linux-stable.git/kernel/sched, branch v4.19.281

sched_getaffinity: don't assume 'cpumask_size()' is fully initialized

2023-04-05T09:15:39+00:00

[ Upstream commit 6015b1aca1a233379625385feb01dd014aca60b5 ]

The getaffinity() system call uses 'cpumask_size()' to decide how big
the CPU mask is - so far so good.  It is indeed the allocation size of a
cpumask.

But the code also assumes that the whole allocation is initialized
without actually doing so itself.  That's wrong, because we might have
fixed-size allocations (making copying and clearing more efficient), but
not all of it is then necessarily used if 'nr_cpu_ids' is smaller.

Having checked other users of 'cpumask_size()', they all seem to be ok,
either using it purely for the allocation size, or explicitly zeroing
the cpumask before using the size in bytes to copy it.

See for example the ublk_ctrl_get_queue_affinity() function that uses
the proper 'zalloc_cpumask_var()' to make sure that the whole mask is
cleared, whether the storage is on the stack or if it was an external
allocation.

Fix this by just zeroing the allocation before using it.  Do the same
for the compat version of sched_getaffinity(), which had the same logic.

Also, for consistency, make sched_getaffinity() use 'cpumask_bits()' to
access the bits.  For a cpumask_var_t, it ends up being a pointer to the
same data either way, but it's just a good idea to treat it like you
would a 'cpumask_t'.  The compat case already did that.

Reported-by: Ryan Roberts 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7d026744-6bd6-6827-0471-b5e8eae0be3f@arm.com/
Cc: Yury Norov 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

sched/fair: Sanitize vruntime of entity being migrated

2023-04-05T09:15:38+00:00

commit a53ce18cacb477dd0513c607f187d16f0fa96f71 upstream.

Commit 829c1651e9c4 ("sched/fair: sanitize vruntime of entity being placed")
fixes an overflowing bug, but ignore a case that se->exec_start is reset
after a migration.

For fixing this case, we delay the reset of se->exec_start after
placing the entity which se->exec_start to detect long sleeping task.

In order to take into account a possible divergence between the clock_task
of 2 rqs, we increase the threshold to around 104 days.

Fixes: 829c1651e9c4 ("sched/fair: sanitize vruntime of entity being placed")
Originally-by: Zhang Qiao 
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Tested-by: Zhang Qiao 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230317160810.107988-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/fair: sanitize vruntime of entity being placed

2023-04-05T09:15:38+00:00

commit 829c1651e9c4a6f78398d3e67651cef9bb6b42cc upstream.

When a scheduling entity is placed onto cfs_rq, its vruntime is pulled
to the base level (around cfs_rq->min_vruntime), so that the entity
doesn't gain extra boost when placed backwards.

However, if the entity being placed wasn't executed for a long time, its
vruntime may get too far behind (e.g. while cfs_rq was executing a
low-weight hog), which can inverse the vruntime comparison due to s64
overflow.  This results in the entity being placed with its original
vruntime way forwards, so that it will effectively never get to the cpu.

To prevent that, ignore the vruntime of the entity being placed if it
didn't execute for much longer than the characteristic sheduler time
scale.

[rkagan: formatted, adjusted commit log, comments, cutoff value]
Signed-off-by: Zhang Qiao 
Co-developed-by: Roman Kagan 
Signed-off-by: Roman Kagan 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230130122216.3555094-1-rkagan@amazon.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

panic: Consolidate open-coded panic_on_warn checks

2023-02-06T06:49:46+00:00

commit 79cc1ba7badf9e7a12af99695a557e9ce27ee967 upstream.

Several run-time checkers (KASAN, UBSAN, KFENCE, KCSAN, sched) roll
their own warnings, and each check "panic_on_warn". Consolidate this
into a single function so that future instrumentation can be added in
a single location.

Cc: Marco Elver 
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Juri Lelli 
Cc: Vincent Guittot 
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann 
Cc: Steven Rostedt 
Cc: Ben Segall 
Cc: Mel Gorman 
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira 
Cc: Valentin Schneider 
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin 
Cc: Alexander Potapenko 
Cc: Andrey Konovalov 
Cc: Vincenzo Frascino 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: David Gow 
Cc: tangmeng 
Cc: Jann Horn 
Cc: Shuah Khan 
Cc: Petr Mladek 
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" 
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
Cc: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" 
Cc: Tiezhu Yang 
Cc: kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain 
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook 
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver 
Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117234328.594699-4-keescook@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/deadline: Fix priority inheritance with multiple scheduling classes

2022-09-05T08:26:28+00:00

commit 2279f540ea7d05f22d2f0c4224319330228586bc upstream.

Glenn reported that "an application [he developed produces] a BUG in
deadline.c when a SCHED_DEADLINE task contends with CFS tasks on nested
PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT mutexes.  I believe the bug is triggered when a CFS
task that was boosted by a SCHED_DEADLINE task boosts another CFS task
(nested priority inheritance).

 ------------[ cut here ]------------
 kernel BUG at kernel/sched/deadline.c:1462!
 invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
 CPU: 12 PID: 19171 Comm: dl_boost_bug Tainted: ...
 Hardware name: ...
 RIP: 0010:enqueue_task_dl+0x335/0x910
 Code: ...
 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000c2bbc68 EFLAGS: 00010002
 RAX: 0000000000000009 RBX: ffff888c0af94c00 RCX: ffffffff81e12500
 RDX: 000000000000002e RSI: ffff888c0af94c00 RDI: ffff888c10b22600
 RBP: ffffc9000c2bbd08 R08: 0000000000000009 R09: 0000000000000078
 R10: ffffffff81e12440 R11: ffffffff81e1236c R12: ffff888bc8932600
 R13: ffff888c0af94eb8 R14: ffff888c10b22600 R15: ffff888bc8932600
 FS:  00007fa58ac55700(0000) GS:ffff888c10b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 00007fa58b523230 CR3: 0000000bf44ab003 CR4: 00000000007606e0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 PKRU: 55555554
 Call Trace:
  ? intel_pstate_update_util_hwp+0x13/0x170
  rt_mutex_setprio+0x1cc/0x4b0
  task_blocks_on_rt_mutex+0x225/0x260
  rt_spin_lock_slowlock_locked+0xab/0x2d0
  rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x50/0x80
  hrtimer_grab_expiry_lock+0x20/0x30
  hrtimer_cancel+0x13/0x30
  do_nanosleep+0xa0/0x150
  hrtimer_nanosleep+0xe1/0x230
  ? __hrtimer_init_sleeper+0x60/0x60
  __x64_sys_nanosleep+0x8d/0xa0
  do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x100
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
 RIP: 0033:0x7fa58b52330d
 ...
 ---[ end trace 0000000000000002 ]—

He also provided a simple reproducer creating the situation below:

 So the execution order of locking steps are the following
 (N1 and N2 are non-deadline tasks. D1 is a deadline task. M1 and M2
 are mutexes that are enabled * with priority inheritance.)

 Time moves forward as this timeline goes down:

 N1              N2               D1
 |               |                |
 |               |                |
 Lock(M1)        |                |
 |               |                |
 |             Lock(M2)           |
 |               |                |
 |               |              Lock(M2)
 |               |                |
 |             Lock(M1)           |
 |             (!!bug triggered!) |

Daniel reported a similar situation as well, by just letting ksoftirqd
run with DEADLINE (and eventually block on a mutex).

Problem is that boosted entities (Priority Inheritance) use static
DEADLINE parameters of the top priority waiter. However, there might be
cases where top waiter could be a non-DEADLINE entity that is currently
boosted by a DEADLINE entity from a different lock chain (i.e., nested
priority chains involving entities of non-DEADLINE classes). In this
case, top waiter static DEADLINE parameters could be null (initialized
to 0 at fork()) and replenish_dl_entity() would hit a BUG().

Fix this by keeping track of the original donor and using its parameters
when a task is boosted.

Reported-by: Glenn Elliott 
Reported-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira 
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Tested-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira 
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201117061432.517340-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com
[Ankit: Regenerated the patch for v4.19.y]
Signed-off-by: Ankit Jain 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/deadline: Fix stale throttling on de-/boosted tasks

2022-09-05T08:26:28+00:00

commit 46fcc4b00c3cca8adb9b7c9afdd499f64e427135 upstream.

When a boosted task gets throttled, what normally happens is that it's
immediately enqueued again with ENQUEUE_REPLENISH, which replenishes the
runtime and clears the dl_throttled flag. There is a special case however:
if the throttling happened on sched-out and the task has been deboosted in
the meantime, the replenish is skipped as the task will return to its
normal scheduling class. This leaves the task with the dl_throttled flag
set.

Now if the task gets boosted up to the deadline scheduling class again
while it is sleeping, it's still in the throttled state. The normal wakeup
however will enqueue the task with ENQUEUE_REPLENISH not set, so we don't
actually place it on the rq. Thus we end up with a task that is runnable,
but not actually on the rq and neither a immediate replenishment happens,
nor is the replenishment timer set up, so the task is stuck in
forever-throttled limbo.

Clear the dl_throttled flag before dropping back to the normal scheduling
class to fix this issue.

Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Acked-by: Juri Lelli 
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200831110719.2126930-1-l.stach@pengutronix.de
[Ankit: Regenerated the patch for v4.19.y]
Signed-off-by: Ankit Jain 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/deadline: Unthrottle PI boosted threads while enqueuing

2022-09-05T08:26:28+00:00

commit feff2e65efd8d84cf831668e182b2ce73c604bbb upstream.

stress-ng has a test (stress-ng --cyclic) that creates a set of threads
under SCHED_DEADLINE with the following parameters:

    dl_runtime   =  10000 (10 us)
    dl_deadline  = 100000 (100 us)
    dl_period    = 100000 (100 us)

These parameters are very aggressive. When using a system without HRTICK
set, these threads can easily execute longer than the dl_runtime because
the throttling happens with 1/HZ resolution.

During the main part of the test, the system works just fine because
the workload does not try to run over the 10 us. The problem happens at
the end of the test, on the exit() path. During exit(), the threads need
to do some cleanups that require real-time mutex locks, mainly those
related to memory management, resulting in this scenario:

Note: locks are rt_mutexes...
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    TASK A:		TASK B:				TASK C:
    activation
							activation
			activation

    lock(a): OK!	lock(b): OK!
    			
    			lock(a)
    			-> block (task A owns it)
			  -> self notice/set throttled
 +--<			  -> arm replenished timer
 |    			switch-out
 |    							lock(b)
 |    							->  B prio>
 |    							-> boost TASK B
 |  unlock(a)						switch-out
 |  -> handle lock a to B
 |    -> wakeup(B)
 |      -> B is throttled:
 |        -> do not enqueue
 |     switch-out
 |
 |
 +---------------------> replenishment timer
			-> TASK B is boosted:
			  -> do not enqueue
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------

BOOM: TASK B is runnable but !enqueued, holding TASK C: the system
crashes with hung task C.

This problem is avoided by removing the throttle state from the boosted
thread while boosting it (by TASK A in the example above), allowing it to
be queued and run boosted.

The next replenishment will take care of the runtime overrun, pushing
the deadline further away. See the "while (dl_se->runtime <= 0)" on
replenish_dl_entity() for more information.

Reported-by: Mark Simmons 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli 
Tested-by: Mark Simmons 
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5076e003450835ec74e6fa5917d02c4fa41687e6.1600170294.git.bristot@redhat.com
[Ankit: Regenerated the patch for v4.19.y]
Signed-off-by: Ankit Jain 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

nohz/full, sched/rt: Fix missed tick-reenabling bug in dequeue_task_rt()

2022-08-25T09:15:02+00:00

[ Upstream commit 5c66d1b9b30f737fcef85a0b75bfe0590e16b62a ]

dequeue_task_rt() only decrements 'rt_rq->rt_nr_running' after having
called sched_update_tick_dependency() preventing it from re-enabling the
tick on systems that no longer have pending SCHED_RT tasks but have
multiple runnable SCHED_OTHER tasks:

  dequeue_task_rt()
    dequeue_rt_entity()
      dequeue_rt_stack()
        dequeue_top_rt_rq()
	  sub_nr_running()	// decrements rq->nr_running
	    sched_update_tick_dependency()
	      sched_can_stop_tick()	// checks rq->rt.rt_nr_running,
	      ...
        __dequeue_rt_entity()
          dec_rt_tasks()	// decrements rq->rt.rt_nr_running
	  ...

Every other scheduler class performs the operation in the opposite
order, and sched_update_tick_dependency() expects the values to be
updated as such. So avoid the misbehaviour by inverting the order in
which the above operations are performed in the RT scheduler.

Fixes: 76d92ac305f2 ("sched: Migrate sched to use new tick dependency mask model")
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider 
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220628092259.330171-1-nsaenzju@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

sched/debug: Remove mpol_get/put and task_lock/unlock from sched_show_numa

2022-04-15T12:14:44+00:00

[ Upstream commit 28c988c3ec29db74a1dda631b18785958d57df4f ]

The older format of /proc/pid/sched printed home node info which
required the mempolicy and task lock around mpol_get(). However
the format has changed since then and there is no need for
sched_show_numa() any more to have mempolicy argument,
asssociated mpol_get/put and task_lock/unlock. Remove them.

Fixes: 397f2378f1361 ("sched/numa: Fix numa balancing stats in /proc/pid/sched")
Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju 
Acked-by: Mel Gorman 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220118050515.2973-1-bharata@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

sched/topology: Fix sched_domain_topology_level alloc in sched_init_numa()

2022-03-23T08:10:41+00:00

commit 71e5f6644fb2f3304fcb310145ded234a37e7cc1 upstream.

Commit "sched/topology: Make sched_init_numa() use a set for the
deduplicating sort" allocates 'i + nr_levels (level)' instead of
'i + nr_levels + 1' sched_domain_topology_level.

This led to an Oops (on Arm64 juno with CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG):

sched_init_domains
  build_sched_domains()
    __free_domain_allocs()
      __sdt_free() {
	...
        for_each_sd_topology(tl)
	  ...
          sd = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, j); <--
	  ...
      }

Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar 
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot 
Tested-by: Barry Song 
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/6000e39e-7d28-c360-9cd6-8798fd22a9bf@arm.com
Signed-off-by: dann frazier 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman