linux-stable.git/kernel/bpf, branch v6.8.7

bpf: support deferring bpf_link dealloc to after RCU grace period

2024-04-10T14:38:23+00:00

commit 1a80dbcb2dbaf6e4c216e62e30fa7d3daa8001ce upstream.

BPF link for some program types is passed as a "context" which can be
used by those BPF programs to look up additional information. E.g., for
multi-kprobes and multi-uprobes, link is used to fetch BPF cookie values.

Because of this runtime dependency, when bpf_link refcnt drops to zero
there could still be active BPF programs running accessing link data.

This patch adds generic support to defer bpf_link dealloc callback to
after RCU GP, if requested. This is done by exposing two different
deallocation callbacks, one synchronous and one deferred. If deferred
one is provided, bpf_link_free() will schedule dealloc_deferred()
callback to happen after RCU GP.

BPF is using two flavors of RCU: "classic" non-sleepable one and RCU
tasks trace one. The latter is used when sleepable BPF programs are
used. bpf_link_free() accommodates that by checking underlying BPF
program's sleepable flag, and goes either through normal RCU GP only for
non-sleepable, or through RCU tasks trace GP *and* then normal RCU GP
(taking into account rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp() optimization), if BPF
program is sleepable.

We use this for multi-kprobe and multi-uprobe links, which dereference
link during program run. We also preventively switch raw_tp link to use
deferred dealloc callback, as upcoming changes in bpf-next tree expose
raw_tp link data (specifically, cookie value) to BPF program at runtime
as well.

Fixes: 0dcac2725406 ("bpf: Add multi kprobe link")
Fixes: 89ae89f53d20 ("bpf: Add multi uprobe link")
Reported-by: syzbot+981935d9485a560bfbcb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+2cb5a6c573e98db598cc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+62d8b26793e8a2bd0516@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328052426.3042617-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

kbuild: make -Woverride-init warnings more consistent

2024-04-10T14:38:00+00:00

[ Upstream commit c40845e3195d074b34f8f8e400e28c9403a06588 ]

The -Woverride-init warn about code that may be intentional or not,
but the inintentional ones tend to be real bugs, so there is a bit of
disagreement on whether this warning option should be enabled by default
and we have multiple settings in scripts/Makefile.extrawarn as well as
individual subsystems.

Older versions of clang only supported -Wno-initializer-overrides with
the same meaning as gcc's -Woverride-init, though all supported versions
now work with both. Because of this difference, an earlier cleanup of
mine accidentally turned the clang warning off for W=1 builds and only
left it on for W=2, while it's still enabled for gcc with W=1.

There is also one driver that only turns the warning off for newer
versions of gcc but not other compilers, and some but not all the
Makefiles still use a cc-disable-warning conditional that is no
longer needed with supported compilers here.

Address all of the above by removing the special cases for clang
and always turning the warning off unconditionally where it got
in the way, using the syntax that is supported by both compilers.

Fixes: 2cd3271b7a31 ("kbuild: avoid duplicate warning options")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann 
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz 
Acked-by: Jani Nikula 
Acked-by: Andrew Jeffery 
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula 
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij 
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Protect against int overflow for stack access size

2024-04-10T14:37:58+00:00

[ Upstream commit ecc6a2101840177e57c925c102d2d29f260d37c8 ]

This patch re-introduces protection against the size of access to stack
memory being negative; the access size can appear negative as a result
of overflowing its signed int representation. This should not actually
happen, as there are other protections along the way, but we should
protect against it anyway. One code path was missing such protections
(fixed in the previous patch in the series), causing out-of-bounds array
accesses in check_stack_range_initialized(). This patch causes the
verification of a program with such a non-sensical access size to fail.

This check used to exist in a more indirect way, but was inadvertendly
removed in a833a17aeac7.

Fixes: a833a17aeac7 ("bpf: Fix verification of indirect var-off stack access")
Reported-by: syzbot+33f4297b5f927648741a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+aafd0513053a1cbf52ef@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQLORV5PT0iTAhRER+iLBTkByCYNBYyvBSgjN1T31K+gOw@mail.gmail.com/
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240327024245.318299-3-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: report RCU QS in cpumap kthread

2024-03-26T22:17:38+00:00

[ Upstream commit 00bf63122459e87193ee7f1bc6161c83a525569f ]

When there are heavy load, cpumap kernel threads can be busy polling
packets from redirect queues and block out RCU tasks from reaching
quiescent states. It is insufficient to just call cond_resched() in such
context. Periodically raise a consolidated RCU QS before cond_resched
fixes the problem.

Fixes: 6710e1126934 ("bpf: introduce new bpf cpu map type BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP")
Reviewed-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer 
Signed-off-by: Yan Zhai 
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney 
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c17b9f1517e19d813da3ede5ed33ee18496bb5d8.1710877680.git.yan@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: hardcode BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE to 2MB * num_possible_nodes()

2024-03-26T22:16:57+00:00

[ Upstream commit d6170e4aaf86424c24ce06e355b4573daa891b17 ]

On some architectures like ARM64, PMD_SIZE can be really large in some
configurations. Like with CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y the PMD_SIZE is
512MB.

Use 2MB * num_possible_nodes() as the size for allocations done through
the prog pack allocator. On most architectures, PMD_SIZE will be equal
to 2MB in case of 4KB pages and will be greater than 2MB for bigger page
sizes.

Fixes: ea2babac63d4 ("bpf: Simplify bpf_prog_pack_[size|mask]")
Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" 
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/7e216c88-77ee-47b8-becc-a0f780868d3c@sirena.org.uk/
Reported-by: kernel test robot 
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403092219.dhgcuz2G-lkp@intel.com/
Suggested-by: Song Liu 
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan 
Message-ID: <20240311122722.86232-1-puranjay12@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Fix stackmap overflow check on 32-bit arches

2024-03-26T22:16:55+00:00

[ Upstream commit 7a4b21250bf79eef26543d35bd390448646c536b ]

The stackmap code relies on roundup_pow_of_two() to compute the number
of hash buckets, and contains an overflow check by checking if the
resulting value is 0. However, on 32-bit arches, the roundup code itself
can overflow by doing a 32-bit left-shift of an unsigned long value,
which is undefined behaviour, so it is not guaranteed to truncate
neatly. This was triggered by syzbot on the DEVMAP_HASH type, which
contains the same check, copied from the hashtab code.

The commit in the fixes tag actually attempted to fix this, but the fix
did not account for the UB, so the fix only works on CPUs where an
overflow does result in a neat truncation to zero, which is not
guaranteed. Checking the value before rounding does not have this
problem.

Fixes: 6183f4d3a0a2 ("bpf: Check for integer overflow when using roundup_pow_of_two()")
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 
Reviewed-by: Bui Quang Minh 
Message-ID: <20240307120340.99577-4-toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Fix hashtab overflow check on 32-bit arches

2024-03-26T22:16:55+00:00

[ Upstream commit 6787d916c2cf9850c97a0a3f73e08c43e7d973b1 ]

The hashtab code relies on roundup_pow_of_two() to compute the number of
hash buckets, and contains an overflow check by checking if the
resulting value is 0. However, on 32-bit arches, the roundup code itself
can overflow by doing a 32-bit left-shift of an unsigned long value,
which is undefined behaviour, so it is not guaranteed to truncate
neatly. This was triggered by syzbot on the DEVMAP_HASH type, which
contains the same check, copied from the hashtab code. So apply the same
fix to hashtab, by moving the overflow check to before the roundup.

Fixes: daaf427c6ab3 ("bpf: fix arraymap NULL deref and missing overflow and zero size checks")
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 
Message-ID: <20240307120340.99577-3-toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Fix DEVMAP_HASH overflow check on 32-bit arches

2024-03-26T22:16:55+00:00

[ Upstream commit 281d464a34f540de166cee74b723e97ac2515ec3 ]

The devmap code allocates a number hash buckets equal to the next power
of two of the max_entries value provided when creating the map. When
rounding up to the next power of two, the 32-bit variable storing the
number of buckets can overflow, and the code checks for overflow by
checking if the truncated 32-bit value is equal to 0. However, on 32-bit
arches the rounding up itself can overflow mid-way through, because it
ends up doing a left-shift of 32 bits on an unsigned long value. If the
size of an unsigned long is four bytes, this is undefined behaviour, so
there is no guarantee that we'll end up with a nice and tidy 0-value at
the end.

Syzbot managed to turn this into a crash on arm32 by creating a
DEVMAP_HASH with max_entries > 0x80000000 and then trying to update it.
Fix this by moving the overflow check to before the rounding up
operation.

Fixes: 6f9d451ab1a3 ("xdp: Add devmap_hash map type for looking up devices by hashed index")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/000000000000ed666a0611af6818@google.com
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+8cd36f6b65f3cafd400a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 
Message-ID: <20240307120340.99577-2-toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Mark bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}() helpers with notrace correctly

2024-03-26T22:16:43+00:00

[ Upstream commit 178c54666f9c4d2f49f2ea661d0c11b52f0ed190 ]

Currently tracing is supposed not to allow for bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}()
helper calls. This is to prevent deadlock for the following cases:
  - there is a prog (prog-A) calling bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}().
  - there is a tracing program (prog-B), e.g., fentry, attached
    to bpf_spin_lock() and/or bpf_spin_unlock().
  - prog-B calls bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}().
For such a case, when prog-A calls bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}(),
a deadlock will happen.

The related source codes are below in kernel/bpf/helpers.c:
  notrace BPF_CALL_1(bpf_spin_lock, struct bpf_spin_lock *, lock)
  notrace BPF_CALL_1(bpf_spin_unlock, struct bpf_spin_lock *, lock)
notrace is supposed to prevent fentry prog from attaching to
bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}().

But actually this is not the case and fentry prog can successfully
attached to bpf_spin_lock(). Siddharth Chintamaneni reported
the issue in [1]. The following is the macro definition for
above BPF_CALL_1:
  #define BPF_CALL_x(x, name, ...)                                               \
        static __always_inline                                                 \
        u64 ____##name(__BPF_MAP(x, __BPF_DECL_ARGS, __BPF_V, __VA_ARGS__));   \
        typedef u64 (*btf_##name)(__BPF_MAP(x, __BPF_DECL_ARGS, __BPF_V, __VA_ARGS__)); \
        u64 name(__BPF_REG(x, __BPF_DECL_REGS, __BPF_N, __VA_ARGS__));         \
        u64 name(__BPF_REG(x, __BPF_DECL_REGS, __BPF_N, __VA_ARGS__))          \
        {                                                                      \
                return ((btf_##name)____##name)(__BPF_MAP(x,__BPF_CAST,__BPF_N,__VA_ARGS__));\
        }                                                                      \
        static __always_inline                                                 \
        u64 ____##name(__BPF_MAP(x, __BPF_DECL_ARGS, __BPF_V, __VA_ARGS__))

  #define BPF_CALL_1(name, ...)   BPF_CALL_x(1, name, __VA_ARGS__)

The notrace attribute is actually applied to the static always_inline function
____bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}(). The actual callback function
bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}() is not marked with notrace, hence
allowing fentry prog to attach to two helpers, and this
may cause the above mentioned deadlock. Siddharth Chintamaneni
actually has a reproducer in [2].

To fix the issue, a new macro NOTRACE_BPF_CALL_1 is introduced which
will add notrace attribute to the original function instead of
the hidden always_inline function and this fixed the problem.

  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAE5sdEigPnoGrzN8WU7Tx-h-iFuMZgW06qp0KHWtpvoXxf1OAQ@mail.gmail.com/
  [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAE5sdEg6yUc_Jz50AnUXEEUh6O73yQ1Z6NV2srJnef0ZrQkZew@mail.gmail.com/

Fixes: d83525ca62cf ("bpf: introduce bpf_spin_lock")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song 
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240207070102.335167-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: don't emit warnings intended for global subprogs for static subprogs

2024-03-26T22:16:38+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1eb986746a67952df86eb2c50a36450ef103d01b ]

When btf_prepare_func_args() was generalized to handle both static and
global subprogs, a few warnings/errors that are meant only for global
subprog cases started to be emitted for static subprogs, where they are
sort of expected and irrelavant.

Stop polutting verifier logs with irrelevant scary-looking messages.

Fixes: e26080d0da87 ("bpf: prepare btf_prepare_func_args() for handling static subprogs")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240202190529.2374377-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin