linux-stable.git/kernel/bpf, branch v6.0.2 Linux kernel stable tree bpf: Fix resetting logic for unreferenced kptrs 2022-10-12T07:39:04+00:00 Jules Irenge jbi.octave@gmail.com 2022-09-07T15:24:20+00:00 390ba6a7755d6db79e8000d5501096c24f3b8bfd commit 9fad7fe5b29803584c7f17a2abe6c2936fec6828 upstream. Sparse reported a warning at bpf_map_free_kptrs() "warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer" During the process of fixing this warning, it was discovered that the current code erroneously writes to the pointer variable instead of deferencing and writing to the actual kptr. Hence, Sparse tool accidentally helped to uncover this problem. Fix this by doing WRITE_ONCE(*p, 0) instead of WRITE_ONCE(p, 0). Note that the effect of this bug is that unreferenced kptrs will not be cleared during check_and_free_fields. It is not a problem if the clearing is not done during map_free stage, as there is nothing to free for them. Fixes: 14a324f6a67e ("bpf: Wire up freeing of referenced kptr") Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Yxi3pJaK6UDjVJSy@playground Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 9fad7fe5b29803584c7f17a2abe6c2936fec6828 upstream.

Sparse reported a warning at bpf_map_free_kptrs()
"warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer"
During the process of fixing this warning, it was discovered that the current
code erroneously writes to the pointer variable instead of deferencing and
writing to the actual kptr. Hence, Sparse tool accidentally helped to uncover
this problem. Fix this by doing WRITE_ONCE(*p, 0) instead of WRITE_ONCE(p, 0).

Note that the effect of this bug is that unreferenced kptrs will not be cleared
during check_and_free_fields. It is not a problem if the clearing is not done
during map_free stage, as there is nothing to free for them.

Fixes: 14a324f6a67e ("bpf: Wire up freeing of referenced kptr")
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Yxi3pJaK6UDjVJSy@playground
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Gate dynptr API behind CAP_BPF 2022-10-12T07:39:04+00:00 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi memxor@gmail.com 2022-09-21T14:35:50+00:00 50fe01fa7640bc216bb1a47754a1f799c20eff8e commit 8addbfc7b308d591f8a5f2f6bb24d08d9d79dfbb upstream. This has been enabled for unprivileged programs for only one kernel release, hence the expected annoyances due to this move are low. Users using ringbuf can stick to non-dynptr APIs. The actual use cases dynptr is meant to serve may not make sense in unprivileged BPF programs. Hence, gate these helpers behind CAP_BPF and limit use to privileged BPF programs. Fixes: 263ae152e962 ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_from_mem for local dynptrs") Fixes: bc34dee65a65 ("bpf: Dynptr support for ring buffers") Fixes: 13bbbfbea759 ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_read and bpf_dynptr_write") Fixes: 34d4ef5775f7 ("bpf: Add dynptr data slices") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921143550.30247-1-memxor@gmail.com Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 8addbfc7b308d591f8a5f2f6bb24d08d9d79dfbb upstream.

This has been enabled for unprivileged programs for only one kernel
release, hence the expected annoyances due to this move are low. Users
using ringbuf can stick to non-dynptr APIs. The actual use cases dynptr
is meant to serve may not make sense in unprivileged BPF programs.

Hence, gate these helpers behind CAP_BPF and limit use to privileged
BPF programs.

Fixes: 263ae152e962 ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_from_mem for local dynptrs")
Fixes: bc34dee65a65 ("bpf: Dynptr support for ring buffers")
Fixes: 13bbbfbea759 ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_read and bpf_dynptr_write")
Fixes: 34d4ef5775f7 ("bpf: Add dynptr data slices")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921143550.30247-1-memxor@gmail.com
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf 2022-08-26T11:19:09+00:00 David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net 2022-08-26T11:19:09+00:00 2e085ec0e2d7afa14bcfbcd4c41240f5d3372bfe Daniel borkmann says: ==================== The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree. We've added 11 non-merge commits during the last 14 day(s) which contain a total of 13 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Fix BPF verifier's precision tracking around BPF ring buffer, from Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi. 2) Fix regression in tunnel key infra when passing FLOWI_FLAG_ANYSRC, from Eyal Birger. 3) Fix insufficient permissions for bpf_sys_bpf() helper, from YiFei Zhu. 4) Fix splat from hitting BUG when purging effective cgroup programs, from Pu Lehui. 5) Fix range tracking for array poke descriptors, from Daniel Borkmann. 6) Fix corrupted packets for XDP_SHARED_UMEM in aligned mode, from Magnus Karlsson. 7) Fix NULL pointer splat in BPF sockmap sk_msg_recvmsg(), from Liu Jian. 8) Add READ_ONCE() to bpf_jit_limit when reading from sysctl, from Kuniyuki Iwashima. 9) Add BPF selftest lru_bug check to s390x deny list, from Daniel Müller. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
Daniel borkmann says:

====================
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree.

We've added 11 non-merge commits during the last 14 day(s) which contain
a total of 13 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-).

The main changes are:

1) Fix BPF verifier's precision tracking around BPF ring buffer, from Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi.

2) Fix regression in tunnel key infra when passing FLOWI_FLAG_ANYSRC, from Eyal Birger.

3) Fix insufficient permissions for bpf_sys_bpf() helper, from YiFei Zhu.

4) Fix splat from hitting BUG when purging effective cgroup programs, from Pu Lehui.

5) Fix range tracking for array poke descriptors, from Daniel Borkmann.

6) Fix corrupted packets for XDP_SHARED_UMEM in aligned mode, from Magnus Karlsson.

7) Fix NULL pointer splat in BPF sockmap sk_msg_recvmsg(), from Liu Jian.

8) Add READ_ONCE() to bpf_jit_limit when reading from sysctl, from Kuniyuki Iwashima.

9) Add BPF selftest lru_bug check to s390x deny list, from Daniel Müller.
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
bpf: Don't use tnum_range on array range checking for poke descriptors 2022-08-25T21:58:30+00:00 Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net 2022-08-25T21:26:47+00:00 a657182a5c5150cdfacb6640aad1d2712571a409 Hsin-Wei reported a KASAN splat triggered by their BPF runtime fuzzer which is based on a customized syzkaller: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888004e90b58 by task syz-executor.0/1489 CPU: 1 PID: 1489 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.19.0 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xc9 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1f/0x1f0 ? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 kasan_report.cold+0xeb/0x197 ? kvmalloc_node+0x170/0x200 ? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 ? arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher+0xd0/0xd0 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x43/0x70 bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x3e8/0x640 ? bpf_obj_name_cpy+0x149/0x1b0 bpf_prog_load+0x102f/0x2220 ? __bpf_prog_put.constprop.0+0x220/0x220 ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 ? __might_fault+0xd6/0x180 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? lock_is_held_type+0xa6/0x120 ? __might_fault+0x147/0x180 __sys_bpf+0x137b/0x6070 ? bpf_perf_link_attach+0x530/0x530 ? new_sync_read+0x600/0x600 ? __fget_files+0x255/0x450 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? fput+0x30/0x1a0 ? ksys_write+0x1a8/0x260 __x64_sys_bpf+0x7a/0xc0 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x21/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f917c4e2c2d The problem here is that a range of tnum_range(0, map->max_entries - 1) has limited ability to represent the concrete tight range with the tnum as the set of resulting states from value + mask can result in a superset of the actual intended range, and as such a tnum_in(range, reg->var_off) check may yield true when it shouldn't, for example tnum_range(0, 2) would result in 00XX -> v = 0000, m = 0011 such that the intended set of {0, 1, 2} is here represented by a less precise superset of {0, 1, 2, 3}. As the register is known const scalar, really just use the concrete reg->var_off.value for the upper index check. Fixes: d2e4c1e6c294 ("bpf: Constant map key tracking for prog array pokes") Reported-by: Hsin-Wei Hung <hsinweih@uci.edu> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/984b37f9fdf7ac36831d2137415a4a915744c1b6.1661462653.git.daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
Hsin-Wei reported a KASAN splat triggered by their BPF runtime fuzzer which
is based on a customized syzkaller:

  BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0
  Read of size 8 at addr ffff888004e90b58 by task syz-executor.0/1489
  CPU: 1 PID: 1489 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.19.0 #1
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
  1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xc9
   print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1f/0x1f0
   ? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0
   kasan_report.cold+0xeb/0x197
   ? kvmalloc_node+0x170/0x200
   ? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0
   bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0
   ? arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher+0xd0/0xd0
   ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x43/0x70
   bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x3e8/0x640
   ? bpf_obj_name_cpy+0x149/0x1b0
   bpf_prog_load+0x102f/0x2220
   ? __bpf_prog_put.constprop.0+0x220/0x220
   ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110
   ? __might_fault+0xd6/0x180
   ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0
   ? lock_is_held_type+0xa6/0x120
   ? __might_fault+0x147/0x180
   __sys_bpf+0x137b/0x6070
   ? bpf_perf_link_attach+0x530/0x530
   ? new_sync_read+0x600/0x600
   ? __fget_files+0x255/0x450
   ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0
   ? fput+0x30/0x1a0
   ? ksys_write+0x1a8/0x260
   __x64_sys_bpf+0x7a/0xc0
   ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x21/0x70
   do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
  RIP: 0033:0x7f917c4e2c2d

The problem here is that a range of tnum_range(0, map->max_entries - 1) has
limited ability to represent the concrete tight range with the tnum as the
set of resulting states from value + mask can result in a superset of the
actual intended range, and as such a tnum_in(range, reg->var_off) check may
yield true when it shouldn't, for example tnum_range(0, 2) would result in
00XX -> v = 0000, m = 0011 such that the intended set of {0, 1, 2} is here
represented by a less precise superset of {0, 1, 2, 3}. As the register is
known const scalar, really just use the concrete reg->var_off.value for the
upper index check.

Fixes: d2e4c1e6c294 ("bpf: Constant map key tracking for prog array pokes")
Reported-by: Hsin-Wei Hung <hsinweih@uci.edu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/984b37f9fdf7ac36831d2137415a4a915744c1b6.1661462653.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf: Do mark_chain_precision for ARG_CONST_ALLOC_SIZE_OR_ZERO 2022-08-25T19:07:45+00:00 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi memxor@gmail.com 2022-08-23T18:52:59+00:00 2fc31465c5373b5ca4edf2e5238558cb62902311 Precision markers need to be propagated whenever we have an ARG_CONST_* style argument, as the verifier cannot consider imprecise scalars to be equivalent for the purposes of states_equal check when such arguments refine the return value (in this case, set mem_size for PTR_TO_MEM). The resultant mem_size for the R0 is derived from the constant value, and if the verifier incorrectly prunes states considering them equivalent where such arguments exist (by seeing that both registers have reg->precise as false in regsafe), we can end up with invalid programs passing the verifier which can do access beyond what should have been the correct mem_size in that explored state. To show a concrete example of the problem: 0000000000000000 <prog>: 0: r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 80) 1: r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 76) 2: r3 = r1 3: r3 += 4 4: if r3 > r2 goto +18 <LBB5_5> 5: w2 = 0 6: *(u32 *)(r1 + 0) = r2 7: r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0) 8: r2 = 1 9: if w1 == 0 goto +1 <LBB5_3> 10: r2 = -1 0000000000000058 <LBB5_3>: 11: r1 = 0 ll 13: r3 = 0 14: call bpf_ringbuf_reserve 15: if r0 == 0 goto +7 <LBB5_5> 16: r1 = r0 17: r1 += 16777215 18: w2 = 0 19: *(u8 *)(r1 + 0) = r2 20: r1 = r0 21: r2 = 0 22: call bpf_ringbuf_submit 00000000000000b8 <LBB5_5>: 23: w0 = 0 24: exit For the first case, the single line execution's exploration will prune the search at insn 14 for the branch insn 9's second leg as it will be verified first using r2 = -1 (UINT_MAX), while as w1 at insn 9 will always be 0 so at runtime we don't get error for being greater than UINT_MAX/4 from bpf_ringbuf_reserve. The verifier during regsafe just sees reg->precise as false for both r2 registers in both states, hence considers them equal for purposes of states_equal. If we propagated precise markers using the backtracking support, we would use the precise marking to then ensure that old r2 (UINT_MAX) was within the new r2 (1) and this would never be true, so the verification would rightfully fail. The end result is that the out of bounds access at instruction 19 would be permitted without this fix. Note that reg->precise is always set to true when user does not have CAP_BPF (or when subprog count is greater than 1 (i.e. use of any static or global functions)), hence this is only a problem when precision marks need to be explicitly propagated (i.e. privileged users with CAP_BPF). A simplified test case has been included in the next patch to prevent future regressions. Fixes: 457f44363a88 ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220823185300.406-2-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
Precision markers need to be propagated whenever we have an ARG_CONST_*
style argument, as the verifier cannot consider imprecise scalars to be
equivalent for the purposes of states_equal check when such arguments
refine the return value (in this case, set mem_size for PTR_TO_MEM). The
resultant mem_size for the R0 is derived from the constant value, and if
the verifier incorrectly prunes states considering them equivalent where
such arguments exist (by seeing that both registers have reg->precise as
false in regsafe), we can end up with invalid programs passing the
verifier which can do access beyond what should have been the correct
mem_size in that explored state.

To show a concrete example of the problem:

0000000000000000 <prog>:
       0:       r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 80)
       1:       r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 76)
       2:       r3 = r1
       3:       r3 += 4
       4:       if r3 > r2 goto +18 <LBB5_5>
       5:       w2 = 0
       6:       *(u32 *)(r1 + 0) = r2
       7:       r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0)
       8:       r2 = 1
       9:       if w1 == 0 goto +1 <LBB5_3>
      10:       r2 = -1

0000000000000058 <LBB5_3>:
      11:       r1 = 0 ll
      13:       r3 = 0
      14:       call bpf_ringbuf_reserve
      15:       if r0 == 0 goto +7 <LBB5_5>
      16:       r1 = r0
      17:       r1 += 16777215
      18:       w2 = 0
      19:       *(u8 *)(r1 + 0) = r2
      20:       r1 = r0
      21:       r2 = 0
      22:       call bpf_ringbuf_submit

00000000000000b8 <LBB5_5>:
      23:       w0 = 0
      24:       exit

For the first case, the single line execution's exploration will prune
the search at insn 14 for the branch insn 9's second leg as it will be
verified first using r2 = -1 (UINT_MAX), while as w1 at insn 9 will
always be 0 so at runtime we don't get error for being greater than
UINT_MAX/4 from bpf_ringbuf_reserve. The verifier during regsafe just
sees reg->precise as false for both r2 registers in both states, hence
considers them equal for purposes of states_equal.

If we propagated precise markers using the backtracking support, we
would use the precise marking to then ensure that old r2 (UINT_MAX) was
within the new r2 (1) and this would never be true, so the verification
would rightfully fail.

The end result is that the out of bounds access at instruction 19 would
be permitted without this fix.

Note that reg->precise is always set to true when user does not have
CAP_BPF (or when subprog count is greater than 1 (i.e. use of any static
or global functions)), hence this is only a problem when precision marks
need to be explicitly propagated (i.e. privileged users with CAP_BPF).

A simplified test case has been included in the next patch to prevent
future regressions.

Fixes: 457f44363a88 ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220823185300.406-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf: Fix a data-race around bpf_jit_limit. 2022-08-23T22:27:14+00:00 Kuniyuki Iwashima kuniyu@amazon.com 2022-08-23T21:58:04+00:00 0947ae1121083d363d522ff7518ee72b55bd8d29 While reading bpf_jit_limit, it can be changed concurrently via sysctl, WRITE_ONCE() in __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax(). The size of bpf_jit_limit is long, so we need to add a paired READ_ONCE() to avoid load-tearing. Fixes: ede95a63b5e8 ("bpf: add bpf_jit_limit knob to restrict unpriv allocations") Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220823215804.2177-1-kuniyu@amazon.com 
While reading bpf_jit_limit, it can be changed concurrently via sysctl,
WRITE_ONCE() in __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax(). The size of bpf_jit_limit
is long, so we need to add a paired READ_ONCE() to avoid load-tearing.

Fixes: ede95a63b5e8 ("bpf: add bpf_jit_limit knob to restrict unpriv allocations")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220823215804.2177-1-kuniyu@amazon.com
bpf, cgroup: Fix kernel BUG in purge_effective_progs 2022-08-18T21:27:33+00:00 Pu Lehui pulehui@huawei.com 2022-08-13T13:40:30+00:00 7d6620f107bae6ed687ff07668e8e8f855487aa9 Syzkaller reported a triggered kernel BUG as follows: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at kernel/bpf/cgroup.c:925! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 194 Comm: detach Not tainted 5.19.0-14184-g69dac8e431af #8 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__cgroup_bpf_detach+0x1f2/0x2a0 Code: 00 e8 92 60 30 00 84 c0 75 d8 4c 89 e0 31 f6 85 f6 74 19 42 f6 84 28 48 05 00 00 02 75 0e 48 8b 80 c0 00 00 00 48 85 c0 75 e5 <0f> 0b 48 8b 0c5 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000055bdb0 EFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888100ec0800 RCX: ffffc900000f1000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff888100ec4578 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffff888100ec0800 R09: 0000000000000040 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff888100ec4000 R13: 000000000000000d R14: ffffc90000199000 R15: ffff888100effb00 FS: 00007f68213d2b80(0000) GS:ffff88813bc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055f74a0e5850 CR3: 0000000102836000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 Call Trace: <TASK> cgroup_bpf_prog_detach+0xcc/0x100 __sys_bpf+0x2273/0x2a00 __x64_sys_bpf+0x17/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f68214dbcb9 Code: 08 44 89 e0 5b 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff8 RSP: 002b:00007ffeb487db68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000000b RCX: 00007f68214dbcb9 RDX: 0000000000000090 RSI: 00007ffeb487db70 RDI: 0000000000000009 RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000012 R09: 0000000b00000003 R10: 00007ffeb487db70 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffeb487dc20 R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 000055f74a1011b0 </TASK> Modules linked in: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Repetition steps: For the following cgroup tree, root | cg1 | cg2 1. attach prog2 to cg2, and then attach prog1 to cg1, both bpf progs attach type is NONE or OVERRIDE. 2. write 1 to /proc/thread-self/fail-nth for failslab. 3. detach prog1 for cg1, and then kernel BUG occur. Failslab injection will cause kmalloc fail and fall back to purge_effective_progs. The problem is that cg2 have attached another prog, so when go through cg2 layer, iteration will add pos to 1, and subsequent operations will be skipped by the following condition, and cg will meet NULL in the end. `if (pos && !(cg->bpf.flags[atype] & BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI))` The NULL cg means no link or prog match, this is as expected, and it's not a bug. So here just skip the no match situation. Fixes: 4c46091ee985 ("bpf: Fix KASAN use-after-free Read in compute_effective_progs") Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220813134030.1972696-1-pulehui@huawei.com 
Syzkaller reported a triggered kernel BUG as follows:

  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at kernel/bpf/cgroup.c:925!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
  CPU: 1 PID: 194 Comm: detach Not tainted 5.19.0-14184-g69dac8e431af #8
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
  rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  RIP: 0010:__cgroup_bpf_detach+0x1f2/0x2a0
  Code: 00 e8 92 60 30 00 84 c0 75 d8 4c 89 e0 31 f6 85 f6 74 19 42 f6 84
  28 48 05 00 00 02 75 0e 48 8b 80 c0 00 00 00 48 85 c0 75 e5 <0f> 0b 48
  8b 0c5
  RSP: 0018:ffffc9000055bdb0 EFLAGS: 00000246
  RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888100ec0800 RCX: ffffc900000f1000
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff888100ec4578
  RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffff888100ec0800 R09: 0000000000000040
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff888100ec4000
  R13: 000000000000000d R14: ffffc90000199000 R15: ffff888100effb00
  FS:  00007f68213d2b80(0000) GS:ffff88813bc80000(0000)
  knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 000055f74a0e5850 CR3: 0000000102836000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   cgroup_bpf_prog_detach+0xcc/0x100
   __sys_bpf+0x2273/0x2a00
   __x64_sys_bpf+0x17/0x20
   do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
  RIP: 0033:0x7f68214dbcb9
  Code: 08 44 89 e0 5b 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89
  f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01
  f0 ff8
  RSP: 002b:00007ffeb487db68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000000b RCX: 00007f68214dbcb9
  RDX: 0000000000000090 RSI: 00007ffeb487db70 RDI: 0000000000000009
  RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000012 R09: 0000000b00000003
  R10: 00007ffeb487db70 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffeb487dc20
  R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 000055f74a1011b0
   </TASK>
  Modules linked in:
  ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Repetition steps:

For the following cgroup tree,

  root
   |
  cg1
   |
  cg2

  1. attach prog2 to cg2, and then attach prog1 to cg1, both bpf progs
     attach type is NONE or OVERRIDE.
  2. write 1 to /proc/thread-self/fail-nth for failslab.
  3. detach prog1 for cg1, and then kernel BUG occur.

Failslab injection will cause kmalloc fail and fall back to
purge_effective_progs. The problem is that cg2 have attached another prog,
so when go through cg2 layer, iteration will add pos to 1, and subsequent
operations will be skipped by the following condition, and cg will meet
NULL in the end.

  `if (pos && !(cg->bpf.flags[atype] & BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI))`

The NULL cg means no link or prog match, this is as expected, and it's not
a bug. So here just skip the no match situation.

Fixes: 4c46091ee985 ("bpf: Fix KASAN use-after-free Read in compute_effective_progs")
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220813134030.1972696-1-pulehui@huawei.com
net: Fix suspicious RCU usage in bpf_sk_reuseport_detach() 2022-08-17T23:42:59+00:00 David Howells dhowells@redhat.com 2022-08-16T09:34:40+00:00 fc4aaf9fb3c99bcb326d52f9d320ed5680bd1cee bpf_sk_reuseport_detach() calls __rcu_dereference_sk_user_data_with_flags() to obtain the value of sk->sk_user_data, but that function is only usable if the RCU read lock is held, and neither that function nor any of its callers hold it. Fix this by adding a new helper, __locked_read_sk_user_data_with_flags() that checks to see if sk->sk_callback_lock() is held and use that here instead. Alternatively, making __rcu_dereference_sk_user_data_with_flags() use rcu_dereference_checked() might suffice. Without this, the following warning can be occasionally observed: ============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.0.0-rc1-build2+ #563 Not tainted ----------------------------- include/net/sock.h:592 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 5 locks held by locktest/29873: #0: ffff88812734b550 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#9){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __sock_release+0x77/0x121 #1: ffff88812f5621b0 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: tcp_close+0x1c/0x70 #2: ffff88810312f5c8 (&h->lhash2[i].lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: inet_unhash+0x76/0x1c0 #3: ffffffff83768bb8 (reuseport_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: reuseport_detach_sock+0x18/0xdd #4: ffff88812f562438 (clock-AF_INET){++..}-{2:2}, at: bpf_sk_reuseport_detach+0x24/0xa4 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 29873 Comm: locktest Not tainted 6.0.0-rc1-build2+ #563 Hardware name: ASUS All Series/H97-PLUS, BIOS 2306 10/09/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x4c/0x5f bpf_sk_reuseport_detach+0x6d/0xa4 reuseport_detach_sock+0x75/0xdd inet_unhash+0xa5/0x1c0 tcp_set_state+0x169/0x20f ? lockdep_sock_is_held+0x3a/0x3a ? __lock_release.isra.0+0x13e/0x220 ? reacquire_held_locks+0x1bb/0x1bb ? hlock_class+0x31/0x96 ? mark_lock+0x9e/0x1af __tcp_close+0x50/0x4b6 tcp_close+0x28/0x70 inet_release+0x8e/0xa7 __sock_release+0x95/0x121 sock_close+0x14/0x17 __fput+0x20f/0x36a task_work_run+0xa3/0xcc exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x9c/0x14d syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x18/0x44 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Fixes: cf8c1e967224 ("net: refactor bpf_sk_reuseport_detach()") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166064248071.3502205.10036394558814861778.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> 
bpf_sk_reuseport_detach() calls __rcu_dereference_sk_user_data_with_flags()
to obtain the value of sk->sk_user_data, but that function is only usable
if the RCU read lock is held, and neither that function nor any of its
callers hold it.

Fix this by adding a new helper, __locked_read_sk_user_data_with_flags()
that checks to see if sk->sk_callback_lock() is held and use that here
instead.

Alternatively, making __rcu_dereference_sk_user_data_with_flags() use
rcu_dereference_checked() might suffice.

Without this, the following warning can be occasionally observed:

=============================
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
6.0.0-rc1-build2+ #563 Not tainted
-----------------------------
include/net/sock.h:592 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
5 locks held by locktest/29873:
 #0: ffff88812734b550 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#9){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __sock_release+0x77/0x121
 #1: ffff88812f5621b0 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: tcp_close+0x1c/0x70
 #2: ffff88810312f5c8 (&h->lhash2[i].lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: inet_unhash+0x76/0x1c0
 #3: ffffffff83768bb8 (reuseport_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: reuseport_detach_sock+0x18/0xdd
 #4: ffff88812f562438 (clock-AF_INET){++..}-{2:2}, at: bpf_sk_reuseport_detach+0x24/0xa4

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 29873 Comm: locktest Not tainted 6.0.0-rc1-build2+ #563
Hardware name: ASUS All Series/H97-PLUS, BIOS 2306 10/09/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x4c/0x5f
 bpf_sk_reuseport_detach+0x6d/0xa4
 reuseport_detach_sock+0x75/0xdd
 inet_unhash+0xa5/0x1c0
 tcp_set_state+0x169/0x20f
 ? lockdep_sock_is_held+0x3a/0x3a
 ? __lock_release.isra.0+0x13e/0x220
 ? reacquire_held_locks+0x1bb/0x1bb
 ? hlock_class+0x31/0x96
 ? mark_lock+0x9e/0x1af
 __tcp_close+0x50/0x4b6
 tcp_close+0x28/0x70
 inet_release+0x8e/0xa7
 __sock_release+0x95/0x121
 sock_close+0x14/0x17
 __fput+0x20f/0x36a
 task_work_run+0xa3/0xcc
 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x9c/0x14d
 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x18/0x44
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Fixes: cf8c1e967224 ("net: refactor bpf_sk_reuseport_detach()")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166064248071.3502205.10036394558814861778.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
bpf: Restrict bpf_sys_bpf to CAP_PERFMON 2022-08-17T22:27:49+00:00 YiFei Zhu zhuyifei@google.com 2022-08-16T20:55:16+00:00 14b20b784f59bdd95f6f1cfb112c9818bcec4d84 The verifier cannot perform sufficient validation of any pointers passed into bpf_attr and treats them as integers rather than pointers. The helper will then read from arbitrary pointers passed into it. Restrict the helper to CAP_PERFMON since the security model in BPF of arbitrary kernel read is CAP_BPF + CAP_PERFMON. Fixes: af2ac3e13e45 ("bpf: Prepare bpf syscall to be used from kernel and user space.") Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220816205517.682470-1-zhuyifei@google.com 
The verifier cannot perform sufficient validation of any pointers passed
into bpf_attr and treats them as integers rather than pointers. The helper
will then read from arbitrary pointers passed into it. Restrict the helper
to CAP_PERFMON since the security model in BPF of arbitrary kernel read is
CAP_BPF + CAP_PERFMON.

Fixes: af2ac3e13e45 ("bpf: Prepare bpf syscall to be used from kernel and user space.")
Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220816205517.682470-1-zhuyifei@google.com
bpf: Shut up kern_sys_bpf warning. 2022-08-11T06:58:13+00:00 Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org 2022-08-11T06:52:28+00:00 4e4588f1c4d2e67c993208f0550ef3fae33abce4 Shut up this warning: kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5089:5: warning: no previous prototype for function 'kern_sys_bpf' [-Wmissing-prototypes] int kern_sys_bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size) Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
Shut up this warning:
kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5089:5: warning: no previous prototype for function 'kern_sys_bpf' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
int kern_sys_bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size)

Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>