commit 76f970ce51c80f625eb6ddbb24e9cb51b977b598 upstream.
This reverts commit eff6c8ce8d4d7faef75f66614dd20bb50595d261.
Hazem reported a 30% drop in UnixBench spawn test with commit
eff6c8ce8d4d ("sched/core: Reduce cost of sched_move_task when config
autogroup") on a m6g.xlarge AWS EC2 instance with 4 vCPUs and 16 GiB RAM
(aarch64) (single level MC sched domain):
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250205151026.13061-1-hagarhem@amazon.com
There is an early bail from sched_move_task() if p->sched_task_group is
equal to p's 'cpu cgroup' (sched_get_task_group()). E.g. both are
pointing to taskgroup '/user.slice/user-1000.slice/session-1.scope'
(Ubuntu '22.04.5 LTS').
So in:
do_exit()
sched_autogroup_exit_task()
sched_move_task()
if sched_get_task_group(p) == p->sched_task_group
return
/* p is enqueued */
dequeue_task() \
sched_change_group() |
task_change_group_fair() |
detach_task_cfs_rq() | (1)
set_task_rq() |
attach_task_cfs_rq() |
enqueue_task() /
(1) isn't called for p anymore.
Turns out that the regression is related to sgs->group_util in
group_is_overloaded() and group_has_capacity(). If (1) isn't called for
all the 'spawn' tasks then sgs->group_util is ~900 and
sgs->group_capacity = 1024 (single CPU sched domain) and this leads to
group_is_overloaded() returning true (2) and group_has_capacity() false
(3) much more often compared to the case when (1) is called.
I.e. there are much more cases of 'group_is_overloaded' and
'group_fully_busy' in WF_FORK wakeup sched_balance_find_dst_cpu() which
then returns much more often a CPU != smp_processor_id() (5).
This isn't good for these extremely short running tasks (FORK + EXIT)
and also involves calling sched_balance_find_dst_group_cpu() unnecessary
(single CPU sched domain).
Instead if (1) is called for 'p->flags & PF_EXITING' then the path
(4),(6) is taken much more often.
select_task_rq_fair(..., wake_flags = WF_FORK)
cpu = smp_processor_id()
new_cpu = sched_balance_find_dst_cpu(..., cpu, ...)
group = sched_balance_find_dst_group(..., cpu)
do {
update_sg_wakeup_stats()
sgs->group_type = group_classify()
if group_is_overloaded() (2)
return group_overloaded
if !group_has_capacity() (3)
return group_fully_busy
return group_has_spare (4)
} while group
if local_sgs.group_type > idlest_sgs.group_type
return idlest (5)
case group_has_spare:
if local_sgs.idle_cpus >= idlest_sgs.idle_cpus
return NULL (6)
Unixbench Tests './Run -c 4 spawn' on:
(a) VM AWS instance (m7gd.16xlarge) with v6.13 ('maxcpus=4 nr_cpus=4')
and Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS (aarch64).
Shell & test run in '/user.slice/user-1000.slice/session-1.scope'.
w/o patch w/ patch
21005 27120
(b) i7-13700K with tip/sched/core ('nosmt maxcpus=8 nr_cpus=8') and
Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS (x86_64).
Shell & test run in '/A'.
w/o patch w/ patch
67675 88806
CONFIG_SCHED_AUTOGROUP=y & /sys/proc/kernel/sched_autogroup_enabled equal
0 or 1.
Reported-by: Hazem Mohamed Abuelfotoh <abuehaze@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Hagar Hemdan <hagarhem@amazon.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250314151345.275739-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit bcc6244e13b4d4903511a1ea84368abf925031c0 ] Clarify that wake_up_q() does an atomic write to task->wake_q.next, after which a concurrent __wake_q_add() can immediately overwrite task->wake_q.next again. Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250129-sched-wakeup-prettier-v1-1-2f51f5f663fa@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 82c387ef7568c0d96a918a5a78d9cad6256cfa15 upstream. David reported a warning observed while loop testing kexec jump: Interrupts enabled after irqrouter_resume+0x0/0x50 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 560 at drivers/base/syscore.c:103 syscore_resume+0x18a/0x220 kernel_kexec+0xf6/0x180 __do_sys_reboot+0x206/0x250 do_syscall_64+0x95/0x180 The corresponding interrupt flag trace: hardirqs last enabled at (15573): [<ffffffffa8281b8e>] __up_console_sem+0x7e/0x90 hardirqs last disabled at (15580): [<ffffffffa8281b73>] __up_console_sem+0x63/0x90 That means __up_console_sem() was invoked with interrupts enabled. Further instrumentation revealed that in the interrupt disabled section of kexec jump one of the syscore_suspend() callbacks woke up a task, which set the NEED_RESCHED flag. A later callback in the resume path invoked cond_resched() which in turn led to the invocation of the scheduler: __cond_resched+0x21/0x60 down_timeout+0x18/0x60 acpi_os_wait_semaphore+0x4c/0x80 acpi_ut_acquire_mutex+0x3d/0x100 acpi_ns_get_node+0x27/0x60 acpi_ns_evaluate+0x1cb/0x2d0 acpi_rs_set_srs_method_data+0x156/0x190 acpi_pci_link_set+0x11c/0x290 irqrouter_resume+0x54/0x60 syscore_resume+0x6a/0x200 kernel_kexec+0x145/0x1c0 __do_sys_reboot+0xeb/0x240 do_syscall_64+0x95/0x180 This is a long standing problem, which probably got more visible with the recent printk changes. Something does a task wakeup and the scheduler sets the NEED_RESCHED flag. cond_resched() sees it set and invokes schedule() from a completely bogus context. The scheduler enables interrupts after context switching, which causes the above warning at the end. Quite some of the code paths in syscore_suspend()/resume() can result in triggering a wakeup with the exactly same consequences. They might not have done so yet, but as they share a lot of code with normal operations it's just a question of time. The problem only affects the PREEMPT_NONE and PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY scheduling models. Full preemption is not affected as cond_resched() is disabled and the preemption check preemptible() takes the interrupt disabled flag into account. Cure the problem by adding a corresponding check into cond_resched(). Reported-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Tested-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/7717fe2ac0ce5f0a2c43fdab8b11f4483d54a2a4.camel@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit d6f3e7d564b2309e1f17e709a70eca78d7ca2bb8 upstream.
scx_move_task() is called from sched_move_task() and tells the BPF scheduler
that cgroup migration is being committed. sched_move_task() is used by both
cgroup and autogroup migrations and scx_move_task() tried to filter out
autogroup migrations by testing the destination cgroup and PF_EXITING but
this is not enough. In fact, without explicitly tagging the thread which is
doing the cgroup migration, there is no good way to tell apart
scx_move_task() invocations for racing migration to the root cgroup and an
autogroup migration.
This led to scx_move_task() incorrectly ignoring a migration from non-root
cgroup to an autogroup of the root cgroup triggering the following warning:
WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1 at kernel/sched/ext.c:3725 scx_cgroup_can_attach+0x196/0x340
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
cgroup_migrate_execute+0x5b1/0x700
cgroup_attach_task+0x296/0x400
__cgroup_procs_write+0x128/0x140
cgroup_procs_write+0x17/0x30
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x141/0x1f0
vfs_write+0x31d/0x4a0
__x64_sys_write+0x72/0xf0
do_syscall_64+0x82/0x160
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
Fix it by adding an argument to sched_move_task() that indicates whether the
moving is for a cgroup or autogroup migration. After the change,
scx_move_task() is called only for cgroup migrations and renamed to
scx_cgroup_move_task().
Link: https://github.com/sched-ext/scx/issues/370
Fixes: 819513666966 ("sched_ext: Add cgroup support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.12+
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 108ad0999085df2366dd9ef437573955cb3f5586 ] When steal time exceeds the measured delta when updating clock_task, we currently try to catch up the excess in future updates. However, this results in inaccurate run times for the future things using clock_task, in some situations, as they end up getting additional steal time that did not actually happen. This is because there is a window between reading the elapsed time in update_rq_clock() and sampling the steal time in update_rq_clock_task(). If the VCPU gets preempted between those two points, any additional steal time is accounted to the outgoing task even though the calculated delta did not actually contain any of that "stolen" time. When this race happens, we can end up with steal time that exceeds the calculated delta, and the previous code would try to catch up that excess steal time in future clock updates, which is given to the next, incoming task, even though it did not actually have any time stolen. This behavior is particularly bad when steal time can be very long, which we've seen when trying to extend steal time to contain the duration that the host was suspended [0]. When this happens, clock_task stays frozen, during which the running task stays running for the whole duration, since its run time doesn't increase. However the race can happen even under normal operation. Ideally we would read the elapsed cpu time and the steal time atomically, to prevent this race from happening in the first place, but doing so is non-trivial. Since the time between those two points isn't otherwise accounted anywhere, neither to the outgoing task nor the incoming task (because the "end of outgoing task" and "start of incoming task" timestamps are the same), I would argue that the right thing to do is to simply drop any excess steal time, in order to prevent these issues. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20240820043543.837914-1-suleiman@google.com/ Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241118043745.1857272-1-suleiman@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 7d9da040575b343085287686fa902a5b2d43c7ca ]
When running hackbench in a cgroup with bandwidth throttling enabled,
following PSI splat was observed:
psi: inconsistent task state! task=1831:hackbench cpu=8 psi_flags=14 clear=0 set=4
When investigating the series of events leading up to the splat,
following sequence was observed:
[008] d..2.: sched_switch: ... ==> next_comm=hackbench next_pid=1831 next_prio=120
...
[008] dN.2.: dequeue_entity(task delayed): task=hackbench pid=1831 cfs_rq->throttled=0
[008] dN.2.: pick_task_fair: check_cfs_rq_runtime() throttled cfs_rq on CPU8
# CPU8 goes into newidle balance and releases the rq lock
...
# CPU15 on same LLC Domain is trying to wakeup hackbench(pid=1831)
[015] d..4.: psi_flags_change: psi: task state: task=1831:hackbench cpu=8 psi_flags=14 clear=0 set=4 final=14 # Splat (cfs_rq->throttled=1)
[015] d..4.: sched_wakeup: comm=hackbench pid=1831 prio=120 target_cpu=008 # Task has woken on a throttled hierarchy
[008] d..2.: sched_switch: prev_comm=hackbench prev_pid=1831 prev_prio=120 prev_state=S ==> ...
psi_dequeue() relies on psi_sched_switch() to set the correct PSI flags
for the blocked entity, however, with the introduction of DELAY_DEQUEUE,
the block task can wakeup when newidle balance drops the runqueue lock
during __schedule().
If a task wakes before psi_sched_switch() adjusts the PSI flags, skip
any modifications in psi_enqueue() which would still see the flags of a
running task and not a blocked one. Instead, rely on psi_sched_switch()
to do the right thing.
Since the status returned by try_to_block_task() may no longer be true
by the time schedule reaches psi_sched_switch(), check if the task is
blocked or not using a combination of task_on_rq_queued() and
p->se.sched_delayed checks.
[ prateek: Commit message, testing, early bailout in psi_enqueue() ]
Fixes: 152e11f6df29 ("sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue") # 1a6151017ee5
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241227061941.2315-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
We can't stop the tick of a rq if there are at least 2 tasks enqueued in
the whole hierarchy and not only at the root cfs rq.
rq->cfs.nr_running tracks the number of sched_entity at one level
whereas rq->cfs.h_nr_running tracks all queued tasks in the
hierarchy.
Fixes: 11cc374f4643b ("sched_ext: Simplify scx_can_stop_tick() invocation in sched_can_stop_tick()")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241202174606.4074512-2-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Scheduler raises a SCHED_SOFTIRQ to trigger a load balancing event on
from the IPI handler on the idle CPU. If the SMP function is invoked
from an idle CPU via flush_smp_call_function_queue() then the HARD-IRQ
flag is not set and raise_softirq_irqoff() needlessly wakes ksoftirqd
because soft interrupts are handled before ksoftirqd get on the CPU.
Adding a trace_printk() in nohz_csd_func() at the spot of raising
SCHED_SOFTIRQ and enabling trace events for sched_switch, sched_wakeup,
and softirq_entry (for SCHED_SOFTIRQ vector alone) helps observing the
current behavior:
<idle>-0 [000] dN.1.: nohz_csd_func: Raising SCHED_SOFTIRQ from nohz_csd_func
<idle>-0 [000] dN.4.: sched_wakeup: comm=ksoftirqd/0 pid=16 prio=120 target_cpu=000
<idle>-0 [000] .Ns1.: softirq_entry: vec=7 [action=SCHED]
<idle>-0 [000] .Ns1.: softirq_exit: vec=7 [action=SCHED]
<idle>-0 [000] d..2.: sched_switch: prev_comm=swapper/0 prev_pid=0 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm=ksoftirqd/0 next_pid=16 next_prio=120
ksoftirqd/0-16 [000] d..2.: sched_switch: prev_comm=ksoftirqd/0 prev_pid=16 prev_prio=120 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=swapper/0 next_pid=0 next_prio=120
...
Use __raise_softirq_irqoff() to raise the softirq. The SMP function call
is always invoked on the requested CPU in an interrupt handler. It is
guaranteed that soft interrupts are handled at the end.
Following are the observations with the changes when enabling the same
set of events:
<idle>-0 [000] dN.1.: nohz_csd_func: Raising SCHED_SOFTIRQ for nohz_idle_balance
<idle>-0 [000] dN.1.: softirq_raise: vec=7 [action=SCHED]
<idle>-0 [000] .Ns1.: softirq_entry: vec=7 [action=SCHED]
No unnecessary ksoftirqd wakeups are seen from idle task's context to
service the softirq.
Fixes: b2a02fc43a1f ("smp: Optimize send_call_function_single_ipi()")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/fcf823f-195e-6c9a-eac3-25f870cb35ac@inria.fr/ [1]
Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241119054432.6405-5-kprateek.nayak@amd.com
The need_resched() check currently in nohz_csd_func() can be tracked
to have been added in scheduler_ipi() back in 2011 via commit
ca38062e57e9 ("sched: Use resched IPI to kick off the nohz idle balance")
Since then, it has travelled quite a bit but it seems like an idle_cpu()
check currently is sufficient to detect the need to bail out from an
idle load balancing. To justify this removal, consider all the following
case where an idle load balancing could race with a task wakeup:
o Since commit f3dd3f674555b ("sched: Remove the limitation of WF_ON_CPU
on wakelist if wakee cpu is idle") a target perceived to be idle
(target_rq->nr_running == 0) will return true for
ttwu_queue_cond(target) which will offload the task wakeup to the idle
target via an IPI.
In all such cases target_rq->ttwu_pending will be set to 1 before
queuing the wake function.
If an idle load balance races here, following scenarios are possible:
- The CPU is not in TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG mode in which case an actual
IPI is sent to the CPU to wake it out of idle. If the
nohz_csd_func() queues before sched_ttwu_pending(), the idle load
balance will bail out since idle_cpu(target) returns 0 since
target_rq->ttwu_pending is 1. If the nohz_csd_func() is queued after
sched_ttwu_pending() it should see rq->nr_running to be non-zero and
bail out of idle load balancing.
- The CPU is in TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG mode and instead of an actual IPI,
the sender will simply set TIF_NEED_RESCHED for the target to put it
out of idle and flush_smp_call_function_queue() in do_idle() will
execute the call function. Depending on the ordering of the queuing
of nohz_csd_func() and sched_ttwu_pending(), the idle_cpu() check in
nohz_csd_func() should either see target_rq->ttwu_pending = 1 or
target_rq->nr_running to be non-zero if there is a genuine task
wakeup racing with the idle load balance kick.
o The waker CPU perceives the target CPU to be busy
(targer_rq->nr_running != 0) but the CPU is in fact going idle and due
to a series of unfortunate events, the system reaches a case where the
waker CPU decides to perform the wakeup by itself in ttwu_queue() on
the target CPU but target is concurrently selected for idle load
balance (XXX: Can this happen? I'm not sure, but we'll consider the
mother of all coincidences to estimate the worst case scenario).
ttwu_do_activate() calls enqueue_task() which would increment
"rq->nr_running" post which it calls wakeup_preempt() which is
responsible for setting TIF_NEED_RESCHED (via a resched IPI or by
setting TIF_NEED_RESCHED on a TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG idle CPU) The key
thing to note in this case is that rq->nr_running is already non-zero
in case of a wakeup before TIF_NEED_RESCHED is set which would
lead to idle_cpu() check returning false.
In all cases, it seems that need_resched() check is unnecessary when
checking for idle_cpu() first since an impending wakeup racing with idle
load balancer will either set the "rq->ttwu_pending" or indicate a newly
woken task via "rq->nr_running".
Chasing the reason why this check might have existed in the first place,
I came across Peter's suggestion on the fist iteration of Suresh's
patch from 2011 [1] where the condition to raise the SCHED_SOFTIRQ was:
sched_ttwu_do_pending(list);
if (unlikely((rq->idle == current) &&
rq->nohz_balance_kick &&
!need_resched()))
raise_softirq_irqoff(SCHED_SOFTIRQ);
Since the condition to raise the SCHED_SOFIRQ was preceded by
sched_ttwu_do_pending() (which is equivalent of sched_ttwu_pending()) in
the current upstream kernel, the need_resched() check was necessary to
catch a newly queued task. Peter suggested modifying it to:
if (idle_cpu() && rq->nohz_balance_kick && !need_resched())
raise_softirq_irqoff(SCHED_SOFTIRQ);
where idle_cpu() seems to have replaced "rq->idle == current" check.
Even back then, the idle_cpu() check would have been sufficient to catch
a new task being enqueued. Since commit b2a02fc43a1f ("smp: Optimize
send_call_function_single_ipi()") overloads the interpretation of
TIF_NEED_RESCHED for TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG idling, remove the
need_resched() check in nohz_csd_func() to raise SCHED_SOFTIRQ based
on Peter's suggestion.
Fixes: b2a02fc43a1f ("smp: Optimize send_call_function_single_ipi()")
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241119054432.6405-3-kprateek.nayak@amd.com
Pull scheduler updates from Ingo Molnar:
"Core facilities:
- Add the "Lazy preemption" model (CONFIG_PREEMPT_LAZY=y), which
optimizes fair-class preemption by delaying preemption requests to
the tick boundary, while working as full preemption for
RR/FIFO/DEADLINE classes. (Peter Zijlstra)
- x86: Enable Lazy preemption (Peter Zijlstra)
- riscv: Enable Lazy preemption (Jisheng Zhang)
- Initialize idle tasks only once (Thomas Gleixner)
- sched/ext: Remove sched_fork() hack (Thomas Gleixner)
Fair scheduler:
- Optimize the PLACE_LAG when se->vlag is zero (Huang Shijie)
Idle loop:
- Optimize the generic idle loop by removing unnecessary memory
barrier (Zhongqiu Han)
RSEQ:
- Improve cache locality of RSEQ concurrency IDs for intermittent
workloads (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Waitqueues:
- Make wake_up_{bit,var} less fragile (Neil Brown)
PSI:
- Pass enqueue/dequeue flags to psi callbacks directly (Johannes
Weiner)
Preparatory patches for proxy execution:
- Add move_queued_task_locked helper (Connor O'Brien)
- Consolidate pick_*_task to task_is_pushable helper (Connor O'Brien)
- Split out __schedule() deactivate task logic into a helper (John
Stultz)
- Split scheduler and execution contexts (Peter Zijlstra)
- Make mutex::wait_lock irq safe (Juri Lelli)
- Expose __mutex_owner() (Juri Lelli)
- Remove wakeups from under mutex::wait_lock (Peter Zijlstra)
Misc fixes and cleanups:
- Remove unused __HAVE_THREAD_FUNCTIONS hook support (David
Disseldorp)
- Update the comment for TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY (Sebastian Andrzej
Siewior)
- Remove unused bit_wait_io_timeout (Dr. David Alan Gilbert)
- remove the DOUBLE_TICK feature (Huang Shijie)
- fix the comment for PREEMPT_SHORT (Huang Shijie)
- Fix unnused variable warning (Christian Loehle)
- No PREEMPT_RT=y for all{yes,mod}config"
* tag 'sched-core-2024-11-18' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (33 commits)
sched, x86: Update the comment for TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY.
sched: No PREEMPT_RT=y for all{yes,mod}config
riscv: add PREEMPT_LAZY support
sched, x86: Enable Lazy preemption
sched: Enable PREEMPT_DYNAMIC for PREEMPT_RT
sched: Add Lazy preemption model
sched: Add TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY infrastructure
sched/ext: Remove sched_fork() hack
sched: Initialize idle tasks only once
sched: psi: pass enqueue/dequeue flags to psi callbacks directly
sched/uclamp: Fix unnused variable warning
sched: Split scheduler and execution contexts
sched: Split out __schedule() deactivate task logic into a helper
sched: Consolidate pick_*_task to task_is_pushable helper
sched: Add move_queued_task_locked helper
locking/mutex: Expose __mutex_owner()
locking/mutex: Make mutex::wait_lock irq safe
locking/mutex: Remove wakeups from under mutex::wait_lock
sched: Improve cache locality of RSEQ concurrency IDs for intermittent workloads
sched: idle: Optimize the generic idle loop by removing needless memory barrier
...