linux-stable.git/kernel/sched/core.c, branch v5.10.78 Linux kernel stable tree sched/scs: Reset the shadow stack when idle_task_exit 2021-10-27T07:56:55+00:00 Woody Lin woodylin@google.com 2021-10-12T08:35:21+00:00 96fe5061291d9e9734abf6bb187ef7532824522d [ Upstream commit 63acd42c0d4942f74710b11c38602fb14dea7320 ] Commit f1a0a376ca0c ("sched/core: Initialize the idle task with preemption disabled") removed the init_idle() call from idle_thread_get(). This was the sole call-path on hotplug that resets the Shadow Call Stack (scs) Stack Pointer (sp). Not resetting the scs-sp leads to scs overflow after enough hotplug cycles. Therefore add an explicit scs_task_reset() to the hotplug code to make sure the scs-sp does get reset on hotplug. Fixes: f1a0a376ca0c ("sched/core: Initialize the idle task with preemption disabled") Signed-off-by: Woody Lin <woodylin@google.com> [peterz: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012083521.973587-1-woodylin@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 63acd42c0d4942f74710b11c38602fb14dea7320 ]

Commit f1a0a376ca0c ("sched/core: Initialize the idle task with
preemption disabled") removed the init_idle() call from
idle_thread_get(). This was the sole call-path on hotplug that resets
the Shadow Call Stack (scs) Stack Pointer (sp).

Not resetting the scs-sp leads to scs overflow after enough hotplug
cycles. Therefore add an explicit scs_task_reset() to the hotplug code
to make sure the scs-sp does get reset on hotplug.

Fixes: f1a0a376ca0c ("sched/core: Initialize the idle task with preemption disabled")
Signed-off-by: Woody Lin <woodylin@google.com>
[peterz: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012083521.973587-1-woodylin@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
sched: Fix UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE setting 2021-09-15T07:50:28+00:00 Quentin Perret qperret@google.com 2021-08-05T10:21:53+00:00 e6778e1b22d090321a715e9f3c4ded352fc2b067 [ Upstream commit ca4984a7dd863f3e1c0df775ae3e744bff24c303 ] The UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE flag is set on a runqueue when dequeueing the last uclamp active task (that is, when buckets.tasks reaches 0 for all buckets) to maintain the last uclamp.max and prevent blocked util from suddenly becoming visible. However, there is an asymmetry in how the flag is set and cleared which can lead to having the flag set whilst there are active tasks on the rq. Specifically, the flag is cleared in the uclamp_rq_inc() path, which is called at enqueue time, but set in uclamp_rq_dec_id() which is called both when dequeueing a task _and_ in the update_uclamp_active() path. As a result, when both uclamp_rq_{dec,ind}_id() are called from update_uclamp_active(), the flag ends up being set but not cleared, hence leaving the runqueue in a broken state. Fix this by clearing the flag in update_uclamp_active() as well. Fixes: e496187da710 ("sched/uclamp: Enforce last task's UCLAMP_MAX") Reported-by: Rick Yiu <rickyiu@google.com> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210805102154.590709-2-qperret@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit ca4984a7dd863f3e1c0df775ae3e744bff24c303 ]

The UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE flag is set on a runqueue when dequeueing the last
uclamp active task (that is, when buckets.tasks reaches 0 for all
buckets) to maintain the last uclamp.max and prevent blocked util from
suddenly becoming visible.

However, there is an asymmetry in how the flag is set and cleared which
can lead to having the flag set whilst there are active tasks on the rq.
Specifically, the flag is cleared in the uclamp_rq_inc() path, which is
called at enqueue time, but set in uclamp_rq_dec_id() which is called
both when dequeueing a task _and_ in the update_uclamp_active() path. As
a result, when both uclamp_rq_{dec,ind}_id() are called from
update_uclamp_active(), the flag ends up being set but not cleared,
hence leaving the runqueue in a broken state.

Fix this by clearing the flag in update_uclamp_active() as well.

Fixes: e496187da710 ("sched/uclamp: Enforce last task's UCLAMP_MAX")
Reported-by: Rick Yiu <rickyiu@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210805102154.590709-2-qperret@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
sched/rt: Fix double enqueue caused by rt_effective_prio 2021-08-12T11:22:19+00:00 Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org 2021-08-03T10:45:01+00:00 a3e6bd0c71bb5e4821aff9ab8f221bfc08039d73 commit f558c2b834ec27e75d37b1c860c139e7b7c3a8e4 upstream. Double enqueues in rt runqueues (list) have been reported while running a simple test that spawns a number of threads doing a short sleep/run pattern while being concurrently setscheduled between rt and fair class. WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2825 at kernel/sched/rt.c:1294 enqueue_task_rt+0x355/0x360 CPU: 3 PID: 2825 Comm: setsched__13 RIP: 0010:enqueue_task_rt+0x355/0x360 Call Trace: __sched_setscheduler+0x581/0x9d0 _sched_setscheduler+0x63/0xa0 do_sched_setscheduler+0xa0/0x150 __x64_sys_sched_setscheduler+0x1a/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae list_add double add: new=ffff9867cb629b40, prev=ffff9867cb629b40, next=ffff98679fc67ca0. kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:31! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT_RT SMP PTI CPU: 3 PID: 2825 Comm: setsched__13 RIP: 0010:__list_add_valid+0x41/0x50 Call Trace: enqueue_task_rt+0x291/0x360 __sched_setscheduler+0x581/0x9d0 _sched_setscheduler+0x63/0xa0 do_sched_setscheduler+0xa0/0x150 __x64_sys_sched_setscheduler+0x1a/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae __sched_setscheduler() uses rt_effective_prio() to handle proper queuing of priority boosted tasks that are setscheduled while being boosted. rt_effective_prio() is however called twice per each __sched_setscheduler() call: first directly by __sched_setscheduler() before dequeuing the task and then by __setscheduler() to actually do the priority change. If the priority of the pi_top_task is concurrently being changed however, it might happen that the two calls return different results. If, for example, the first call returned the same rt priority the task was running at and the second one a fair priority, the task won't be removed by the rt list (on_list still set) and then enqueued in the fair runqueue. When eventually setscheduled back to rt it will be seen as enqueued already and the WARNING/BUG be issued. Fix this by calling rt_effective_prio() only once and then reusing the return value. While at it refactor code as well for clarity. Concurrent priority inheritance handling is still safe and will eventually converge to a new state by following the inheritance chain(s). Fixes: 0782e63bc6fe ("sched: Handle priority boosted tasks proper in setscheduler()") [squashed Peterz changes; added changelog] Reported-by: Mark Simmons <msimmons@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210803104501.38333-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit f558c2b834ec27e75d37b1c860c139e7b7c3a8e4 upstream.

Double enqueues in rt runqueues (list) have been reported while running
a simple test that spawns a number of threads doing a short sleep/run
pattern while being concurrently setscheduled between rt and fair class.

  WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2825 at kernel/sched/rt.c:1294 enqueue_task_rt+0x355/0x360
  CPU: 3 PID: 2825 Comm: setsched__13
  RIP: 0010:enqueue_task_rt+0x355/0x360
  Call Trace:
   __sched_setscheduler+0x581/0x9d0
   _sched_setscheduler+0x63/0xa0
   do_sched_setscheduler+0xa0/0x150
   __x64_sys_sched_setscheduler+0x1a/0x30
   do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

  list_add double add: new=ffff9867cb629b40, prev=ffff9867cb629b40,
		       next=ffff98679fc67ca0.
  kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:31!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT_RT SMP PTI
  CPU: 3 PID: 2825 Comm: setsched__13
  RIP: 0010:__list_add_valid+0x41/0x50
  Call Trace:
   enqueue_task_rt+0x291/0x360
   __sched_setscheduler+0x581/0x9d0
   _sched_setscheduler+0x63/0xa0
   do_sched_setscheduler+0xa0/0x150
   __x64_sys_sched_setscheduler+0x1a/0x30
   do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

__sched_setscheduler() uses rt_effective_prio() to handle proper queuing
of priority boosted tasks that are setscheduled while being boosted.
rt_effective_prio() is however called twice per each
__sched_setscheduler() call: first directly by __sched_setscheduler()
before dequeuing the task and then by __setscheduler() to actually do
the priority change. If the priority of the pi_top_task is concurrently
being changed however, it might happen that the two calls return
different results. If, for example, the first call returned the same rt
priority the task was running at and the second one a fair priority, the
task won't be removed by the rt list (on_list still set) and then
enqueued in the fair runqueue. When eventually setscheduled back to rt
it will be seen as enqueued already and the WARNING/BUG be issued.

Fix this by calling rt_effective_prio() only once and then reusing the
return value. While at it refactor code as well for clarity. Concurrent
priority inheritance handling is still safe and will eventually converge
to a new state by following the inheritance chain(s).

Fixes: 0782e63bc6fe ("sched: Handle priority boosted tasks proper in setscheduler()")
[squashed Peterz changes; added changelog]
Reported-by: Mark Simmons <msimmons@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210803104501.38333-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
sched/uclamp: Fix uclamp_tg_restrict() 2021-07-14T14:56:10+00:00 Qais Yousef qais.yousef@arm.com 2021-06-17T16:51:55+00:00 ca47a4fa8996e9469302257af66ad3073942a013 [ Upstream commit 0213b7083e81f4acd69db32cb72eb4e5f220329a ] Now cpu.uclamp.min acts as a protection, we need to make sure that the uclamp request of the task is within the allowed range of the cgroup, that is it is clamp()'ed correctly by tg->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN] and tg->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX]. As reported by Xuewen [1] we can have some corner cases where there's inversion between uclamp requested by task (p) and the uclamp values of the taskgroup it's attached to (tg). Following table demonstrates 2 corner cases: | p | tg | effective -----------+-----+------+----------- CASE 1 -----------+-----+------+----------- uclamp_min | 60% | 0% | 60% -----------+-----+------+----------- uclamp_max | 80% | 50% | 50% -----------+-----+------+----------- CASE 2 -----------+-----+------+----------- uclamp_min | 0% | 30% | 30% -----------+-----+------+----------- uclamp_max | 20% | 50% | 20% -----------+-----+------+----------- With this fix we get: | p | tg | effective -----------+-----+------+----------- CASE 1 -----------+-----+------+----------- uclamp_min | 60% | 0% | 50% -----------+-----+------+----------- uclamp_max | 80% | 50% | 50% -----------+-----+------+----------- CASE 2 -----------+-----+------+----------- uclamp_min | 0% | 30% | 30% -----------+-----+------+----------- uclamp_max | 20% | 50% | 30% -----------+-----+------+----------- Additionally uclamp_update_active_tasks() must now unconditionally update both UCLAMP_MIN/MAX because changing the tg's UCLAMP_MAX for instance could have an impact on the effective UCLAMP_MIN of the tasks. | p | tg | effective -----------+-----+------+----------- old -----------+-----+------+----------- uclamp_min | 60% | 0% | 50% -----------+-----+------+----------- uclamp_max | 80% | 50% | 50% -----------+-----+------+----------- *new* -----------+-----+------+----------- uclamp_min | 60% | 0% | *60%* -----------+-----+------+----------- uclamp_max | 80% |*70%* | *70%* -----------+-----+------+----------- [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAB8ipk_a6VFNjiEnHRHkUMBKbA+qzPQvhtNjJ_YNzQhqV_o8Zw@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 0c18f2ecfcc2 ("sched/uclamp: Fix wrong implementation of cpu.uclamp.min") Reported-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210617165155.3774110-1-qais.yousef@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 0213b7083e81f4acd69db32cb72eb4e5f220329a ]

Now cpu.uclamp.min acts as a protection, we need to make sure that the
uclamp request of the task is within the allowed range of the cgroup,
that is it is clamp()'ed correctly by tg->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN] and
tg->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX].

As reported by Xuewen [1] we can have some corner cases where there's
inversion between uclamp requested by task (p) and the uclamp values of
the taskgroup it's attached to (tg). Following table demonstrates
2 corner cases:

	           |  p  |  tg  |  effective
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	CASE 1
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	uclamp_min | 60% | 0%   |  60%
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	uclamp_max | 80% | 50%  |  50%
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	CASE 2
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	uclamp_min | 0%  | 30%  |  30%
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	uclamp_max | 20% | 50%  |  20%
	-----------+-----+------+-----------

With this fix we get:

	           |  p  |  tg  |  effective
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	CASE 1
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	uclamp_min | 60% | 0%   |  50%
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	uclamp_max | 80% | 50%  |  50%
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	CASE 2
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	uclamp_min | 0%  | 30%  |  30%
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	uclamp_max | 20% | 50%  |  30%
	-----------+-----+------+-----------

Additionally uclamp_update_active_tasks() must now unconditionally
update both UCLAMP_MIN/MAX because changing the tg's UCLAMP_MAX for
instance could have an impact on the effective UCLAMP_MIN of the tasks.

	           |  p  |  tg  |  effective
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	old
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	uclamp_min | 60% | 0%   |  50%
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	uclamp_max | 80% | 50%  |  50%
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	*new*
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	uclamp_min | 60% | 0%   | *60%*
	-----------+-----+------+-----------
	uclamp_max | 80% |*70%* | *70%*
	-----------+-----+------+-----------

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAB8ipk_a6VFNjiEnHRHkUMBKbA+qzPQvhtNjJ_YNzQhqV_o8Zw@mail.gmail.com/

Fixes: 0c18f2ecfcc2 ("sched/uclamp: Fix wrong implementation of cpu.uclamp.min")
Reported-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210617165155.3774110-1-qais.yousef@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
sched/uclamp: Fix locking around cpu_util_update_eff() 2021-07-14T14:56:03+00:00 Qais Yousef qais.yousef@arm.com 2021-05-10T14:50:32+00:00 37481ad72d96d78325d213ccbf8791b70089fa4d [ Upstream commit 93b73858701fd01de26a4a874eb95f9b7156fd4b ] cpu_cgroup_css_online() calls cpu_util_update_eff() without holding the uclamp_mutex or rcu_read_lock() like other call sites, which is a mistake. The uclamp_mutex is required to protect against concurrent reads and writes that could update the cgroup hierarchy. The rcu_read_lock() is required to traverse the cgroup data structures in cpu_util_update_eff(). Surround the caller with the required locks and add some asserts to better document the dependency in cpu_util_update_eff(). Fixes: 7226017ad37a ("sched/uclamp: Fix a bug in propagating uclamp value in new cgroups") Reported-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210510145032.1934078-3-qais.yousef@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 93b73858701fd01de26a4a874eb95f9b7156fd4b ]

cpu_cgroup_css_online() calls cpu_util_update_eff() without holding the
uclamp_mutex or rcu_read_lock() like other call sites, which is
a mistake.

The uclamp_mutex is required to protect against concurrent reads and
writes that could update the cgroup hierarchy.

The rcu_read_lock() is required to traverse the cgroup data structures
in cpu_util_update_eff().

Surround the caller with the required locks and add some asserts to
better document the dependency in cpu_util_update_eff().

Fixes: 7226017ad37a ("sched/uclamp: Fix a bug in propagating uclamp value in new cgroups")
Reported-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210510145032.1934078-3-qais.yousef@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
sched/uclamp: Fix wrong implementation of cpu.uclamp.min 2021-07-14T14:56:03+00:00 Qais Yousef qais.yousef@arm.com 2021-05-10T14:50:31+00:00 6c2b3d565fca65b07cae4c24b1a4ee9fa65d0297 [ Upstream commit 0c18f2ecfcc274a4bcc1d122f79ebd4001c3b445 ] cpu.uclamp.min is a protection as described in cgroup-v2 Resource Distribution Model Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst which means we try our best to preserve the minimum performance point of tasks in this group. See full description of cpu.uclamp.min in the cgroup-v2.rst. But the current implementation makes it a limit, which is not what was intended. For example: tg->cpu.uclamp.min = 20% p0->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN] = 0 p1->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN] = 50% Previous Behavior (limit): p0->effective_uclamp = 0 p1->effective_uclamp = 20% New Behavior (Protection): p0->effective_uclamp = 20% p1->effective_uclamp = 50% Which is inline with how protections should work. With this change the cgroup and per-task behaviors are the same, as expected. Additionally, we remove the confusing relationship between cgroup and !user_defined flag. We don't want for example RT tasks that are boosted by default to max to change their boost value when they attach to a cgroup. If a cgroup wants to limit the max performance point of tasks attached to it, then cpu.uclamp.max must be set accordingly. Or if they want to set different boost value based on cgroup, then sysctl_sched_util_clamp_min_rt_default must be used to NOT boost to max and set the right cpu.uclamp.min for each group to let the RT tasks obtain the desired boost value when attached to that group. As it stands the dependency on !user_defined flag adds an extra layer of complexity that is not required now cpu.uclamp.min behaves properly as a protection. The propagation model of effective cpu.uclamp.min in child cgroups as implemented by cpu_util_update_eff() is still correct. The parent protection sets an upper limit of what the child cgroups will effectively get. Fixes: 3eac870a3247 (sched/uclamp: Use TG's clamps to restrict TASK's clamps) Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210510145032.1934078-2-qais.yousef@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 0c18f2ecfcc274a4bcc1d122f79ebd4001c3b445 ]

cpu.uclamp.min is a protection as described in cgroup-v2 Resource
Distribution Model

	Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst

which means we try our best to preserve the minimum performance point of
tasks in this group. See full description of cpu.uclamp.min in the
cgroup-v2.rst.

But the current implementation makes it a limit, which is not what was
intended.

For example:

	tg->cpu.uclamp.min = 20%

	p0->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN] = 0
	p1->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN] = 50%

	Previous Behavior (limit):

		p0->effective_uclamp = 0
		p1->effective_uclamp = 20%

	New Behavior (Protection):

		p0->effective_uclamp = 20%
		p1->effective_uclamp = 50%

Which is inline with how protections should work.

With this change the cgroup and per-task behaviors are the same, as
expected.

Additionally, we remove the confusing relationship between cgroup and
!user_defined flag.

We don't want for example RT tasks that are boosted by default to max to
change their boost value when they attach to a cgroup. If a cgroup wants
to limit the max performance point of tasks attached to it, then
cpu.uclamp.max must be set accordingly.

Or if they want to set different boost value based on cgroup, then
sysctl_sched_util_clamp_min_rt_default must be used to NOT boost to max
and set the right cpu.uclamp.min for each group to let the RT tasks
obtain the desired boost value when attached to that group.

As it stands the dependency on !user_defined flag adds an extra layer of
complexity that is not required now cpu.uclamp.min behaves properly as
a protection.

The propagation model of effective cpu.uclamp.min in child cgroups as
implemented by cpu_util_update_eff() is still correct. The parent
protection sets an upper limit of what the child cgroups will
effectively get.

Fixes: 3eac870a3247 (sched/uclamp: Use TG's clamps to restrict TASK's clamps)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210510145032.1934078-2-qais.yousef@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
sched/core: Initialize the idle task with preemption disabled 2021-07-14T14:55:50+00:00 Valentin Schneider valentin.schneider@arm.com 2021-05-12T09:46:36+00:00 3c51d82d0b7862d7d246016c74b4390fb1fa1f11 [ Upstream commit f1a0a376ca0c4ef1fc3d24e3e502acbb5b795674 ] As pointed out by commit de9b8f5dcbd9 ("sched: Fix crash trying to dequeue/enqueue the idle thread") init_idle() can and will be invoked more than once on the same idle task. At boot time, it is invoked for the boot CPU thread by sched_init(). Then smp_init() creates the threads for all the secondary CPUs and invokes init_idle() on them. As the hotplug machinery brings the secondaries to life, it will issue calls to idle_thread_get(), which itself invokes init_idle() yet again. In this case it's invoked twice more per secondary: at _cpu_up(), and at bringup_cpu(). Given smp_init() already initializes the idle tasks for all *possible* CPUs, no further initialization should be required. Now, removing init_idle() from idle_thread_get() exposes some interesting expectations with regards to the idle task's preempt_count: the secondary startup always issues a preempt_disable(), requiring some reset of the preempt count to 0 between hot-unplug and hotplug, which is currently served by idle_thread_get() -> idle_init(). Given the idle task is supposed to have preemption disabled once and never see it re-enabled, it seems that what we actually want is to initialize its preempt_count to PREEMPT_DISABLED and leave it there. Do that, and remove init_idle() from idle_thread_get(). Secondary startups were patched via coccinelle: @begone@ @@ -preempt_disable(); ... cpu_startup_entry(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE); Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210512094636.2958515-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit f1a0a376ca0c4ef1fc3d24e3e502acbb5b795674 ]

As pointed out by commit

  de9b8f5dcbd9 ("sched: Fix crash trying to dequeue/enqueue the idle thread")

init_idle() can and will be invoked more than once on the same idle
task. At boot time, it is invoked for the boot CPU thread by
sched_init(). Then smp_init() creates the threads for all the secondary
CPUs and invokes init_idle() on them.

As the hotplug machinery brings the secondaries to life, it will issue
calls to idle_thread_get(), which itself invokes init_idle() yet again.
In this case it's invoked twice more per secondary: at _cpu_up(), and at
bringup_cpu().

Given smp_init() already initializes the idle tasks for all *possible*
CPUs, no further initialization should be required. Now, removing
init_idle() from idle_thread_get() exposes some interesting expectations
with regards to the idle task's preempt_count: the secondary startup always
issues a preempt_disable(), requiring some reset of the preempt count to 0
between hot-unplug and hotplug, which is currently served by
idle_thread_get() -> idle_init().

Given the idle task is supposed to have preemption disabled once and never
see it re-enabled, it seems that what we actually want is to initialize its
preempt_count to PREEMPT_DISABLED and leave it there. Do that, and remove
init_idle() from idle_thread_get().

Secondary startups were patched via coccinelle:

  @begone@
  @@

  -preempt_disable();
  ...
  cpu_startup_entry(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE);

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210512094636.2958515-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
sched: Fix out-of-bound access in uclamp 2021-05-19T08:13:09+00:00 Quentin Perret qperret@google.com 2021-04-30T15:14:12+00:00 f7347c85490b92dd144fa1fba9e1eca501656ab3 [ Upstream commit 6d2f8909a5fabb73fe2a63918117943986c39b6c ] Util-clamp places tasks in different buckets based on their clamp values for performance reasons. However, the size of buckets is currently computed using a rounding division, which can lead to an off-by-one error in some configurations. For instance, with 20 buckets, the bucket size will be 1024/20=51. A task with a clamp of 1024 will be mapped to bucket id 1024/51=20. Sadly, correct indexes are in range [0,19], hence leading to an out of bound memory access. Clamp the bucket id to fix the issue. Fixes: 69842cba9ace ("sched/uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting") Suggested-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210430151412.160913-1-qperret@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 6d2f8909a5fabb73fe2a63918117943986c39b6c ]

Util-clamp places tasks in different buckets based on their clamp values
for performance reasons. However, the size of buckets is currently
computed using a rounding division, which can lead to an off-by-one
error in some configurations.

For instance, with 20 buckets, the bucket size will be 1024/20=51. A
task with a clamp of 1024 will be mapped to bucket id 1024/51=20. Sadly,
correct indexes are in range [0,19], hence leading to an out of bound
memory access.

Clamp the bucket id to fix the issue.

Fixes: 69842cba9ace ("sched/uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting")
Suggested-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210430151412.160913-1-qperret@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
smp: Fix smp_call_function_single_async prototype 2021-05-14T07:50:46+00:00 Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de 2021-05-05T21:12:42+00:00 41f1aed56de5b478002e98c3572664e592666f13 commit 1139aeb1c521eb4a050920ce6c64c36c4f2a3ab7 upstream. As of commit 966a967116e6 ("smp: Avoid using two cache lines for struct call_single_data"), the smp code prefers 32-byte aligned call_single_data objects for performance reasons, but the block layer includes an instance of this structure in the main 'struct request' that is more senstive to size than to performance here, see 4ccafe032005 ("block: unalign call_single_data in struct request"). The result is a violation of the calling conventions that clang correctly points out: block/blk-mq.c:630:39: warning: passing 8-byte aligned argument to 32-byte aligned parameter 2 of 'smp_call_function_single_async' may result in an unaligned pointer access [-Walign-mismatch] smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &rq->csd); It does seem that the usage of the call_single_data without cache line alignment should still be allowed by the smp code, so just change the function prototype so it accepts both, but leave the default alignment unchanged for the other users. This seems better to me than adding a local hack to shut up an otherwise correct warning in the caller. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210505211300.3174456-1-arnd@kernel.org [nc: Fix conflicts, modify rq_csd_init] Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 1139aeb1c521eb4a050920ce6c64c36c4f2a3ab7 upstream.

As of commit 966a967116e6 ("smp: Avoid using two cache lines for struct
call_single_data"), the smp code prefers 32-byte aligned call_single_data
objects for performance reasons, but the block layer includes an instance
of this structure in the main 'struct request' that is more senstive
to size than to performance here, see 4ccafe032005 ("block: unalign
call_single_data in struct request").

The result is a violation of the calling conventions that clang correctly
points out:

block/blk-mq.c:630:39: warning: passing 8-byte aligned argument to 32-byte aligned parameter 2 of 'smp_call_function_single_async' may result in an unaligned pointer access [-Walign-mismatch]
                smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &rq->csd);

It does seem that the usage of the call_single_data without cache line
alignment should still be allowed by the smp code, so just change the
function prototype so it accepts both, but leave the default alignment
unchanged for the other users. This seems better to me than adding
a local hack to shut up an otherwise correct warning in the caller.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210505211300.3174456-1-arnd@kernel.org
[nc: Fix conflicts, modify rq_csd_init]
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
sched/features: Fix hrtick reprogramming 2021-03-07T11:34:13+00:00 Juri Lelli juri.lelli@redhat.com 2021-02-08T07:35:53+00:00 9a68fa0ebb288370be3f74819e1d8c8f401c4e71 [ Upstream commit 156ec6f42b8d300dbbf382738ff35c8bad8f4c3a ] Hung tasks and RCU stall cases were reported on systems which were not 100% busy. Investigation of such unexpected cases (no sign of potential starvation caused by tasks hogging the system) pointed out that the periodic sched tick timer wasn't serviced anymore after a certain point and that caused all machinery that depends on it (timers, RCU, etc.) to stop working as well. This issues was however only reproducible if HRTICK was enabled. Looking at core dumps it was found that the rbtree of the hrtimer base used also for the hrtick was corrupted (i.e. next as seen from the base root and actual leftmost obtained by traversing the tree are different). Same base is also used for periodic tick hrtimer, which might get "lost" if the rbtree gets corrupted. Much alike what described in commit 1f71addd34f4c ("tick/sched: Do not mess with an enqueued hrtimer") there is a race window between hrtimer_set_expires() in hrtick_start and hrtimer_start_expires() in __hrtick_restart() in which the former might be operating on an already queued hrtick hrtimer, which might lead to corruption of the base. Use hrtick_start() (which removes the timer before enqueuing it back) to ensure hrtick hrtimer reprogramming is entirely guarded by the base lock, so that no race conditions can occur. Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves <lgoncalv@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210208073554.14629-2-juri.lelli@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 156ec6f42b8d300dbbf382738ff35c8bad8f4c3a ]

Hung tasks and RCU stall cases were reported on systems which were not
100% busy. Investigation of such unexpected cases (no sign of potential
starvation caused by tasks hogging the system) pointed out that the
periodic sched tick timer wasn't serviced anymore after a certain point
and that caused all machinery that depends on it (timers, RCU, etc.) to
stop working as well. This issues was however only reproducible if
HRTICK was enabled.

Looking at core dumps it was found that the rbtree of the hrtimer base
used also for the hrtick was corrupted (i.e. next as seen from the base
root and actual leftmost obtained by traversing the tree are different).
Same base is also used for periodic tick hrtimer, which might get "lost"
if the rbtree gets corrupted.

Much alike what described in commit 1f71addd34f4c ("tick/sched: Do not
mess with an enqueued hrtimer") there is a race window between
hrtimer_set_expires() in hrtick_start and hrtimer_start_expires() in
__hrtick_restart() in which the former might be operating on an already
queued hrtick hrtimer, which might lead to corruption of the base.

Use hrtick_start() (which removes the timer before enqueuing it back) to
ensure hrtick hrtimer reprogramming is entirely guarded by the base
lock, so that no race conditions can occur.

Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210208073554.14629-2-juri.lelli@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>