linux-stable.git/kernel/locking/lockdep.c, branch v5.4.285 Linux kernel stable tree lockdep: fix deadlock issue between lockdep and rcu 2024-11-08T15:20:46+00:00 Zhiguo Niu zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com 2024-10-12T23:22:44+00:00 a20d4f0d9e2cffb11cfeb9fd5382112fa88c3711 commit a6f88ac32c6e63e69c595bfae220d8641704c9b7 upstream. There is a deadlock scenario between lockdep and rcu when rcu nocb feature is enabled, just as following call stack: rcuop/x -000|queued_spin_lock_slowpath(lock = 0xFFFFFF817F2A8A80, val = ?) -001|queued_spin_lock(inline) // try to hold nocb_gp_lock -001|do_raw_spin_lock(lock = 0xFFFFFF817F2A8A80) -002|__raw_spin_lock_irqsave(inline) -002|_raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock = 0xFFFFFF817F2A8A80) -003|wake_nocb_gp_defer(inline) -003|__call_rcu_nocb_wake(rdp = 0xFFFFFF817F30B680) -004|__call_rcu_common(inline) -004|call_rcu(head = 0xFFFFFFC082EECC28, func = ?) -005|call_rcu_zapped(inline) -005|free_zapped_rcu(ch = ?)// hold graph lock -006|rcu_do_batch(rdp = 0xFFFFFF817F245680) -007|nocb_cb_wait(inline) -007|rcu_nocb_cb_kthread(arg = 0xFFFFFF817F245680) -008|kthread(_create = 0xFFFFFF80803122C0) -009|ret_from_fork(asm) rcuop/y -000|queued_spin_lock_slowpath(lock = 0xFFFFFFC08291BBC8, val = 0) -001|queued_spin_lock() -001|lockdep_lock() -001|graph_lock() // try to hold graph lock -002|lookup_chain_cache_add() -002|validate_chain() -003|lock_acquire -004|_raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock = 0xFFFFFF817F211D80) -005|lock_timer_base(inline) -006|mod_timer(inline) -006|wake_nocb_gp_defer(inline)// hold nocb_gp_lock -006|__call_rcu_nocb_wake(rdp = 0xFFFFFF817F2A8680) -007|__call_rcu_common(inline) -007|call_rcu(head = 0xFFFFFFC0822E0B58, func = ?) -008|call_rcu_hurry(inline) -008|rcu_sync_call(inline) -008|rcu_sync_func(rhp = 0xFFFFFFC0822E0B58) -009|rcu_do_batch(rdp = 0xFFFFFF817F266680) -010|nocb_cb_wait(inline) -010|rcu_nocb_cb_kthread(arg = 0xFFFFFF817F266680) -011|kthread(_create = 0xFFFFFF8080363740) -012|ret_from_fork(asm) rcuop/x and rcuop/y are rcu nocb threads with the same nocb gp thread. This patch release the graph lock before lockdep call_rcu. Fixes: a0b0fd53e1e6 ("locking/lockdep: Free lock classes that are no longer in use") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com> Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com> Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240620225436.3127927-1-cmllamas@google.com Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
commit a6f88ac32c6e63e69c595bfae220d8641704c9b7 upstream.

There is a deadlock scenario between lockdep and rcu when
rcu nocb feature is enabled, just as following call stack:

     rcuop/x
-000|queued_spin_lock_slowpath(lock = 0xFFFFFF817F2A8A80, val = ?)
-001|queued_spin_lock(inline) // try to hold nocb_gp_lock
-001|do_raw_spin_lock(lock = 0xFFFFFF817F2A8A80)
-002|__raw_spin_lock_irqsave(inline)
-002|_raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock = 0xFFFFFF817F2A8A80)
-003|wake_nocb_gp_defer(inline)
-003|__call_rcu_nocb_wake(rdp = 0xFFFFFF817F30B680)
-004|__call_rcu_common(inline)
-004|call_rcu(head = 0xFFFFFFC082EECC28, func = ?)
-005|call_rcu_zapped(inline)
-005|free_zapped_rcu(ch = ?)// hold graph lock
-006|rcu_do_batch(rdp = 0xFFFFFF817F245680)
-007|nocb_cb_wait(inline)
-007|rcu_nocb_cb_kthread(arg = 0xFFFFFF817F245680)
-008|kthread(_create = 0xFFFFFF80803122C0)
-009|ret_from_fork(asm)

     rcuop/y
-000|queued_spin_lock_slowpath(lock = 0xFFFFFFC08291BBC8, val = 0)
-001|queued_spin_lock()
-001|lockdep_lock()
-001|graph_lock() // try to hold graph lock
-002|lookup_chain_cache_add()
-002|validate_chain()
-003|lock_acquire
-004|_raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock = 0xFFFFFF817F211D80)
-005|lock_timer_base(inline)
-006|mod_timer(inline)
-006|wake_nocb_gp_defer(inline)// hold nocb_gp_lock
-006|__call_rcu_nocb_wake(rdp = 0xFFFFFF817F2A8680)
-007|__call_rcu_common(inline)
-007|call_rcu(head = 0xFFFFFFC0822E0B58, func = ?)
-008|call_rcu_hurry(inline)
-008|rcu_sync_call(inline)
-008|rcu_sync_func(rhp = 0xFFFFFFC0822E0B58)
-009|rcu_do_batch(rdp = 0xFFFFFF817F266680)
-010|nocb_cb_wait(inline)
-010|rcu_nocb_cb_kthread(arg = 0xFFFFFF817F266680)
-011|kthread(_create = 0xFFFFFF8080363740)
-012|ret_from_fork(asm)

rcuop/x and rcuop/y are rcu nocb threads with the same nocb gp thread.
This patch release the graph lock before lockdep call_rcu.

Fixes: a0b0fd53e1e6 ("locking/lockdep: Free lock classes that are no longer in use")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240620225436.3127927-1-cmllamas@google.com
Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
locking/lockdep: Avoid potential access of invalid memory in lock_class 2024-11-08T15:20:46+00:00 Waiman Long longman@redhat.com 2024-10-12T23:22:43+00:00 abdc85d6305f488d881d3181ca554e615dfc124d commit 61cc4534b6550997c97a03759ab46b29d44c0017 upstream. It was found that reading /proc/lockdep after a lockdep splat may potentially cause an access to freed memory if lockdep_unregister_key() is called after the splat but before access to /proc/lockdep [1]. This is due to the fact that graph_lock() call in lockdep_unregister_key() fails after the clearing of debug_locks by the splat process. After lockdep_unregister_key() is called, the lock_name may be freed but the corresponding lock_class structure still have a reference to it. That invalid memory pointer will then be accessed when /proc/lockdep is read by a user and a use-after-free (UAF) error will be reported if KASAN is enabled. To fix this problem, lockdep_unregister_key() is now modified to always search for a matching key irrespective of the debug_locks state and zap the corresponding lock class if a matching one is found. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/77f05c15-81b6-bddd-9650-80d5f23fe330@i-love.sakura.ne.jp/ Fixes: 8b39adbee805 ("locking/lockdep: Make lockdep_unregister_key() honor 'debug_locks' again") Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220103023558.1377055-1-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
commit 61cc4534b6550997c97a03759ab46b29d44c0017 upstream.

It was found that reading /proc/lockdep after a lockdep splat may
potentially cause an access to freed memory if lockdep_unregister_key()
is called after the splat but before access to /proc/lockdep [1]. This
is due to the fact that graph_lock() call in lockdep_unregister_key()
fails after the clearing of debug_locks by the splat process.

After lockdep_unregister_key() is called, the lock_name may be freed
but the corresponding lock_class structure still have a reference to
it. That invalid memory pointer will then be accessed when /proc/lockdep
is read by a user and a use-after-free (UAF) error will be reported if
KASAN is enabled.

To fix this problem, lockdep_unregister_key() is now modified to always
search for a matching key irrespective of the debug_locks state and
zap the corresponding lock class if a matching one is found.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/77f05c15-81b6-bddd-9650-80d5f23fe330@i-love.sakura.ne.jp/

Fixes: 8b39adbee805 ("locking/lockdep: Make lockdep_unregister_key() honor 'debug_locks' again")
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220103023558.1377055-1-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
locking/lockdep: Rework lockdep_lock 2024-11-08T15:20:46+00:00 Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org 2024-10-12T23:22:42+00:00 991e129724c27115be83d72609831efbf95a4628 commit 248efb2158f1e23750728e92ad9db3ab60c14485 upstream. A few sites want to assert we own the graph_lock/lockdep_lock, provide a more conventional lock interface for it with a number of trivial debug checks. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200313102107.GX12561@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
commit 248efb2158f1e23750728e92ad9db3ab60c14485 upstream.

A few sites want to assert we own the graph_lock/lockdep_lock, provide
a more conventional lock interface for it with a number of trivial
debug checks.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200313102107.GX12561@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
locking/lockdep: Fix bad recursion pattern 2024-11-08T15:20:46+00:00 Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org 2024-10-12T23:22:41+00:00 60519a39aec309047c84867d2cbc7b485e514922 commit 10476e6304222ced7df9b3d5fb0a043b3c2a1ad8 upstream. There were two patterns for lockdep_recursion: Pattern-A: if (current->lockdep_recursion) return current->lockdep_recursion = 1; /* do stuff */ current->lockdep_recursion = 0; Pattern-B: current->lockdep_recursion++; /* do stuff */ current->lockdep_recursion--; But a third pattern has emerged: Pattern-C: current->lockdep_recursion = 1; /* do stuff */ current->lockdep_recursion = 0; And while this isn't broken per-se, it is highly dangerous because it doesn't nest properly. Get rid of all Pattern-C instances and shore up Pattern-A with a warning. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200313093325.GW12561@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
commit 10476e6304222ced7df9b3d5fb0a043b3c2a1ad8 upstream.

There were two patterns for lockdep_recursion:

Pattern-A:
	if (current->lockdep_recursion)
		return

	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
	/* do stuff */
	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;

Pattern-B:
	current->lockdep_recursion++;
	/* do stuff */
	current->lockdep_recursion--;

But a third pattern has emerged:

Pattern-C:
	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
	/* do stuff */
	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;

And while this isn't broken per-se, it is highly dangerous because it
doesn't nest properly.

Get rid of all Pattern-C instances and shore up Pattern-A with a
warning.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200313093325.GW12561@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
treewide: Remove uninitialized_var() usage 2023-06-09T08:29:01+00:00 Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org 2020-06-03T20:09:38+00:00 0638dcc7e75fbb766761e7b4694d0f0f141bbbd1 commit 3f649ab728cda8038259d8f14492fe400fbab911 upstream. Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1] (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings (e.g. "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized, either simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes. In preparation for removing[2] the[3] macro[4], remove all remaining needless uses with the following script: git grep '\buninitialized_var\b' | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u | \ xargs perl -pi -e \ 's/\buninitialized_var\(([^\)]+)\)/\1/g; s:\s*/\* (GCC be quiet|to make compiler happy) \*/$::g;' drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.c was manually tweaked to avoid pathological white-space. No outstanding warnings were found building allmodconfig with GCC 9.3.0 for x86_64, i386, arm64, arm, powerpc, powerpc64le, s390x, mips, sparc64, alpha, and m68k. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-glider@google.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@mail.gmail.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@mail.gmail.com/ [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/ Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # drivers/infiniband and mlx4/mlx5 Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> # IB Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> # wireless drivers Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> # erofs Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 3f649ab728cda8038259d8f14492fe400fbab911 upstream.

Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1]
(or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings
(e.g. "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized,
either simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes.

In preparation for removing[2] the[3] macro[4], remove all remaining
needless uses with the following script:

git grep '\buninitialized_var\b' | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u | \
	xargs perl -pi -e \
		's/\buninitialized_var\(([^\)]+)\)/\1/g;
		 s:\s*/\* (GCC be quiet|to make compiler happy) \*/$::g;'

drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.c was manually tweaked to avoid
pathological white-space.

No outstanding warnings were found building allmodconfig with GCC 9.3.0
for x86_64, i386, arm64, arm, powerpc, powerpc64le, s390x, mips, sparc64,
alpha, and m68k.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-glider@google.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@mail.gmail.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@mail.gmail.com/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/

Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # drivers/infiniband and mlx4/mlx5
Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> # IB
Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> # wireless drivers
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> # erofs
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
locking/lockdep: Avoid RCU-induced noinstr fail 2021-11-17T08:48:28+00:00 Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org 2021-06-24T09:41:10+00:00 a82f379378ab867fb91dc6abf160de4214cdb34a [ Upstream commit ce0b9c805dd66d5e49fd53ec5415ae398f4c56e6 ] vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: look_up_lock_class()+0xc7: call to rcu_read_lock_any_held() leaves .noinstr.text section Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210624095148.311980536@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit ce0b9c805dd66d5e49fd53ec5415ae398f4c56e6 ]

vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: look_up_lock_class()+0xc7: call to rcu_read_lock_any_held() leaves .noinstr.text section

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210624095148.311980536@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
lockding/lockdep: Avoid to find wrong lock dep path in check_irq_usage() 2021-07-14T14:53:15+00:00 Boqun Feng boqun.feng@gmail.com 2021-06-18T17:01:09+00:00 2ef6cd6e486551250506251fdc7370c004a884f3 [ Upstream commit 7b1f8c6179769af6ffa055e1169610b51d71edd5 ] In the step #3 of check_irq_usage(), we seach backwards to find a lock whose usage conflicts the usage of @target_entry1 on safe/unsafe. However, we should only keep the irq-unsafe usage of @target_entry1 into consideration, because it could be a case where a lock is hardirq-unsafe but soft-safe, and in check_irq_usage() we find it because its hardirq-unsafe could result into a hardirq-safe-unsafe deadlock, but currently since we don't filter out the other usage bits, so we may find a lock dependency path softirq-unsafe -> softirq-safe, which in fact doesn't cause a deadlock. And this may cause misleading lockdep splats. Fix this by only keeping LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ_ALL bits when we try the backwards search. Reported-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618170110.3699115-4-boqun.feng@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 7b1f8c6179769af6ffa055e1169610b51d71edd5 ]

In the step #3 of check_irq_usage(), we seach backwards to find a lock
whose usage conflicts the usage of @target_entry1 on safe/unsafe.
However, we should only keep the irq-unsafe usage of @target_entry1 into
consideration, because it could be a case where a lock is hardirq-unsafe
but soft-safe, and in check_irq_usage() we find it because its
hardirq-unsafe could result into a hardirq-safe-unsafe deadlock, but
currently since we don't filter out the other usage bits, so we may find
a lock dependency path softirq-unsafe -> softirq-safe, which in fact
doesn't cause a deadlock. And this may cause misleading lockdep splats.

Fix this by only keeping LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ_ALL bits when we try the
backwards search.

Reported-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618170110.3699115-4-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
locking/lockdep: Fix the dep path printing for backwards BFS 2021-07-14T14:53:15+00:00 Boqun Feng boqun.feng@gmail.com 2021-06-18T17:01:07+00:00 1b45a85262bf6954400e0e3a5011881389d51f1c [ Upstream commit 69c7a5fb2482636f525f016c8333fdb9111ecb9d ] We use the same code to print backwards lock dependency path as the forwards lock dependency path, and this could result into incorrect printing because for a backwards lock_list ->trace is not the call trace where the lock of ->class is acquired. Fix this by introducing a separate function on printing the backwards dependency path. Also add a few comments about the printing while we are at it. Reported-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618170110.3699115-2-boqun.feng@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 69c7a5fb2482636f525f016c8333fdb9111ecb9d ]

We use the same code to print backwards lock dependency path as the
forwards lock dependency path, and this could result into incorrect
printing because for a backwards lock_list ->trace is not the call trace
where the lock of ->class is acquired.

Fix this by introducing a separate function on printing the backwards
dependency path. Also add a few comments about the printing while we are
at it.

Reported-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618170110.3699115-2-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
lockdep: Add a missing initialization hint to the "INFO: Trying to register non-static key" message 2021-04-21T10:56:13+00:00 Tetsuo Handa penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp 2021-03-21T06:49:13+00:00 68bd0d8ab19ecefeb591baa4d8c3fe3f9852792f [ Upstream commit 3a85969e9d912d5dd85362ee37b5f81266e00e77 ] Since this message is printed when dynamically allocated spinlocks (e.g. kzalloc()) are used without initialization (e.g. spin_lock_init()), suggest to developers to check whether initialization functions for objects were called, before making developers wonder what annotation is missing. [ mingo: Minor tweaks to the message. ] Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210321064913.4619-1-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 3a85969e9d912d5dd85362ee37b5f81266e00e77 ]

Since this message is printed when dynamically allocated spinlocks (e.g.
kzalloc()) are used without initialization (e.g. spin_lock_init()),
suggest to developers to check whether initialization functions for objects
were called, before making developers wonder what annotation is missing.

[ mingo: Minor tweaks to the message. ]

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210321064913.4619-1-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
locking/lockdep: Decrement IRQ context counters when removing lock chain 2020-10-01T11:17:33+00:00 Waiman Long longman@redhat.com 2020-02-06T15:24:03+00:00 ef6eb812132156239cf2bfdd6f756edd779fdcaf [ Upstream commit b3b9c187dc2544923a601733a85352b9ddaba9b3 ] There are currently three counters to track the IRQ context of a lock chain - nr_hardirq_chains, nr_softirq_chains and nr_process_chains. They are incremented when a new lock chain is added, but they are not decremented when a lock chain is removed. That causes some of the statistic counts reported by /proc/lockdep_stats to be incorrect. IRQ Fix that by decrementing the right counter when a lock chain is removed. Since inc_chains() no longer accesses hardirq_context and softirq_context directly, it is moved out from the CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS conditional compilation block. Fixes: a0b0fd53e1e6 ("locking/lockdep: Free lock classes that are no longer in use") Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200206152408.24165-2-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit b3b9c187dc2544923a601733a85352b9ddaba9b3 ]

There are currently three counters to track the IRQ context of a lock
chain - nr_hardirq_chains, nr_softirq_chains and nr_process_chains.
They are incremented when a new lock chain is added, but they are
not decremented when a lock chain is removed. That causes some of the
statistic counts reported by /proc/lockdep_stats to be incorrect.
IRQ
Fix that by decrementing the right counter when a lock chain is removed.

Since inc_chains() no longer accesses hardirq_context and softirq_context
directly, it is moved out from the CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS conditional
compilation block.

Fixes: a0b0fd53e1e6 ("locking/lockdep: Free lock classes that are no longer in use")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200206152408.24165-2-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>