linux-stable.git/kernel/events, branch v5.2.9

perf/core: Fix creating kernel counters for PMUs that override event->cpu

2019-08-16T08:11:07+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4ce54af8b33d3e21ca935fc1b89b58cbba956051 ]

Some hardware PMU drivers will override perf_event.cpu inside their
event_init callback. This causes a lockdep splat when initialized through
the kernel API:

 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 250 at kernel/events/core.c:2917 ctx_sched_out+0x78/0x208
 pc : ctx_sched_out+0x78/0x208
 Call trace:
  ctx_sched_out+0x78/0x208
  __perf_install_in_context+0x160/0x248
  remote_function+0x58/0x68
  generic_exec_single+0x100/0x180
  smp_call_function_single+0x174/0x1b8
  perf_install_in_context+0x178/0x188
  perf_event_create_kernel_counter+0x118/0x160

Fix this by calling perf_install_in_context with event->cpu, just like
perf_event_open

Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Frank Li 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Namhyung Kim 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Will Deacon 
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c4ebe0503623066896d7046def4d6b1e06e0eb2e.1563972056.git.leonard.crestez@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

perf/core: Fix race between close() and fork()

2019-07-28T06:27:22+00:00

commit 1cf8dfe8a661f0462925df943140e9f6d1ea5233 upstream.

Syzcaller reported the following Use-after-Free bug:

	close()						clone()

							  copy_process()
							    perf_event_init_task()
							      perf_event_init_context()
							        mutex_lock(parent_ctx->mutex)
								inherit_task_group()
								  inherit_group()
								    inherit_event()
								      mutex_lock(event->child_mutex)
								      // expose event on child list
								      list_add_tail()
								      mutex_unlock(event->child_mutex)
							        mutex_unlock(parent_ctx->mutex)

							    ...
							    goto bad_fork_*

							  bad_fork_cleanup_perf:
							    perf_event_free_task()

	  perf_release()
	    perf_event_release_kernel()
	      list_for_each_entry()
		mutex_lock(ctx->mutex)
		mutex_lock(event->child_mutex)
		// event is from the failing inherit
		// on the other CPU
		perf_remove_from_context()
		list_move()
		mutex_unlock(event->child_mutex)
		mutex_unlock(ctx->mutex)

							      mutex_lock(ctx->mutex)
							      list_for_each_entry_safe()
							        // event already stolen
							      mutex_unlock(ctx->mutex)

							    delayed_free_task()
							      free_task()

	     list_for_each_entry_safe()
	       list_del()
	       free_event()
	         _free_event()
		   // and so event->hw.target
		   // is the already freed failed clone()
		   if (event->hw.target)
		     put_task_struct(event->hw.target)
		       // WHOOPSIE, already quite dead

Which puts the lie to the the comment on perf_event_free_task():
'unexposed, unused context' not so much.

Which is a 'fun' confluence of fail; copy_process() doing an
unconditional free_task() and not respecting refcounts, and perf having
creative locking. In particular:

  82d94856fa22 ("perf/core: Fix lock inversion between perf,trace,cpuhp")

seems to have overlooked this 'fun' parade.

Solve it by using the fact that detached events still have a reference
count on their (previous) context. With this perf_event_free_task()
can detect when events have escaped and wait for their destruction.

Debugged-by: Alexander Shishkin 
Reported-by: syzbot+a24c397a29ad22d86c98@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Acked-by: Mark Rutland 
Cc: 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Stephane Eranian 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Vince Weaver 
Fixes: 82d94856fa22 ("perf/core: Fix lock inversion between perf,trace,cpuhp")
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/core: Fix exclusive events' grouping

2019-07-28T06:27:22+00:00

commit 8a58ddae23796c733c5dfbd717538d89d036c5bd upstream.

So far, we tried to disallow grouping exclusive events for the fear of
complications they would cause with moving between contexts. Specifically,
moving a software group to a hardware context would violate the exclusivity
rules if both groups contain matching exclusive events.

This attempt was, however, unsuccessful: the check that we have in the
perf_event_open() syscall is both wrong (looks at wrong PMU) and
insufficient (group leader may still be exclusive), as can be illustrated
by running:

  $ perf record -e '{intel_pt//,cycles}' uname
  $ perf record -e '{cycles,intel_pt//}' uname

ultimately successfully.

Furthermore, we are completely free to trigger the exclusivity violation
by:

   perf -e '{cycles,intel_pt//}' -e '{intel_pt//,instructions}'

even though the helpful perf record will not allow that, the ABI will.

The warning later in the perf_event_open() path will also not trigger, because
it's also wrong.

Fix all this by validating the original group before moving, getting rid
of broken safeguards and placing a useful one to perf_install_in_context().

Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: 
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Stephane Eranian 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Vince Weaver 
Cc: mathieu.poirier@linaro.org
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com
Fixes: bed5b25ad9c8a ("perf: Add a pmu capability for "exclusive" events")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190701110755.24646-1-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/x86: Disable extended registers for non-supported PMUs

2019-06-24T17:19:23+00:00

The perf fuzzer caused Skylake machine to crash:

[ 9680.085831] Call Trace:
[ 9680.088301]  
[ 9680.090363]  perf_output_sample_regs+0x43/0xa0
[ 9680.094928]  perf_output_sample+0x3aa/0x7a0
[ 9680.099181]  perf_event_output_forward+0x53/0x80
[ 9680.103917]  __perf_event_overflow+0x52/0xf0
[ 9680.108266]  ? perf_trace_run_bpf_submit+0xc0/0xc0
[ 9680.113108]  perf_swevent_hrtimer+0xe2/0x150
[ 9680.117475]  ? check_preempt_wakeup+0x181/0x230
[ 9680.122091]  ? check_preempt_curr+0x62/0x90
[ 9680.126361]  ? ttwu_do_wakeup+0x19/0x140
[ 9680.130355]  ? try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x460
[ 9680.134366]  ? reweight_entity+0x15b/0x1a0
[ 9680.138559]  ? __queue_work+0x103/0x3f0
[ 9680.142472]  ? update_dl_rq_load_avg+0x1cd/0x270
[ 9680.147194]  ? timerqueue_del+0x1e/0x40
[ 9680.151092]  ? __remove_hrtimer+0x35/0x70
[ 9680.155191]  __hrtimer_run_queues+0x100/0x280
[ 9680.159658]  hrtimer_interrupt+0x100/0x220
[ 9680.163835]  smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6a/0x140
[ 9680.168555]  apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20
[ 9680.172756]  

The XMM registers can only be collected by PEBS hardware events on the
platforms with PEBS baseline support, e.g. Icelake, not software/probe
events.

Add capabilities flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS to indicate the PMU
which support extended registers. For X86, the extended registers are
XMM registers.

Add has_extended_regs() to check if extended registers are applied.

The generic code define the mask of extended registers as 0 if arch
headers haven't overridden it.

Originally-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Reported-by: Vince Weaver 
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Stephane Eranian 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Fixes: 878068ea270e ("perf/x86: Support outputting XMM registers")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1559081314-9714-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

perf/ioctl: Add check for the sample_period value

2019-06-24T17:19:22+00:00

perf_event_open() limits the sample_period to 63 bits. See:

  0819b2e30ccb ("perf: Limit perf_event_attr::sample_period to 63 bits")

Make ioctl() consistent with it.

Also on PowerPC, negative sample_period could cause a recursive
PMIs leading to a hang (reported when running perf-fuzzer).

Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Stephane Eranian 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Vince Weaver 
Cc: acme@kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Fixes: 0819b2e30ccb ("perf: Limit perf_event_attr::sample_period to 63 bits")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604042953.914-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

perf/core: Fix perf_sample_regs_user() mm check

2019-06-17T10:11:58+00:00

perf_sample_regs_user() uses 'current->mm' to test for the presence of
userspace, but this is insufficient, consider use_mm().

A better test is: '!(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)', exec() clears
PF_KTHREAD after it sets the new ->mm but before it drops to userspace
for the first time.

Possibly obsoletes: bf05fc25f268 ("powerpc/perf: Fix oops when kthread execs user process")

Reported-by: Ravi Bangoria 
Reported-by: Young Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Acked-by: Will Deacon 
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Michael Ellerman 
Cc: Naveen N. Rao 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Stephane Eranian 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Fixes: 4018994f3d87 ("perf: Add ability to attach user level registers dump to sample")
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

perf/ring-buffer: Use regular variables for nesting

2019-05-24T07:00:11+00:00

While the IRQ/NMI will nest, the nest-count will be invariant over the
actual exception, since it will decrement equal to increment.

This means we can -- carefully -- use a regular variable since the
typical LOAD-STORE race doesn't exist (similar to preempt_count).

This optimizes the ring-buffer for all LOAD-STORE architectures, since
they need to use atomic ops to implement local_t.

Suggested-by: Alexander Shishkin 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Stephane Eranian 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Vince Weaver 
Cc: acme@kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com
Cc: namhyung@kernel.org
Cc: yabinc@google.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190517115418.481392777@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

perf/ring-buffer: Always use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() for rb->user_page data

2019-05-24T07:00:11+00:00

We must use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() on rb->user_page data such that
concurrent usage will see whole values. A few key sites were missing
this.

Suggested-by: Yabin Cui 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Stephane Eranian 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Vince Weaver 
Cc: acme@kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com
Cc: namhyung@kernel.org
Fixes: 7b732a750477 ("perf_counter: new output ABI - part 1")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190517115418.394192145@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

perf/ring_buffer: Add ordering to rb->nest increment

2019-05-24T07:00:10+00:00

Similar to how decrementing rb->next too early can cause data_head to
(temporarily) be observed to go backward, so too can this happen when
we increment too late.

This barrier() ensures the rb->head load happens after the increment,
both the one in the 'goto again' path, as the one from
perf_output_get_handle() -- albeit very unlikely to matter for the
latter.

Suggested-by: Yabin Cui 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Stephane Eranian 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Vince Weaver 
Cc: acme@kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com
Cc: namhyung@kernel.org
Fixes: ef60777c9abd ("perf: Optimize the perf_output() path by removing IRQ-disables")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190517115418.309516009@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

perf/ring_buffer: Fix exposing a temporarily decreased data_head

2019-05-24T07:00:10+00:00

In perf_output_put_handle(), an IRQ/NMI can happen in below location and
write records to the same ring buffer:

	...
	local_dec_and_test(&rb->nest)
	...                          <-- an IRQ/NMI can happen here
	rb->user_page->data_head = head;
	...

In this case, a value A is written to data_head in the IRQ, then a value
B is written to data_head after the IRQ. And A > B. As a result,
data_head is temporarily decreased from A to B. And a reader may see
data_head < data_tail if it read the buffer frequently enough, which
creates unexpected behaviors.

This can be fixed by moving dec(&rb->nest) to after updating data_head,
which prevents the IRQ/NMI above from updating data_head.

[ Split up by peterz. ]

Signed-off-by: Yabin Cui 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Namhyung Kim 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Stephane Eranian 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Vince Weaver 
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com
Fixes: ef60777c9abd ("perf: Optimize the perf_output() path by removing IRQ-disables")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190517115418.224478157@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar