called much earlier in copy_process(), before the new task is added to the thread_group. Now it is done in the sched_post_fork(), which is called after that. To fix the issue the remove the update_load param from the update_load param() function and call reweight_task() only if the task flag doesn't have the TASK_NEW flag set. Fixes: 4ef0c5c6b5ba ("kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an invalid sched_task_group") Reported-by: syzbot+af7a719bc92395ee41b3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220203161846.1160750-1-tadeusz.struk@linaro.org 
Syzbot found a GPF in reweight_entity. This has been bisected to
commit 4ef0c5c6b5ba ("kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an invalid
sched_task_group")

There is a race between sched_post_fork() and setpriority(PRIO_PGRP)
within a thread group that causes a null-ptr-deref in
reweight_entity() in CFS. The scenario is that the main process spawns
number of new threads, which then call setpriority(PRIO_PGRP, 0, -20),
wait, and exit.  For each of the new threads the copy_process() gets
invoked, which adds the new task_struct and calls sched_post_fork()
for it.

In the above scenario there is a possibility that
setpriority(PRIO_PGRP) and set_one_prio() will be called for a thread
in the group that is just being created by copy_process(), and for
which the sched_post_fork() has not been executed yet. This will
trigger a null pointer dereference in reweight_entity(), as it will
try to access the run queue pointer, which hasn't been set.

Before the mentioned change the cfs_rq pointer for the task  has been
set in sched_fork(), which is called much earlier in copy_process(),
before the new task is added to the thread_group.  Now it is done in
the sched_post_fork(), which is called after that.  To fix the issue
the remove the update_load param from the update_load param() function
and call reweight_task() only if the task flag doesn't have the
TASK_NEW flag set.

Fixes: 4ef0c5c6b5ba ("kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an invalid sched_task_group")
Reported-by: syzbot+af7a719bc92395ee41b3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220203161846.1160750-1-tadeusz.struk@linaro.org
Merge tag 'sched_urgent_for_v5.17_rc2_p2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip 2022-01-30T11:09:00+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2022-01-30T11:09:00+00:00 24f4db1f3a2725a6308105081d822b26889e1018 Pull scheduler fix from Borislav Petkov: "Make sure the membarrier-rseq fence commands are part of the reported set when querying membarrier(2) commands through MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY" * tag 'sched_urgent_for_v5.17_rc2_p2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: sched/membarrier: Fix membarrier-rseq fence command missing from query bitmask 
Pull scheduler fix from Borislav Petkov:
 "Make sure the membarrier-rseq fence commands are part of the reported
  set when querying membarrier(2) commands through MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY"

* tag 'sched_urgent_for_v5.17_rc2_p2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  sched/membarrier: Fix membarrier-rseq fence command missing from query bitmask