linux-stable.git/kernel/power/energy_model.c, branch v6.2 Linux kernel stable tree PM: EM: convert power field to micro-Watts precision and align drivers 2022-07-15T17:17:30+00:00 Lukasz Luba lukasz.luba@arm.com 2022-07-07T07:15:52+00:00 ae6ccaa650380d243cf43d31c864c5ced2fd4612 The milli-Watts precision causes rounding errors while calculating efficiency cost for each OPP. This is especially visible in the 'simple' Energy Model (EM), where the power for each OPP is provided from OPP framework. This can cause some OPPs to be marked inefficient, while using micro-Watts precision that might not happen. Update all EM users which access 'power' field and assume the value is in milli-Watts. Solve also an issue with potential overflow in calculation of energy estimation on 32bit machine. It's needed now since the power value (thus the 'cost' as well) are higher. Example calculation which shows the rounding error and impact: power = 'dyn-power-coeff' * volt_mV * volt_mV * freq_MHz power_a_uW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^6 = 18000 power_a_mW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^9 = 18 power_b_uW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^6 = 21961 power_b_mW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^9 = 21 max_freq = 2000MHz cost_a_mW = 18 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72 cost_a_uW = 18000 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72000 cost_b_mW = 21 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 70 // <- artificially better cost_b_uW = 21961 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 73203 The 'cost_b_mW' (which is based on old milli-Watts) is misleadingly better that the 'cost_b_uW' (this patch uses micro-Watts) and such would have impact on the 'inefficient OPPs' information in the Cpufreq framework. This patch set removes the rounding issue. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
The milli-Watts precision causes rounding errors while calculating
efficiency cost for each OPP. This is especially visible in the 'simple'
Energy Model (EM), where the power for each OPP is provided from OPP
framework. This can cause some OPPs to be marked inefficient, while
using micro-Watts precision that might not happen.

Update all EM users which access 'power' field and assume the value is
in milli-Watts.

Solve also an issue with potential overflow in calculation of energy
estimation on 32bit machine. It's needed now since the power value
(thus the 'cost' as well) are higher.

Example calculation which shows the rounding error and impact:

power = 'dyn-power-coeff' * volt_mV * volt_mV * freq_MHz

power_a_uW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^6 = 18000
power_a_mW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^9 = 18

power_b_uW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^6 = 21961
power_b_mW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^9 = 21

max_freq = 2000MHz

cost_a_mW = 18 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72
cost_a_uW = 18000 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72000

cost_b_mW = 21 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 70 // <- artificially better
cost_b_uW = 21961 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 73203

The 'cost_b_mW' (which is based on old milli-Watts) is misleadingly
better that the 'cost_b_uW' (this patch uses micro-Watts) and such
would have impact on the 'inefficient OPPs' information in the Cpufreq
framework. This patch set removes the rounding issue.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
PM: EM: Decrement policy counter 2022-05-11T17:15:14+00:00 Pierre Gondois Pierre.Gondois@arm.com 2022-04-26T14:44:48+00:00 c9d8923bfbcb63f15ea6cb2b5c8426fc3d96f643 In commit e458716a92b57 ("PM: EM: Mark inefficiencies in CPUFreq"), cpufreq_cpu_get() is called without a cpufreq_cpu_put(), permanently increasing the reference counts of the policy struct. Decrement the reference count once the policy struct is not used anymore. Fixes: e458716a92b57 ("PM: EM: Mark inefficiencies in CPUFreq") Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
In commit e458716a92b57 ("PM: EM: Mark inefficiencies in CPUFreq"),
cpufreq_cpu_get() is called without a cpufreq_cpu_put(), permanently
increasing the reference counts of the policy struct.

Decrement the reference count once the policy struct is not used
anymore.

Fixes: e458716a92b57 ("PM: EM: Mark inefficiencies in CPUFreq")
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
PM: EM: Remove old debugfs files and print all 'flags' 2022-04-13T14:26:17+00:00 Lukasz Luba lukasz.luba@arm.com 2022-03-21T09:57:26+00:00 16857482b830544f5849daa1048f82d00b68957e The Energy Model gets more bits used in 'flags'. Avoid adding another debugfs file just to print what is the status of a new flag. Simply remove old debugfs files and add one generic which prints all flags as a hex value. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
The Energy Model gets more bits used in 'flags'. Avoid adding another
debugfs file just to print what is the status of a new flag. Simply
remove old debugfs files and add one generic which prints all flags
as a hex value.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
PM: EM: Change the order of arguments in the .active_power() callback 2022-04-13T14:26:17+00:00 Lukasz Luba lukasz.luba@arm.com 2022-03-21T09:57:25+00:00 75a3a99a5a9886af13be44e640cb415ebda80db2 The .active_power() callback passes the device pointer when it's called. Aligned with a convetion present in other subsystems and pass the 'dev' as a first argument. It looks more cleaner. Adjust all affected drivers which implement that API callback. Suggested-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
The .active_power() callback passes the device pointer when it's called.
Aligned with a convetion present in other subsystems and pass the 'dev'
as a first argument. It looks more cleaner.

Adjust all affected drivers which implement that API callback.

Suggested-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
PM: EM: Use the new .get_cost() callback while registering EM 2022-04-13T14:26:17+00:00 Lukasz Luba lukasz.luba@arm.com 2022-03-21T09:57:24+00:00 91362463114eb63ead5f02c11d58c46064c339e7 The Energy Model (EM) allows to provide the 'cost' values when the device driver provides the .get_cost() optional callback. This removes restriction which is in the EM calculation function of the 'cost' for each performance state. Now, the driver is in charge of providing the right values which are then used by Energy Aware Scheduler. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
The Energy Model (EM) allows to provide the 'cost' values when the device
driver provides the .get_cost() optional callback. This removes
restriction which is in the EM calculation function of the 'cost'
for each performance state. Now, the driver is in charge of providing
the right values which are then used by Energy Aware Scheduler.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
PM: EM: Add artificial EM flag 2022-04-13T14:26:17+00:00 Pierre Gondois Pierre.Gondois@arm.com 2022-03-21T09:57:23+00:00 fc3a9a9858478ab5f8441765a3f9552a0ceba10c The Energy Model (EM) can be used on platforms which are missing real power information. Those platforms would implement .get_cost() which populates needed values for the Energy Aware Scheduler (EAS). The EAS doesn't use 'power' fields from EM, but other frameworks might use them. Thus, to avoid miss-usage of this specific type of EM, introduce a new flags which can be checked by other frameworks. Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <Pierre.Gondois@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
The Energy Model (EM) can be used on platforms which are missing real
power information. Those platforms would implement .get_cost() which
populates needed values for the Energy Aware Scheduler (EAS). The EAS
doesn't use 'power' fields from EM, but other frameworks might use them.
Thus, to avoid miss-usage of this specific type of EM, introduce a new
flags which can be checked by other frameworks.

Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <Pierre.Gondois@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
PM: EM: Mark inefficiencies in CPUFreq 2021-10-05T14:33:05+00:00 Vincent Donnefort vincent.donnefort@arm.com 2021-09-08T14:05:30+00:00 e458716a92b57f854deb89bb40aa3554c2b6205e The Energy Model has a 1:1 mapping between OPPs and performance states (em_perf_state). If a CPUFreq driver registers an Energy Model, inefficiencies found by the latter can be applied to CPUFreq. Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
The Energy Model has a 1:1 mapping between OPPs and performance states
(em_perf_state). If a CPUFreq driver registers an Energy Model,
inefficiencies found by the latter can be applied to CPUFreq.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
PM: EM: Allow skipping inefficient states 2021-10-05T14:33:05+00:00 Vincent Donnefort vincent.donnefort@arm.com 2021-09-08T14:05:25+00:00 8354eb9eb3ddb4a8d0857648a470beffcc9d8639 The new performance domain flag EM_PERF_DOMAIN_SKIP_INEFFICIENCIES allows to not take into account inefficient states when estimating energy consumption. This intends to let the Energy Model know that CPUFreq itself will skip inefficiencies and such states don't need to be part of the estimation anymore. Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
The new performance domain flag EM_PERF_DOMAIN_SKIP_INEFFICIENCIES allows
to not take into account inefficient states when estimating energy
consumption. This intends to let the Energy Model know that CPUFreq itself
will skip inefficiencies and such states don't need to be part of the
estimation anymore.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
PM: EM: Extend em_perf_domain with a flag field 2021-10-05T14:33:05+00:00 Vincent Donnefort vincent.donnefort@arm.com 2021-09-08T14:05:24+00:00 88f7a89560f6d0fc7803a8933637488f14e0a098 Merge the current "milliwatts" option into a "flag" field. This intends to prepare the extension of this structure for inefficient states support in the Energy Model. Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
Merge the current "milliwatts" option into a "flag" field. This intends to
prepare the extension of this structure for inefficient states support in
the Energy Model.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
PM: EM: Mark inefficient states 2021-10-05T14:33:05+00:00 Vincent Donnefort vincent.donnefort@arm.com 2021-09-08T14:05:23+00:00 c8ed99533dbc0fcc1142671ec80acb33045d2999 Some SoCs, such as the sd855 have OPPs within the same performance domain, whose cost is higher than others with a higher frequency. Even though those OPPs are interesting from a cooling perspective, it makes no sense to use them when the device can run at full capacity. Those OPPs handicap the performance domain, when choosing the most energy-efficient CPU and are wasting energy. They are inefficient. Hence, add support for such OPPs to the Energy Model. The table can now be read skipping inefficient performance states (and by extension, inefficient OPPs). Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
Some SoCs, such as the sd855 have OPPs within the same performance domain,
whose cost is higher than others with a higher frequency. Even though
those OPPs are interesting from a cooling perspective, it makes no sense
to use them when the device can run at full capacity. Those OPPs handicap
the performance domain, when choosing the most energy-efficient CPU and
are wasting energy. They are inefficient.

Hence, add support for such OPPs to the Energy Model. The table can now
be read skipping inefficient performance states (and by extension,
inefficient OPPs).

Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>