linux-stable.git/kernel/bpf, branch v5.4.97 Linux kernel stable tree bpf, cgroup: Fix problematic bounds check 2021-02-10T08:25:27+00:00 Loris Reiff loris.reiff@liblor.ch 2021-01-22T16:42:32+00:00 02531b5549ebf39d6f3c0602f083901211149355 [ Upstream commit f4a2da755a7e1f5d845c52aee71336cee289935a ] Since ctx.optlen is signed, a larger value than max_value could be passed, as it is later on used as unsigned, which causes a WARN_ON_ONCE in the copy_to_user. Fixes: 0d01da6afc54 ("bpf: implement getsockopt and setsockopt hooks") Signed-off-by: Loris Reiff <loris.reiff@liblor.ch> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210122164232.61770-2-loris.reiff@liblor.ch Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit f4a2da755a7e1f5d845c52aee71336cee289935a ]

Since ctx.optlen is signed, a larger value than max_value could be
passed, as it is later on used as unsigned, which causes a WARN_ON_ONCE
in the copy_to_user.

Fixes: 0d01da6afc54 ("bpf: implement getsockopt and setsockopt hooks")
Signed-off-by: Loris Reiff <loris.reiff@liblor.ch>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210122164232.61770-2-loris.reiff@liblor.ch
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf, cgroup: Fix optlen WARN_ON_ONCE toctou 2021-02-10T08:25:27+00:00 Loris Reiff loris.reiff@liblor.ch 2021-01-22T16:42:31+00:00 9146fffc5d2a3ec49906daf18d2e983d995b3521 [ Upstream commit bb8b81e396f7afbe7c50d789e2107512274d2a35 ] A toctou issue in `__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt` can trigger a WARN_ON_ONCE in a check of `copy_from_user`. `*optlen` is checked to be non-negative in the individual getsockopt functions beforehand. Changing `*optlen` in a race to a negative value will result in a `copy_from_user(ctx.optval, optval, ctx.optlen)` with `ctx.optlen` being a negative integer. Fixes: 0d01da6afc54 ("bpf: implement getsockopt and setsockopt hooks") Signed-off-by: Loris Reiff <loris.reiff@liblor.ch> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210122164232.61770-1-loris.reiff@liblor.ch Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit bb8b81e396f7afbe7c50d789e2107512274d2a35 ]

A toctou issue in `__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt` can trigger a
WARN_ON_ONCE in a check of `copy_from_user`.

`*optlen` is checked to be non-negative in the individual getsockopt
functions beforehand. Changing `*optlen` in a race to a negative value
will result in a `copy_from_user(ctx.optval, optval, ctx.optlen)` with
`ctx.optlen` being a negative integer.

Fixes: 0d01da6afc54 ("bpf: implement getsockopt and setsockopt hooks")
Signed-off-by: Loris Reiff <loris.reiff@liblor.ch>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210122164232.61770-1-loris.reiff@liblor.ch
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Fix helper bpf_map_peek_elem_proto pointing to wrong callback 2021-01-23T14:57:56+00:00 Mircea Cirjaliu mcirjaliu@bitdefender.com 2021-01-19T20:53:18+00:00 bd4793843c8505ff7037ad159386603a59a59ca1 commit 301a33d51880619d0c5a581b5a48d3a5248fa84b upstream. I assume this was obtained by copy/paste. Point it to bpf_map_peek_elem() instead of bpf_map_pop_elem(). In practice it may have been less likely hit when under JIT given shielded via 84430d4232c3 ("bpf, verifier: avoid retpoline for map push/pop/peek operation"). Fixes: f1a2e44a3aec ("bpf: add queue and stack maps") Signed-off-by: Mircea Cirjaliu <mcirjaliu@bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Mauricio Vasquez <mauriciovasquezbernal@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/AM7PR02MB6082663DFDCCE8DA7A6DD6B1BBA30@AM7PR02MB6082.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 301a33d51880619d0c5a581b5a48d3a5248fa84b upstream.

I assume this was obtained by copy/paste. Point it to bpf_map_peek_elem()
instead of bpf_map_pop_elem(). In practice it may have been less likely
hit when under JIT given shielded via 84430d4232c3 ("bpf, verifier: avoid
retpoline for map push/pop/peek operation").

Fixes: f1a2e44a3aec ("bpf: add queue and stack maps")
Signed-off-by: Mircea Cirjaliu <mcirjaliu@bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Mauricio Vasquez <mauriciovasquezbernal@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/AM7PR02MB6082663DFDCCE8DA7A6DD6B1BBA30@AM7PR02MB6082.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Don't leak memory in bpf getsockopt when optlen == 0 2021-01-23T14:57:56+00:00 Stanislav Fomichev sdf@google.com 2021-01-12T16:28:29+00:00 79ce12cfa56a5b5a256b1c92e98a8a3a3425d131 commit 4be34f3d0731b38a1b24566b37fbb39500aaf3a2 upstream. optlen == 0 indicates that the kernel should ignore BPF buffer and use the original one from the user. We, however, forget to free the temporary buffer that we've allocated for BPF. Fixes: d8fe449a9c51 ("bpf: Don't return EINVAL from {get,set}sockopt when optlen > PAGE_SIZE") Reported-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210112162829.775079-1-sdf@google.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 4be34f3d0731b38a1b24566b37fbb39500aaf3a2 upstream.

optlen == 0 indicates that the kernel should ignore BPF buffer
and use the original one from the user. We, however, forget
to free the temporary buffer that we've allocated for BPF.

Fixes: d8fe449a9c51 ("bpf: Don't return EINVAL from {get,set}sockopt when optlen > PAGE_SIZE")
Reported-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210112162829.775079-1-sdf@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Zero-fill re-used per-cpu map element 2020-11-18T18:20:26+00:00 David Verbeiren david.verbeiren@tessares.net 2020-11-04T11:23:32+00:00 c602ad2b52dcbca5af08e5137bd5575c039b52e3 [ Upstream commit d3bec0138bfbe58606fc1d6f57a4cdc1a20218db ] Zero-fill element values for all other cpus than current, just as when not using prealloc. This is the only way the bpf program can ensure known initial values for all cpus ('onallcpus' cannot be set when coming from the bpf program). The scenario is: bpf program inserts some elements in a per-cpu map, then deletes some (or userspace does). When later adding new elements using bpf_map_update_elem(), the bpf program can only set the value of the new elements for the current cpu. When prealloc is enabled, previously deleted elements are re-used. Without the fix, values for other cpus remain whatever they were when the re-used entry was previously freed. A selftest is added to validate correct operation in above scenario as well as in case of LRU per-cpu map element re-use. Fixes: 6c9059817432 ("bpf: pre-allocate hash map elements") Signed-off-by: David Verbeiren <david.verbeiren@tessares.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201104112332.15191-1-david.verbeiren@tessares.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit d3bec0138bfbe58606fc1d6f57a4cdc1a20218db ]

Zero-fill element values for all other cpus than current, just as
when not using prealloc. This is the only way the bpf program can
ensure known initial values for all cpus ('onallcpus' cannot be
set when coming from the bpf program).

The scenario is: bpf program inserts some elements in a per-cpu
map, then deletes some (or userspace does). When later adding
new elements using bpf_map_update_elem(), the bpf program can
only set the value of the new elements for the current cpu.
When prealloc is enabled, previously deleted elements are re-used.
Without the fix, values for other cpus remain whatever they were
when the re-used entry was previously freed.

A selftest is added to validate correct operation in above
scenario as well as in case of LRU per-cpu map element re-use.

Fixes: 6c9059817432 ("bpf: pre-allocate hash map elements")
Signed-off-by: David Verbeiren <david.verbeiren@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201104112332.15191-1-david.verbeiren@tessares.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Don't rely on GCC __attribute__((optimize)) to disable GCSE 2020-11-18T18:20:26+00:00 Ard Biesheuvel ardb@kernel.org 2020-10-28T17:15:05+00:00 d2e61c5202e63fd591023525965a7379ba493385 [ Upstream commit 080b6f40763565f65ebb9540219c71ce885cf568 ] Commit 3193c0836 ("bpf: Disable GCC -fgcse optimization for ___bpf_prog_run()") introduced a __no_fgcse macro that expands to a function scope __attribute__((optimize("-fno-gcse"))), to disable a GCC specific optimization that was causing trouble on x86 builds, and was not expected to have any positive effect in the first place. However, as the GCC manual documents, __attribute__((optimize)) is not for production use, and results in all other optimization options to be forgotten for the function in question. This can cause all kinds of trouble, but in one particular reported case, it causes -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables to be disregarded, resulting in .eh_frame info to be emitted for the function. This reverts commit 3193c0836, and instead, it disables the -fgcse optimization for the entire source file, but only when building for X86 using GCC with CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON disabled. Note that the original commit states that CONFIG_RETPOLINE=n triggers the issue, whereas CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y performs better without the optimization, so it is kept disabled in both cases. Fixes: 3193c0836f20 ("bpf: Disable GCC -fgcse optimization for ___bpf_prog_run()") Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMuHMdUg0WJHEcq6to0-eODpXPOywLot6UD2=GFHpzoj_hCoBQ@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201028171506.15682-2-ardb@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 080b6f40763565f65ebb9540219c71ce885cf568 ]

Commit 3193c0836 ("bpf: Disable GCC -fgcse optimization for
___bpf_prog_run()") introduced a __no_fgcse macro that expands to a
function scope __attribute__((optimize("-fno-gcse"))), to disable a
GCC specific optimization that was causing trouble on x86 builds, and
was not expected to have any positive effect in the first place.

However, as the GCC manual documents, __attribute__((optimize))
is not for production use, and results in all other optimization
options to be forgotten for the function in question. This can
cause all kinds of trouble, but in one particular reported case,
it causes -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables to be disregarded,
resulting in .eh_frame info to be emitted for the function.

This reverts commit 3193c0836, and instead, it disables the -fgcse
optimization for the entire source file, but only when building for
X86 using GCC with CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON disabled. Note that the
original commit states that CONFIG_RETPOLINE=n triggers the issue,
whereas CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y performs better without the optimization,
so it is kept disabled in both cases.

Fixes: 3193c0836f20 ("bpf: Disable GCC -fgcse optimization for ___bpf_prog_run()")
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMuHMdUg0WJHEcq6to0-eODpXPOywLot6UD2=GFHpzoj_hCoBQ@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201028171506.15682-2-ardb@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Permit map_ptr arithmetic with opcode add and offset 0 2020-11-05T10:43:17+00:00 Yonghong Song yhs@fb.com 2020-09-08T17:57:02+00:00 4801ffdd6962ad70f32aa6e7d8fc9cfc4789ab81 [ Upstream commit 7c6967326267bd5c0dded0a99541357d70dd11ac ] Commit 41c48f3a98231 ("bpf: Support access to bpf map fields") added support to access map fields with CORE support. For example, struct bpf_map { __u32 max_entries; } __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); struct bpf_array { struct bpf_map map; __u32 elem_size; } __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); struct { __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY); __uint(max_entries, 4); __type(key, __u32); __type(value, __u32); } m_array SEC(".maps"); SEC("cgroup_skb/egress") int cg_skb(void *ctx) { struct bpf_array *array = (struct bpf_array *)&m_array; /* .. array->map.max_entries .. */ } In kernel, bpf_htab has similar structure, struct bpf_htab { struct bpf_map map; ... } In the above cg_skb(), to access array->map.max_entries, with CORE, the clang will generate two builtin's. base = &m_array; /* access array.map */ map_addr = __builtin_preserve_struct_access_info(base, 0, 0); /* access array.map.max_entries */ max_entries_addr = __builtin_preserve_struct_access_info(map_addr, 0, 0); max_entries = *max_entries_addr; In the current llvm, if two builtin's are in the same function or in the same function after inlining, the compiler is smart enough to chain them together and generates like below: base = &m_array; max_entries = *(base + reloc_offset); /* reloc_offset = 0 in this case */ and we are fine. But if we force no inlining for one of functions in test_map_ptr() selftest, e.g., check_default(), the above two __builtin_preserve_* will be in two different functions. In this case, we will have code like: func check_hash(): reloc_offset_map = 0; base = &m_array; map_base = base + reloc_offset_map; check_default(map_base, ...) func check_default(map_base, ...): max_entries = *(map_base + reloc_offset_max_entries); In kernel, map_ptr (CONST_PTR_TO_MAP) does not allow any arithmetic. The above "map_base = base + reloc_offset_map" will trigger a verifier failure. ; VERIFY(check_default(&hash->map, map)); 0: (18) r7 = 0xffffb4fe8018a004 2: (b4) w1 = 110 3: (63) *(u32 *)(r7 +0) = r1 R1_w=invP110 R7_w=map_value(id=0,off=4,ks=4,vs=8,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; VERIFY_TYPE(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, check_hash); 4: (18) r1 = 0xffffb4fe8018a000 6: (b4) w2 = 1 7: (63) *(u32 *)(r1 +0) = r2 R1_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=8,imm=0) R2_w=invP1 R7_w=map_value(id=0,off=4,ks=4,vs=8,imm=0) R10=fp0 8: (b7) r2 = 0 9: (18) r8 = 0xffff90bcb500c000 11: (18) r1 = 0xffff90bcb500c000 13: (0f) r1 += r2 R1 pointer arithmetic on map_ptr prohibited To fix the issue, let us permit map_ptr + 0 arithmetic which will result in exactly the same map_ptr. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200908175702.2463625-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 7c6967326267bd5c0dded0a99541357d70dd11ac ]

Commit 41c48f3a98231 ("bpf: Support access
to bpf map fields") added support to access map fields
with CORE support. For example,

            struct bpf_map {
                    __u32 max_entries;
            } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));

            struct bpf_array {
                    struct bpf_map map;
                    __u32 elem_size;
            } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));

            struct {
                    __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
                    __uint(max_entries, 4);
                    __type(key, __u32);
                    __type(value, __u32);
            } m_array SEC(".maps");

            SEC("cgroup_skb/egress")
            int cg_skb(void *ctx)
            {
                    struct bpf_array *array = (struct bpf_array *)&m_array;

                    /* .. array->map.max_entries .. */
            }

In kernel, bpf_htab has similar structure,

	    struct bpf_htab {
		    struct bpf_map map;
                    ...
            }

In the above cg_skb(), to access array->map.max_entries, with CORE, the clang will
generate two builtin's.
            base = &m_array;
            /* access array.map */
            map_addr = __builtin_preserve_struct_access_info(base, 0, 0);
            /* access array.map.max_entries */
            max_entries_addr = __builtin_preserve_struct_access_info(map_addr, 0, 0);
	    max_entries = *max_entries_addr;

In the current llvm, if two builtin's are in the same function or
in the same function after inlining, the compiler is smart enough to chain
them together and generates like below:
            base = &m_array;
            max_entries = *(base + reloc_offset); /* reloc_offset = 0 in this case */
and we are fine.

But if we force no inlining for one of functions in test_map_ptr() selftest, e.g.,
check_default(), the above two __builtin_preserve_* will be in two different
functions. In this case, we will have code like:
   func check_hash():
            reloc_offset_map = 0;
            base = &m_array;
            map_base = base + reloc_offset_map;
            check_default(map_base, ...)
   func check_default(map_base, ...):
            max_entries = *(map_base + reloc_offset_max_entries);

In kernel, map_ptr (CONST_PTR_TO_MAP) does not allow any arithmetic.
The above "map_base = base + reloc_offset_map" will trigger a verifier failure.
  ; VERIFY(check_default(&hash->map, map));
  0: (18) r7 = 0xffffb4fe8018a004
  2: (b4) w1 = 110
  3: (63) *(u32 *)(r7 +0) = r1
   R1_w=invP110 R7_w=map_value(id=0,off=4,ks=4,vs=8,imm=0) R10=fp0
  ; VERIFY_TYPE(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, check_hash);
  4: (18) r1 = 0xffffb4fe8018a000
  6: (b4) w2 = 1
  7: (63) *(u32 *)(r1 +0) = r2
   R1_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=8,imm=0) R2_w=invP1 R7_w=map_value(id=0,off=4,ks=4,vs=8,imm=0) R10=fp0
  8: (b7) r2 = 0
  9: (18) r8 = 0xffff90bcb500c000
  11: (18) r1 = 0xffff90bcb500c000
  13: (0f) r1 += r2
  R1 pointer arithmetic on map_ptr prohibited

To fix the issue, let us permit map_ptr + 0 arithmetic which will
result in exactly the same map_ptr.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200908175702.2463625-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Limit caller's stack depth 256 for subprogs with tailcalls 2020-10-29T08:58:06+00:00 Maciej Fijalkowski maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com 2020-09-16T21:10:07+00:00 3a8d86d8da1b992db9af553be7c6d62249b5df5e [ Upstream commit 7f6e4312e15a5c370e84eaa685879b6bdcc717e4 ] Protect against potential stack overflow that might happen when bpf2bpf calls get combined with tailcalls. Limit the caller's stack depth for such case down to 256 so that the worst case scenario would result in 8k stack size (32 which is tailcall limit * 256 = 8k). Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 7f6e4312e15a5c370e84eaa685879b6bdcc717e4 ]

Protect against potential stack overflow that might happen when bpf2bpf
calls get combined with tailcalls. Limit the caller's stack depth for
such case down to 256 so that the worst case scenario would result in 8k
stack size (32 which is tailcall limit * 256 = 8k).

Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Fix sysfs export of empty BTF section 2020-10-14T08:32:58+00:00 Tony Ambardar tony.ambardar@gmail.com 2020-09-20T05:01:33+00:00 67a57230b4bfb377cd479c9b32d1e2ab70bc96d1 commit e23bb04b0c938588eae41b7f4712b722290ed2b8 upstream. If BTF data is missing or removed from the ELF section it is still exported via sysfs as a zero-length file: root@OpenWrt:/# ls -l /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 18 02:59 /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux Moreover, reads from this file succeed and leak kernel data: root@OpenWrt:/# hexdump -C /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux|head -10 000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| * 000cc0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 83 b0 80 |................| 000cd0 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| 000ce0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 57 ac 6e 9d |............W.n.| 000cf0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| * 002650 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 |................| 002660 80 82 9a c4 80 85 97 80 81 a9 51 68 00 00 00 02 |..........Qh....| 002670 80 25 44 dc 80 85 97 80 81 a9 50 24 81 ab c4 60 |.%D.......P$...`| This situation was first observed with kernel 5.4.x, cross-compiled for a MIPS target system. Fix by adding a sanity-check for export of zero-length data sections. Fixes: 341dfcf8d78e ("btf: expose BTF info through sysfs") Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <Tony.Ambardar@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/b38db205a66238f70823039a8c531535864eaac5.1600417359.git.Tony.Ambardar@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit e23bb04b0c938588eae41b7f4712b722290ed2b8 upstream.

If BTF data is missing or removed from the ELF section it is still exported
via sysfs as a zero-length file:

  root@OpenWrt:/# ls -l /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux
  -r--r--r--    1 root    root    0 Jul 18 02:59 /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux

Moreover, reads from this file succeed and leak kernel data:

  root@OpenWrt:/# hexdump -C /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux|head -10
  000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
  *
  000cc0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 83 b0 80 |................|
  000cd0 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
  000ce0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 57 ac 6e 9d |............W.n.|
  000cf0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
  *
  002650 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 |................|
  002660 80 82 9a c4 80 85 97 80 81 a9 51 68 00 00 00 02 |..........Qh....|
  002670 80 25 44 dc 80 85 97 80 81 a9 50 24 81 ab c4 60 |.%D.......P$...`|

This situation was first observed with kernel 5.4.x, cross-compiled for a
MIPS target system. Fix by adding a sanity-check for export of zero-length
data sections.

Fixes: 341dfcf8d78e ("btf: expose BTF info through sysfs")
Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <Tony.Ambardar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/b38db205a66238f70823039a8c531535864eaac5.1600417359.git.Tony.Ambardar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Fix a rcu warning for bpffs map pretty-print 2020-10-01T11:18:19+00:00 Yonghong Song yhs@fb.com 2020-09-16T00:44:01+00:00 43cdb648e1da7b195eba564c5af5a2c320f77dce [ Upstream commit ce880cb825fcc22d4e39046a6c3a3a7f6603883d ] Running selftest ./btf_btf -p the kernel had the following warning: [ 51.528185] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1756 at kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:717 htab_map_get_next_key+0x2eb/0x300 [ 51.529217] Modules linked in: [ 51.529583] CPU: 3 PID: 1756 Comm: test_btf Not tainted 5.9.0-rc1+ #878 [ 51.530346] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.9.3-1.el7.centos 04/01/2014 [ 51.531410] RIP: 0010:htab_map_get_next_key+0x2eb/0x300 ... [ 51.542826] Call Trace: [ 51.543119] map_seq_next+0x53/0x80 [ 51.543528] seq_read+0x263/0x400 [ 51.543932] vfs_read+0xad/0x1c0 [ 51.544311] ksys_read+0x5f/0xe0 [ 51.544689] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [ 51.545116] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 The related source code in kernel/bpf/hashtab.c: 709 static int htab_map_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *next_key) 710 { 711 struct bpf_htab *htab = container_of(map, struct bpf_htab, map); 712 struct hlist_nulls_head *head; 713 struct htab_elem *l, *next_l; 714 u32 hash, key_size; 715 int i = 0; 716 717 WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held()); In kernel/bpf/inode.c, bpffs map pretty print calls map->ops->map_get_next_key() without holding a rcu_read_lock(), hence causing the above warning. To fix the issue, just surrounding map->ops->map_get_next_key() with rcu read lock. Fixes: a26ca7c982cb ("bpf: btf: Add pretty print support to the basic arraymap") Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200916004401.146277-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit ce880cb825fcc22d4e39046a6c3a3a7f6603883d ]

Running selftest
  ./btf_btf -p
the kernel had the following warning:
  [   51.528185] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1756 at kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:717 htab_map_get_next_key+0x2eb/0x300
  [   51.529217] Modules linked in:
  [   51.529583] CPU: 3 PID: 1756 Comm: test_btf Not tainted 5.9.0-rc1+ #878
  [   51.530346] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.9.3-1.el7.centos 04/01/2014
  [   51.531410] RIP: 0010:htab_map_get_next_key+0x2eb/0x300
  ...
  [   51.542826] Call Trace:
  [   51.543119]  map_seq_next+0x53/0x80
  [   51.543528]  seq_read+0x263/0x400
  [   51.543932]  vfs_read+0xad/0x1c0
  [   51.544311]  ksys_read+0x5f/0xe0
  [   51.544689]  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
  [   51.545116]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

The related source code in kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:
  709 static int htab_map_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *next_key)
  710 {
  711         struct bpf_htab *htab = container_of(map, struct bpf_htab, map);
  712         struct hlist_nulls_head *head;
  713         struct htab_elem *l, *next_l;
  714         u32 hash, key_size;
  715         int i = 0;
  716
  717         WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());

In kernel/bpf/inode.c, bpffs map pretty print calls map->ops->map_get_next_key()
without holding a rcu_read_lock(), hence causing the above warning.
To fix the issue, just surrounding map->ops->map_get_next_key() with rcu read lock.

Fixes: a26ca7c982cb ("bpf: btf: Add pretty print support to the basic arraymap")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200916004401.146277-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>