Pull sched_ext fixes from Tejun Heo:

 - The fair sched class currently has a bug where its balance() returns
   true telling the sched core that it has tasks to run but then NULL
   from pick_task(). This makes sched core call sched_ext's pick_task()
   without preceding balance() which can lead to stalls in partial mode.

   For now, work around by detecting the condition and forcing the CPU
   to go through another scheduling cycle.

 - Add a missing newline to an error message and fix drgn introspection
   tool which went out of sync.

* tag 'sched_ext-for-6.12-rc7-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/sched_ext:
  sched_ext: Handle cases where pick_task_scx() is called without preceding balance_scx()
  sched_ext: Update scx_show_state.py to match scx_ops_bypass_depth's new type
  sched_ext: Add a missing newline at the end of an error message

sched_ext dispatches tasks from the BPF scheduler from balance_scx() and
thus every pick_task_scx() call must be preceded by balance_scx(). While
this usually holds, due to a bug, there are cases where the fair class's
balance() returns true indicating that it has tasks to run on the CPU and
thus terminating balance() calls but fails to actually find the next task to
run when pick_task() is called. In such cases, pick_task_scx() can be called
without preceding balance_scx().

Detect this condition using SCX_RQ_BAL_PENDING flags. If detected, keep
running the previous task if possible and avoid stalling from entering idle
without balancing.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/Ztj_h5c2LYsdXYbA@slm.duckdns.org

Commit 98442f0ccd82 ("sched: Fix delayed_dequeue vs
switched_from_fair()") overlooked that __setscheduler_prio(), now
__setscheduler_class() relies on p->policy for task_should_scx(), and
moved the call before __setscheduler_params() updates it, causing it
to be using the old p->policy value.

Resolve this by changing task_should_scx() to take the policy itself
instead of a task pointer, such that __sched_setscheduler() can pass
in the updated policy.

Fixes: 98442f0ccd82 ("sched: Fix delayed_dequeue vs switched_from_fair()")
Signed-off-by: Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

 Conflicts:
	kernel/sched/ext.c

There's a context conflict between this upstream commit:

  3fdb9ebcec10 sched_ext: Start schedulers with consistent p->scx.slice values

... and this fix in sched/urgent:

  98442f0ccd82 sched: Fix delayed_dequeue vs switched_from_fair()

Resolve it.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Sean noted that ever since commit 152e11f6df29 ("sched/fair: Implement
delayed dequeue") KVM's preemption notifiers have started
mis-classifying preemption vs blocking.

Notably p->on_rq is no longer sufficient to determine if a task is
runnable or blocked -- the aforementioned commit introduces tasks that
remain on the runqueue even through they will not run again, and
should be considered blocked for many cases.

Add the task_is_runnable() helper to classify things and audit all
external users of the p->on_rq state. Also add a few comments.

Fixes: 152e11f6df29 ("sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue")
Reported-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Tested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241010091843.GK33184@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net

Since sched_delayed tasks remain queued even after blocking, the load
balancer can migrate them between runqueues while PSI considers them
to be asleep. As a result, it misreads the migration requeue followed
by a wakeup as a double queue:

  psi: inconsistent task state! task=... cpu=... psi_flags=4 clear=. set=4

First, call psi_enqueue() after p->sched_class->enqueue_task(). A
wakeup will clear p->se.sched_delayed while a migration will not, so
psi can use that flag to tell them apart.

Then teach psi to migrate any "sleep" state when delayed-dequeue tasks
are being migrated.

Delayed-dequeue tasks can be revived by ttwu_runnable(), which will
call down with a new ENQUEUE_DELAYED. Instead of further complicating
the wakeup conditional in enqueue_task(), identify migration contexts
instead and default to wakeup handling for all other cases.

It's not just the warning in dmesg, the task state corruption causes a
permanent CPU pressure indication, which messes with workload/machine
health monitoring.

Debugged-by-and-original-fix-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Fixes: 152e11f6df29 ("sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240830123458.3557-1-spasswolf@web.de/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cd67fbcd-d659-4822-bb90-7e8fbb40a856@molgen.mpg.de/
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241010193712.GC181795@cmpxchg.org

psi_dequeue() in for blocked task expects psi_sched_switch() to clear
the TSK_.*RUNNING PSI flags and set the TSK_IOWAIT flags however
psi_sched_switch() uses "!task_on_rq_queued(prev)" to detect if the task
is blocked or still runnable which is no longer true with DELAY_DEQUEUE
since a blocking task can be left queued on the runqueue.

This can lead to PSI splats similar to:

    psi: inconsistent task state! task=... cpu=... psi_flags=4 clear=0 set=4

when the task is requeued since the TSK_RUNNING flag was not cleared
when the task was blocked.

Explicitly communicate that the task was blocked to psi_sched_switch()
even if it was delayed and is still on the runqueue.

  [ prateek: Broke off the relevant part from [1], commit message ]

Fixes: 152e11f6df29 ("sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240830123458.3557-1-spasswolf@web.de/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cd67fbcd-d659-4822-bb90-7e8fbb40a856@molgen.mpg.de/
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Not-yet-signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241004123506.GR18071@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/ [1]

Commit 2e0199df252a ("sched/fair: Prepare exit/cleanup paths for delayed_dequeue")
and its follow up fixes try to deal with a rather unfortunate
situation where is task is enqueued in a new class, even though it
shouldn't have been. Mostly because the existing ->switched_to/from()
hooks are in the wrong place for this case.

This all led to Paul being able to trigger failures at something like
once per 10k CPU hours of RCU torture.

For now, do the ugly thing and move the code to the right place by
ignoring the switch hooks.

Note: Clean up the whole sched_class::switch*_{to,from}() thing.

Fixes: 2e0199df252a ("sched/fair: Prepare exit/cleanup paths for delayed_dequeue")
Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241003185037.GA5594@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net

With KASAN and PREEMPT_RT enabled, calling task_work_add() in
task_tick_mm_cid() may cause the following splat.

[   63.696416] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48
[   63.696416] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 610, name: modprobe
[   63.696416] preempt_count: 10001, expected: 0
[   63.696416] RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 1

This problem is caused by the following call trace.

  sched_tick() [ acquire rq->__lock ]
   -> task_tick_mm_cid()
    -> task_work_add()
     -> __kasan_record_aux_stack()
      -> kasan_save_stack()
       -> stack_depot_save_flags()
        -> alloc_pages_mpol_noprof()
         -> __alloc_pages_noprof()
	  -> get_page_from_freelist()
	   -> rmqueue()
	    -> rmqueue_pcplist()
	     -> __rmqueue_pcplist()
	      -> rmqueue_bulk()
	       -> rt_spin_lock()

The rq lock is a raw_spinlock_t. We can't sleep while holding
it. IOW, we can't call alloc_pages() in stack_depot_save_flags().

The task_tick_mm_cid() function with its task_work_add() call was
introduced by commit 223baf9d17f2 ("sched: Fix performance regression
introduced by mm_cid") in v6.4 kernel.

Fortunately, there is a kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() variant that
calls stack_depot_save_flags() while not allowing it to allocate
new pages.  To allow task_tick_mm_cid() to use task_work without
page allocation, a new TWAF_NO_ALLOC flag is added to enable calling
kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() instead of kasan_record_aux_stack()
if set. The task_tick_mm_cid() function is modified to add this new flag.

The possible downside is the missing stack trace in a KASAN report due
to new page allocation required when task_work_add_noallloc() is called
which should be rare.

Fixes: 223baf9d17f2 ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241010014432.194742-1-longman@redhat.com

During ttwu, ->select_task_rq() can be skipped if only one CPU is allowed or
migration is disabled. sched_ext schedulers may perform operations such as
direct dispatch from ->select_task_rq() path and it is useful for them to
know whether ->select_task_rq() was skipped in the ->enqueue_task() path.

Currently, sched_ext schedulers are using ENQUEUE_WAKEUP for this purpose
and end up assuming incorrectly that ->select_task_rq() was called for tasks
that are bound to a single CPU or migration disabled.

Make select_task_rq() indicate whether ->select_task_rq() was called by
setting WF_RQ_SELECTED in *wake_flags and make ttwu_do_activate() map that
to ENQUEUE_RQ_SELECTED for ->enqueue_task().

This will be used by sched_ext to fix ->select_task_rq() skip detection.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>