Revert commit 08b98d329165 (PM / sleep / ACPI: Use the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0
flag) as it caused system suspend (in the default configuration) to fail
on Dell XPS13 (9360) with the Kaby Lake processor.

Fixes: 08b98d329165 (PM / sleep / ACPI: Use the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 flag)
Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Modify the ACPI system sleep support setup code to select
suspend-to-idle as the default system sleep state if the
ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 flag is set in the FADT and the
default sleep state was not selected from the kernel command
line.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>

There are systems in which the platform doesn't support any special
sleep states, so suspend-to-idle (PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE) is the only
available system sleep state.  However, some user space frameworks
only use the "mem" and (sometimes) "standby" sleep state labels, so
the users of those systems need to modify user space in order to be
able to use system suspend at all and that may be a pain in practice.

Commit 0399d4db3edf (PM / sleep: Introduce command line argument for
sleep state enumeration) attempted to address this problem by adding
a command line argument to change the meaning of the "mem" string in
/sys/power/state to make it trigger suspend-to-idle (instead of
suspend-to-RAM).

However, there also are systems in which the platform does support
special sleep states, but suspend-to-idle is the preferred one anyway
(it even may save more energy than the platform-provided sleep states
in some cases) and the above commit doesn't help in those cases.

For this reason, rework the system sleep state selection interface
again (but preserve backwards compatibiliby).  Namely, add a new
sysfs file, /sys/power/mem_sleep, that will control the system
suspend mode triggered by writing "mem" to /sys/power/state (in
analogy with what /sys/power/disk does for hibernation).  Make it
select suspend-to-RAM ("deep" sleep) by default (if supported) and
fall back to suspend-to-idle ("s2idle") otherwise and add a new
command line argument, mem_sleep_default, allowing that default to
be overridden if need be.

At the same time, drop the relative_sleep_states command line
argument that doesn't make sense any more.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>

Commit 4bcc595ccd80 (printk: reinstate KERN_CONT for printing
continuation lines) exposed a missing KERN_CONT from one of the
messages shown on entering suspend. With v4.9-rc1, the 'done.' shown
after syncing the filesystems no longer appears as a continuation but
a new message with its own timestamp.

[    9.259566] PM: Syncing filesystems ... [    9.264119] done.

Fix this by adding the KERN_CONT log level for the 'done.' part of the
message seen after syncing filesystems. While we are at it, convert
these suspend printks to pr_info and pr_cont, respectively.

Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Suspend-to-idle (aka the "freeze" sleep state) is a system sleep state
in which all of the processors enter deepest possible idle state and
wait for interrupts right after suspending all the devices.

There is no hard requirement for a platform to support and register
platform specific suspend_ops to enter suspend-to-idle/freeze state.
Only deeper system sleep states like PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY and
PM_SUSPEND_MEM rely on such low level support/implementation.

suspend-to-idle can be entered as along as all the devices can be
suspended. This patch enables the support for suspend-to-idle even on
systems that don't have any low level support for deeper system sleep
states and/or don't register any platform specific suspend_ops.

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Tested-by: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This makes pm notifier PREPARE/POST symmetrical: if PREPARE
fails, we will only undo what ever happened on PREPARE.

It fixes the unbalanced CPU hotplug enable in CPU PM notifier.

Signed-off-by: Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Use the more common logging method with the eventual goal of removing
pr_warning altogether.

Miscellanea:

 - Realign arguments
 - Coalesce formats
 - Add missing space between a few coalesced formats

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>	[kernel/power/suspend.c]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

replacing printk(s) with appropriate pr_info and pr_err
in order to fix checkpatch.pl warnings

Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

There are quite a few cases in which device drivers, bus types or
even the PM core itself may benefit from knowing whether or not
the platform firmware will be involved in the upcoming system power
transition (during system suspend) or whether or not it was involved
in it (during system resume).

For this reason, introduce global system suspend flags that can be
used by the platform code to expose that information for the benefit
of the other parts of the kernel and make the ACPI core set them
as appropriate.

Users of the new flags will be added later.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The Linux kernel suspend path has traditionally invoked sys_sync()
before freezing user threads.

But sys_sync() can be expensive, and some user-space OS's do not want
the kernel to pay the cost of sys_sync() on every suspend -- preferring
invoke sync() from user-space if/when they want it.

So make sys_sync on suspend build-time optional.

The default is unchanged.

Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>