linux-stable.git/kernel/bpf, branch v5.4.232 Linux kernel stable tree bpf: Fix pointer-leak due to insufficient speculative store bypass mitigation 2023-02-06T06:52:36+00:00 Luis Gerhorst gerhorst@cs.fau.de 2023-01-09T15:05:46+00:00 81b3374944d201872cfcf82730a7860f8e7c31dd [ Upstream commit e4f4db47794c9f474b184ee1418f42e6a07412b6 ] To mitigate Spectre v4, 2039f26f3aca ("bpf: Fix leakage due to insufficient speculative store bypass mitigation") inserts lfence instructions after 1) initializing a stack slot and 2) spilling a pointer to the stack. However, this does not cover cases where a stack slot is first initialized with a pointer (subject to sanitization) but then overwritten with a scalar (not subject to sanitization because the slot was already initialized). In this case, the second write may be subject to speculative store bypass (SSB) creating a speculative pointer-as-scalar type confusion. This allows the program to subsequently leak the numerical pointer value using, for example, a branch-based cache side channel. To fix this, also sanitize scalars if they write a stack slot that previously contained a pointer. Assuming that pointer-spills are only generated by LLVM on register-pressure, the performance impact on most real-world BPF programs should be small. The following unprivileged BPF bytecode drafts a minimal exploit and the mitigation: [...] // r6 = 0 or 1 (skalar, unknown user input) // r7 = accessible ptr for side channel // r10 = frame pointer (fp), to be leaked // r9 = r10 # fp alias to encourage ssb *(u64 *)(r9 - 8) = r10 // fp[-8] = ptr, to be leaked // lfence added here because of pointer spill to stack. // // Ommitted: Dummy bpf_ringbuf_output() here to train alias predictor // for no r9-r10 dependency. // *(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r6 // fp[-8] = scalar, overwrites ptr // 2039f26f3aca: no lfence added because stack slot was not STACK_INVALID, // store may be subject to SSB // // fix: also add an lfence when the slot contained a ptr // r8 = *(u64 *)(r9 - 8) // r8 = architecturally a scalar, speculatively a ptr // // leak ptr using branch-based cache side channel: r8 &= 1 // choose bit to leak if r8 == 0 goto SLOW // no mispredict // architecturally dead code if input r6 is 0, // only executes speculatively iff ptr bit is 1 r8 = *(u64 *)(r7 + 0) # encode bit in cache (0: slow, 1: fast) SLOW: [...] After running this, the program can time the access to *(r7 + 0) to determine whether the chosen pointer bit was 0 or 1. Repeat this 64 times to recover the whole address on amd64. In summary, sanitization can only be skipped if one scalar is overwritten with another scalar. Scalar-confusion due to speculative store bypass can not lead to invalid accesses because the pointer bounds deducted during verification are enforced using branchless logic. See 979d63d50c0c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic") for details. Do not make the mitigation depend on !env->allow_{uninit_stack,ptr_leaks} because speculative leaks are likely unexpected if these were enabled. For example, leaking the address to a protected log file may be acceptable while disabling the mitigation might unintentionally leak the address into the cached-state of a map that is accessible to unprivileged processes. Fixes: 2039f26f3aca ("bpf: Fix leakage due to insufficient speculative store bypass mitigation") Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <gerhorst@cs.fau.de> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Henriette Hofmeier <henriette.hofmeier@rub.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/edc95bad-aada-9cfc-ffe2-fa9bb206583c@cs.fau.de Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230109150544.41465-1-gerhorst@cs.fau.de Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit e4f4db47794c9f474b184ee1418f42e6a07412b6 ]

To mitigate Spectre v4, 2039f26f3aca ("bpf: Fix leakage due to
insufficient speculative store bypass mitigation") inserts lfence
instructions after 1) initializing a stack slot and 2) spilling a
pointer to the stack.

However, this does not cover cases where a stack slot is first
initialized with a pointer (subject to sanitization) but then
overwritten with a scalar (not subject to sanitization because
the slot was already initialized). In this case, the second write
may be subject to speculative store bypass (SSB) creating a
speculative pointer-as-scalar type confusion. This allows the
program to subsequently leak the numerical pointer value using,
for example, a branch-based cache side channel.

To fix this, also sanitize scalars if they write a stack slot
that previously contained a pointer. Assuming that pointer-spills
are only generated by LLVM on register-pressure, the performance
impact on most real-world BPF programs should be small.

The following unprivileged BPF bytecode drafts a minimal exploit
and the mitigation:

  [...]
  // r6 = 0 or 1 (skalar, unknown user input)
  // r7 = accessible ptr for side channel
  // r10 = frame pointer (fp), to be leaked
  //
  r9 = r10 # fp alias to encourage ssb
  *(u64 *)(r9 - 8) = r10 // fp[-8] = ptr, to be leaked
  // lfence added here because of pointer spill to stack.
  //
  // Ommitted: Dummy bpf_ringbuf_output() here to train alias predictor
  // for no r9-r10 dependency.
  //
  *(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r6 // fp[-8] = scalar, overwrites ptr
  // 2039f26f3aca: no lfence added because stack slot was not STACK_INVALID,
  // store may be subject to SSB
  //
  // fix: also add an lfence when the slot contained a ptr
  //
  r8 = *(u64 *)(r9 - 8)
  // r8 = architecturally a scalar, speculatively a ptr
  //
  // leak ptr using branch-based cache side channel:
  r8 &= 1 // choose bit to leak
  if r8 == 0 goto SLOW // no mispredict
  // architecturally dead code if input r6 is 0,
  // only executes speculatively iff ptr bit is 1
  r8 = *(u64 *)(r7 + 0) # encode bit in cache (0: slow, 1: fast)
SLOW:
  [...]

After running this, the program can time the access to *(r7 + 0) to
determine whether the chosen pointer bit was 0 or 1. Repeat this 64
times to recover the whole address on amd64.

In summary, sanitization can only be skipped if one scalar is
overwritten with another scalar. Scalar-confusion due to speculative
store bypass can not lead to invalid accesses because the pointer
bounds deducted during verification are enforced using branchless
logic. See 979d63d50c0c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on
pointer arithmetic") for details.

Do not make the mitigation depend on !env->allow_{uninit_stack,ptr_leaks}
because speculative leaks are likely unexpected if these were enabled.
For example, leaking the address to a protected log file may be acceptable
while disabling the mitigation might unintentionally leak the address
into the cached-state of a map that is accessible to unprivileged
processes.

Fixes: 2039f26f3aca ("bpf: Fix leakage due to insufficient speculative store bypass mitigation")
Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <gerhorst@cs.fau.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Henriette Hofmeier <henriette.hofmeier@rub.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/edc95bad-aada-9cfc-ffe2-fa9bb206583c@cs.fau.de
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230109150544.41465-1-gerhorst@cs.fau.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Prevent decl_tag from being referenced in func_proto arg 2023-01-18T10:41:37+00:00 Stanislav Fomichev sdf@google.com 2022-11-23T03:54:22+00:00 89357aa97b521fca76e39d81e2b1ac5edb3d0b96 [ Upstream commit f17472d4599697d701aa239b4c475a506bccfd19 ] Syzkaller managed to hit another decl_tag issue: btf_func_proto_check kernel/bpf/btf.c:4506 [inline] btf_check_all_types kernel/bpf/btf.c:4734 [inline] btf_parse_type_sec+0x1175/0x1980 kernel/bpf/btf.c:4763 btf_parse kernel/bpf/btf.c:5042 [inline] btf_new_fd+0x65a/0xb00 kernel/bpf/btf.c:6709 bpf_btf_load+0x6f/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4342 __sys_bpf+0x50a/0x6c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5034 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5093 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5091 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5091 do_syscall_64+0x54/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:48 This seems similar to commit ea68376c8bed ("bpf: prevent decl_tag from being referenced in func_proto") but for the argument. Reported-by: syzbot+8dd0551dda6020944c5d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221123035422.872531-2-sdf@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit f17472d4599697d701aa239b4c475a506bccfd19 ]

Syzkaller managed to hit another decl_tag issue:

  btf_func_proto_check kernel/bpf/btf.c:4506 [inline]
  btf_check_all_types kernel/bpf/btf.c:4734 [inline]
  btf_parse_type_sec+0x1175/0x1980 kernel/bpf/btf.c:4763
  btf_parse kernel/bpf/btf.c:5042 [inline]
  btf_new_fd+0x65a/0xb00 kernel/bpf/btf.c:6709
  bpf_btf_load+0x6f/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4342
  __sys_bpf+0x50a/0x6c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5034
  __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5093 [inline]
  __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5091 [inline]
  __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5091
  do_syscall_64+0x54/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:48

This seems similar to commit ea68376c8bed ("bpf: prevent decl_tag from being
referenced in func_proto") but for the argument.

Reported-by: syzbot+8dd0551dda6020944c5d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221123035422.872531-2-sdf@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: propagate precision in ALU/ALU64 operations 2023-01-18T10:41:02+00:00 Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org 2022-11-04T16:36:44+00:00 d70fa0a6ce74c18cec191e6c9f93d81a13a92f69 [ Upstream commit a3b666bfa9c9edc05bca62a87abafe0936bd7f97 ] When processing ALU/ALU64 operations (apart from BPF_MOV, which is handled correctly already; and BPF_NEG and BPF_END are special and don't have source register), if destination register is already marked precise, this causes problem with potentially missing precision tracking for the source register. E.g., when we have r1 >>= r5 and r1 is marked precise, but r5 isn't, this will lead to r5 staying as imprecise. This is due to the precision backtracking logic stopping early when it sees r1 is already marked precise. If r1 wasn't precise, we'd keep backtracking and would add r5 to the set of registers that need to be marked precise. So there is a discrepancy here which can lead to invalid and incompatible states matched due to lack of precision marking on r5. If r1 wasn't precise, precision backtracking would correctly mark both r1 and r5 as precise. This is simple to fix, though. During the forward instruction simulation pass, for arithmetic operations of `scalar <op>= scalar` form (where <op> is ALU or ALU64 operations), if destination register is already precise, mark source register as precise. This applies only when both involved registers are SCALARs. `ptr += scalar` and `scalar += ptr` cases are already handled correctly. This does have (negative) effect on some selftest programs and few Cilium programs. ~/baseline-tmp-results.csv are veristat results with this patch, while ~/baseline-results.csv is without it. See post scriptum for instructions on how to make Cilium programs testable with veristat. Correctness has a price. $ ./veristat -C -e file,prog,insns,states ~/baseline-results.csv ~/baseline-tmp-results.csv | grep -v '+0' File Program Total insns (A) Total insns (B) Total insns (DIFF) Total states (A) Total states (B) Total states (DIFF) ----------------------- -------------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- bpf_cubic.bpf.linked1.o bpf_cubic_cong_avoid 997 1700 +703 (+70.51%) 62 90 +28 (+45.16%) test_l4lb.bpf.linked1.o balancer_ingress 4559 5469 +910 (+19.96%) 118 126 +8 (+6.78%) ----------------------- -------------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- $ ./veristat -C -e file,prog,verdict,insns,states ~/baseline-results-cilium.csv ~/baseline-tmp-results-cilium.csv | grep -v '+0' File Program Total insns (A) Total insns (B) Total insns (DIFF) Total states (A) Total states (B) Total states (DIFF) ------------- ------------------------------ --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- bpf_host.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 4448 5261 +813 (+18.28%) 234 247 +13 (+5.56%) bpf_host.o tail_nodeport_nat_ipv6_egress 3396 3446 +50 (+1.47%) 201 203 +2 (+1.00%) bpf_lxc.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 4448 5261 +813 (+18.28%) 234 247 +13 (+5.56%) bpf_overlay.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 4448 5261 +813 (+18.28%) 234 247 +13 (+5.56%) bpf_xdp.o tail_lb_ipv4 71736 73442 +1706 (+2.38%) 4295 4370 +75 (+1.75%) ------------- ------------------------------ --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- P.S. To make Cilium ([0]) programs libbpf-compatible and thus veristat-loadable, apply changes from topmost commit in [1], which does minimal changes to Cilium source code, mostly around SEC() annotations and BPF map definitions. [0] https://github.com/cilium/cilium/ [1] https://github.com/anakryiko/cilium/commits/libbpf-friendliness Fixes: b5dc0163d8fd ("bpf: precise scalar_value tracking") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221104163649.121784-2-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit a3b666bfa9c9edc05bca62a87abafe0936bd7f97 ]

When processing ALU/ALU64 operations (apart from BPF_MOV, which is
handled correctly already; and BPF_NEG and BPF_END are special and don't
have source register), if destination register is already marked
precise, this causes problem with potentially missing precision tracking
for the source register. E.g., when we have r1 >>= r5 and r1 is marked
precise, but r5 isn't, this will lead to r5 staying as imprecise. This
is due to the precision backtracking logic stopping early when it sees
r1 is already marked precise. If r1 wasn't precise, we'd keep
backtracking and would add r5 to the set of registers that need to be
marked precise. So there is a discrepancy here which can lead to invalid
and incompatible states matched due to lack of precision marking on r5.
If r1 wasn't precise, precision backtracking would correctly mark both
r1 and r5 as precise.

This is simple to fix, though. During the forward instruction simulation
pass, for arithmetic operations of `scalar <op>= scalar` form (where
<op> is ALU or ALU64 operations), if destination register is already
precise, mark source register as precise. This applies only when both
involved registers are SCALARs. `ptr += scalar` and `scalar += ptr`
cases are already handled correctly.

This does have (negative) effect on some selftest programs and few
Cilium programs.  ~/baseline-tmp-results.csv are veristat results with
this patch, while ~/baseline-results.csv is without it. See post
scriptum for instructions on how to make Cilium programs testable with
veristat. Correctness has a price.

$ ./veristat -C -e file,prog,insns,states ~/baseline-results.csv ~/baseline-tmp-results.csv | grep -v '+0'
File                     Program               Total insns (A)  Total insns (B)  Total insns (DIFF)  Total states (A)  Total states (B)  Total states (DIFF)
-----------------------  --------------------  ---------------  ---------------  ------------------  ----------------  ----------------  -------------------
bpf_cubic.bpf.linked1.o  bpf_cubic_cong_avoid              997             1700      +703 (+70.51%)                62                90        +28 (+45.16%)
test_l4lb.bpf.linked1.o  balancer_ingress                 4559             5469      +910 (+19.96%)               118               126          +8 (+6.78%)
-----------------------  --------------------  ---------------  ---------------  ------------------  ----------------  ----------------  -------------------

$ ./veristat -C -e file,prog,verdict,insns,states ~/baseline-results-cilium.csv ~/baseline-tmp-results-cilium.csv | grep -v '+0'
File           Program                         Total insns (A)  Total insns (B)  Total insns (DIFF)  Total states (A)  Total states (B)  Total states (DIFF)
-------------  ------------------------------  ---------------  ---------------  ------------------  ----------------  ----------------  -------------------
bpf_host.o     tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6             4448             5261      +813 (+18.28%)               234               247         +13 (+5.56%)
bpf_host.o     tail_nodeport_nat_ipv6_egress              3396             3446        +50 (+1.47%)               201               203          +2 (+1.00%)
bpf_lxc.o      tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6             4448             5261      +813 (+18.28%)               234               247         +13 (+5.56%)
bpf_overlay.o  tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6             4448             5261      +813 (+18.28%)               234               247         +13 (+5.56%)
bpf_xdp.o      tail_lb_ipv4                              71736            73442      +1706 (+2.38%)              4295              4370         +75 (+1.75%)
-------------  ------------------------------  ---------------  ---------------  ------------------  ----------------  ----------------  -------------------

P.S. To make Cilium ([0]) programs libbpf-compatible and thus
veristat-loadable, apply changes from topmost commit in [1], which does
minimal changes to Cilium source code, mostly around SEC() annotations
and BPF map definitions.

  [0] https://github.com/cilium/cilium/
  [1] https://github.com/anakryiko/cilium/commits/libbpf-friendliness

Fixes: b5dc0163d8fd ("bpf: precise scalar_value tracking")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221104163649.121784-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Ensure correct locking around vulnerable function find_vpid() 2022-10-26T11:22:24+00:00 Lee Jones lee@kernel.org 2022-09-12T13:38:55+00:00 215c146b402161c545475f736953494355384903 [ Upstream commit 83c10cc362d91c0d8d25e60779ee52fdbbf3894d ] The documentation for find_vpid() clearly states: "Must be called with the tasklist_lock or rcu_read_lock() held." Presently we do neither for find_vpid() instance in bpf_task_fd_query(). Add proper rcu_read_lock/unlock() to fix the issue. Fixes: 41bdc4b40ed6f ("bpf: introduce bpf subcommand BPF_TASK_FD_QUERY") Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220912133855.1218900-1-lee@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 83c10cc362d91c0d8d25e60779ee52fdbbf3894d ]

The documentation for find_vpid() clearly states:

  "Must be called with the tasklist_lock or rcu_read_lock() held."

Presently we do neither for find_vpid() instance in bpf_task_fd_query().
Add proper rcu_read_lock/unlock() to fix the issue.

Fixes: 41bdc4b40ed6f ("bpf: introduce bpf subcommand BPF_TASK_FD_QUERY")
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220912133855.1218900-1-lee@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: btf: fix truncated last_member_type_id in btf_struct_resolve 2022-10-26T11:22:24+00:00 Lorenz Bauer oss@lmb.io 2022-09-10T11:01:20+00:00 e0bab93245b6be6f862d413b3b042c451e77f4af [ Upstream commit a37a32583e282d8d815e22add29bc1e91e19951a ] When trying to finish resolving a struct member, btf_struct_resolve saves the member type id in a u16 temporary variable. This truncates the 32 bit type id value if it exceeds UINT16_MAX. As a result, structs that have members with type ids > UINT16_MAX and which need resolution will fail with a message like this: [67414] STRUCT ff_device size=120 vlen=12 effect_owners type_id=67434 bits_offset=960 Member exceeds struct_size Fix this by changing the type of last_member_type_id to u32. Fixes: a0791f0df7d2 ("bpf: fix BTF limits") Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <oss@lmb.io> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220910110120.339242-1-oss@lmb.io Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit a37a32583e282d8d815e22add29bc1e91e19951a ]

When trying to finish resolving a struct member, btf_struct_resolve
saves the member type id in a u16 temporary variable. This truncates
the 32 bit type id value if it exceeds UINT16_MAX.

As a result, structs that have members with type ids > UINT16_MAX and
which need resolution will fail with a message like this:

    [67414] STRUCT ff_device size=120 vlen=12
        effect_owners type_id=67434 bits_offset=960 Member exceeds struct_size

Fix this by changing the type of last_member_type_id to u32.

Fixes: a0791f0df7d2 ("bpf: fix BTF limits")
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <oss@lmb.io>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220910110120.339242-1-oss@lmb.io
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Verifer, adjust_scalar_min_max_vals to always call update_reg_bounds() 2022-08-11T10:57:51+00:00 John Fastabend john.fastabend@gmail.com 2022-08-03T14:50:01+00:00 7c1134c7da997523e2834dd516e2ddc51920699a commit 294f2fc6da27620a506e6c050241655459ccd6bd upstream. Currently, for all op verification we call __red_deduce_bounds() and __red_bound_offset() but we only call __update_reg_bounds() in bitwise ops. However, we could benefit from calling __update_reg_bounds() in BPF_ADD, BPF_SUB, and BPF_MUL cases as well. For example, a register with state 'R1_w=invP0' when we subtract from it, w1 -= 2 Before coerce we will now have an smin_value=S64_MIN, smax_value=U64_MAX and unsigned bounds umin_value=0, umax_value=U64_MAX. These will then be clamped to S32_MIN, U32_MAX values by coerce in the case of alu32 op as done in above example. However tnum will be a constant because the ALU op is done on a constant. Without update_reg_bounds() we have a scenario where tnum is a const but our unsigned bounds do not reflect this. By calling update_reg_bounds after coerce to 32bit we further refine the umin_value to U64_MAX in the alu64 case or U32_MAX in the alu32 case above. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158507151689.15666.566796274289413203.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 294f2fc6da27620a506e6c050241655459ccd6bd upstream.

Currently, for all op verification we call __red_deduce_bounds() and
__red_bound_offset() but we only call __update_reg_bounds() in bitwise
ops. However, we could benefit from calling __update_reg_bounds() in
BPF_ADD, BPF_SUB, and BPF_MUL cases as well.

For example, a register with state 'R1_w=invP0' when we subtract from
it,

 w1 -= 2

Before coerce we will now have an smin_value=S64_MIN, smax_value=U64_MAX
and unsigned bounds umin_value=0, umax_value=U64_MAX. These will then
be clamped to S32_MIN, U32_MAX values by coerce in the case of alu32 op
as done in above example. However tnum will be a constant because the
ALU op is done on a constant.

Without update_reg_bounds() we have a scenario where tnum is a const
but our unsigned bounds do not reflect this. By calling update_reg_bounds
after coerce to 32bit we further refine the umin_value to U64_MAX in the
alu64 case or U32_MAX in the alu32 case above.

Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158507151689.15666.566796274289413203.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Make sure mac_header was set before using it 2022-07-29T15:14:16+00:00 Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com 2022-07-07T12:39:00+00:00 4f1d21c77b15b6eb60f2929bca33e34f95383b24 commit 0326195f523a549e0a9d7fd44c70b26fd7265090 upstream. Classic BPF has a way to load bytes starting from the mac header. Some skbs do not have a mac header, and skb_mac_header() in this case is returning a pointer that 65535 bytes after skb->head. Existing range check in bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper() was properly kicking and no illegal access was happening. New sanity check in skb_mac_header() is firing, so we need to avoid it. WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 28990 at include/linux/skbuff.h:2785 skb_mac_header include/linux/skbuff.h:2785 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 28990 at include/linux/skbuff.h:2785 bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper+0x1b1/0x1c0 kernel/bpf/core.c:74 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 28990 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc4-syzkaller-00865-g4874fb9484be #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/29/2022 RIP: 0010:skb_mac_header include/linux/skbuff.h:2785 [inline] RIP: 0010:bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper+0x1b1/0x1c0 kernel/bpf/core.c:74 Code: ff ff 45 31 f6 e9 5a ff ff ff e8 aa 27 40 00 e9 3b ff ff ff e8 90 27 40 00 e9 df fe ff ff e8 86 27 40 00 eb 9e e8 2f 2c f3 ff <0f> 0b eb b1 e8 96 27 40 00 e9 79 fe ff ff 90 41 57 41 56 41 55 41 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000309f668 EFLAGS: 00010216 RAX: 0000000000000118 RBX: ffffffffffeff00c RCX: ffffc9000e417000 RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffffff81873f21 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: ffff8880842878c0 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 000000000000ffff R10: 000000000000ffff R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000004 R13: ffff88803ac56c00 R14: 000000000000ffff R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 00007f5c88a16700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fdaa9f6c058 CR3: 000000003a82c000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ____bpf_skb_load_helper_32 net/core/filter.c:276 [inline] bpf_skb_load_helper_32+0x191/0x220 net/core/filter.c:264 Fixes: f9aefd6b2aa3 ("net: warn if mac header was not set") Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220707123900.945305-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 0326195f523a549e0a9d7fd44c70b26fd7265090 upstream.

Classic BPF has a way to load bytes starting from the mac header.

Some skbs do not have a mac header, and skb_mac_header()
in this case is returning a pointer that 65535 bytes after
skb->head.

Existing range check in bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper()
was properly kicking and no illegal access was happening.

New sanity check in skb_mac_header() is firing, so we need
to avoid it.

WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 28990 at include/linux/skbuff.h:2785 skb_mac_header include/linux/skbuff.h:2785 [inline]
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 28990 at include/linux/skbuff.h:2785 bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper+0x1b1/0x1c0 kernel/bpf/core.c:74
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 28990 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc4-syzkaller-00865-g4874fb9484be #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/29/2022
RIP: 0010:skb_mac_header include/linux/skbuff.h:2785 [inline]
RIP: 0010:bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper+0x1b1/0x1c0 kernel/bpf/core.c:74
Code: ff ff 45 31 f6 e9 5a ff ff ff e8 aa 27 40 00 e9 3b ff ff ff e8 90 27 40 00 e9 df fe ff ff e8 86 27 40 00 eb 9e e8 2f 2c f3 ff <0f> 0b eb b1 e8 96 27 40 00 e9 79 fe ff ff 90 41 57 41 56 41 55 41
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000309f668 EFLAGS: 00010216
RAX: 0000000000000118 RBX: ffffffffffeff00c RCX: ffffc9000e417000
RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffffff81873f21 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: ffff8880842878c0 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 000000000000ffff
R10: 000000000000ffff R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000004
R13: ffff88803ac56c00 R14: 000000000000ffff R15: dffffc0000000000
FS: 00007f5c88a16700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fdaa9f6c058 CR3: 000000003a82c000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
____bpf_skb_load_helper_32 net/core/filter.c:276 [inline]
bpf_skb_load_helper_32+0x191/0x220 net/core/filter.c:264

Fixes: f9aefd6b2aa3 ("net: warn if mac header was not set")
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220707123900.945305-1-edumazet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Fix incorrect memory charge cost calculation in stack_map_alloc() 2022-06-22T12:11:02+00:00 Yuntao Wang ytcoode@gmail.com 2022-06-14T14:26:22+00:00 e804587ecdcde138ab2d4394ba3cd5ac5efaea3b commit b45043192b3e481304062938a6561da2ceea46a6 upstream. This is a backport of the original upstream patch for 5.4/5.10. The original upstream patch has been applied to 5.4/5.10 branches, which simply removed the line: cost += n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket)); This is correct for upstream branch but incorrect for 5.4/5.10 branches, as the 5.4/5.10 branches do not have the commit 370868107bf6 ("bpf: Eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps"), so the bpf_map_charge_init() function has not been removed. Currently the bpf_map_charge_init() function in 5.4/5.10 branches takes a wrong memory charge cost, the attr->max_entries * (sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket) + (u64)value_size)) part is missing, let's fix it. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4.y Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.10.y Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit b45043192b3e481304062938a6561da2ceea46a6 upstream.

This is a backport of the original upstream patch for 5.4/5.10.

The original upstream patch has been applied to 5.4/5.10 branches, which
simply removed the line:

  cost += n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket));

This is correct for upstream branch but incorrect for 5.4/5.10 branches,
as the 5.4/5.10 branches do not have the commit 370868107bf6 ("bpf:
Eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps"), so the
bpf_map_charge_init() function has not been removed.

Currently the bpf_map_charge_init() function in 5.4/5.10 branches takes a
wrong memory charge cost, the

  attr->max_entries * (sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket) + (u64)value_size))

part is missing, let's fix it.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4.y
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.10.y
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Fix excessive memory allocation in stack_map_alloc() 2022-06-14T16:11:32+00:00 Yuntao Wang ytcoode@gmail.com 2022-04-07T13:04:23+00:00 93c0f9d78dddd3e60062b83715e5fabd2692d6a0 [ Upstream commit b45043192b3e481304062938a6561da2ceea46a6 ] The 'n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket))' part of the allocated memory for 'smap' is never used after the memlock accounting was removed, thus get rid of it. [ Note, Daniel: Commit b936ca643ade ("bpf: rework memlock-based memory accounting for maps") moved `cost += n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket))` up and therefore before the bpf_map_area_alloc() allocation, sigh. In a later step commit c85d69135a91 ("bpf: move memory size checks to bpf_map_charge_init()"), and the overflow checks of `cost >= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE` moved into bpf_map_charge_init(). And then 370868107bf6 ("bpf: Eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps") finally removed the bpf_map_charge_init(). Anyway, the original code did the allocation same way as /after/ this fix. ] Fixes: b936ca643ade ("bpf: rework memlock-based memory accounting for maps") Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220407130423.798386-1-ytcoode@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit b45043192b3e481304062938a6561da2ceea46a6 ]

The 'n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket))' part of the
allocated memory for 'smap' is never used after the memlock accounting was
removed, thus get rid of it.

[ Note, Daniel:

Commit b936ca643ade ("bpf: rework memlock-based memory accounting for maps")
moved `cost += n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket))`
up and therefore before the bpf_map_area_alloc() allocation, sigh. In a later
step commit c85d69135a91 ("bpf: move memory size checks to bpf_map_charge_init()"),
and the overflow checks of `cost >= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE` moved into
bpf_map_charge_init(). And then 370868107bf6 ("bpf: Eliminate rlimit-based
memory accounting for stackmap maps") finally removed the bpf_map_charge_init().
Anyway, the original code did the allocation same way as /after/ this fix. ]

Fixes: b936ca643ade ("bpf: rework memlock-based memory accounting for maps")
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220407130423.798386-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Add kconfig knob for disabling unpriv bpf by default 2022-02-16T11:52:49+00:00 Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net 2021-05-11T20:35:17+00:00 c230f6ba1011de8eee5e2468f67eaffaee0f82d4 commit 08389d888287c3823f80b0216766b71e17f0aba5 upstream. Add a kconfig knob which allows for unprivileged bpf to be disabled by default. If set, the knob sets /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled to value of 2. This still allows a transition of 2 -> {0,1} through an admin. Similarly, this also still keeps 1 -> {1} behavior intact, so that once set to permanently disabled, it cannot be undone aside from a reboot. We've also added extra2 with max of 2 for the procfs handler, so that an admin still has a chance to toggle between 0 <-> 2. Either way, as an additional alternative, applications can make use of CAP_BPF that we added a while ago. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/74ec548079189e4e4dffaeb42b8987bb3c852eee.1620765074.git.daniel@iogearbox.net [fllinden@amazon.com: backported to 5.4] Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fllinden@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 08389d888287c3823f80b0216766b71e17f0aba5 upstream.

Add a kconfig knob which allows for unprivileged bpf to be disabled by default.
If set, the knob sets /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled to value of 2.

This still allows a transition of 2 -> {0,1} through an admin. Similarly,
this also still keeps 1 -> {1} behavior intact, so that once set to permanently
disabled, it cannot be undone aside from a reboot.

We've also added extra2 with max of 2 for the procfs handler, so that an admin
still has a chance to toggle between 0 <-> 2.

Either way, as an additional alternative, applications can make use of CAP_BPF
that we added a while ago.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/74ec548079189e4e4dffaeb42b8987bb3c852eee.1620765074.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
[fllinden@amazon.com: backported to 5.4]
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fllinden@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>