[ Upstream commit 11377947b5861fa59bf77c827e1dd7c081842cc9 ] Currently, if the rcuscale module's async module parameter is specified for RCU implementations that do not have async primitives such as RCU Tasks Rude (which now lacks a call_rcu_tasks_rude() function), there will be a series of splats due to calls to a NULL pointer. This commit therefore warns of this situation, but switches to non-async testing. Signed-off-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fd70e9f1d85f5323096ad313ba73f5fe3d15ea41 ] For kernels built with CONFIG_FORCE_NR_CPUS=y, the nr_cpu_ids is defined as NR_CPUS instead of the number of possible cpus, this will cause the following system panic: smpboot: Allowing 4 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs ... setup_percpu: NR_CPUS:512 nr_cpumask_bits:512 nr_cpu_ids:512 nr_node_ids:1 ... BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff9911c8c8 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 0 PID: 15 Comm: rcu_tasks_trace Tainted: G W 6.6.21 #1 5dc7acf91a5e8e9ac9dcfc35bee0245691283ea6 RIP: 0010:rcu_tasks_need_gpcb+0x25d/0x2c0 RSP: 0018:ffffa371c00a3e60 EFLAGS: 00010082 CR2: ffffffff9911c8c8 CR3: 000000040fa20005 CR4: 00000000001706f0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x23/0x80 ? page_fault_oops+0xa4/0x180 ? exc_page_fault+0x152/0x180 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x40 ? rcu_tasks_need_gpcb+0x25d/0x2c0 ? __pfx_rcu_tasks_kthread+0x40/0x40 rcu_tasks_one_gp+0x69/0x180 rcu_tasks_kthread+0x94/0xc0 kthread+0xe8/0x140 ? __pfx_kthread+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x80 ? __pfx_kthread+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x80 </TASK> Considering that there may be holes in the CPU numbers, use the maximum possible cpu number, instead of nr_cpu_ids, for configuring enqueue and dequeue limits. [ neeraj.upadhyay: Fix htmldocs build error reported by Stephen Rothwell ] Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/CALMA0xaTSMN+p4xUXkzrtR5r6k7hgoswcaXx7baR_z9r5jjskw@mail.gmail.com/T/#u Reported-by: Zhixu Liu <zhixu.liu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 9139f93209d1ffd7f489ab19dee01b7c3a1a43d2 ]
After a CPU is marked offline and until it reaches its final trip to
idle, rcuo has several opportunities to be woken up, either because
a callback has been queued in the meantime or because
rcutree_report_cpu_dead() has issued the final deferred NOCB wake up.
If RCU-boosting is enabled, RCU kthreads are set to SCHED_FIFO policy.
And if RT-bandwidth is enabled, the related hrtimer might be armed.
However this then happens after hrtimers have been migrated at the
CPUHP_AP_HRTIMERS_DYING stage, which is broken as reported by the
following warning:
Call trace:
enqueue_hrtimer+0x7c/0xf8
hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x2b8/0x300
enqueue_task_rt+0x298/0x3f0
enqueue_task+0x94/0x188
ttwu_do_activate+0xb4/0x27c
try_to_wake_up+0x2d8/0x79c
wake_up_process+0x18/0x28
__wake_nocb_gp+0x80/0x1a0
do_nocb_deferred_wakeup_common+0x3c/0xcc
rcu_report_dead+0x68/0x1ac
cpuhp_report_idle_dead+0x48/0x9c
do_idle+0x288/0x294
cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x3c
secondary_start_kernel+0x138/0x158
Fix this with waking up rcuo using an IPI if necessary. Since the
existing API to deal with this situation only handles swait queue, rcuo
is only woken up from offline CPUs if it's not already waiting on a
grace period. In the worst case some callbacks will just wait for a
grace period to complete before being assigned to a subsequent one.
Reported-by: "Cheng-Jui Wang (王正睿)" <Cheng-Jui.Wang@mediatek.com>
Fixes: 5c0930ccaad5 ("hrtimers: Push pending hrtimers away from outgoing CPU earlier")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit e4f78057291608f6968a6789c5ebb3bde7d95504 ] The bypass lock contention mitigation assumes there can be at most 2 contenders on the bypass lock, following this scheme: 1) One kthread takes the bypass lock 2) Another one spins on it and increment the contended counter 3) A third one (a bypass enqueuer) sees the contended counter on and busy loops waiting on it to decrement. However this assumption is wrong. There can be only one CPU to find the lock contended because call_rcu() (the bypass enqueuer) is the only bypass lock acquire site that may not already hold the NOCB lock beforehand, all the other sites must first contend on the NOCB lock. Therefore step 2) is impossible. The other problem is that the mitigation assumes that contenders all belong to the same rdp CPU, which is also impossible for a raw spinlock. In theory the warning could trigger if the enqueuer holds the bypass lock and another CPU flushes the bypass queue concurrently but this is prevented from all flush users: 1) NOCB kthreads only flush if they successfully _tried_ to lock the bypass lock. So no contention management here. 2) Flush on callbacks migration happen remotely when the CPU is offline. No concurrency against bypass enqueue. 3) Flush on deoffloading happen either locally with IRQs disabled or remotely when the CPU is not yet online. No concurrency against bypass enqueue. 4) Flush on barrier entrain happen either locally with IRQs disabled or remotely when the CPU is offline. No concurrency against bypass enqueue. For those reasons, the bypass lock contention mitigation isn't needed and is even wrong. Remove it but keep the warning reporting a contended bypass lock on a remote CPU, to keep unexpected contention awareness. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 55d4669ef1b76823083caecfab12a8bd2ccdcf64 ]
When rcu_barrier() calls rcu_rdp_cpu_online() and observes a CPU off
rnp->qsmaskinitnext, it means that all accesses from the offline CPU
preceding the CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU are visible to RCU barrier, including
callbacks expiration and counter updates.
However interrupts can still fire after stop_machine() re-enables
interrupts and before rcutree_report_cpu_dead(). The related accesses
happening between CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU and rnp->qsmaskinitnext clearing
are _NOT_ guaranteed to be seen by rcu_barrier() without proper
ordering, especially when callbacks are invoked there to the end, making
rcutree_migrate_callback() bypass barrier_lock.
The following theoretical race example can make rcu_barrier() hang:
CPU 0 CPU 1
----- -----
//cpu_down()
smpboot_park_threads()
//ksoftirqd is parked now
<IRQ>
rcu_sched_clock_irq()
invoke_rcu_core()
do_softirq()
rcu_core()
rcu_do_batch()
// callback storm
// rcu_do_batch() returns
// before completing all
// of them
// do_softirq also returns early because of
// timeout. It defers to ksoftirqd but
// it's parked
</IRQ>
stop_machine()
take_cpu_down()
rcu_barrier()
spin_lock(barrier_lock)
// observes rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist) != 0
<IRQ>
do_softirq()
rcu_core()
rcu_do_batch()
//completes all pending callbacks
//smp_mb() implied _after_ callback number dec
</IRQ>
rcutree_report_cpu_dead()
rnp->qsmaskinitnext &= ~rdp->grpmask;
rcutree_migrate_callback()
// no callback, early return without locking
// barrier_lock
//observes !rcu_rdp_cpu_online(rdp)
rcu_barrier_entrain()
rcu_segcblist_entrain()
// Observe rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(rsclp) == 0
// because no barrier between reading
// rnp->qsmaskinitnext and rsclp->len
rcu_segcblist_add_len()
smp_mb__before_atomic()
// will now observe the 0 count and empty
// list, but too late, we enqueue regardless
WRITE_ONCE(rsclp->len, rsclp->len + v);
// ignored barrier callback
// rcu barrier stall...
This could be solved with a read memory barrier, enforcing the message
passing between rnp->qsmaskinitnext and rsclp->len, matching the full
memory barrier after rsclp->len addition in rcu_segcblist_add_len()
performed at the end of rcu_do_batch().
However the rcu_barrier() is complicated enough and probably doesn't
need too many more subtleties. CPU down is a slowpath and the
barrier_lock seldom contended. Solve the issue with unconditionally
locking the barrier_lock on rcutree_migrate_callbacks(). This makes sure
that either rcu_barrier() sees the empty queue or its entrained
callback will be migrated.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 6040072f4774a575fa67b912efe7722874be337b ] On powerpc systems, spinlock acquisition does not order prior stores against later loads. This means that this statement: rfcp->rfc_next = NULL; Can be reordered to follow this statement: WRITE_ONCE(*rfcpp, rfcp); Which is then a data race with rcu_torture_fwd_prog_cr(), specifically, this statement: rfcpn = READ_ONCE(rfcp->rfc_next) KCSAN located this data race, which represents a real failure on powerpc. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com> Cc: <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 9855c37edf0009cc276cecfee09f7e76e2380212 ]
This reverts commit 28319d6dc5e2ffefa452c2377dd0f71621b5bff0. The race
it fixed was subject to conditions that don't exist anymore since:
1612160b9127 ("rcu-tasks: Eliminate deadlocks involving do_exit() and RCU tasks")
This latter commit removes the use of SRCU that used to cover the
RCU-tasks blind spot on exit between the tasklist's removal and the
final preemption disabling. The task is now placed instead into a
temporary list inside which voluntary sleeps are accounted as RCU-tasks
quiescent states. This would disarm the deadlock initially reported
against PID namespace exit.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 399ced9594dfab51b782798efe60a2376cd5b724 ]
When RCU-TASKS-TRACE pre-gp takes a snapshot of the current task running
on all online CPUs, no explicit ordering synchronizes properly with a
context switch. This lack of ordering can permit the new task to miss
pre-grace-period update-side accesses. The following diagram, courtesy
of Paul, shows the possible bad scenario:
CPU 0 CPU 1
----- -----
// Pre-GP update side access
WRITE_ONCE(*X, 1);
smp_mb();
r0 = rq->curr;
RCU_INIT_POINTER(rq->curr, TASK_B)
spin_unlock(rq)
rcu_read_lock_trace()
r1 = X;
/* ignore TASK_B */
Either r0==TASK_B or r1==1 is needed but neither is guaranteed.
One possible solution to solve this is to wait for an RCU grace period
at the beginning of the RCU-tasks-trace grace period before taking the
current tasks snaphot. However this would introduce large additional
latencies to RCU-tasks-trace grace periods.
Another solution is to lock the target runqueue while taking the current
task snapshot. This ensures that the update side sees the latest context
switch and subsequent context switches will see the pre-grace-period
update side accesses.
This commit therefore adds runqueue locking to cpu_curr_snapshot().
Fixes: e386b6725798 ("rcu-tasks: Eliminate RCU Tasks Trace IPIs to online CPUs")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
fixes.2024.04.15a: RCU fixes misc.2024.04.12a: Miscellaneous fixes rcu-sync-normal-improve.2024.04.15a: Improving synchronize_rcu() call rcu-tasks.2024.04.15a: Tasks RCU updates rcutorture.2024.04.15a: Torture-test updates
The rcu_gp_slow_register/unregister() is only useful in tests where torture_type=rcu, so this commit therefore generates ->gp_slow_register() and ->gp_slow_unregister() function pointers in the rcu_torture_ops structure, and slows grace periods only when these function pointers exist. Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>