linux-stable.git/kernel/bpf, branch v5.4.112 Linux kernel stable tree bpf: Add sanity check for upper ptr_limit 2021-03-20T09:39:46+00:00 Piotr Krysiuk piotras@gmail.com 2021-03-16T08:47:02+00:00 4e4c85404a23efaeb96a03cbb023bcd403b0d7f6 commit 1b1597e64e1a610c7a96710fc4717158e98a08b3 upstream. Given we know the max possible value of ptr_limit at the time of retrieving the latter, add basic assertions, so that the verifier can bail out if anything looks odd and reject the program. Nothing triggered this so far, but it also does not hurt to have these. Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 1b1597e64e1a610c7a96710fc4717158e98a08b3 upstream.

Given we know the max possible value of ptr_limit at the time of retrieving
the latter, add basic assertions, so that the verifier can bail out if
anything looks odd and reject the program. Nothing triggered this so far,
but it also does not hurt to have these.

Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Simplify alu_limit masking for pointer arithmetic 2021-03-20T09:39:46+00:00 Piotr Krysiuk piotras@gmail.com 2021-03-16T07:26:25+00:00 524471df8fa9a8e9f57f8ebc9b498afd77deb715 commit b5871dca250cd391885218b99cc015aca1a51aea upstream. Instead of having the mov32 with aux->alu_limit - 1 immediate, move this operation to retrieve_ptr_limit() instead to simplify the logic and to allow for subsequent sanity boundary checks inside retrieve_ptr_limit(). This avoids in future that at the time of the verifier masking rewrite we'd run into an underflow which would not sign extend due to the nature of mov32 instruction. Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit b5871dca250cd391885218b99cc015aca1a51aea upstream.

Instead of having the mov32 with aux->alu_limit - 1 immediate, move this
operation to retrieve_ptr_limit() instead to simplify the logic and to
allow for subsequent sanity boundary checks inside retrieve_ptr_limit().
This avoids in future that at the time of the verifier masking rewrite
we'd run into an underflow which would not sign extend due to the nature
of mov32 instruction.

Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Fix off-by-one for area size in creating mask to left 2021-03-20T09:39:46+00:00 Piotr Krysiuk piotras@gmail.com 2021-03-16T07:20:16+00:00 2da0540739e43154b500a817d9c95d36c2f6a323 commit 10d2bb2e6b1d8c4576c56a748f697dbeb8388899 upstream. retrieve_ptr_limit() computes the ptr_limit for registers with stack and map_value type. ptr_limit is the size of the memory area that is still valid / in-bounds from the point of the current position and direction of the operation (add / sub). This size will later be used for masking the operation such that attempting out-of-bounds access in the speculative domain is redirected to remain within the bounds of the current map value. When masking to the right the size is correct, however, when masking to the left, the size is off-by-one which would lead to an incorrect mask and thus incorrect arithmetic operation in the non-speculative domain. Piotr found that if the resulting alu_limit value is zero, then the BPF_MOV32_IMM() from the fixup_bpf_calls() rewrite will end up loading 0xffffffff into AX instead of sign-extending to the full 64 bit range, and as a result, this allows abuse for executing speculatively out-of- bounds loads against 4GB window of address space and thus extracting the contents of kernel memory via side-channel. Fixes: 979d63d50c0c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic") Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 10d2bb2e6b1d8c4576c56a748f697dbeb8388899 upstream.

retrieve_ptr_limit() computes the ptr_limit for registers with stack and
map_value type. ptr_limit is the size of the memory area that is still
valid / in-bounds from the point of the current position and direction
of the operation (add / sub). This size will later be used for masking
the operation such that attempting out-of-bounds access in the speculative
domain is redirected to remain within the bounds of the current map value.

When masking to the right the size is correct, however, when masking to
the left, the size is off-by-one which would lead to an incorrect mask
and thus incorrect arithmetic operation in the non-speculative domain.
Piotr found that if the resulting alu_limit value is zero, then the
BPF_MOV32_IMM() from the fixup_bpf_calls() rewrite will end up loading
0xffffffff into AX instead of sign-extending to the full 64 bit range,
and as a result, this allows abuse for executing speculatively out-of-
bounds loads against 4GB window of address space and thus extracting the
contents of kernel memory via side-channel.

Fixes: 979d63d50c0c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic")
Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Prohibit alu ops for pointer types not defining ptr_limit 2021-03-20T09:39:46+00:00 Piotr Krysiuk piotras@gmail.com 2021-03-16T08:47:02+00:00 ea8fb45eaac141b13f656a7056e4823845aa3b69 commit f232326f6966cf2a1d1db7bc917a4ce5f9f55f76 upstream. The purpose of this patch is to streamline error propagation and in particular to propagate retrieve_ptr_limit() errors for pointer types that are not defining a ptr_limit such that register-based alu ops against these types can be rejected. The main rationale is that a gap has been identified by Piotr in the existing protection against speculatively out-of-bounds loads, for example, in case of ctx pointers, unprivileged programs can still perform pointer arithmetic. This can be abused to execute speculatively out-of-bounds loads without restrictions and thus extract contents of kernel memory. Fix this by rejecting unprivileged programs that attempt any pointer arithmetic on unprotected pointer types. The two affected ones are pointer to ctx as well as pointer to map. Field access to a modified ctx' pointer is rejected at a later point in time in the verifier, and 7c6967326267 ("bpf: Permit map_ptr arithmetic with opcode add and offset 0") only relevant for root-only use cases. Risk of unprivileged program breakage is considered very low. Fixes: 7c6967326267 ("bpf: Permit map_ptr arithmetic with opcode add and offset 0") Fixes: b2157399cc98 ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit f232326f6966cf2a1d1db7bc917a4ce5f9f55f76 upstream.

The purpose of this patch is to streamline error propagation and in particular
to propagate retrieve_ptr_limit() errors for pointer types that are not defining
a ptr_limit such that register-based alu ops against these types can be rejected.

The main rationale is that a gap has been identified by Piotr in the existing
protection against speculatively out-of-bounds loads, for example, in case of
ctx pointers, unprivileged programs can still perform pointer arithmetic. This
can be abused to execute speculatively out-of-bounds loads without restrictions
and thus extract contents of kernel memory.

Fix this by rejecting unprivileged programs that attempt any pointer arithmetic
on unprotected pointer types. The two affected ones are pointer to ctx as well
as pointer to map. Field access to a modified ctx' pointer is rejected at a
later point in time in the verifier, and 7c6967326267 ("bpf: Permit map_ptr
arithmetic with opcode add and offset 0") only relevant for root-only use cases.
Risk of unprivileged program breakage is considered very low.

Fixes: 7c6967326267 ("bpf: Permit map_ptr arithmetic with opcode add and offset 0")
Fixes: b2157399cc98 ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation")
Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf_lru_list: Read double-checked variable once without lock 2021-03-04T09:26:16+00:00 Marco Elver elver@google.com 2021-02-09T11:27:01+00:00 4dcfd936030b1f2477fbdf136e02688b7fc1910e [ Upstream commit 6df8fb83301d68ea0a0c0e1cbcc790fcc333ed12 ] For double-checked locking in bpf_common_lru_push_free(), node->type is read outside the critical section and then re-checked under the lock. However, concurrent writes to node->type result in data races. For example, the following concurrent access was observed by KCSAN: write to 0xffff88801521bc22 of 1 bytes by task 10038 on cpu 1: __bpf_lru_node_move_in kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:91 __local_list_flush kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:298 ... read to 0xffff88801521bc22 of 1 bytes by task 10043 on cpu 0: bpf_common_lru_push_free kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:507 bpf_lru_push_free kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:555 ... Fix the data races where node->type is read outside the critical section (for double-checked locking) by marking the access with READ_ONCE() as well as ensuring the variable is only accessed once. Fixes: 3a08c2fd7634 ("bpf: LRU List") Reported-by: syzbot+3536db46dfa58c573458@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+516acdb03d3e27d91bcd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210209112701.3341724-1-elver@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 6df8fb83301d68ea0a0c0e1cbcc790fcc333ed12 ]

For double-checked locking in bpf_common_lru_push_free(), node->type is
read outside the critical section and then re-checked under the lock.
However, concurrent writes to node->type result in data races.

For example, the following concurrent access was observed by KCSAN:

  write to 0xffff88801521bc22 of 1 bytes by task 10038 on cpu 1:
   __bpf_lru_node_move_in        kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:91
   __local_list_flush            kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:298
   ...
  read to 0xffff88801521bc22 of 1 bytes by task 10043 on cpu 0:
   bpf_common_lru_push_free      kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:507
   bpf_lru_push_free             kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:555
   ...

Fix the data races where node->type is read outside the critical section
(for double-checked locking) by marking the access with READ_ONCE() as
well as ensuring the variable is only accessed once.

Fixes: 3a08c2fd7634 ("bpf: LRU List")
Reported-by: syzbot+3536db46dfa58c573458@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+516acdb03d3e27d91bcd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210209112701.3341724-1-elver@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Fix truncation handling for mod32 dst reg wrt zero 2021-02-26T09:10:26+00:00 Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net 2021-02-10T13:14:42+00:00 185c2266c1df80bec001c987d64cae2d9cd13816 commit 9b00f1b78809309163dda2d044d9e94a3c0248a3 upstream. Recently noticed that when mod32 with a known src reg of 0 is performed, then the dst register is 32-bit truncated in verifier: 0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 0: (b7) r0 = 0 1: R0_w=inv0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 1: (b7) r1 = -1 2: R0_w=inv0 R1_w=inv-1 R10=fp0 2: (b4) w2 = -1 3: R0_w=inv0 R1_w=inv-1 R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0 3: (9c) w1 %= w0 4: R0_w=inv0 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0 4: (b7) r0 = 1 5: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0 5: (1d) if r1 == r2 goto pc+1 R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0 6: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0 6: (b7) r0 = 2 7: R0_w=inv2 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0 7: (95) exit 7: R0=inv1 R1=inv(id=0,umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2=inv4294967295 R10=fp0 7: (95) exit However, as a runtime result, we get 2 instead of 1, meaning the dst register does not contain (u32)-1 in this case. The reason is fairly straight forward given the 0 test leaves the dst register as-is: # ./bpftool p d x i 23 0: (b7) r0 = 0 1: (b7) r1 = -1 2: (b4) w2 = -1 3: (16) if w0 == 0x0 goto pc+1 4: (9c) w1 %= w0 5: (b7) r0 = 1 6: (1d) if r1 == r2 goto pc+1 7: (b7) r0 = 2 8: (95) exit This was originally not an issue given the dst register was marked as completely unknown (aka 64 bit unknown). However, after 468f6eafa6c4 ("bpf: fix 32-bit ALU op verification") the verifier casts the register output to 32 bit, and hence it becomes 32 bit unknown. Note that for the case where the src register is unknown, the dst register is marked 64 bit unknown. After the fix, the register is truncated by the runtime and the test passes: # ./bpftool p d x i 23 0: (b7) r0 = 0 1: (b7) r1 = -1 2: (b4) w2 = -1 3: (16) if w0 == 0x0 goto pc+2 4: (9c) w1 %= w0 5: (05) goto pc+1 6: (bc) w1 = w1 7: (b7) r0 = 1 8: (1d) if r1 == r2 goto pc+1 9: (b7) r0 = 2 10: (95) exit Semantics also match with {R,W}x mod{64,32} 0 -> {R,W}x. Invalid div has always been {R,W}x div{64,32} 0 -> 0. Rewrites are as follows: mod32: mod64: (16) if w0 == 0x0 goto pc+2 (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1 (9c) w1 %= w0 (9f) r1 %= r0 (05) goto pc+1 (bc) w1 = w1 Fixes: 468f6eafa6c4 ("bpf: fix 32-bit ALU op verification") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 9b00f1b78809309163dda2d044d9e94a3c0248a3 upstream.

Recently noticed that when mod32 with a known src reg of 0 is performed,
then the dst register is 32-bit truncated in verifier:

  0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
  0: (b7) r0 = 0
  1: R0_w=inv0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
  1: (b7) r1 = -1
  2: R0_w=inv0 R1_w=inv-1 R10=fp0
  2: (b4) w2 = -1
  3: R0_w=inv0 R1_w=inv-1 R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0
  3: (9c) w1 %= w0
  4: R0_w=inv0 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0
  4: (b7) r0 = 1
  5: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0
  5: (1d) if r1 == r2 goto pc+1
   R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0
  6: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0
  6: (b7) r0 = 2
  7: R0_w=inv2 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0
  7: (95) exit
  7: R0=inv1 R1=inv(id=0,umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2=inv4294967295 R10=fp0
  7: (95) exit

However, as a runtime result, we get 2 instead of 1, meaning the dst
register does not contain (u32)-1 in this case. The reason is fairly
straight forward given the 0 test leaves the dst register as-is:

  # ./bpftool p d x i 23
   0: (b7) r0 = 0
   1: (b7) r1 = -1
   2: (b4) w2 = -1
   3: (16) if w0 == 0x0 goto pc+1
   4: (9c) w1 %= w0
   5: (b7) r0 = 1
   6: (1d) if r1 == r2 goto pc+1
   7: (b7) r0 = 2
   8: (95) exit

This was originally not an issue given the dst register was marked as
completely unknown (aka 64 bit unknown). However, after 468f6eafa6c4
("bpf: fix 32-bit ALU op verification") the verifier casts the register
output to 32 bit, and hence it becomes 32 bit unknown. Note that for
the case where the src register is unknown, the dst register is marked
64 bit unknown. After the fix, the register is truncated by the runtime
and the test passes:

  # ./bpftool p d x i 23
   0: (b7) r0 = 0
   1: (b7) r1 = -1
   2: (b4) w2 = -1
   3: (16) if w0 == 0x0 goto pc+2
   4: (9c) w1 %= w0
   5: (05) goto pc+1
   6: (bc) w1 = w1
   7: (b7) r0 = 1
   8: (1d) if r1 == r2 goto pc+1
   9: (b7) r0 = 2
  10: (95) exit

Semantics also match with {R,W}x mod{64,32} 0 -> {R,W}x. Invalid div
has always been {R,W}x div{64,32} 0 -> 0. Rewrites are as follows:

  mod32:                            mod64:

  (16) if w0 == 0x0 goto pc+2       (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1
  (9c) w1 %= w0                     (9f) r1 %= r0
  (05) goto pc+1
  (bc) w1 = w1

Fixes: 468f6eafa6c4 ("bpf: fix 32-bit ALU op verification")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Check for integer overflow when using roundup_pow_of_two() 2021-02-17T09:35:16+00:00 Bui Quang Minh minhquangbui99@gmail.com 2021-01-27T06:36:53+00:00 7e3a6b820535eb395784060ae26c5af579528fa0 [ Upstream commit 6183f4d3a0a2ad230511987c6c362ca43ec0055f ] On 32-bit architecture, roundup_pow_of_two() can return 0 when the argument has upper most bit set due to resulting 1UL << 32. Add a check for this case. Fixes: d5a3b1f69186 ("bpf: introduce BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK_TRACE") Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127063653.3576-1-minhquangbui99@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 6183f4d3a0a2ad230511987c6c362ca43ec0055f ]

On 32-bit architecture, roundup_pow_of_two() can return 0 when the argument
has upper most bit set due to resulting 1UL << 32. Add a check for this case.

Fixes: d5a3b1f69186 ("bpf: introduce BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK_TRACE")
Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127063653.3576-1-minhquangbui99@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Fix 32 bit src register truncation on div/mod 2021-02-13T12:52:56+00:00 Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net 2021-02-09T18:46:10+00:00 78e2f71b89b22222583f74803d14f3d90cdf9d12 commit e88b2c6e5a4d9ce30d75391e4d950da74bb2bd90 upstream. While reviewing a different fix, John and I noticed an oddity in one of the BPF program dumps that stood out, for example: # bpftool p d x i 13 0: (b7) r0 = 808464450 1: (b4) w4 = 808464432 2: (bc) w0 = w0 3: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1 4: (9c) w4 %= w0 [...] In line 2 we noticed that the mov32 would 32 bit truncate the original src register for the div/mod operation. While for the two operations the dst register is typically marked unknown e.g. from adjust_scalar_min_max_vals() the src register is not, and thus verifier keeps tracking original bounds, simplified: 0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 0: (b7) r0 = -1 1: R0_w=invP-1 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 1: (b7) r1 = -1 2: R0_w=invP-1 R1_w=invP-1 R10=fp0 2: (3c) w0 /= w1 3: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=invP-1 R10=fp0 3: (77) r1 >>= 32 4: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=invP4294967295 R10=fp0 4: (bf) r0 = r1 5: R0_w=invP4294967295 R1_w=invP4294967295 R10=fp0 5: (95) exit processed 6 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0 Runtime result of r0 at exit is 0 instead of expected -1. Remove the verifier mov32 src rewrite in div/mod and replace it with a jmp32 test instead. After the fix, we result in the following code generation when having dividend r1 and divisor r6: div, 64 bit: div, 32 bit: 0: (b7) r6 = 8 0: (b7) r6 = 8 1: (b7) r1 = 8 1: (b7) r1 = 8 2: (55) if r6 != 0x0 goto pc+2 2: (56) if w6 != 0x0 goto pc+2 3: (ac) w1 ^= w1 3: (ac) w1 ^= w1 4: (05) goto pc+1 4: (05) goto pc+1 5: (3f) r1 /= r6 5: (3c) w1 /= w6 6: (b7) r0 = 0 6: (b7) r0 = 0 7: (95) exit 7: (95) exit mod, 64 bit: mod, 32 bit: 0: (b7) r6 = 8 0: (b7) r6 = 8 1: (b7) r1 = 8 1: (b7) r1 = 8 2: (15) if r6 == 0x0 goto pc+1 2: (16) if w6 == 0x0 goto pc+1 3: (9f) r1 %= r6 3: (9c) w1 %= w6 4: (b7) r0 = 0 4: (b7) r0 = 0 5: (95) exit 5: (95) exit x86 in particular can throw a 'divide error' exception for div instruction not only for divisor being zero, but also for the case when the quotient is too large for the designated register. For the edx:eax and rdx:rax dividend pair it is not an issue in x86 BPF JIT since we always zero edx (rdx). Hence really the only protection needed is against divisor being zero. Fixes: 68fda450a7df ("bpf: fix 32-bit divide by zero") Co-developed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit e88b2c6e5a4d9ce30d75391e4d950da74bb2bd90 upstream.

While reviewing a different fix, John and I noticed an oddity in one of the
BPF program dumps that stood out, for example:

  # bpftool p d x i 13
   0: (b7) r0 = 808464450
   1: (b4) w4 = 808464432
   2: (bc) w0 = w0
   3: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1
   4: (9c) w4 %= w0
  [...]

In line 2 we noticed that the mov32 would 32 bit truncate the original src
register for the div/mod operation. While for the two operations the dst
register is typically marked unknown e.g. from adjust_scalar_min_max_vals()
the src register is not, and thus verifier keeps tracking original bounds,
simplified:

  0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
  0: (b7) r0 = -1
  1: R0_w=invP-1 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
  1: (b7) r1 = -1
  2: R0_w=invP-1 R1_w=invP-1 R10=fp0
  2: (3c) w0 /= w1
  3: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=invP-1 R10=fp0
  3: (77) r1 >>= 32
  4: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=invP4294967295 R10=fp0
  4: (bf) r0 = r1
  5: R0_w=invP4294967295 R1_w=invP4294967295 R10=fp0
  5: (95) exit
  processed 6 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0

Runtime result of r0 at exit is 0 instead of expected -1. Remove the
verifier mov32 src rewrite in div/mod and replace it with a jmp32 test
instead. After the fix, we result in the following code generation when
having dividend r1 and divisor r6:

  div, 64 bit:                             div, 32 bit:

   0: (b7) r6 = 8                           0: (b7) r6 = 8
   1: (b7) r1 = 8                           1: (b7) r1 = 8
   2: (55) if r6 != 0x0 goto pc+2           2: (56) if w6 != 0x0 goto pc+2
   3: (ac) w1 ^= w1                         3: (ac) w1 ^= w1
   4: (05) goto pc+1                        4: (05) goto pc+1
   5: (3f) r1 /= r6                         5: (3c) w1 /= w6
   6: (b7) r0 = 0                           6: (b7) r0 = 0
   7: (95) exit                             7: (95) exit

  mod, 64 bit:                             mod, 32 bit:

   0: (b7) r6 = 8                           0: (b7) r6 = 8
   1: (b7) r1 = 8                           1: (b7) r1 = 8
   2: (15) if r6 == 0x0 goto pc+1           2: (16) if w6 == 0x0 goto pc+1
   3: (9f) r1 %= r6                         3: (9c) w1 %= w6
   4: (b7) r0 = 0                           4: (b7) r0 = 0
   5: (95) exit                             5: (95) exit

x86 in particular can throw a 'divide error' exception for div
instruction not only for divisor being zero, but also for the case
when the quotient is too large for the designated register. For the
edx:eax and rdx:rax dividend pair it is not an issue in x86 BPF JIT
since we always zero edx (rdx). Hence really the only protection
needed is against divisor being zero.

Fixes: 68fda450a7df ("bpf: fix 32-bit divide by zero")
Co-developed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf, cgroup: Fix problematic bounds check 2021-02-10T08:25:27+00:00 Loris Reiff loris.reiff@liblor.ch 2021-01-22T16:42:32+00:00 02531b5549ebf39d6f3c0602f083901211149355 [ Upstream commit f4a2da755a7e1f5d845c52aee71336cee289935a ] Since ctx.optlen is signed, a larger value than max_value could be passed, as it is later on used as unsigned, which causes a WARN_ON_ONCE in the copy_to_user. Fixes: 0d01da6afc54 ("bpf: implement getsockopt and setsockopt hooks") Signed-off-by: Loris Reiff <loris.reiff@liblor.ch> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210122164232.61770-2-loris.reiff@liblor.ch Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit f4a2da755a7e1f5d845c52aee71336cee289935a ]

Since ctx.optlen is signed, a larger value than max_value could be
passed, as it is later on used as unsigned, which causes a WARN_ON_ONCE
in the copy_to_user.

Fixes: 0d01da6afc54 ("bpf: implement getsockopt and setsockopt hooks")
Signed-off-by: Loris Reiff <loris.reiff@liblor.ch>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210122164232.61770-2-loris.reiff@liblor.ch
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf, cgroup: Fix optlen WARN_ON_ONCE toctou 2021-02-10T08:25:27+00:00 Loris Reiff loris.reiff@liblor.ch 2021-01-22T16:42:31+00:00 9146fffc5d2a3ec49906daf18d2e983d995b3521 [ Upstream commit bb8b81e396f7afbe7c50d789e2107512274d2a35 ] A toctou issue in `__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt` can trigger a WARN_ON_ONCE in a check of `copy_from_user`. `*optlen` is checked to be non-negative in the individual getsockopt functions beforehand. Changing `*optlen` in a race to a negative value will result in a `copy_from_user(ctx.optval, optval, ctx.optlen)` with `ctx.optlen` being a negative integer. Fixes: 0d01da6afc54 ("bpf: implement getsockopt and setsockopt hooks") Signed-off-by: Loris Reiff <loris.reiff@liblor.ch> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210122164232.61770-1-loris.reiff@liblor.ch Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit bb8b81e396f7afbe7c50d789e2107512274d2a35 ]

A toctou issue in `__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt` can trigger a
WARN_ON_ONCE in a check of `copy_from_user`.

`*optlen` is checked to be non-negative in the individual getsockopt
functions beforehand. Changing `*optlen` in a race to a negative value
will result in a `copy_from_user(ctx.optval, optval, ctx.optlen)` with
`ctx.optlen` being a negative integer.

Fixes: 0d01da6afc54 ("bpf: implement getsockopt and setsockopt hooks")
Signed-off-by: Loris Reiff <loris.reiff@liblor.ch>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210122164232.61770-1-loris.reiff@liblor.ch
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>